Refracta Development, Scripts, etc.
Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:32 pm
"A child of three coould solve that problem"
"Quick, someone run for a child of three"
MarxBrothers
Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:36 pm
Yes, easy to solve but not for someone who doesn't want to register at Wikipedia.

You want to take a crack at it?
Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:08 pm
Puh, to be honest: not really. If doing that syntax i get headaches.
Let me pull it around my head (though it's of those things where i think: "pull it round the head" in the hope to forget until someone else does it).
I am sure someone at antix takes care of that (for antix, duh) and i thinking asking for their help is a good option.
I am very lazy these days and often just browse the web. Let me look at the links you gave above.
dbbo is good with wiki syntax. I will send a request for help at twitter (another good option) -as long fsmithred is fine with it (which i assume, as long he won't intervene in the following say 48 hours).
Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:55 am
[quote="golinux"]Refracta should at least be included on these two pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison ... tributionshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_family#Debian-basedCreating an entry specifically for Refracta would be a bit more complicated but most of the content was worked out at the beginning of the thread.
I do hope someone will take it on.
Those wikipedia pages are far from being comprehensive.
Same goes for
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Li ... tributions which only shows 48 "Debian derivatives"
In contrast, the search results list at distrowatch shows 66
(params: active, based on Debian, not based on Ubuntu)
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostyp ... tus=Activeand even that list is STILL incomplete (at least a dozen are stalled on the "distrowatch waiting list")
BTW, what the heck criteria does DW consider when describing a distro as "active"?
I think their criteria needs to be more strict & that their db should be culled.
Anyhow, if you signup and edit at wikipedia, brace yourself for finding a whole lotta politics/********.
Edit something...
...seconds later (literally)(must be bots scripted to watch given pages)
you might find your painstakingly-crafted edit reverted, for no good reason.
So, messing with wikipedia isn't worth the aggravation, in my opinion.