From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 11:21:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51ILuoo014544; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:21:56 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51ILpXp029374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:21:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51ILaYB008564; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:21:36 -0700 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51IKjA8102252 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:20:45 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51IKi5Q023820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:20:44 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i51IM8Ft018128 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:20:43 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i51IKfRd017960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 28 May 2004, robert delius royar wrote: > Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Carbon than I can suggest how to write > the conditionals so that the code is not included which is inapropriate for > 10.2 or 10.3. A uname -a for 10.2 will return a string which contains "6.x.x > Darwin Kernel Version 6.x.x" You can use Gestalt(gestaltSystemVersion) (that's just pseudo-code), but Gestalt.h (in CarbonCore) actually recommends a better way of getting the info on Mac OS X. I think that's the question you're asking -- how to get the specific system version you're running on. If you do that, then you could set the #defines to be equal to the various responses to Gestalt (or the other method if you use that one). Otherwise, there may be stuff in CarbonCore/ConditioalMacros.h that helps you. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 12:01:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51J11Ww018069; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:01:01 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51J0x4m019047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51J0qWi018802; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:52 -0700 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51J06lp049824 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:06 -0700 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51J04Hj001274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:05 -0700 Received: from heaven.corp.google.com (gpsi1.corp.google.com [10.3.0.251]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i51J01JQ008075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:01 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: disable displaying flowed text? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ryanb@heaven.corp.google.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi all. i really like the flowed text support in pine 4.60, and i definitely prefer to send it, so my recipients can use it if they like. however, i'd prefer not to use it to display mail that i'm reading. i often run pine in terminals significantly wider than 80 characters, and it's hard to read the long lines of text that result from displaying flowed text. is there any way i can turn off *displaying* flowed text? if not, could i add it as a feature request? if necessary, i'm happy to write a patch...well, after i finish another pine patch i'm working on. :P -Ryan -- "Woooo!!!" -Twinsen -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 12:08:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51J8nAK018615; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:08:49 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51J8lKE031361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:08:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51J8aYN015992; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:08:36 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51J7p4L053456 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:07:51 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51J7nRp028170 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:07:49 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (IDENT:6m6LU/FO8KJPlvUKFe/MIEttewqa8cnb@zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i51J7hd2001197; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:07:43 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Ryan Barrett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.25.0.60; VDF 6.25.0.80 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Ryan Barrett (foopine-info@ryanb.org.net) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) however, i'd prefer not to use it to display mail that i'm reading. i :) often run pine in terminals significantly wider than 80 characters, and :) it's hard to read the long lines of text that result from displaying :) flowed text. Ryan, You can always set viewer-margin-left and viewer-margin-right to improve your reading of messages, or you can press "H" and see the same message with format=flowed off. Of course the last command depends on if you have enabled [X] enable-full-header-cmd. I hope this helps. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 12:13:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JDGdY018966; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:13:16 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JDEgW031689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:13:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51JD71D016936; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:13:07 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51JCfGB038810 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:12:41 -0700 Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.pqbs.com [24.75.124.5]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JCd2x023670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:12:40 -0700 Received: from rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com (rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com [192.168.27.101]) by mail.bellhow.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i51JCYcH017380 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 15:12:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA22409 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 15:12:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 15:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: daniel lance herrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: herrick@rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > hi all. i really like the flowed text support in pine 4.60, and i > definitely prefer to send it, so my recipients can use it if they like. > > however, i'd prefer not to use it to display mail that i'm reading. i > often run pine in terminals significantly wider than 80 characters, and > it's hard to read the long lines of text that result from displaying > flowed text. > > is there any way i can turn off *displaying* flowed text? if not, could i > add it as a feature request? if necessary, i'm happy to write a > patch...well, after i finish another pine patch i'm working on. :P Does composer-wrap-column = 50 affect the width for flowing text in the viewer? Would it satisfy you, Ryan, if it did? dan From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 12:22:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JM49t019897; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:22:04 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JM2sJ032053 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:22:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51JLtVl012132; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:21:55 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51JLH63071688 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:21:17 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51JLG8Q000484 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:21:17 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (IDENT:wXmex9mAkJn7L7LU88ragptdc/X+bYoC@zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i51JLFd2002334; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:21:15 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: daniel lance herrick X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.25.0.60; VDF 6.25.0.80 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** daniel lance herrick (foodan.herrick@pbs.proquest.com.net) wrote in the...: :) On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: :) :) > hi all. i really like the flowed text support in pine 4.60, and i :) > definitely prefer to send it, so my recipients can use it if they :) > like. :) > :) > however, i'd prefer not to use it to display mail that i'm reading. i :) > often run pine in terminals significantly wider than 80 characters, :) > and it's hard to read the long lines of text that result from :) > displaying flowed text. :) > :) > is there any way i can turn off *displaying* flowed text? if not, :) > could i add it as a feature request? if necessary, i'm happy to write :) > a patch...well, after i finish another pine patch i'm working on. :P :) :) Does :) :) composer-wrap-column = 50 :) :) affect the width for flowing text in the viewer? No it does not. This has to do with the width of the text as seen in the composer and is enforced when you write text as well as when you justify (here the editor is Pico, the embedded editor, not an alternate editor). The width of display is controlled by the margins to the left and to the right, there is no total width of the text since in f=f there is no assumption on the screen width, and doing otherwise would defeat the purpose of this format. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 12:28:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JS8dK020181; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:28:08 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JS48o032278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:28:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51JRtJl013152; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:27:55 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51JRRQ8049730 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:27:27 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51JRQq9006722 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:27:26 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JRPDJ002703 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:27:25 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51JRPh9004383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:27:25 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bug: in folder view, subject wraps to next line? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 29 May 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > On Sat, 29 May 2004, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> I have noticed similar problems with tab characters in the subject line. >> Are you sure that the subject doesn't contain any control characters? > > fairly sure, but not entirely. say 80%. > > even if the subject does contain control characters, it seems like a bug. > i've seen pine handle subjects w/control characters correctly before (i.e., > not wrap them to the next line). > > -Ryan If you could send us a message that exhibits this behavior, and perhaps a copy of your pinerc, maybe we could reproduce the problem and figure out what is going wrong. Thanks. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 13:46:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KkeYj024971; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:46:40 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KkctE002524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:46:38 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51KkUPe015124; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:46:30 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51KjrNx007892 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:45:53 -0700 Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51Kjq5I004254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:45:52 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KjoVe031716; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:45:50 -0700 Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KjolT016642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:45:50 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:43:47 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Bug Report: TO filter does not work as claimed In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: mrc@ndcms.cac.washington.edu X-To: "Erik T. Ray" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum , Pine Team X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello Erik - I apologize for the delay in responding; I did not know about your message until today. Not all of the Pine developers read pine-info regularly. The only way to be sure that you reach the Pine developers is to send mail to pine@cac.washington.edu. There is no list of "defective IMAP servers" in Pine; but there is a way to work with defective IMAP servers. Pine has an optional switch in the mailbox name, "/loser", which disables many IMAP operations in favor of doing the task locally. For example, if you use "/loser", rather than doing a search on the server, Pine will download the necessary data and search locally. This will cause these operations to work correctly, at a possibly significant performance cost. For example, if your Courier server is called broken.example.com, you can set inbox-path = {broken.example.com/loser}INBOX This should remedy your specific problem. Unfortunately, calling Courier "defective" is an understatement. Courier is not an IMAP server at all. In addition to its bugs, Courier deviates from the IMAP specification in several critical ways. I gave up any attempt to communicate with the author of Courier years ago. Consequently, any use of Courier is a crap-shoot, even with "/loser". You may be able to get an IMAP client to work with it, but there are no guarantees. The only real fix is to dump Courier in favor of a standards-compliant server, such as UW or Cyrus. On Fri, 28 May 2004, Erik T. Ray wrote: > No one has replied to this message yet. Perhaps if I put "bug report" in the > subject line it will elicit a response. To summarize, a claimed workaround in > the 4.55 release notes about "TO" filters does not seem to be working in > 4.58. Thanks. > > Begin forwarded message: >> From: "Erik T. Ray" >> Date: May 4, 2004 2:34:37 PM EDT >> To: Pine Discussion Forum >> Subject: Courier IMAP and TO filter >> >> I am using Pine 4.58 with an inbox-path set to a remote IMAP server. The >> server is Courier imapd 1.7.3 on Redhat 7.3. The problem I am having is >> that the "TO" filter does not properly match any messages, though the >> other filters do. I notice in the release notes for Pine 4.55 that this >> issue has been addressed: >> >> With some defective IMAP servers a filter which required a match in >> the To pattern would not match. The IMAP server defect is that the >> server does not implement a HEADER search for the empty string to be >> equivalent to a test for the header existing. >> >> Is Courier imapd included in that list of "defective IMAP servers" and if >> so, any idea why this workaround is not working for me? If it is something >> else, can anyone suggest a workaround I might try? Thanks. > > -- > Erik Ray Unix Systems Administrator > Harvard-MIT Data Center Harvard University > phone: (617) 496-5097 mobile: (781) 710-1162 > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 13:47:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KluAO025056; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:56 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KlsTL002584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51KlkV7017036; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:46 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51KlEcF117854 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:14 -0700 Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51KlDRr029733 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:13 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KlCbc031951; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:12 -0700 Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51KlBAY016219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:47:11 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:45:08 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: mrc@ndcms.cac.washington.edu X-To: Alexander V Alekseev X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thank you for reporting this problem. This problem has already been called to our attention, and will be fixed in Pine 4.61. Since you use PC-Pine, regrettably there is no patch for the problem in 4.60. I could give you a patch for UNIX Pine 4.60 if you like. On Sun, 30 May 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: > Hello! > > I've installed 4.60 in addition to 4.58. > Nothing in configuration changed. My character set is > > character-set=WINDOWS-1251 > > Pine 4.58 automatically recoded other russian charsets > (as koi8-r) to windows-1251. But 4.60 only displays > charset warning and nothing changes. 4.58 still work OK. > > Any ideas? > > Bye. Alex. > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 1 14:22:52 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51LMpYd026889; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:51 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51LMnkf024866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:49 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i51LMeUe018100; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:40 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i51LMALX068950 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:10 -0700 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i51LM9bs032509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:09 -0700 Received: from heaven.corp.google.com (gpsi1.corp.google.com [10.3.0.251]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i51LM34O014694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:03 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ryanb@heaven.corp.google.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > You can always set viewer-margin-left and viewer-margin-right to > improve your reading of messages, or you can press "H" and see the same > message with format=flowed off. these are close, but not quite it. viewing with headers on works perfectly, except that i have to page through screenloads of headers, which is no good. the margin options are helpful, but don't quite work, since i use pine in terminals of varying widths. :/ ideally, i'd like an option that turns format=flowed on or off. (btw, eduardo, what is this format=... syntax?) alternatively, i'd be happy with a viewer-wrap-column option that affects the viewer the same way composer-wrap-column affects pico. -Ryan -- "Woooo!!!" -Twinsen From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 00:15:19 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i527FGQ3017987; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:15:16 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i527FEGm021915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:15:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i527F3hw013874; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:15:03 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i527DgPh082764 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:13:43 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i527DdKu016945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:13:41 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru (z101170.int.cboss.ru [10.98.250.14]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i527CHSa029253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:12:23 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:12:17 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XX_bGirK@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > Thank you for reporting this problem. > > This problem has already been called to our attention, and will be fixed > in Pine 4.61. Since you use PC-Pine, regrettably there is no patch for > the problem in 4.60. I could give you a patch for UNIX Pine 4.60 if you > like. Under Linux I use iconv patch, which works much better. Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 02:28:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i529SVao024952; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:28:31 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i529STDN025435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:28:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i529SJBq011504; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:28:19 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i529RNlp044590 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:27:23 -0700 Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i529RMBA005477 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:27:22 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i529RGSF023698; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:27:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (mrc@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i529RG5n025218; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:27:16 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Alexander V Alekseev X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: > Under Linux I use iconv patch, which works much better. The iconv() patch does not work in many cases in which the code in 4.60 does. Nor is iconv() available on the other ports of UNIX where Pine runs. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 03:07:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52A7OTc026450; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:07:24 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52A7MDf018674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:07:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52A7Ehf008840; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:07:15 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52A6R0R071922 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:06:27 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52A6PFS001275 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:06:26 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru (z101170.int.cboss.ru [10.98.250.14]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i52A44Sa001482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:04:08 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:04:04 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXLrHirK@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: > > Under Linux I use iconv patch, which works much better. > > The iconv() patch does not work in many cases in which the code in 4.60 > does. Nor is iconv() available on the other ports of UNIX where Pine > runs. I don't know as for non-cyrillic charsets, but for Russian mail native pine code doesn't work well. Half a year ago it didn't decode mime Subject, From and other headers. I couldn't read UTF-8. I had to use DISPLAY-FILTERS, but postponed-mail was filtered twice. So I started to look for other mail client, or some way to use pine. So, if want to support iconv()-uncapable systems, why no to emulate iconv for them with your own code with current capabilities? You cannot make charset translation better than iconv(). Its developers already did it for you. Why not to use it? Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 09:53:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Gr5oJ009845; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:53:05 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Gr3gI000927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:53:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52Gqt7H017656; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:52:55 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52GqBet048066 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:52:11 -0700 Received: from mxout6.cac.washington.edu (mxout6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.20]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52GqAUV030778 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:52:10 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) by mxout6.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Gq4xA009444; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:52:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (mrc@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Gq4sg007266; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:52:04 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 09:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Alexander V Alekseev X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: > I don't know as for non-cyrillic charsets, but for Russian > mail native pine code doesn't work well. Half a year ago it didn't > decode mime Subject, From and other headers. I couldn't read UTF-8. Pine 4.58 should convert between 8-bit (e.g. Russian) character sets without problem, and Pine 4.60 should read UTF-8 email. Unfortunately, conversion between 8-bit character sets was broken in Pine 4.60, and none of our beta testers reported this problem until after Pine 4.60 was released. The bug was simple -- one line that needs to be deleted -- and will be fixed in 4.61. > So, if want to support iconv()-uncapable systems, why no to > emulate iconv for them with your own code with current capabilities? I started writing Pine's internal code long before iconv() existed. That internal code has been used for searching for years. > You cannot make charset translation better than iconv(). Its developers > already did it for you. Why not to use it? Pine's internal character set code does more than iconv(). Among other things, the iconv() patch deletes support for character sets that I use! -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 10:08:07 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52H84st010803; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:08:04 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52H82sD007147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:08:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52H7rMs008864; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:07:53 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52H7MQu013260 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:07:22 -0700 Received: from nimbus.anzio.com (nimbus.anzio.com [66.129.220.220]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52H7KvQ028870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:07:20 -0700 Received: from nimbus.anzio.com (nimbus.anzio.com [66.129.220.220]) by nimbus.anzio.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i52HBE09029367; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:11:14 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bob Rasmussen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > Pine's internal character set code does more than iconv(). Among other > things, the iconv() patch deletes support for character sets that I use! Which ones? And are you referring to Kaindl's iconv() patch? Regards, ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc. personal e-mail: ras@anzio.com company e-mail: rsi@anzio.com voice: (US) 503-624-0360 (9:00-6:00 Pacific Time) fax: (US) 503-624-0760 web: http://www.anzio.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 10:29:19 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52HTHZQ011721; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:29:17 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52HTF81008154 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:29:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52HT8qG011956; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:29:08 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52HQc5e105370 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:26:38 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52HQZSc002797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:26:37 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F7967C746 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marissa Krupa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.58 mail shrinkage issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: kmk@ganesh.oak.suse.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear List, I have recently reconfigured my .pinerc to a different imap server. Sometimes when I save a mail to a local folder, or save many mails at once with the highlighting feature, I receive an error like this: Mail Shrank 1580 --> 1435 Then Save to foo folder: FAILED I never experienced this error with the other imap server. Strange this is that some mails save just fine to the same folders. Sometimes only one email will "shrink" upon sending & fail. Sometimes many mails. This error never happens when I save mails to the imap server folders. Any ideas? Is this something a newer version would fix? Thank you kindly! Best regards, Marissa Krupa Public Relations Specialist ------------------------------------------------------------------- Marissa Krupa Novell/SUSE LINUX 1100 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94111 T: +1 415 591 6620 F: +1 415 591 6619 kmk@suse.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- simply change at http://www.suse.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 12:48:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52JmfSL019090; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:48:41 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Jmdh4010472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:48:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52JmRR1011330; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:48:27 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52JlVCm041448 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:47:31 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52JlR8S032092 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:47:28 -0700 Received: from extimap.suse.de (extimap.suse.de [195.135.220.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A271679026 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from extimap.suse.de (extimap.suse.de [195.135.220.6]) by extimap.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2768692AB1 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <7806641.1086205468103.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@extimap.suse.de> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marissa Krupa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Fwd: [Pine 4.58 mail shrinkage issue] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_631_7795126.1086205467997" X-Priority: 3 (normal) X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.21-215-smp i386 (JVM 1.3.1_04) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FWD_MSG 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ------=_Part_631_7795126.1086205467997 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Addendum to first message: I've discovered that the only emails unable to be saved on the local folders are from the domain of the imap server itself. All other emails from outside this server are able to be saved. Has anyone every heard of that before? Any possible options for fixing? It seems it's a server issue & not necessarily a pine config issue. Thanks again, Marissa ------=_Part_631_7795126.1086205467997 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Received: from extimap.suse.de ([unix socket]) by extimap (Cyrus v2.1.16) with LMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 19:37:47 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.suse.de", Issuer "SuSE Linux AG internal IMAP-Server CA" (verified OK)) by extimap.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5755BDD05 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:37:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hermes.suse.de (Postfix) id 7D6E668F23; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:37:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from scanhost.suse.de (scanhost.suse.de [10.0.0.5]) by hermes.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7238D6904F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:37:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.suse.de ([10.0.0.1]) by scanhost.suse.de (scanhost [10.0.0.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 21939-02 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E23E69033 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:37:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1B367B1E6 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:32:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52HSrfr018464; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:28:53 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52HQc5e105370 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:26:38 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52HQZSc002797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:26:37 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F7967C746 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marissa Krupa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.58 mail shrinkage issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: kmk@ganesh.oak.suse.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at scanhost.suse.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01, MY_LINUX X-Spam-Level: Dear List, I have recently reconfigured my .pinerc to a different imap server. Sometimes when I save a mail to a local folder, or save many mails at once with the highlighting feature, I receive an error like this: Mail Shrank 1580 --> 1435 Then Save to foo folder: FAILED I never experienced this error with the other imap server. Strange this is that some mails save just fine to the same folders. Sometimes only one email will "shrink" upon sending & fail. Sometimes many mails. This error never happens when I save mails to the imap server folders. Any ideas? Is this something a newer version would fix? Thank you kindly! Best regards, Marissa Krupa Public Relations Specialist ------------------------------------------------------------------- Marissa Krupa Novell/SUSE LINUX 1100 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94111 T: +1 415 591 6620 F: +1 415 591 6619 kmk@suse.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- simply change at http://www.suse.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_Part_631_7795126.1086205467997-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 13:39:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52KdVp7021625; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:39:31 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52KdTun012540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:39:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52KdLHA016730; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:39:21 -0700 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52KcihW056634 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:38:44 -0700 Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Kch0n032501 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:38:43 -0700 Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56124872C; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:38:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Dell8K.localdomain (netblock-66-159-216-138.dslextreme.com [66.159.216.138]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5A32A9B81; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:38:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@Dell8K.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > Unfortunately, conversion between 8-bit character sets was broken in Pine > 4.60, and none of our beta testers reported this problem until after Pine 4.60 > was released. The bug was simple -- one line that needs to be deleted Some of us always build Pine from source, ya know. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 W: 26601 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA 91302-1959 (818) 444-3685 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 15:35:15 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52MZEHd027373; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:35:14 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52MZCOb021849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:35:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52MZ3cK012908; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:35:03 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52MYNJX064472 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:34:23 -0700 Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52MYLX9010687 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:34:22 -0700 Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735AD4873F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Dell8K.localdomain (netblock-66-159-216-138.dslextreme.com [66.159.216.138]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EAC1E282F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@Dell8K.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, daniel lance herrick wrote: > composer-wrap-column = 50 I'd hope the option to make that read the current xterm width, if available, would be in there, too. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 W: 26601 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA 91302-1959 (818) 444-3685 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 15:56:29 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52MuSej028668; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:56:28 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52MuQxa022645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:56:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52MuJOp015232; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:56:19 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52MtfvS069566 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:55:41 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52MteF6025636 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:55:40 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i52Mv5tJ007718 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:55:37 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i52MtKLT021475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Kenneth Crudup wrote: >On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, daniel lance herrick wrote: > >> composer-wrap-column = 50 > >I'd hope the option to make that read the current xterm width, if >available, would be in there, too. I think you're talking about pico, but at least when viewing messages, this does work -- I can resize the (Terminal, which also adheres to xterm protocol, AFAIK) window, and if the message doesn't have hard returns, I'll see wider lines. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 16:43:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52Nhg46031051; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:43:42 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52NhdUN020802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:43:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i52NhSUK012998; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:43:28 -0700 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i52NgovO097350 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:42:50 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i52NgnXB022928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:42:49 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i52NhYij023462 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:42:48 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i52NgWd0017224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable displaying flowed text? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: >On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Kenneth Crudup wrote: >>On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, daniel lance herrick wrote: >> >>> composer-wrap-column = 50 >> >>I'd hope the option to make that read the current xterm width, if >>available, would be in there, too. > >I think you're talking about pico, but at least when viewing messages, >this does work -- I can resize the (Terminal, which also adheres to xterm >protocol, AFAIK) window, and if the message doesn't have hard returns, I'll see >wider lines. aaah, interesting. I was about to gripe about this particular message still showing up funky.. When viewing the message, "see" showed up on its own line.. (this is when I was viewing the message, pre-adding the quote char in this reply). I went into the config and my composer-wrap-column was set to 79. I changed it to 80, but it made no difference. (This is me misunderstanding what the "composer" is, I think, according to a personal reply I got yesterday). But it'd be great if I were able to do this. Bug-or-at-least-strangeness this made me find: I thought maybe I could set the composer-wrap-column to 81 to sort of work around the problem (or at least see if it made the issue go away on this particular message). If I try to set the composer wrap column above 80, it says (I was playing with ridiculously large numbers): [Composer-wrap-column of 81100 not supported (Max 80). Using "80"] But it still leaves my bogus number in there. I think that if you have typed too-large/small of a number there, it should clamp the number to the highest (or lowest) valid number, and change the number I actually see there --- or at the very least, change it when I save changes to the config screen.. i.e. if I go back in, it'll _then_ show me 80. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 18:31:43 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i531VgGk002229; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:31:42 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i531VeK0024586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:31:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i531VWYd010796; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:31:32 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i531UqX9053060 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:30:52 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i531Upo6017516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:30:52 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i531WJfH017596 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:30:51 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i531UYuF007580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9%, Report='UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __UPPERCASE_25_50 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > If you run pine with "-d verbose=9,imap=4" you may be able to look at the debug > file and figure out the where and why of the message. I have a debug file when this happened, but what should I look for? This looks relevant, I think: IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000000 CAPABILITY IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: * CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 ACL QUOTA LITERAL+ NAMESPACE UIDPLUS CHILDREN LANGUAGE XSENDER X-NETSCAPE XSERVERINFO AUTH=PLAIN STARTTLS IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000000 OK CAPABILITY completed imap_cmd({mail.apple.com}sent-mail, STARTTLS, 0x0) IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000001 STARTTLS IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000001 OK STARTTLS completed sslfailure: host=mail.apple.com reason=SSL negotiation failed Here's my current config: inbox-path = {mail.apple.com/user=mattack/notls}INBOX So unless there's some user error I'm missing, it seems to not be working as expected. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 2 18:38:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i531cLpQ002636; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:38:21 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i531cJXQ027610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:38:20 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i531cBYl013574; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:38:12 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i531bsJj035066 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:37:54 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i531bpYa003405 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:37:51 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i531dIBv018171 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:37:51 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i531bYA0022993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9%, Report='UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __UPPERCASE_25_50 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: >On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: >> If you run pine with "-d verbose=9,imap=4" you may be able to look at the debug >> file and figure out the where and why of the message. > >I have a debug file when this happened, but what should I look for? > >This looks relevant, I think: > >IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000000 CAPABILITY >IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: * CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 ACL QUOTA LITERAL+ NAMESPACE UIDPLUS CHILDREN LANGUAGE XSENDER X-NETSCAPE XSERVERINFO AUTH=PLAIN STARTTLS >IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000000 OK CAPABILITY completed >imap_cmd({mail.apple.com}sent-mail, STARTTLS, 0x0) >IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000001 STARTTLS >IMAP DEBUG 18:25:54 6/2: 00000001 OK STARTTLS completed >sslfailure: host=mail.apple.com reason=SSL negotiation failed Though also, does this mean that my IMAP server is saying the wrong thing? If it's saying STARTTLS but STARTTLS is not actually working.. that sounds bad.. (but it should still be overridden by my /notls thing) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 08:53:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53Frvtu002984; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:53:57 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53Frt5L018056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:53:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i53Frg5b011078; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:53:43 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53FqlR5014980 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:52:47 -0700 Received: from mxout6.cac.washington.edu (mxout6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.20]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53FqkKf025764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:52:46 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout6.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53Fqjw4027296 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:52:45 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53Fqjqr009017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:52:45 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The first thing I'd want to look at is the whole debug file, if possible, to make sure that this particular STARTTLS happens for your inbox. It is possible that some other mailbox is being opened. Probably not, but that's the first thing I'd look for. Steve From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 11:29:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53ITfEC011235; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:29:41 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53ITdK1031177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:29:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i53ITTv8013812; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:29:29 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53ISjQV038734 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:28:46 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53ISjSG002228 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:28:45 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53ISiHX012329 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:28:44 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IShNH002894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:28:44 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1903383771-1209621675-1086287323=:5012" X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1903383771-1209621675-1086287323=:5012 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Kenneth Crudup wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > >> Unfortunately, conversion between 8-bit character sets was broken in Pine >> 4.60, and none of our beta testers reported this problem until after Pine 4.60 >> was released. The bug was simple -- one line that needs to be deleted > > > > Some of us always build Pine from source, ya know. > > -Kenny Here ya go. Patch for conversion bug is attached. Steve ---1903383771-1209621675-1086287323=:5012 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-Description: patch for .../pine/strings.c Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=diff KioqIHN0cmluZ3MuYy5vcmlnCVRodSBKdW4gIDMgMTE6MjY6MjIgMjAwNA0K LS0tIHN0cmluZ3MuYwlUaHUgSnVuICAzIDExOjI3OjI1IDIwMDQNCioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDM3NTQsMzc2MCAqKioqDQogIAkJcCA9IGN0LT50 YWJsZSA9ICh1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICopDQogIAkJICBmc19nZXQoMjU2ICog c2l6ZW9mKHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIpKTsNCiAgCQlmb3IoaSA9IDA7IGkgPCAy NTY7IGkrKyl7DQohIAkJICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgZmM7DQogIAkJICAg IHBbaV0gPSAnPyc7DQogIAkJICAgIHN3aXRjaChmcm9tLT50eXBlKXsJLyog Z2V0ICJmcm9tIiBVQ1MtMiBjb2RlcG9pbnQgKi8NCiAgCQkgICAgY2FzZSBD VF8xQllURTA6CS8qIElTTyA4ODU5LTEgKi8NCi0tLSAzNzU0LDM3NjAgLS0t LQ0KICAJCXAgPSBjdC0+dGFibGUgPSAodW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKQ0KICAJ CSAgZnNfZ2V0KDI1NiAqIHNpemVvZih1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyKSk7DQogIAkJ Zm9yKGkgPSAwOyBpIDwgMjU2OyBpKyspew0KISAJCSAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBp bnQgZmM7DQogIAkJICAgIHBbaV0gPSAnPyc7DQogIAkJICAgIHN3aXRjaChm cm9tLT50eXBlKXsJLyogZ2V0ICJmcm9tIiBVQ1MtMiBjb2RlcG9pbnQgKi8N CiAgCQkgICAgY2FzZSBDVF8xQllURTA6CS8qIElTTyA4ODU5LTEgKi8NCioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDM3ODksMzc5NSAqKioqDQogIAkJCX0NCiAg CQkJYnJlYWs7DQogIAkJICAgIH0NCi0gCQkgICAgcFtpXSA9IGk7DQogIAkJ fQ0KICAJCWJyZWFrOw0KICAJICAgIH0NCi0tLSAzNzg5LDM3OTQgLS0tLQ0K ---1903383771-1209621675-1086287323=:5012-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 11:39:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IdtJb012043; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:55 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IdqLZ024618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i53IdfQ1013040; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:41 -0700 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53IdB3Y035608 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:11 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IdAZc000805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:10 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i53Idwr9018361 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:10 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i53Id8R1010987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > The first thing I'd want to look at is the whole debug file, if possible, to > make sure that this particular STARTTLS happens for your inbox. It is possible > that some other mailbox is being opened. Probably not, but that's the first > thing I'd look for. Is there anything "secret" in the debug file? Also, I had to run for quite a while before getting this to happen. My biggest .pine-debug file, which is I think the one this happened on, is 9 megs. Is there any way I could get the debug output to just spew out issues relevant to this problem? Basically, I'll do whatever I can to provide more info, this issue drives me nuts. I do think that "some other mailbox is being opened", because it happens infrequently, but most reproducibly, when I'm trying to compose a message when there's already a postponed message -- so it can't open the postponed-msgs folder. (I think I explained this in an original mail way back.) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 11:59:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IxBTp013117; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:59:11 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53Ix9PM032400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:59:10 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i53Ix10x017920; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:59:01 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53IwLbX116680 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:58:21 -0700 Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53IwK9w018043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:58:20 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IwJqC028233 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:58:19 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53IwJoc007567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:58:19 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: >> The first thing I'd want to look at is the whole debug file, if possible, to >> make sure that this particular STARTTLS happens for your inbox. It is possible >> that some other mailbox is being opened. Probably not, but that's the first >> thing I'd look for. > > Is there anything "secret" in the debug file? I don't think so, but some people consider their address secret, so it is in the eye of the beholder. > Also, I had to run for quite a while before getting this to happen. > My biggest .pine-debug file, which is I think the one this happened on, > is 9 megs. > > Is there any way I could get the debug output to just spew out issues relevant > to this problem? Nope. > Basically, I'll do whatever I can to provide more info, this issue drives > me nuts. > > I do think that "some other mailbox is being opened", because it happens > infrequently, but most reproducibly, when I'm trying to compose a message when > there's already a postponed message -- so it can't open the postponed-msgs > folder. (I think I explained this in an original mail way back.) You can try to fix it by making sure that /notls appears everywhere it needs to appear in the config file. Most places where there is a hostname will have to have /notls, or at least the ones that go to the defective host. For example, if you have any collections defined on an IMAP server, go to the Setup Collections screen and add the /notls to the server name there. If you have a fully-qualified mailbox name for postponed-folder add the /notls there, too. If the smtp server gives you errors, you need it there, too. If not, you don't want it because it removes the encryption. My guess would be that you have a collection and the server name in that collection does not have /notls after it. Steve From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 13:01:29 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53K1Stx016288; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:01:28 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53K1QSI027770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:01:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i53K1E0U015444; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:01:14 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53K0FJW116624 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:00:16 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53K0ELB008862 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:00:14 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i53K0D6H027767 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i53K0DQJ027747 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Birl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Message X UID Y less than Z MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Im sure this must have been discussed before, but I cannot seem to find a good answer from Google. I appeneded one mail file to the end of another. Now Pine (4.60, and even earlier versions) displays the cryptic Message 73 UID 2 less than 104 when I open up said folder (which currently has 143 messages in it). I read http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/low-level.html and figured that *maybe* dates were involved, but .... The date for message 2 is Jan 23 2004 The date for message 73 is Feb 11 2004 The date for message 104 is Feb 15 2004 So Im back to being confuzzed. Thanks. Birl -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 13:59:21 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53KxKAj019343; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:59:20 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53KxIqI005405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:59:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i53KxAAu010952; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:59:10 -0700 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i53Kwc3i091602 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:58:38 -0700 Received: from mxsf06.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf06.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.206]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i53KwIxV008827 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:58:18 -0700 Received: from bygracealone.charter.net (66-188-135-70.mad.wi.charter.com [66.188.135.70]) by mxsf06.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i53KvvrD060529 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:57:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from chomiak (helo=localhost) by bygracealone.charter.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVzHf-0001JU-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 15:57:55 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 15:57:55 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Cheryl Homiak To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: spellcheck problem in 4.60 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is driving me crazy because I don't like ispell at all. I have Pine 4.60 installed on two linux computers and I have no value set for the spellchecker on both of them. One, however, was an installation where there already was a Pine installed and the other was a fresh installation where there had been no Pine. On the installation where I had reinstalled Pine where a previous version already existed, spelling works fine and apparently calls the Pine spell command. But on the computer with a fresh installation I get "not found" when I try to use the spell checker. so I put ispell in but want to go back to the Pine speler. What is wrong and what to I do. I installed on both computers with the .deb file found on the Pine site. Thanks. -- Cheryl "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 18:15:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i541FMWk032103; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:15:22 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i541FIFq007118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:15:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i541FBBZ011506; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:15:11 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i541EPn5007868 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:14:25 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i541EO0L016622 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:14:24 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i541FsOG012196 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:14:23 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i541ELmc013903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > My guess would be that you have a collection and the server name in that > collection does not have /notls after it. Ok, I do have a collection that was just called "Mail on mail.apple.com" with the server. I added /notls to that one. I'm not actually using collections as far as I remember, so maybe I should just delete it. But I'll live with this for a while and see if that error goes away.. if not, I'll check around if I have the server name in other places in my config file. Thanks.. If this _does_ fix it, then that just leads to another admittedly wide- ranging enhancement request -- if pine had noticed I added /notls to one instance of "mail.apple.com", it would have made sense for it to mention that I had other instances of the server WITHOUT /notls. Even if it couldn't/wouldn't automatically change all of them, if it just said "you should update the server in the collectionList ", that would have clued me in. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 3 23:44:20 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:44:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i546iDf4011636; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:44:13 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i546iBoi015295 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:44:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i546i1aG010940; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:44:02 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i546hA5v035666 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:43:10 -0700 Received: from slave.umbr.cas.cz (slave.umbr.cas.cz [147.231.252.3]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i546h62L009621 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:43:07 -0700 Received: by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4FDC17EE7; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:43:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31AB7B79 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:43:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:43:05 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Expunge does not filter in INBOX (pine4.60+chappa all patch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-X-Sender: wolf@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all, can anyone check this error I've found in pine 4.60? If you create filter with some To: pattern on INBOX (internal /var/spool/mail/ mailbox) and with some status (I set "If message is important"), then if you save this filter and exit from settings, the filter is applied. But if you are in INBOX, you set Important some message with the correct To: address and press X (as expunge), filter doesn't apply. In pine 4.58 this worked fine. Can anyone to check where is the problem and fix it? Please:)) Bye. Robert Wolf. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 4 05:53:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 05:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from pcp03680486pcs.newhvn01.in.comcast.net (pcp03680486pcs.newhvn01.in.comcast.net [68.53.233.66]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i54Crnk5026812 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 05:53:49 -0700 Received: from 128.73.73.48 by 68.53.233.66; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:47:49 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Adrienne Sullivan" Reply-To: "Adrienne Sullivan" To: mailarch+pine-info@groupms.cac.washington.edu Subject: Fast action pain reljever. Best pric3s! don't wanna miss... raze Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:52:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--919009521808945713" X-IP: 132.132.110.240 ----919009521808945713 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi mailarch+pine-info@groupms.cac.washington.edu,


Don't forget to write!
And also don't forget to visit the site, you
sould really be aware of the market nowdays.
Thanks,
Adrienne Sullivan ----919009521808945713-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 4 06:36:51 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54DaoBs028204 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:36:50 -0700 Received: from emztd2972.com ([81.199.80.202]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i54Dai0E006545 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 06:36:47 -0700 Message-Id: <200406041336.i54Dai0E006545@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "MUSTAFA ALI" Reply-To: mustafa_ali@caramail.com To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 14:35:29 +0200 Subject: FUNDS FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENTS X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='RELAY_IN_CBL 8, RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, US_DOLLARS_3 0.694, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' DEAR SIR=2FMADAM Having gotten your contact and profile=2Cwhich impresses me a lot=2CI am interested in disposing the sum of US$15=2C500=2C000 to be invested in any viable and profitable venture that you will recommend to me in your country=2Cwith you as the trustee=2E The funds are problem-free and safe=2E If you are willing to work with me=2CI will be expecting you to contact me by mail and=2For phone to go into details=2E Please be notified that since I do not have the expertise to invest the fundsabroad=2CI will rely and trust upon your loyalty and integrity=2E My best regards=2E MR=2EMUSTAFA ALI PRIVATE LINE +229 98 69 14 PLEASE CONTACT ME ON THIS=28mustafa=5Fali=40caramail=2Ecom =29 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 4 15:47:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54MlcML022853; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:47:38 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54Mla50029307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:47:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i54MlMTd005348; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:47:22 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i54Mk6rP067862 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:46:06 -0700 Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i54Mk5HD022956 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:46:05 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54MjxoU031990; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:45:59 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54Mjxg3014067 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:45:59 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Compiling pine 4.60 fails for first time. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1602252935-1023343801-1086389159=:5897" X-To: Jared Griffith X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1602252935-1023343801-1086389159=:5897 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Tue, 11 May 2004, Jared Griffith wrote: > Pine has compiled successfully on my HP-UX 10.20 workstation since about > 4.33, until now. I am trying to compile 4.60 and I get the following: > > Making Pine and rpload/rpdump. > make CC=gcc DEBUG=-O3 -f makefile.ghp > rm -f os.h > ln -s osdep/os-hpx.h os.h > gcc -O3 -DHPP -DSYSTYPE=\"GHP\" -DMOUSE -c filter.c > filter.c: In function `gf_wrap': > filter.c:7657: virtual memory exhausted > *** Error exit code 1 > > Stop. There were some macros in filter.c that grew a good deal in 4.60, which apparently some systems are having trouble with. The attached patch ought to fix it to compile on your system. Jeff --1602252935-1023343801-1086389159=:5897 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="filter.c-diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: filter.c diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="filter.c-diff" LS0tIGZpbHRlci5jCTIwMDQvMDUvMDcgMTc6NDM6MzEJNC4yNjANCisrKyBm aWx0ZXIuYwkyMDA0LzA2LzA0IDIyOjIxOjQ4DQpAQCAtMSw1ICsxLDUgQEAN CiAjaWYgIWRlZmluZWQobGludCkgJiYgIWRlZmluZWQoRE9TKQ0KLXN0YXRp YyBjaGFyIHJjc2lkW10gPSAiJElkOiBmaWx0ZXIuYyx2IDQuMjYwIDIwMDQv MDUvMDcgMTc6NDM6MzEgbWlrZXMgRXhwICQiOw0KK3N0YXRpYyBjaGFyIHJj c2lkW10gPSAiJElkOiBmaWx0ZXIuYyx2IDQuMjY0IDIwMDQvMDYvMDQgMjI6 MTQ6MzcganBmIEV4cCAkIjsNCiAjZW5kaWYNCiAvKi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCiANCkBAIC03MTgsMTcgKzcxOCwyMCBAQA0KICNkZWZp bmUJR0ZfUVVFX0VORChGKQkoJihGKS0+cXVldWVbR0ZfTUFYQlVGIC0gMV0p DQogDQogI2RlZmluZQlHRl9JUF9JTklUKEYpCWlwICA9IChGKSA/ICYoRikt PnF1ZXVlWyhGKS0+cXVldWVpbl0gOiBOVUxMDQorI2RlZmluZQlHRl9JUF9J TklUX0dMTyhGKSAgKCppcHApICA9IChGKSA/ICYoRiktPnF1ZXVlWyhGKS0+ cXVldWVpbl0gOiBOVUxMDQogI2RlZmluZQlHRl9FSUJfSU5JVChGKQllaWIg PSAoRikgPyBHRl9RVUVfRU5EKEYpIDogTlVMTA0KKyNkZWZpbmUJR0ZfRUlC X0lOSVRfR0xPKEYpICAoKmVpYnApID0gKEYpID8gR0ZfUVVFX0VORChGKSA6 IE5VTEwNCiAjZGVmaW5lCUdGX09QX0lOSVQoRikJb3AgID0gKEYpID8gJihG KS0+cXVldWVbKEYpLT5xdWV1ZW91dF0gOiBOVUxMDQogI2RlZmluZQlHRl9F T0JfSU5JVChGKQllb2IgPSAoRikgPyAmKEYpLT5xdWV1ZVsoRiktPnF1ZXVl aW5dIDogTlVMTA0KIA0KICNkZWZpbmUJR0ZfSVBfRU5EKEYpCShGKS0+cXVl dWVpbiAgPSBpcCAtIEdGX1FVRV9TVEFSVChGKQ0KKyNkZWZpbmUJR0ZfSVBf RU5EX0dMTyhGKSAgKEYpLT5xdWV1ZWluICA9ICh1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICop KCppcHApIC0gKHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKilHRl9RVUVfU1RBUlQoRikNCiAj ZGVmaW5lCUdGX09QX0VORChGKQkoRiktPnF1ZXVlb3V0ID0gb3AgLSBHRl9R VUVfU1RBUlQoRikNCiANCi0jZGVmaW5lCUdGX0lOSVQoRkksIEZPKQlyZWdp c3RlciB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICpHRl9PUF9JTklUKEZJKTsJIFwNCi0JCQly ZWdpc3RlciB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICpHRl9FT0JfSU5JVChGSSk7IFwNCi0J CQlyZWdpc3RlciB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICpHRl9JUF9JTklUKEZPKTsgIFwN Ci0JCQlyZWdpc3RlciB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICpHRl9FSUJfSU5JVChGTyk7 DQorI2RlZmluZQlHRl9JTklUKEZJLCBGTykJdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqR0Zf T1BfSU5JVChGSSk7CSBcDQorCQkJdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqR0ZfRU9CX0lO SVQoRkkpOyBcDQorCQkJdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqR0ZfSVBfSU5JVChGTyk7 ICBcDQorCQkJdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqR0ZfRUlCX0lOSVQoRk8pOw0KIA0K ICNkZWZpbmUJR0ZfQ0hfUkVTRVQoRikJKG9wID0gZW9iID0gR0ZfUVVFX1NU QVJUKEYpLCBcDQogCQkJCQkgICAgKEYpLT5xdWV1ZW91dCA9IChGKS0+cXVl dWVpbiA9IDApDQpAQCAtNzM3LDIzICs3NDAsMzUgQEANCiANCiAjZGVmaW5l CUdGX0ZMVVNIKEYpCSgoaW50KShHRl9JUF9FTkQoRiksICgqKEYpLT5mKSgo RiksIEdGX0RBVEEpLCBcDQogCQkJICAgICAgIEdGX0lQX0lOSVQoRiksIEdG X0VJQl9JTklUKEYpKSkNCisjZGVmaW5lCUdGX0ZMVVNIX0dMTyhGKQkoKGlu dCkoR0ZfSVBfRU5EX0dMTyhGKSwgKCooRiktPmYpKChGKSwgR0ZfREFUQSks IFwNCisJCQkgICAgICAgR0ZfSVBfSU5JVF9HTE8oRiksIEdGX0VJQl9JTklU X0dMTyhGKSkpDQogDQogI2RlZmluZQlHRl9QVVRDKEYsIEMpCSgoaW50KSgq aXArKyA9IChDKSwgKGlwID49IGVpYikgPyBHRl9GTFVTSChGKSA6IDEpKQ0K KyNkZWZpbmUJR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oRiwgQykgKChpbnQpKCooKmlwcCkrKyA9 IChDKSwgKCgqaXBwKSA+PSAoKmVpYnApKSA/IEdGX0ZMVVNIX0dMTyhGKSA6 IDEpKQ0KKy8qDQorICogSW50cm9kdWNpbmcgdGhlICpfR0xPIG1hY3JvcyBm b3IgdXNlIGluIHNwbGl0dGluZyB0aGUgYmlnIG1hY3JvcyBvdXQNCisgKiBp bnRvIGZ1bmN0aW9ucyAod3JhcF9mbHVzaCwgd3JhcF9lb2wpLiAgVGhlIHJl YXNvbiB3ZSBuZWVkIGENCisgKiBzZXBhcmF0ZSBtYWNybyBpcyBiZWNhdXNl IG9mIHRoZSB2YXJzIGlwLCBlaWIsIG9wLCBhbmQgZW9iLCB3aGljaCBhcmUN CisgKiBzZXQgdXAgbG9jYWxseSBpbiBhIGNhbGwgdG8gR0ZfSU5JVC4gIFRv IHByZXNlcnZlIHRoZXNlIHZhcmlhYmxlcw0KKyAqIGluIHRoZSBuZXcgZnVu Y3Rpb25zLCB3ZSBub3cgcGFzcyBwb2ludGVycyB0byB0aGVzZSBmb3VyIHZh cnMuICBFYWNoDQorICogb2YgdGhlc2UgbmV3IGZ1bmN0aW9ucyBleHBlY3Rz IHRoZSBwcmVzZW5jZSBvZiBwb2ludGVyIHZhcnMNCisgKiBpcHAsIGVpYnAs IG9wcCwgYW5kIGVvYnAuICANCisgKi8NCiANCiAjZGVmaW5lCUdGX0dFVEMo RiwgQykJKChvcCA8IGVvYikgPyAoKChDKSA9ICpvcCsrKSwgMSkgOiBHRl9D SF9SRVNFVChGKSkNCiANCiAjZGVmaW5lIEdGX0NPTE9SX1BVVEMoRiwgQykg eyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg XA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGNoYXIgKnA7ICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19F TUJFRCk7ICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0ZHQ09MT1IpOyAgICAg ICAgICAgXA0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEdGX1BV VENfR0xPKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsgICAgICAgICBcDQorICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oKEYpLT5u ZXh0LCBUQUdfRkdDT0xPUik7ICAgICAgIFwNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICBwID0gY29sb3JfdG9fYXNjaWlyZ2IoKEMpLT5mZyk7 ICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IGZvcig7ICpwOyBwKyspICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBc DQotICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChG KS0+bmV4dCwgKnApOyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0gICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VN QkVEKTsgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfQkdDT0xPUik7ICAgICAg ICAgICBcDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBHRl9Q VVRDX0dMTygoRiktPm5leHQsICpwKTsgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCisgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTygoRiktPm5l eHQsIFRBR19FTUJFRCk7ICAgICAgICAgXA0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0JHQ09M T1IpOyAgICAgICBcDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg cCA9IGNvbG9yX3RvX2FzY2lpcmdiKChDKS0+YmcpOyAgICAgICAgICAgIFwN CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBmb3IoOyAqcDsgcCsr KSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLSAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsICpwKTsg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTygoRiktPm5leHQsICpwKTsgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIFwNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfQ0KIA0KIC8q DQpAQCAtNzcyLDcgKzc4Nyw2IEBADQogICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGxvbmcgIG47 DQogfSBnZl9pbiwgZ2Zfb3V0Ow0KIA0KLQ0KICNkZWZpbmUJR0ZfU09fU1RB Q0sJc3RydWN0IGdmX3NvX3N0YWNrDQogc3RhdGljIEdGX1NPX1NUQUNLIHsN CiAgICAgU1RPUkVfUwkqc287DQpAQCAtNjc0Nyw3ICs2NzYxLDYgQEANCiAg ICAgY2hhcglzcGVjaWFsWzI1Nl07DQogfSBXUkFQX1M7DQogDQotDQogI2Rl ZmluZQlXUkFQX01BUkdfTChGKQkoKChXUkFQX1MgKikoRiktPm9wdCktPm1h cmdpbl9sKQ0KICNkZWZpbmUJV1JBUF9NQVJHX1IoRikJKCgoV1JBUF9TICop KEYpLT5vcHQpLT5tYXJnaW5fcikNCiAjZGVmaW5lCVdSQVBfQ09MKEYpCSgo KFdSQVBfUyAqKShGKS0+b3B0KS0+d3JhcF9jb2wgLSBXUkFQX01BUkdfUihG KSAtICgoKChXUkFQX1MgKikoRiktPm9wdCktPmxlYXZlX2Zsb3dlZCkgPyAx IDogMCkpDQpAQCAtNjc4MCw5MSArNjc5Myw2IEBADQogI2RlZmluZQlXUkFQ X0NPTE9SKEYpCSgoKFdSQVBfUyAqKShGKS0+b3B0KS0+Y29sb3IpDQogI2Rl ZmluZQlXUkFQX0NPTE9SX1NFVChGKSAgKChXUkFQX0NPTE9SKEYpKSAmJiAo V1JBUF9DT0xPUihGKS0+ZmdbMF0pKQ0KICNkZWZpbmUJV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMo RikJKCgoV1JBUF9TICopKEYpLT5vcHQpLT5zcGFjZXMpDQotI2RlZmluZQlX UkFQX0VPTChGLCBDKQl7CQkJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBpZigoQykgJiYgV1JB UF9MVl9GTEQoRikpCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0 LCAnICcpOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9CT0xEKEYpKXsJCQkJXA0K LQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkJ R0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19CT0xET0ZGKTsJXA0KLQkJCSAgICB9 CQkJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBpZihXUkFQX1VMSU5FKEYpKXsJCQkJXA0KLQkJ CQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkJR0Zf UFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19VTElORU9GRik7CVwNCi0JCQkgICAgfQkJ CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9JTlZFUlNFKEYpIHx8IFdSQVBfQU5D SE9SKEYpKXsJXA0KLQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVE KTsJCVwNCi0JCQkJR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19JTlZPRkYpOwkJ XA0KLQkJCSAgICB9CQkJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBpZihXUkFQX0NPTE9SX1NF VChGKSl7CQkJXA0KLQkJCQljaGFyICpwOwkJCQlcDQotCQkJCUdGX1BVVEMo KEYpLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfRU1CRUQpOwkJXA0KLQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+ bmV4dCwgVEFHX0ZHQ09MT1IpOwlcDQotCQkJCXAgPSBjb2xvcl90b19hc2Np aXJnYihwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9OT1JNX0ZPUkVfQ09MT1IpO1wNCi0JCQkJ Zm9yKDsgKnA7IHArKykJCQkJXA0KLQkJCQkgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0 LCAqcCk7CQlcDQotCQkJCUdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfRU1CRUQp OwkJXA0KLQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0JHQ09MT1IpOwlc DQotCQkJCXAgPSBjb2xvcl90b19hc2NpaXJnYihwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9O T1JNX0JBQ0tfQ09MT1IpO1wNCi0JCQkJZm9yKDsgKnA7IHArKykJCQkJXA0K LQkJCQkgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCAqcCk7CQlcDQotCQkJICAgIH0J CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCAnXDAxNScpOwkJ CVwNCi0JCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsICdcMDEyJyk7CQkJXA0K LQkJCSAgICAoRiktPm4gPSAwTDsJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBzb190cnVuY2F0 ZShXUkFQX1NQQUNFUyhGKSwgMEwpOwkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX1NQQ19M RU4oRikgPSAwOwkJCVwNCi0JCQl9DQotDQotI2RlZmluZQlXUkFQX0JPTChG LEksUSkJewkJCQkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgaW50IG4gPSBXUkFQX01BUkdfTChG KSArICgoSSkgPyBXUkFQX0lOREVOVChGKSA6IDApOyBcDQotCQkJICAgIHdo aWxlKG4tLSA+IDApewkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgICAgKEYpLT5uKys7CQkJCSAg ICAgICAgXA0KLQkJCSAgICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCAnICcpOwkJ ICAgICAgICBcDQotCQkJICAgIH0JCQkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfQUxM V1NQKEYpID0gMTsJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBpZihRKXsJCQkJCVwNCi0gICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBXUkFQX1FVT1RFX0lOU0VSVChG KTsgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotCQkJICAgIH0JCQkJCQlcDQot CQkJICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfQk9MRChGKSl7CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJR0ZfUFVUQygo RiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19FTUJFRCk7CQlcDQotCQkJCUdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5u ZXh0LCBUQUdfQk9MRE9OKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgfQkJCQkJCVwNCi0JCQkg ICAgaWYoV1JBUF9VTElORShGKSl7CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJR0ZfUFVUQygoRikt Pm5leHQsIFRBR19FTUJFRCk7CQlcDQotCQkJCUdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0 LCBUQUdfVUxJTkVPTik7CVwNCi0JCQkgICAgfQkJCQkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAg aWYoV1JBUF9JTlZFUlNFKEYpKXsJCQlcDQotCQkJCUdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5u ZXh0LCBUQUdfRU1CRUQpOwkJXA0KLQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwg VEFHX0lOVk9OKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgfQkJCQkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgaWYo V1JBUF9DT0xPUl9TRVQoRikpewkJCVwNCi0JCQkJY2hhciAqcDsJCQkJXA0K LQkJCQlpZihXUkFQX0NPTE9SKEYpLT5mZ1swXSl7CQlcDQotCQkJCSAgR0Zf UFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19FTUJFRCk7CVwNCi0JCQkJICBHRl9QVVRD KChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0ZHQ09MT1IpOwlcDQotCQkJCSAgcCA9IGNvbG9y X3RvX2FzY2lpcmdiKFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoRiktPmZnKTtcDQotCQkJCSAgZm9y KDsgKnA7IHArKykJCQlcDQotCQkJCSAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwg KnApOwkJXA0KLQkJCQl9CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJCWlmKFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoRikt PmJnWzBdKXsJCVwNCi0JCQkJICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VN QkVEKTsJXA0KLQkJCQkgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfQkdDT0xP Uik7CVwNCi0JCQkJICBwID0gY29sb3JfdG9fYXNjaWlyZ2IoV1JBUF9DT0xP UihGKS0+YmcpO1wNCi0JCQkJICBmb3IoOyAqcDsgcCsrKQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJ ICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCAqcCk7CQlcDQotCQkJCX0JCQkJCVwN Ci0JCQkgICAgfQkJCQkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9BTkNIT1IoRikp ewkJCQlcDQotCQkJCWNoYXIgYnVmWzY0XTsgaW50IGk7CQkJXA0KLQkJCQlH Rl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkJR0ZfUFVU QygoRiktPm5leHQsIFRBR19IQU5ETEUpOwkJXA0KLQkJCQlzcHJpbnRmKGJ1 ZiwgIiVkIiwgV1JBUF9BTkNIT1IoRikpOwlcDQotCQkJCUdGX1BVVEMoKEYp LT5uZXh0LCAoaW50KSBzdHJsZW4oYnVmKSk7CVwNCi0JCQkJZm9yKGkgPSAw OyBidWZbaV07IGkrKykJCQlcDQotCQkJCSAgR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQs IGJ1ZltpXSk7CQlcDQotCQkJICAgIH0JCQkJCQlcDQotCQkJfQ0KLQ0KICNk ZWZpbmUJV1JBUF9QVVRDKEYsQyxWKSB7CQkJCQkJXA0KIAkJCSAgICBpZigo RiktPmxpbmVwID09IFdSQVBfTEFTVEMoRikpewkJXA0KIAkJCQlzaXplX3Qg b2Zmc2V0ID0gKEYpLT5saW5lcCAtIChGKS0+bGluZTsJXA0KQEAgLTY4OTEs MTgzICs2ODE5LDIwIEBADQogCQkJICAgIH0JCQkJCQlcDQogCQkJfQ0KIA0K LSNkZWZpbmUgV1JBUF9GTFVTSF9TKEYscyxuLFYpIHsJCQkJCQlcDQotCQkJ ICAgIGZvcig7IG4gPiAwOyBuLS0scysrKXsJCQlcDQotCQkJCWlmKCpzID09 IFRBR19FTUJFRCl7CQkJXA0KLQkJCQkgICAgaWYobi0tID4gMCl7CQkJXA0K LQkJCQkJc3dpdGNoKCorK3MpewkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgY2FzZSBUQUdfQk9M RE9OIDoJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCxUQUdfRU1C RUQpO1wNCi0JCQkJCSAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCxUQUdfQk9MRE9O KTtcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgV1JBUF9CT0xEKEYpID0gMTsJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAg ICBicmVhazsJCQlcDQotCQkJCQkgIGNhc2UgVEFHX0JPTERPRkYgOgkJXA0K LQkJCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LFRBR19FTUJFRCk7XA0KLQkJ CQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LFRBR19CT0xET0ZGKTtcDQotCQkJ CQkgICAgV1JBUF9CT0xEKEYpID0gMDsJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICBicmVhazsJ CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgIGNhc2UgVEFHX1VMSU5FT04gOgkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAg IEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LFRBR19FTUJFRCk7XA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIEdG X1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LFRBR19VTElORU9OKTtcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgV1JB UF9VTElORShGKSA9IDE7CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgYnJlYWs7CQkJXA0KLQkJ CQkJICBjYXNlIFRBR19VTElORU9GRiA6CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVU QygoRiktPm5leHQsVEFHX0VNQkVEKTtcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQygo RiktPm5leHQsVEFHX1VMSU5FT0ZGKTtcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgV1JBUF9VTElO RShGKSA9IDA7CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgYnJlYWs7CQkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICBj YXNlIFRBR19JTlZPRkYgOgkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5u ZXh0LFRBR19FTUJFRCk7XA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0 LFRBR19JTlZPRkYpO1wNCi0JCQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0FOQ0hPUihGKSA9IDA7 CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgYnJlYWs7CQkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICBjYXNlIFRBR19I QU5ETEUgOgkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LFRBR19F TUJFRCk7XA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIGlmKG4tLSA+IDApewkJXA0KLQkJCQkJCWlu dCBpID0gKisrczsJCVwNCi0JCQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCwgVEFH X0hBTkRMRSk7IFwNCi0JCQkJCQlpZihpIDw9IG4pewkJXA0KLQkJCQkJCSAg ICBuIC09IGk7CQlcDQotCQkJCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCBp KTsgXA0KLQkJCQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0FOQ0hPUihGKSA9IDA7CVwNCi0JCQkJ CQkgICAgd2hpbGUoaS0tID4gMCl7CVwNCi0JCQkJCQkJV1JBUF9BTkNIT1Io RikJXA0KLQkJCQkJCQkgID0gKFdSQVBfQU5DSE9SKEYpIFwNCi0JCQkJCQkJ ICAgICAgICAqIDEwKQlcDQotCQkJCQkJCQkrICgqKytzLScwJyk7XA0KLQkJ CQkJCQkgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCpzKTtcDQotCQkJCQkJICAgIH0J CQlcDQotCQkJCQkJfQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICB9CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAg ICBicmVhazsJCQlcDQotCQkJCQkgIGNhc2UgVEFHX0ZHQ09MT1IgOgkJXA0K LQkJCQkJICAgIGlmKHBpY29fdXNpbmdjb2xvcigpCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAg ICAmJiBuID49IFJHQkxFTil7CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChG KS0+bmV4dCxUQUdfRU1CRUQpO1wNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYp LT5uZXh0LFRBR19GR0NPTE9SKTtcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBpZighV1JBUF9D T0xPUihGKSkJXA0KLQkJCQkJCVdSQVBfQ09MT1IoRik9bmV3X2NvbG9yX3Bh aXIoTlVMTCxOVUxMKTsgXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgICAgc3RybmNweShXUkFQX0NP TE9SKEYpLT5mZywgXA0KLQkJCQkJCSAgICAgIHMrMSwgUkdCTEVOKTsJXA0K LQkJCQkJICAgICAgV1JBUF9DT0xPUihGKS0+ZmdbUkdCTEVOXT0nXDAnOyBc DQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBpID0gUkdCTEVOOwkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgICAgbiAt PSBpOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAgIHdoaWxlKGktLSA+IDApCQlcDQotCQkJ CQkJR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsCVwNCi0JCQkJCQkJKCorK3MpICYgMHhm Zik7CVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICB9CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICBicmVhazsJCQlc DQotCQkJCQkgIGNhc2UgVEFHX0JHQ09MT1IgOgkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIGlm KHBpY29fdXNpbmdjb2xvcigpCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAgICAmJiBuID49IFJH QkxFTil7CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBHRl9QVVRDKChGKS0+bmV4dCxUQUdf RU1CRUQpO1wNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAgIEdGX1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LFRBR19C R0NPTE9SKTtcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBpZighV1JBUF9DT0xPUihGKSkJXA0K LQkJCQkJCVdSQVBfQ09MT1IoRik9bmV3X2NvbG9yX3BhaXIoTlVMTCxOVUxM KTsgXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgICAgc3RybmNweShXUkFQX0NPTE9SKEYpLT5iZyxc DQotCQkJCQkJICAgICAgcysxLCBSR0JMRU4pOwlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBX UkFQX0NPTE9SKEYpLT5iZ1tSR0JMRU5dPSdcMCc7IFwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAg IGkgPSBSR0JMRU47CQlcDQotCQkJCQkgICAgICBuIC09IGk7CQkJXA0KLQkJ CQkJICAgICAgd2hpbGUoaS0tID4gMCkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCQlHRl9QVVRDKChG KS0+bmV4dCwJXA0KLQkJCQkJCQkoKisrcykgJiAweGZmKTsJXA0KLQkJCQkJ ICAgIH0JCQkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIGJyZWFrOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCSAgZGVm YXVsdCA6CQkJXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgIGJyZWFrOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkJCX0JCQkJ XA0KLQkJCQkgICAgfQkJCQkJXA0KLQkJCQl9CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJCWVsc2Ug aWYoVil7CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkJICAgIGlmKCpzID09IFRBQikJCQlcDQotCQkJ CSAgICAgIHdoaWxlKCsrKEYpLT5uICYgMHgwNykgOwkJXA0KLQkJCQkgICAg ZWxzZQkJCQlcDQotCQkJCSAgICAgIChGKS0+biArPSAoaXNjbnRybCgodW5z aWduZWQgY2hhcikgKnMpID8gMiA6IDEpOyBcDQotCQkJCSAgICBpZigoRikt Pm4gPD0gV1JBUF9NQVhfQ09MKEYpKXsJXA0KLQkJCQkgICAgICBHRl9QVVRD KChGKS0+bmV4dCwgKCpzKSAmIDB4ZmYpOwlcDQotCQkJCSAgICB9CQkJCQlc DQotCQkJCSAgICBlbHNlewkJCQkJXA0KLQkJCQkgICAgICBkcHJpbnQoMiwg KGRlYnVnZmlsZSwgIi0tIGdmX3dyYXA6IE9WRVJSVU46ICVjXG4iLCAoKnMp ICYgMHhmZikpOyBcDQotCQkJCSAgICB9CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJCSAgICBXUkFQ X0FMTFdTUChGKSA9IDA7CQkJXA0KLQkJCQl9CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIH0J CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJfQ0KLQ0KLSNkZWZpbmUJV1JBUF9GTFVTSF9FTUJFRChG KQl7CQkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIHJlZ2lzdGVyIGNoYXIgKnM7CQkJCVwNCi0J CQkgICAgcmVnaXN0ZXIgaW50ICAgbjsJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBzID0gKGNo YXIgKilzb190ZXh0KFdSQVBfU1BBQ0VTKEYpKTsJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBuID0g c29fdGVsbChXUkFQX1NQQUNFUyhGKSk7CQlcDQotCQkJICAgIHNvX3NlZWso V1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoRiksIDBMLCAwKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgV1JBUF9GTFVT SF9TKEYscyxuLDApOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgc29fdHJ1bmNhdGUoV1JBUF9T UEFDRVMoRiksIDBMKTsJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgV1JBUF9TUENfTEVOKEYpID0g MDsJCQlcDQotfQ0KLQ0KLSNkZWZpbmUJV1JBUF9GTFVTSChGKQl7CQkJCQkJ XA0KLQkJCSAgICByZWdpc3RlciBjaGFyICpzOwkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIHJl Z2lzdGVyIGludCAgIG47CQkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgcyA9IChjaGFyICopc29f dGV4dChXUkFQX1NQQUNFUyhGKSk7CVwNCi0JCQkgICAgbiA9IHNvX3RlbGwo V1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoRikpOwkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBzb19zZWVrKFdSQVBfU1BB Q0VTKEYpLCAwTCwgMCk7CQlcDQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfRkxVU0hfUyhGLHMs biwxKTsJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIHNvX3RydW5jYXRlKFdSQVBfU1BBQ0VTKEYp LCAwTCk7CQlcDQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfU1BDX0xFTihGKSA9IDA7CQkJXA0K LQkJCSAgICBzID0gKEYpLT5saW5lOwkJCQlcDQotCQkJICAgIG4gPSAoRikt PmxpbmVwIC0gKEYpLT5saW5lOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgV1JBUF9GTFVTSF9T KEYscyxuLDEpOwkJCVwNCi0JCQkgICAgKEYpLT5mMiAgICA9IDA7CQkJCVwN Ci0JCQkgICAgKEYpLT5saW5lcCA9IChGKS0+bGluZTsJCQlcDQotCQkJICAg IFdSQVBfUEJfT0ZGKEYpID0gMDsJCQkJXA0KLQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX1BCX0xF TihGKSA9IDA7CQkJCVwNCi0JCQl9DQotDQotI2RlZmluZSBXUkFQX1FVT1RF X0lOU0VSVChGKSB7ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0gICAgaW50IGo7ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgXA0KLSAgICBDT0xPUl9QQUlSICpjb2wgPSBOVUxMOyAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotICAg IGZvcihqID0gMDsgaiA8IFdSQVBfRkxfUUQoRik7IGorKyl7ICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0JKEYpLT5uICs9IDI7 ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotCWlmKFdSQVBfVVNFX0NMUihmKSl7ICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkg ICAgaWYoKGogJSAzKSA9PSAwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0JICAgICAgICYmIHBzX2dsb2Jh bC0+VkFSX1FVT1RFMV9GT1JFX0NPTE9SICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBcDQotCSAgICAgICAmJiBwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTFfQkFD S19DT0xPUiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkgICAgICAg JiYgKGNvbCA9IG5ld19jb2xvcl9wYWlyKHBzX2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX1FVT1RF MV9GT1JFX0NPTE9SLCAgIFwNCi0JCQkJCXBzX2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX1FVT1RF MV9CQUNLX0NPTE9SKSkgIFwNCi0JICAgICAgICYmIHBpY29faXNfZ29vZF9j b2xvcnBhaXIoY29sKSl7ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBc DQotICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEdGX0NPTE9SX1BVVEMoKEYpLCBjb2wpOyAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0gICAgICAg ICAgICB9ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkgICAgZWxzZSBpZigoaiAl IDMpID09IDEgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIFwNCi0JCSAgICAmJiBwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTJfRk9S RV9DT0xPUiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0JCSAgICAmJiBwc19n bG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTJfQkFDS19DT0xPUiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIFwNCi0JCSAgICAmJiAoY29sID0gbmV3X2NvbG9yX3BhaXIocHNfZ2xv YmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUyX0ZPUkVfQ09MT1IsIFwNCi0JCQkJCSAgICAgcHNf Z2xvYmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUyX0JBQ0tfQ09MT1IpKSBcDQotCQkgICAgJiYg cGljb19pc19nb29kX2NvbG9ycGFpcihjb2wpKXsgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBcDQotCSAgICAgICAgR0ZfQ09MT1JfUFVUQygoRiksIGNvbCk7 ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLSAgICAg ICAgICAgIH0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotCSAgICBlbHNlIGlmKChq ICUgMykgPT0gMiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkJICAgICYmIHBzX2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX1FVT1RFM19G T1JFX0NPTE9SICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkJICAgICYmIHBz X2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX1FVT1RFM19CQUNLX0NPTE9SICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgXA0KLQkJICAgICYmIChjb2wgPSBuZXdfY29sb3JfcGFpcihwc19n bG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTNfRk9SRV9DT0xPUiwgXA0KLQkJCQkJICAgICBw c19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTNfQkFDS19DT0xPUikpIFwNCi0JCSAgICAm JiBwaWNvX2lzX2dvb2RfY29sb3JwYWlyKGNvbCkpeyAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0JICAgICAgICBHRl9DT0xPUl9QVVRDKChGKSwgY29s KTsgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotICAg ICAgICAgICAgfSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0JICAgIGlmKGNvbCl7 ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotCQlmcmVlX2NvbG9yX3BhaXIoJmNvbCk7ICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotCQljb2wgPSBO VUxMOyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBcDQotCSAgICB9ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQl9ICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0JR0ZfUFVUQygoRiktPm5leHQsICc+ Jyk7ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICBcDQotCWlmKCFXUkFQX0xWX0ZMRChGKSkgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkgIEdGX1BVVEMo KEYpLT5uZXh0LCAnICcpOyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIFwNCi0gICAgfSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgXA0KLSAgICBpZihqICYmIFdSQVBfTFZfRkxEKEYpKXsgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBcDQotCUdG X1BVVEMoKEYpLT5uZXh0LCAnICcpOyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLQkoRiktPm4rKzsgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIFwNCi0gICAgfSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgXA0KLX0N CitpbnQgICAgIHdyYXBfZmx1c2ggUFJPVE8oKEZJTFRFUl9TICosIHVuc2ln bmVkIGNoYXIgKiosIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiosDQorCQkJICB1bnNpZ25l ZCBjaGFyICoqLCB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqKSk7DQoraW50ICAgICB3cmFw X2ZsdXNoX2VtYmVkIFBST1RPKChGSUxURVJfUyAqLCB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFy ICoqLCB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqLA0KKwkJCQl1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoq LCB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqKSk7DQoraW50ICAgICB3cmFwX2ZsdXNoX3Mg UFJPVE8oKEZJTFRFUl9TICosY2hhciAqLCBpbnQsIGludCwgdW5zaWduZWQg Y2hhciAqKiwNCisJCQkgICAgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKiwNCisJCQkgICAg dW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKiwgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKikpOw0KK2ludCAg ICAgd3JhcF9lb2wgUFJPVE8oKEZJTFRFUl9TICosIGludCwgdW5zaWduZWQg Y2hhciAqKiwgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKiwNCisJCQkgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNo YXIgKiosIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiopKTsNCitpbnQgICAgIHdyYXBfYm9s IFBST1RPKChGSUxURVJfUyAqLCBpbnQsIGludCwgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAq KiwNCisJCQl1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqLCB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqLCB1 bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqKSk7DQoraW50ICAgICB3cmFwX3F1b3RlX2luc2Vy dCBQUk9UTygoRklMVEVSX1MgKiwgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKiwNCisJCQkJ IHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiosIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiosIA0KKwkJCQkg dW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKikpOw0KIA0KIC8qDQogICogdGhlIG5vIGxvbmdl ciBzaW1wbGUgZmlsdGVyLCBicmVha3MgbGluZXMgYXQgZW5kIG9mIHdoaXRl IHNwYWNlIG5lYXJlc3QNCkBAIC03MTU3LDggKzY5MjIsOCBAQA0KIAkJICAg IH0NCiAJCSAgICBlbHNlewkJCQkvKiBmaXhlZCBsaW5lICovDQogCQkJV1JB UF9IQVJEKGYpID0gMTsNCi0JCQlXUkFQX0ZMVVNIKGYpOwkJCS8qIGl0J3Mg YSBuZXdsaW5lIHRvIHVzICovDQotCQkJV1JBUF9FT0woZiwgMCk7DQorCQkJ d3JhcF9mbHVzaChmLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZvcCwgJmVvYik7DQorCQkJd3Jh cF9lb2woZiwgMCwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZlb2IpOw0KIA0KIAkJCS8q DQogCQkJICogV2hlbiB3ZSBnZXQgdG8gYSByZWFsIGVuZCBvZiBsaW5lLCB3 ZSBkb24ndCBuZWVkIHRvDQpAQCAtNzE3NSw4ICs2OTQwLDggQEANCiAJCSAg ICAvKiBlbHNlIGMgaXMgZmlyc3QgY2hhciBvZiBuZXcgbGluZSwgZmFsbCB0 aHJ1ICovDQogCQl9DQogCQllbHNlew0KLQkJICAgIFdSQVBfRkxVU0goZik7 CQkJLyogaXQncyBhIG5ld2xpbmUgdG8gdXMgKi8NCi0JCSAgICBXUkFQX0VP TChmLCAwKTsNCisJCSAgICB3cmFwX2ZsdXNoKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9w LCAmZW9iKTsNCisJCSAgICB3cmFwX2VvbChmLCAwLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZv cCwgJmVvYik7DQogCQkgICAgV1JBUF9DT0xPUl9VTlNFVChmKTsJCS8qIHNl ZSBub3RlIGFib3ZlICovDQogCQkgICAgaWYoYyA9PSAnXDAxMicpew0KIAkJ CWJyZWFrOw0KQEAgLTcyMDQsMjAgKzY5NjksMjEgQEANCiAJCQkgICAgV1JB UF9GTF9RRChmKSA9IDA7DQogCQkJICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfSEFSRChmKSA9PSAw KXsNCiAJCQkJV1JBUF9IQVJEKGYpID0gMTsNCi0JCQkJV1JBUF9GTFVTSChm KTsJCS8qIGl0J3MgYSBuZXdsaW5lIHRvIHVzICovDQotCQkJCVdSQVBfRU9M KGYsIDApOw0KKwkJCQl3cmFwX2ZsdXNoKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLCAm ZW9iKTsNCisJCQkJd3JhcF9lb2woZiwgMCwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZl b2IpOw0KIAkJCQlXUkFQX0NPTE9SX1VOU0VUKGYpOwkvKiBzZWUgbm90ZSBh Ym92ZSAqLw0KIAkJCSAgICB9DQogCQkJfQ0KIA0KIAkJCWlmKFdSQVBfSEFS RChmKSl7DQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfQk9MKGYsMCwxKTsJCS8qIHdyaXRlIHF1 b3RpbmcgcHJlZml4ICovDQorCQkJICAgIHdyYXBfYm9sKGYsIDAsIDEsICZp cCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLA0KKwkJCQkgICAgICZlb2IpOyAgIC8qIHdyaXRlIHF1 b3RpbmcgcHJlZml4ICovDQogCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfSEFSRChmKSA9IDA7CQkJ ICAgIA0KIAkJCX0NCiANCiAJCQlzd2l0Y2ggKGMpIHsNCiAJCQkgIGNhc2Ug J1wwMTUnIDoJCQkvKiBhIGJsYW5rIGxpbmU/ICovDQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBf RkxVU0goZik7CQkvKiBmbHVzaCB3aGF0IHdlIGdvdCAqLw0KKwkJCSAgICB3 cmFwX2ZsdXNoKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLCAmZW9iKTsNCiAJCQkgICAg c3RhdGUgPSBDQ1I7CQkvKiBnbyBjb2xsZWN0IGl0ICovDQogCQkJICAgIGJy ZWFrOw0KIA0KQEAgLTcyMjYsMTEgKzY5OTIsOSBAQA0KIAkJCSAgICBicmVh azsNCiANCiAJCQkgIGNhc2UgJy0nIDoJCQkvKiBwb3NzaWJsZSBzaWctZGFz aCAqLw0KLQkJCSAgICBpZighV1JBUF9GTF9TSUcoZikpewkvKiBvbmx5IG9u ZSBhbGxvd2VkPyAqLw0KIAkJCQlXUkFQX0ZMX1NJRyhmKSA9IDE7CS8qIGlu aXQgc3RhdGUgKi8NCiAJCQkJc3RhdGUgPSBGTF9TSUc7CQkvKiBnbyBjb2xs ZWN0IGl0ICovDQogCQkJCWJyZWFrOw0KLQkJCSAgICB9DQogDQogCQkJICBk ZWZhdWx0IDoNCiAJCQkgICAgc3RhdGUgPSBERkw7CQkvKiBnbyBiYWNrIHRv IG5vcm1hbCAqLw0KQEAgLTcyNDEsMTEgKzcwMDUsMTIgQEANCiAJCWVsc2V7 DQogCQkgICAgc3RhdGUgPSBERkw7DQogCQkgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9DT01NQShm KSAmJiBjID09IFRBQil7DQotCQkJV1JBUF9CT0woZiwxLDApOwkJLyogY29u dmVydCB0byBub3JtYWwgaW5kZW50ICovDQorCQkJd3JhcF9ib2woZiwgMSwg MCwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsDQorCQkJCSAmZW9iKTsgICAgLyogY29udmVy dCB0byBub3JtYWwgaW5kZW50ICovDQogCQkJYnJlYWs7DQogCQkgICAgfQ0K IA0KLQkJICAgIFdSQVBfQk9MKGYsMCwwKTsNCisJCSAgICB3cmFwX2JvbChm LDAsMCwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZlb2IpOw0KIAkJICAgIGdvdG8gY2Fz ZV9kZmw7CQkJLyogaGFuZGxlIGMgbGlrZSBERkwgY2FzZSAqLw0KIAkJfQ0K IA0KQEAgLTcyNjksMjAgKzcwMzQsMjAgQEANCiAJCQlXUkFQX0ZMX1FEKGYp ID0gV1JBUF9GTF9RQyhmKTsNCiAJCQlpZihXUkFQX0hBUkQoZikgPT0gMCl7 CQkvKiBhZGQgaGFyZCBuZXdsaW5lICovIA0KIAkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0hBUkQo ZikgPSAxOwkJLyogaGFyZCBuZXdsaW5lICovDQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfRkxV U0goZik7DQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfRU9MKGYsIDApOw0KKwkJCSAgICB3cmFw X2ZsdXNoKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLCAmZW9iKTsNCisJCQkgICAgd3Jh cF9lb2woZiwgMCwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZlb2IpOw0KIAkJCSAgICBX UkFQX0NPTE9SX1VOU0VUKGYpOwkvKiBzZWUgbm90ZSBhYm92ZSAqLw0KIAkJ CX0NCiAJCSAgICB9DQogDQogCQkgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9IQVJEKGYpKXsNCi0J CQlXUkFQX0JPTChmLDAsMSk7DQorCQkJd3JhcF9ib2woZiwwLDEsICZpcCwg JmVpYiwgJm9wLCAmZW9iKTsNCiAJCQlXUkFQX0hBUkQoZikgPSAwOw0KIAkJ ICAgIH0NCiANCiAJCSAgICBzd2l0Y2ggKGMpIHsNCiAJCSAgICAgIGNhc2Ug J1wwMTUnIDoJCQkvKiBhIGJsYW5rIGxpbmU/ICovDQotCQkJV1JBUF9GTFVT SChmKTsJCQkvKiBmbHVzaCB3aGF0IHdlIGdvdCAqLw0KKwkJCXdyYXBfZmx1 c2goZiwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZlb2IpOw0KIAkJCXN0YXRlID0gQ0NS OwkJCS8qIGdvIGNvbGxlY3QgaXQgKi8NCiAJCQlicmVhazsNCiANCkBAIC03 MjkxLDExICs3MDU2LDkgQEANCiAJCQlicmVhazsNCiANCiAJCSAgICAgIGNh c2UgJy0nIDoJCQkvKiBzaWcgZGFzaD8gKi8NCi0JCQlpZighV1JBUF9GTF9T SUcoZikpewkJLyogb25seSBvbmUgYWxsb3dlZD8gKi8NCiAJCQkgICAgV1JB UF9GTF9TSUcoZikgPSAxOw0KIAkJCSAgICBzdGF0ZSA9IEZMX1NJRzsNCiAJ CQkgICAgYnJlYWs7DQotCQkJfQ0KIA0KIAkJICAgICAgZGVmYXVsdCA6CQkJ CS8qIHNvbWV0aGluZyBlbHNlICovDQogCQkJc3RhdGUgPSBERkw7DQpAQCAt NzMwOCw3ICs3MDcxLDcgQEANCiAJICAgICAgY2FzZSBGTF9TVEYgOgkJCQkv KiBzcGFjZSBzdHVmZmVkICovDQogCQlzd2l0Y2ggKGMpIHsNCiAJCSAgY2Fz ZSAnXDAxNScgOgkJCQkvKiBhIGJsYW5rIGxpbmU/ICovDQotCQkgICAgV1JB UF9GTFVTSChmKTsJCQkvKiBmbHVzaCB3aGF0IHdlIGdvdCAqLw0KKwkJICAg IHdyYXBfZmx1c2goZiwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZlb2IpOw0KIAkJICAg IHN0YXRlID0gQ0NSOwkJCS8qIGdvIGNvbGxlY3QgaXQgKi8NCiAJCSAgICBi cmVhazsNCiANCkBAIC03MzE5LDEyICs3MDgyLDEwIEBADQogCQkgICAgY29u dGludWU7DQogDQogCQkgIGNhc2UgJy0nIDoJCQkJLyogc2lnIGRhc2g/ICov DQotCQkgICAgaWYoIVdSQVBfRkxfU0lHKGYpKXsNCiAJCQlXUkFQX0ZMX1NJ RyhmKSA9IDE7DQogCQkJV1JBUF9BTExXU1AoZikgPSAwOw0KIAkJCXN0YXRl ID0gRkxfU0lHOw0KIAkJCWJyZWFrOw0KLQkJICAgIH0NCiANCiAJCSAgZGVm YXVsdCA6CQkJCS8qIHNvbWV0aGluZyBlbHNlICovDQogCQkgICAgc3RhdGUg PSBERkw7DQpAQCAtNzMzOCw5ICs3MDk5LDEyIEBADQogCQkgIGNhc2UgMSA6 DQogCQkgICAgaWYoYyAhPSAnLScpewkJCS8qIG5vdCBhIHNpZ2Rhc2ggKi8N CiAJCQlpZigoZi0+biArIFdSQVBfU1BDX0xFTihmKSArIDEpID4gV1JBUF9D T0woZikpew0KLQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0ZMVVNIX0VNQkVEKGYpOwkvKiBub3Rl IGFueSBlbWJlZGRlZCAqLw0KLQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0VPTChmLCAxKTsJCS8q IHBsdW5rIGRvd24gbmV3bGluZSAqLw0KLQkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0JPTChmLDEs MSk7CQkvKiB3cml0ZSBhbnkgcHJlZml4ICovDQorCQkJICAgIHdyYXBfZmx1 c2hfZW1iZWQoZiwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsDQorCQkJCQkgICAgICZlb2Ip OyAgICAgIC8qIG5vdGUgYW55IGVtYmVkZGVkKi8NCisJCQkgICAgd3JhcF9l b2woZiwgMSwgJmlwLCAmZWliLA0KKwkJCQkgICAgICZvcCwgJmVvYik7ICAg ICAgIC8qIHBsdW5rIGRvd24gbmV3bGluZSAqLw0KKwkJCSAgICB3cmFwX2Jv bChmLCAxLCAxLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsDQorCQkJCSAgICAgJm9wLCAmZW9iKTsg ICAgICAgICAvKiB3cml0ZSBhbnkgcHJlZml4ICovDQogCQkJfQ0KIA0KIAkJ CVdSQVBfUFVUQyhmLCctJywgMSk7CQkvKiB3cml0ZSB3aGF0IHdlIGdvdCAq Lw0KQEAgLTczNTcsOSArNzEyMSwxMiBAQA0KIAkJICBjYXNlIDIgOg0KIAkJ ICAgIGlmKGMgIT0gJyAnKXsJCQkvKiBub3QgYSBzaWdkYXNoICovDQogCQkJ aWYoKGYtPm4gKyBXUkFQX1NQQ19MRU4oZikgKyAyKSA+IFdSQVBfQ09MKGYp KXsNCi0JCQkgICAgV1JBUF9GTFVTSF9FTUJFRChmKTsJLyogbm90ZSBhbnkg ZW1iZWRkZWQgKi8NCi0JCQkgICAgV1JBUF9FT0woZiwgMSk7CQkvKiBwbHVu ayBkb3duIG5ld2xpbmUgKi8NCi0JCQkgICAgV1JBUF9CT0woZiwxLDEpOwkJ Lyogd3JpdGUgYW55IHByZWZpeCAqLw0KKwkJCSAgICB3cmFwX2ZsdXNoX2Vt YmVkKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLA0KKwkJCQkJICAgICAmZW9iKTsgICAg ICAvKiBub3RlIGFueSBlbWJlZGRlZCovDQorCQkJICAgIHdyYXBfZW9sKGYs IDEsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwNCisJCQkJICAgICAmb3AsICZlb2IpOyAgICAgICAv KiBwbHVuayBkb3duIG5ld2xpbmUgKi8NCisJCQkgICAgd3JhcF9ib2woZiwg MSwgMSwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsIA0KKwkJCQkgICAgICZlb2IpOyAgIAkg ICAgICAgICAvKiB3cml0ZSBhbnkgcHJlZml4ICovDQogCQkJfQ0KIA0KIAkJ CVdSQVBfUFVUQyhmLCctJywgMSk7CQkvKiB3cml0ZSB3aGF0IHdlIGdvdCAq Lw0KQEAgLTczOTUsNyArNzE2Miw3IEBADQogDQogCQkgICAgICBkZWZhdWx0 IDoJCQkJLyogdGhhdCdzIG5vIHNpZ2Rhc2ghICovDQogCQkJV1JBUF9GTF9T SUcoZikgPSAwOw0KLQkJCVdSQVBfRkxVU0goZik7DQorCQkJd3JhcF9mbHVz aChmLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZvcCwgJmVvYik7DQogCQkJV1JBUF9TUENfTEVO KGYpID0gMTsNCiAJCQlzdGF0ZSA9IERGTDsJCQkvKiBzZXQgbm9ybWFsIHN0 YXRlICovDQogCQkJZ290byBjYXNlX2RmbDsJCQkvKiBhbmQgZ28gZG8gImMi ICovDQpAQCAtNzQzNSw5ICs3MjAyLDggQEANCiAJCQkJV1JBUF9QQl9MRU4o ZikgPSBmLT5mMjsNCiAJCQkJYnJlYWs7DQogCQkJICAgIH0NCi0JCQkgICAg ZWxzZXsNCi0JCQkJV1JBUF9GTFVTSChmKTsNCi0JCQkgICAgfQ0KKwkJCSAg ICBlbHNlDQorCQkJICAgICAgd3JhcF9mbHVzaChmLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZv cCwgJmVvYik7DQogCQkJfQ0KIA0KIAkJCXN3aXRjaChjKXsJCQkvKiByZW1l bWJlciBzZXBhcmF0b3IgKi8NCkBAIC03NDc1LDkgKzcyNDEsOSBAQA0KIAkJ CWNvbnRpbnVlOw0KIA0KIAkJICAgICAgY2FzZSAnXDAxMicgOgkJCS8qIGJh cmUgTEYgaW4gdGV4dD8gKi8NCi0JCQlXUkFQX0ZMVVNIKGYpOwkJCS8qIHRo ZXkgbXVzdCd2ZSBtZWFudCAqLw0KLQkJCVdSQVBfRU9MKGYsIDApOwkJCS8q IG5ld2xpbmUuLi4gKi8NCi0JCQlXUkFQX0JPTChmLDEsMSk7DQorCQkJd3Jh cF9mbHVzaChmLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZvcCwgJmVvYik7IC8qIHRoZXkgbXVz dCd2ZSAqLw0KKwkJCXdyYXBfZW9sKGYsIDAsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLCAm ZW9iKTsgICAgICAgLyogbWVhbnQgKi8NCisJCQl3cmFwX2JvbChmLDEsMSwg JmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsICZlb2IpOyAvKiBuZXdsaW5lLi4uICovDQogCQkJ Y29udGludWU7DQogDQogCQkgICAgICBjYXNlICh1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyKSBU QUdfRU1CRUQgOg0KQEAgLTc0ODksMTYgKzcyNTUsMTkgQEANCiAJCSAgICAg IGNhc2UgJywnIDoNCiAJCQlpZighV1JBUF9RVU9URUQoZikpew0KIAkJCSAg ICBpZihmLT5uICsgV1JBUF9TUENfTEVOKGYpICsgZi0+ZjIgKyAxID4gV1JB UF9DT0woZikpew0KLQkJCQlpZihXUkFQX0FMTFdTUChmKSl7CS8qIGlmIGFu eXRoaW5nIHZpc2libGUgKi8NCi0JCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfRkxVU0goZik7CS8q IGJsYXQgYnVmJ2QgY2hhcnMgKi8NCi0JCQkJfQ0KLQ0KLQkJCQlXUkFQX0VP TChmLCAxKTsJCS8qIHBsdW5rIGRvd24gbmV3bGluZSAqLw0KLQkJCQlXUkFQ X0JPTChmLDEsMSk7CS8qIHdyaXRlIGFueSBwcmVmaXggKi8NCisJCQkJaWYo V1JBUF9BTExXU1AoZikpICAgIC8qIGlmIGFueXRoaW5nIHZpc2libGUgKi8N CisJCQkJICB3cmFwX2ZsdXNoKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLA0KKwkJCQkJ ICAgICAmZW9iKTsgIC8qIC4uLiBibGF0IGJ1ZidkIGNoYXJzICovDQorDQor CQkJCXdyYXBfZW9sKGYsIDEsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLA0KKwkJCQkJICZl b2IpOyAgLyogcGx1bmsgZG93biBuZXdsaW5lICovDQorCQkJCXdyYXBfYm9s KGYsIDEsIDEsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLA0KKwkJCQkJICZlb2IpOyAgICAv KiB3cml0ZSBhbnkgcHJlZml4ICovDQogCQkJICAgIH0NCiANCiAJCQkgICAg V1JBUF9QVVRDKGYsICcsJywgMSk7CS8qIHB1dCBvdXQgY29tbWEgKi8NCi0J CQkgICAgV1JBUF9GTFVTSChmKTsJCS8qIHdyaXRlIGJ1ZidkIGNoYXJzICov DQorCQkJICAgIHdyYXBfZmx1c2goZiwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsDQorCQkJ CSAgICAgICAmZW9iKTsgICAgICAgLyogd3JpdGUgYnVmJ2QgY2hhcnMgKi8N CiAJCQkgICAgY29udGludWU7DQogCQkJfQ0KIA0KQEAgLTc1NDEsNyArNzMx MCw4IEBADQogDQogCQkJICAgIGYtPmxpbmVwID0gcDE7DQogDQotCQkJICAg IFdSQVBfRkxVU0goZik7CQkvKiBmbHVzaCBzaG9ydGVuZWQgYnVmICovDQor CQkJICAgIHdyYXBfZmx1c2goZiwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsDQorCQkJCSAg ICAgICAmZW9iKTsgLyogZmx1c2ggc2hvcnRlbmVkIGJ1ZiAqLw0KIAkJCSAg ICANCiAJCQkgICAgd2hpbGUocDEgPCBwMil7DQogCQkJCWNoYXIgYzIgPSAq cDErKzsNCkBAIC03NTUzLDE4ICs3MzIzLDIxIEBADQogCQkJCXZpcy0tOw0K IAkJCSAgICB9DQogCQkJfQ0KLQkJCWVsc2V7DQotCQkJICAgIFdSQVBfRkxV U0goZik7CQkvKiBmbHVzaCB3aGF0J3MgYnVmJ2QgKi8NCi0JCQl9DQorCQkJ ZWxzZQ0KKwkJCSAgd3JhcF9mbHVzaChmLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZvcCwgJmVv Yik7DQogDQotCQkJV1JBUF9FT0woZiwgMSk7CQkJLyogcGx1bmsgZG93biBu ZXdsaW5lICovDQotCQkJV1JBUF9CT0woZiwxLDEpOwkJLyogd3JpdGUgYW55 IHByZWZpeCAqLw0KKwkJCXdyYXBfZW9sKGYsIDEsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9w LA0KKwkJCQkgJmVvYik7ICAgICAvKiBwbHVuayBkb3duIG5ld2xpbmUgKi8N CisJCQl3cmFwX2JvbChmLDEsMSwgJmlwLCAmZWliLCAmb3AsDQorCQkJCSAm ZW9iKTsgICAgICAvKiB3cml0ZSBhbnkgcHJlZml4ICovDQogCQkgICAgfQ0K IAkJfQ0KIAkJZWxzZSBpZigoZi0+biArIFdSQVBfU1BDX0xFTihmKSArIGYt PmYyICsgeCkgPiBXUkFQX0NPTChmKSl7DQotCQkgICAgV1JBUF9GTFVTSF9F TUJFRChmKTsJCS8qIG5vdGUgYW55IGVtYmVkZGVkICovDQotCQkgICAgV1JB UF9FT0woZiwgMSk7CQkJLyogcGx1bmsgZG93biBuZXdsaW5lICovDQotCQkg ICAgV1JBUF9CT0woZiwxLDEpOwkJCS8qIHdyaXRlIGFueSBwcmVmaXggKi8N CisJCSAgICB3cmFwX2ZsdXNoX2VtYmVkKGYsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLCAm ZW9iKTsNCisJCSAgICB3cmFwX2VvbChmLCAxLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZvcCwN CisJCQkgICAgICZlb2IpOwkgICAgLyogcGx1bmsgZG93biBuZXdsaW5lICov DQorCQkgICAgd3JhcF9ib2woZiwxLDEsICZpcCwgJmVpYiwgJm9wLA0KKwkJ CSAgICAgJmVvYik7CSAgICAgIC8qIHdyaXRlIGFueSBwcmVmaXggKi8NCiAJ CX0NCiANCiAJCVdSQVBfUFVUQyhmLCBjLCAxKTsNCkBAIC03NjE3LDcgKzcz OTAsNyBAQA0KIAlHRl9FTkQoZiwgZi0+bmV4dCk7DQogICAgIH0NCiAgICAg ZWxzZSBpZihmbGcgPT0gR0ZfRU9EKXsNCi0JV1JBUF9GTFVTSChmKTsNCisJ d3JhcF9mbHVzaChmLCAmaXAsICZlaWIsICZvcCwgJmVvYik7DQogCWlmKFdS QVBfQ09MT1IoZikpDQogCSAgZnJlZV9jb2xvcl9wYWlyKCZXUkFQX0NPTE9S KGYpKTsNCiANCkBAIC03NjU2LDYgKzc0MjksMzEzIEBADQogICAgIH0NCiB9 DQogDQoraW50DQord3JhcF9mbHVzaChmLCBpcHAsIGVpYnAsIG9wcCwgZW9i cCkNCisgICAgRklMVEVSX1MgKmY7DQorICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKipp cHA7DQorICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiplaWJwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25l ZCBjaGFyICoqb3BwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqZW9icDsNCit7 DQorICAgIHJlZ2lzdGVyIGNoYXIgKnM7DQorICAgIHJlZ2lzdGVyIGludCAg IG47DQorICAgIHMgPSAoY2hhciAqKXNvX3RleHQoV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoZikp Ow0KKyAgICBuID0gc29fdGVsbChXUkFQX1NQQUNFUyhmKSk7DQorICAgIHNv X3NlZWsoV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoZiksIDBMLCAwKTsNCisgICAgd3JhcF9mbHVz aF9zKGYsIHMsIG4sIDEsIGlwcCwgZWlicCwgb3BwLCBlb2JwKTsNCisgICAg c29fdHJ1bmNhdGUoV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoZiksIDBMKTsNCisgICAgV1JBUF9T UENfTEVOKGYpID0gMDsNCisgICAgcyA9IGYtPmxpbmU7DQorICAgIG4gPSBm LT5saW5lcCAtIGYtPmxpbmU7DQorICAgIHdyYXBfZmx1c2hfcyhmLCBzLCBu LCAxLCBpcHAsIGVpYnAsIG9wcCwgZW9icCk7DQorICAgIGYtPmYyICAgID0g MDsNCisgICAgZi0+bGluZXAgPSBmLT5saW5lOw0KKyAgICBXUkFQX1BCX09G RihmKSA9IDA7DQorICAgIFdSQVBfUEJfTEVOKGYpID0gMDsNCit9DQorDQor aW50DQord3JhcF9mbHVzaF9lbWJlZChmLCBpcHAsIGVpYnAsIG9wcCwgZW9i cCkNCisgICAgRklMVEVSX1MgICAgKmY7DQorICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIg KippcHA7DQorICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiplaWJwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNp Z25lZCBjaGFyICoqb3BwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqZW9icDsN Cit7DQorICByZWdpc3RlciBjaGFyICpzOw0KKyAgcmVnaXN0ZXIgaW50ICAg bjsNCisgIHMgPSAoY2hhciAqKXNvX3RleHQoV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoZikpOw0K KyAgbiA9IHNvX3RlbGwoV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMoZikpOw0KKyAgc29fc2VlayhX UkFQX1NQQUNFUyhmKSwgMEwsIDApOw0KKyAgd3JhcF9mbHVzaF9zKGYsIHMs IG4sIDAsIGlwcCwgZWlicCwgb3BwLCBlb2JwKTsNCisgIHNvX3RydW5jYXRl KFdSQVBfU1BBQ0VTKGYpLCAwTCk7DQorICBXUkFQX1NQQ19MRU4oZikgPSAw Ow0KK30NCisNCitpbnQNCit3cmFwX2ZsdXNoX3MoZiwgcywgbiwgdiwgaXBw LCBlaWJwLCBvcHAsIGVvYnApDQorICAgIEZJTFRFUl9TICAgICpmOw0KKyAg ICBjaGFyICAgICAgICAqczsNCisgICAgaW50ICAgICAgICAgIG47DQorICAg IGludCAgICAgICAgICB2Ow0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqaXBwOw0K KyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqZWlicDsNCisgICAgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hh ciAqKm9wcDsNCisgICAgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKmVvYnA7DQorew0KKyAg ICBmb3IoOyBuID4gMDsgbi0tLHMrKyl7DQorCWlmKCpzID09IFRBR19FTUJF RCl7DQorCSAgICBpZihuLS0gPiAwKXsNCisJCXN3aXRjaCgqKytzKXsNCisJ CSAgY2FzZSBUQUdfQk9MRE9OIDoNCisJCSAgICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5u ZXh0LFRBR19FTUJFRCk7DQorCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCxU QUdfQk9MRE9OKTsNCisJCSAgICBXUkFQX0JPTEQoZikgPSAxOw0KKwkJICAg IGJyZWFrOw0KKwkJICBjYXNlIFRBR19CT0xET0ZGIDoNCisJCSAgICBHRl9Q VVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LFRBR19FTUJFRCk7DQorCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19H TE8oZi0+bmV4dCxUQUdfQk9MRE9GRik7DQorCQkgICAgV1JBUF9CT0xEKGYp ID0gMDsNCisJCSAgICBicmVhazsNCisJCSAgY2FzZSBUQUdfVUxJTkVPTiA6 DQorCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCxUQUdfRU1CRUQpOw0KKwkJ ICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsVEFHX1VMSU5FT04pOw0KKwkJICAg IFdSQVBfVUxJTkUoZikgPSAxOw0KKwkJICAgIGJyZWFrOw0KKwkJICBjYXNl IFRBR19VTElORU9GRiA6DQorCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCxU QUdfRU1CRUQpOw0KKwkJICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsVEFHX1VM SU5FT0ZGKTsNCisJCSAgICBXUkFQX1VMSU5FKGYpID0gMDsNCisJCSAgICBi cmVhazsNCisJCSAgY2FzZSBUQUdfSU5WT0ZGIDoNCisJCSAgICBHRl9QVVRD X0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LFRBR19FTUJFRCk7DQorCQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8o Zi0+bmV4dCxUQUdfSU5WT0ZGKTsNCisJCSAgICBXUkFQX0FOQ0hPUihmKSA9 IDA7DQorCQkgICAgYnJlYWs7DQorCQkgIGNhc2UgVEFHX0hBTkRMRSA6DQor CQkgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCxUQUdfRU1CRUQpOw0KKwkJICAg IGlmKG4tLSA+IDApew0KKwkJCWludCBpID0gKisrczsNCisJCQlHRl9QVVRD X0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfSEFORExFKTsNCisJCQlpZihpIDw9IG4pew0K KwkJCSAgICBuIC09IGk7DQorCQkJICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQs IGkpOw0KKwkJCSAgICBXUkFQX0FOQ0hPUihmKSA9IDA7DQorCQkJICAgIHdo aWxlKGktLSA+IDApew0KKwkJCQlXUkFQX0FOQ0hPUihmKSA9IChXUkFQX0FO Q0hPUihmKSAqIDEwKSArICgqKytzLScwJyk7DQorCQkJCUdGX1BVVENfR0xP KGYtPm5leHQsKnMpOw0KKwkJCSAgICB9DQorCQkJfQ0KKwkJICAgIH0NCisJ CSAgICBicmVhazsNCisJCSAgY2FzZSBUQUdfRkdDT0xPUiA6DQorCQkgICAg aWYocGljb191c2luZ2NvbG9yKCkgJiYgbiA+PSBSR0JMRU4pew0KKwkJCWlu dCBpOw0KKwkJCUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsNCisJ CQlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LFRBR19GR0NPTE9SKTsNCisJCQlpZigh V1JBUF9DT0xPUihmKSkNCisJCQkgIFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoZik9bmV3X2NvbG9y X3BhaXIoTlVMTCxOVUxMKTsNCisJCQlzdHJuY3B5KFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoZikt PmZnLCBzKzEsIFJHQkxFTik7DQorCQkJV1JBUF9DT0xPUihmKS0+ZmdbUkdC TEVOXT0nXDAnOw0KKwkJCWkgPSBSR0JMRU47DQorCQkJbiAtPSBpOw0KKwkJ CXdoaWxlKGktLSA+IDApDQorCQkJICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LA0K KwkJCQkgICgqKytzKSAmIDB4ZmYpOw0KKwkJICAgIH0NCisJCSAgICBicmVh azsNCisJCSAgY2FzZSBUQUdfQkdDT0xPUiA6DQorCQkgICAgaWYocGljb191 c2luZ2NvbG9yKCkgJiYgbiA+PSBSR0JMRU4pew0KKwkJCWludCBpOw0KKwkJ CUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsNCisJCQlHRl9QVVRD X0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LFRBR19CR0NPTE9SKTsNCisJCQlpZighV1JBUF9DT0xP UihmKSkNCisJCQkgIFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoZik9bmV3X2NvbG9yX3BhaXIoTlVM TCxOVUxMKTsNCisJCQlzdHJuY3B5KFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoZiktPmJnLCBzKzEs IFJHQkxFTik7DQorCQkJV1JBUF9DT0xPUihmKS0+YmdbUkdCTEVOXT0nXDAn Ow0KKwkJCWkgPSBSR0JMRU47DQorCQkJbiAtPSBpOw0KKwkJCXdoaWxlKGkt LSA+IDApDQorCQkJICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LA0KKwkJCQkgICgq KytzKSAmIDB4ZmYpOw0KKwkJICAgIH0NCisJCSAgICBicmVhazsNCisJCSAg ZGVmYXVsdCA6DQorCQkgICAgYnJlYWs7DQorCQl9DQorCSAgICB9DQorCX0N CisJZWxzZSBpZih2KXsNCisJICAgIGlmKCpzID09IFRBQikNCisJICAgICAg d2hpbGUoKytmLT5uICYgMHgwNykgOw0KKwkgICAgZWxzZQ0KKwkgICAgICBm LT5uICs9IChpc2NudHJsKCh1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyKSAqcykgPyAyIDogMSk7 DQorCSAgICBpZihmLT5uIDw9IFdSQVBfTUFYX0NPTChmKSl7DQorCQlHRl9Q VVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCAoKnMpICYgMHhmZik7DQorCSAgICB9DQorCSAg ICBlbHNlew0KKwkJZHByaW50KDIsIChkZWJ1Z2ZpbGUsICItLSBnZl93cmFw OiBPVkVSUlVOOiAlY1xuIiwgKCpzKSAmIDB4ZmYpKTsNCisJICAgIH0NCisJ ICAgIFdSQVBfQUxMV1NQKGYpID0gMDsNCisJfQ0KKyAgICB9DQorfQ0KKw0K K2ludA0KK3dyYXBfZW9sKGYsIGMsIGlwcCwgZWlicCwgb3BwLCBlb2JwKQ0K KyAgICBGSUxURVJfUyAqZjsNCisgICAgaW50IGM7DQorICAgIHVuc2lnbmVk IGNoYXIgKippcHA7DQorICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIgKiplaWJwOw0KKyAg ICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqb3BwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoq ZW9icDsNCit7DQorICAgIGlmKGMgJiYgV1JBUF9MVl9GTEQoZikpDQorICAg ICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgJyAnKTsNCisgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9C T0xEKGYpKXsNCisJR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsN CisJR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0JPTERPRkYpOw0KKyAgICB9 DQorICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfVUxJTkUoZikpew0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5u ZXh0LCBUQUdfRU1CRUQpOw0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdf VUxJTkVPRkYpOw0KKyAgICB9DQorICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfSU5WRVJTRShmKSB8 fCBXUkFQX0FOQ0hPUihmKSl7DQorCUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRB R19FTUJFRCk7DQorCUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19JTlZPRkYp Ow0KKyAgICB9DQorICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfQ09MT1JfU0VUKGYpKXsNCisJY2hh ciAqcDsNCisJR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsNCisJ R0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0ZHQ09MT1IpOw0KKwlwID0gY29s b3JfdG9fYXNjaWlyZ2IocHNfZ2xvYmFsLT5WQVJfTk9STV9GT1JFX0NPTE9S KTsNCisJZm9yKDsgKnA7IHArKykNCisJICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0 LCAqcCk7DQorCUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19FTUJFRCk7DQor CUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19CR0NPTE9SKTsNCisJcCA9IGNv bG9yX3RvX2FzY2lpcmdiKHBzX2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX05PUk1fQkFDS19DT0xP Uik7DQorCWZvcig7ICpwOyBwKyspDQorCSAgR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4 dCwgKnApOw0KKyAgICB9DQorICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsICdc MDE1Jyk7DQorICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsICdcMDEyJyk7DQor ICAgIGYtPm4gPSAwTDsNCisgICAgc29fdHJ1bmNhdGUoV1JBUF9TUEFDRVMo ZiksIDBMKTsNCisgICAgV1JBUF9TUENfTEVOKGYpID0gMDsNCit9DQorDQor aW50DQord3JhcF9ib2woZixpdmFyLHEsIGlwcCwgZWlicCwgb3BwLCBlb2Jw KQ0KKyAgICBGSUxURVJfUyAqZjsNCisgICAgaW50IGl2YXI7DQorICAgIGlu dCBxOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqaXBwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25l ZCBjaGFyICoqZWlicDsNCisgICAgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKm9wcDsNCisg ICAgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKmVvYnA7DQorew0KKyAgICBpbnQgbiA9IFdS QVBfTUFSR19MKGYpICsgKGl2YXIgPyBXUkFQX0lOREVOVChmKSA6IDApOw0K KyAgICB3aGlsZShuLS0gPiAwKXsNCisJZi0+bisrOw0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dM TyhmLT5uZXh0LCAnICcpOw0KKyAgICB9DQorICAgIFdSQVBfQUxMV1NQKGYp ID0gMTsNCisgICAgaWYocSkNCisgICAgICB3cmFwX3F1b3RlX2luc2VydChm LCBpcHAsIGVpYnAsIG9wcCwgZW9icCk7DQorDQorICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfQk9M RChmKSl7DQorCUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19FTUJFRCk7DQor CUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19CT0xET04pOw0KKyAgICB9DQor ICAgIGlmKFdSQVBfVUxJTkUoZikpew0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0 LCBUQUdfRU1CRUQpOw0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfVUxJ TkVPTik7DQorICAgIH0NCisgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9JTlZFUlNFKGYpKXsNCisJ R0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0VNQkVEKTsNCisJR0ZfUFVUQ19H TE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgVEFHX0lOVk9OKTsNCisgICAgfQ0KKyAgICBpZihXUkFQ X0NPTE9SX1NFVChmKSl7DQorCWNoYXIgKnA7DQorCWlmKFdSQVBfQ09MT1Io ZiktPmZnWzBdKXsNCisJICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19F TUJFRCk7DQorCSAgICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfRkdDT0xP Uik7DQorCSAgICBwID0gY29sb3JfdG9fYXNjaWlyZ2IoV1JBUF9DT0xPUihm KS0+ZmcpOw0KKwkgICAgZm9yKDsgKnA7IHArKykNCisJICAgICAgR0ZfUFVU Q19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgKnApOw0KKwl9DQorCWlmKFdSQVBfQ09MT1IoZikt PmJnWzBdKXsNCisJICAgIEdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIFRBR19FTUJF RCk7DQorCSAgICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfQkdDT0xPUik7 DQorCSAgICBwID0gY29sb3JfdG9fYXNjaWlyZ2IoV1JBUF9DT0xPUihmKS0+ YmcpOw0KKwkgICAgZm9yKDsgKnA7IHArKykNCisJICAgICAgR0ZfUFVUQ19H TE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgKnApOw0KKwl9DQorICAgIH0NCisgICAgaWYoV1JBUF9B TkNIT1IoZikpew0KKwljaGFyIGJ1Zls2NF07IGludCBpOw0KKwlHRl9QVVRD X0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCBUQUdfRU1CRUQpOw0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5u ZXh0LCBUQUdfSEFORExFKTsNCisJc3ByaW50ZihidWYsICIlZCIsIFdSQVBf QU5DSE9SKGYpKTsNCisJR0ZfUFVUQ19HTE8oZi0+bmV4dCwgKGludCkgc3Ry bGVuKGJ1ZikpOw0KKwlmb3IoaSA9IDA7IGJ1ZltpXTsgaSsrKQ0KKwkgIEdG X1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsIGJ1ZltpXSk7DQorICAgIH0NCit9DQorDQor aW50DQord3JhcF9xdW90ZV9pbnNlcnQoZiwgaXBwLCBlaWJwLCBvcHAsIGVv YnApDQorICAgIEZJTFRFUl9TICpmOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoq aXBwOw0KKyAgICB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICoqZWlicDsNCisgICAgdW5zaWdu ZWQgY2hhciAqKm9wcDsNCisgICAgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqKmVvYnA7DQor ew0KKyAgICBpbnQgajsNCisgICAgQ09MT1JfUEFJUiAqY29sID0gTlVMTDsN CisgICAgZm9yKGogPSAwOyBqIDwgV1JBUF9GTF9RRChmKTsgaisrKXsNCisJ Zi0+biArPSAoV1JBUF9MVl9GTEQoZikgPyAxIDogMik7DQorCWlmKFdSQVBf VVNFX0NMUihmKSl7DQorCSAgICBpZigoaiAlIDMpID09IDANCisJICAgICAg ICYmIHBzX2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX1FVT1RFMV9GT1JFX0NPTE9SDQorCSAgICAg ICAmJiBwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTFfQkFDS19DT0xPUg0KKwkgICAg ICAgJiYgKGNvbCA9IG5ld19jb2xvcl9wYWlyKHBzX2dsb2JhbC0+VkFSX1FV T1RFMV9GT1JFX0NPTE9SLA0KKwkJCQkJcHNfZ2xvYmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUx X0JBQ0tfQ09MT1IpKQ0KKwkgICAgICAgJiYgcGljb19pc19nb29kX2NvbG9y cGFpcihjb2wpKXsNCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgR0ZfQ09MT1JfUFVUQyhm LCBjb2wpOw0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIH0NCisJICAgIGVsc2UgaWYoKGogJSAz KSA9PSAxDQorCQkgICAgJiYgcHNfZ2xvYmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUyX0ZPUkVf Q09MT1INCisJCSAgICAmJiBwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTJfQkFDS19D T0xPUg0KKwkJICAgICYmIChjb2wgPSBuZXdfY29sb3JfcGFpcihwc19nbG9i YWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTJfRk9SRV9DT0xPUiwNCisJCQkJCSAgICAgcHNfZ2xv YmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUyX0JBQ0tfQ09MT1IpKQ0KKwkJICAgICYmIHBpY29f aXNfZ29vZF9jb2xvcnBhaXIoY29sKSl7DQorCSAgICAgICAgR0ZfQ09MT1Jf UFVUQyhmLCBjb2wpOw0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIH0NCisJICAgIGVsc2UgaWYo KGogJSAzKSA9PSAyDQorCQkgICAgJiYgcHNfZ2xvYmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUz X0ZPUkVfQ09MT1INCisJCSAgICAmJiBwc19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTNf QkFDS19DT0xPUg0KKwkJICAgICYmIChjb2wgPSBuZXdfY29sb3JfcGFpcihw c19nbG9iYWwtPlZBUl9RVU9URTNfRk9SRV9DT0xPUiwNCisJCQkJCSAgICAg cHNfZ2xvYmFsLT5WQVJfUVVPVEUzX0JBQ0tfQ09MT1IpKQ0KKwkJICAgICYm IHBpY29faXNfZ29vZF9jb2xvcnBhaXIoY29sKSl7DQorCSAgICAgICAgR0Zf Q09MT1JfUFVUQyhmLCBjb2wpOw0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIH0NCisJICAgIGlm KGNvbCl7DQorCQlmcmVlX2NvbG9yX3BhaXIoJmNvbCk7DQorCQljb2wgPSBO VUxMOw0KKwkgICAgfQ0KKwl9DQorCUdGX1BVVENfR0xPKGYtPm5leHQsICc+ Jyk7DQorCWlmKCFXUkFQX0xWX0ZMRChmKSkNCisJICBHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhm LT5uZXh0LCAnICcpOw0KKyAgICB9DQorICAgIGlmKGogJiYgV1JBUF9MVl9G TEQoZikpew0KKwlHRl9QVVRDX0dMTyhmLT5uZXh0LCAnICcpOw0KKwlmLT5u Kys7DQorICAgIH0NCit9DQorDQorDQogLyoNCiAgKiBmdW5jdGlvbiBjYWxs ZWQgZnJvbSB0aGUgb3V0c2lkZSB0byBzZXQNCiAgKiB3cmFwIGZpbHRlcidz IHdpZHRoIG9wdGlvbg0K --1602252935-1023343801-1086389159=:5897-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 4 15:50:36 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54MoZrh023046; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:50:35 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54MoXoa029438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:50:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i54MoRaD011656; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:50:27 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i54MnoHg084378 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:49:50 -0700 Received: from mxsf27.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf27.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.227]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i54MnY5Q011705 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:49:48 -0700 Received: from bygracealone.charter.net (66-188-135-70.mad.wi.charter.com [66.188.135.70]) by mxsf27.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i54MmEAV039283 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 18:48:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from chomiak (helo=localhost) by bygracealone.charter.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BWNTw-0000WH-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:48:12 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:48:12 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Cheryl Homiak To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: spellcheck problem in 4.60 solved In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN It wasn't really a Pine program at all. apparently if aspell and maybe aspell-bin are installed, they get used by Pine; I had not installed these on the second machine. Thanks anyway. -- Cheryl "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 09:38:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55GcYKV028319; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:38:34 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55GcWOp005294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:38:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55GcGMb013766; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:38:16 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55GbJ1R087626 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:37:19 -0700 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55GbGkI020113 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:37:16 -0700 Received: from server3.messagingengine.com (server3.internal [10.202.2.134]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F701C04242 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:37:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by server3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9F1A0178B8D; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:37:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:37:15 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "abdallah" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine not reading mail? Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sasl-Enc: GA2n/kjSzGO1Ap7im+OuSw 1086453435 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CD 0, __CTE 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I just installed pine on my redhat system. I use fetchmail to fetch mail. When I run fetchmail, it appears to be downloading emails. But when I run pine, there are no emails there. When I checked my home dir, I did not see a MBOX file. I will appreciate your help in this matter. Many thanks, Sam -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Sent 0.000002 seconds ago -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 09:52:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55Gq70Z028845; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:52:07 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55Gq5aE005639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:52:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55Gptq7013020; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:51:55 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55Gp4Lb050904 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:51:04 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55Gp3cY013341 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:51:03 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:38z0BqF5dMhQzw1W5Ooe8pxucp5IhSIj@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i55Gocd2000890; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:50:38 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine not reading mail? In-Reply-To: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: abdallah X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.25.0.61; VDF 6.25.0.85 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** abdallah (ufoabdallah313@fastmail.fm.tv) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I just installed pine on my redhat system. I use fetchmail to fetch :) mail. When I run fetchmail, it appears to be downloading emails. But :) when I run pine, there are no emails there. When I checked my home :) dir, I did not see a MBOX file. Everything depends on where fetchmail is putting that mail. Press M S C and take a look at the value of "inbox-path", if it says "inbox" and this is not working, then change that value to be the full path to the location of the folder where messages are being saved, for example, "/var/spool/mail/username". Notice that Pine does not like that you change your inbox-path in the middle of a session, if you do so, quit Pine and restart it. Pine will try the new value in the next session. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 10:00:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55H0umK029049; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:00:56 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55H0sqL005824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:00:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55H0l55016768; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:00:47 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55H0TpB083056 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:00:29 -0700 Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55H0NqF023812 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:00:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk [130.225.197.72]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i55GxpqK016531; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:59:51 +0200 (MEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id 511CF805C85; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:59:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3802805C83; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:59:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:59:43 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine not reading mail? In-Reply-To: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: abdallah X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, abdallah wrote: > I just installed pine on my redhat system. I use fetchmail to fetch > mail. When I run fetchmail, it appears to be downloading emails. But > when I run pine, there are no emails there. When I checked my home dir, > I did not see a MBOX file. It sounds that fetchmail does not put your mail into the file which Pine opens. Check fetchmail's destination first, then compare it to the mailbox file which Pine looks up. Hope this helps... Greetings, Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 10:08:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55H8cNd029375; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:08:38 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55H8as8027841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:08:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55H8T86015052; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:08:29 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55H829p110070 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:08:02 -0700 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55H7xgr005608 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:07:59 -0700 Received: from server3.messagingengine.com (server3.internal [10.202.2.134]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC646C04134 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 13:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by server3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D3EE11685F7; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 13:07:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1086455278.24201.197833572@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 10:07:58 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "abdallah" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine not reading mail? In-Reply-To: References: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sasl-Enc: pWJ/Av/OOuWJAJKfHXr8YQ 1086455278 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __CD 0, __CTE 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:50:38 -0700 (PDT), "Eduardo Chappa" said: > *** abdallah (ufoabdallah313@fastmail.fm.tv) wrote in the pine-info list > today: > > :) I just installed pine on my redhat system. I use fetchmail to fetch > :) mail. When I run fetchmail, it appears to be downloading emails. But > :) when I run pine, there are no emails there. When I checked my home > :) dir, I did not see a MBOX file. > > Everything depends on where fetchmail is putting that mail. Press M S C > and take a look at the value of "inbox-path", if it says "inbox" and this > is not working, then change that value to be the full path to the > location > of the folder where messages are being saved, for example, > "/var/spool/mail/username". > Notice that Pine does not like that you change your inbox-path in the > middle of a session, if you do so, quit Pine and restart it. Pine will > try > the new value in the next session. > > Eduardo > http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ I changed the path to /var/spool/mail/user - it then asked me for a folder to use for inbox. What should go there? Under /var/spool/mail/ there are no folders/ Just two user file names - root and sam. sam -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 10:28:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55HS9Yo030180; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:28:09 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55HS7c2006657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:28:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55HRxh8016058; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:27:59 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55HRVAn069452 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:27:32 -0700 Received: from relay-5v.club-internet.fr (relay-5v.club-internet.fr [194.158.96.110]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55HRShT027962 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:27:29 -0700 Received: from dim (l01v-21-11.d2.club-internet.fr [195.36.184.11]) by relay-5v.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AA216BC; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 19:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 19:27:22 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Pierre-Philipp Braun To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine not reading mail? In-Reply-To: References: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: abdallah X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, PGP_SIGNATURE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Quoting Claus Atzenbeck, 18:59 +0200 Sat 5th Jun 2004, > On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, abdallah wrote: > > > I just installed pine on my redhat system. I use fetchmail to fetch > > mail. When I run fetchmail, it appears to be downloading emails. But > > when I run pine, there are no emails there. When I checked my home dir, > > I did not see a MBOX file. > > It sounds that fetchmail does not put your mail into the file which Pine > opens. > > Check fetchmail's destination first, then compare it to the mailbox file > which Pine looks up. Besides, there is 'getmail' with is easier to configure, and even faster in my view, to fetch mails to local dirs. You may then use procmail -Y to redirect the mails to your MBOX-es. A ~/.getmail/getmailrc example, [default] verbose = 1 readall = 0 message_log = /var/log/getmail.log timeout = 240 max_message_size = 1048576 no_delivered_to = 1 no_received = 1 delete = 1 [Joe's Mail] server = mail.isp.com port = 8110 username = joeuser password = pass postmaster = "| procmail -Y ~/.procmail/joerules" which ends, for example, with, :0 * ^To.*joe@iap /var/mail/joe :0 * ^Cc.*joe@iap CC :0: OTHERS assuming MAILDIR=/joemailfolder at first. - -- Pierre-Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFAwgJ+/gRjJo8mT84RAmD+AKC6dPfvuCHYWHUZ0+skOdFwMpLA5gCgp26u dnm8E9kXn1wvU3PFMMsj/lk= =UQtY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 11:22:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55IMNgl031965; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:22:23 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55IMLWx007863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:22:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55IMCuc011824; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:22:12 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55ILIqp087800 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:21:18 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55ILH77001531 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:21:17 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:yM4kuHdGqnp0OfgQHTkNG0hHmPn75UjA@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i55IL0d2005503; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:21:01 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine not reading mail? In-Reply-To: <1086455278.24201.197833572@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1086453435.20596.197832674@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: abdallah X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.25.0.61; VDF 6.25.0.85 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** abdallah (ufoabdallah313@fastmail.fm.tv) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:50:38 -0700 (PDT), "Eduardo Chappa" :) said: :) > *** abdallah (ufoabdallah313@fastmail.fm.tv) wrote in the pine-info :) > list today: :) > :) > :) I just installed pine on my redhat system. I use fetchmail to :) > :) fetch mail. When I run fetchmail, it appears to be downloading :) > :) emails. But when I run pine, there are no emails there. When I :) > :) checked my home dir, I did not see a MBOX file. :) > :) > Everything depends on where fetchmail is putting that mail. Press M S :) > C and take a look at the value of "inbox-path", if it says "inbox" :) > and this is not working, then change that value to be the full path :) > to the location of the folder where messages are being saved, for :) > example, "/var/spool/mail/username". :) :) > Notice that Pine does not like that you change your inbox-path in the :) > middle of a session, if you do so, quit Pine and restart it. Pine :) > will try the new value in the next session. :) :) I changed the path to /var/spool/mail/user - it then asked me for a :) folder to use for inbox. What should go there? Under /var/spool/mail/ :) there are no folders/ Just two user file names - root and sam. Ah ok, I know what's going on. Ever since maildrops came to existence changing the inbox-path is not that easy. First press M S C and put the cursor over inbox-path, now press RETURN and remove anything that that line says, press RETURN again and enter the full path to the location of your inbox, something like /var/spool/mail/user, or maybe /var/mail/user, everything depends on your system. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 5 12:57:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55Jusib002548; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:54 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55JuqXK032421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i55JujgD017148; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:45 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i55Ju6IU109980 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:06 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i55Ju5Ko011561 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:05 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i55JuPfR006822 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:26 -0700 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i55JuPYD006818 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:25 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: quell-displaying-flowed-text patch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-2089789960-1086464746=:6684" Content-ID: X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-2089789960-1086464746=:6684 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: hi all. i've added an option to turn off displaying flowed text when viewing messages. a patch is attached. this page has more information...but as a subscriber to this list, i doubt it will tell you anything you don't already know. :P http://snarfed.org/space/pine+flowed-text+patch -Ryan -- "Woooo!" -Twinsen --8323328-2089789960-1086464746=:6684 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; NAME="quell-displaying-flowed-text.patch.4.60" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="quell-displaying-flowed-text.patch.4.60" ZGlmZiAtcmMgcGluZTQuNjAvcGluZS9pbml0LmMgcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxh eS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5lL2luaXQuYw0KKioqIHBpbmU0LjYwL3BpbmUv aW5pdC5jCTIwMDQtMDUtMDcgMTU6MTc6NDMuMDAwMDAwMDAwIC0wNzAwDQot LS0gcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxheS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5lL2luaXQuYwky MDA0LTA2LTA0IDIxOjM2OjU1LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMA0KKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqDQoqKiogMjY2MiwyNjY3ICoqKioNCi0tLSAyNjYyLDI2NzAgLS0t LQ0KICAjZW5kaWYNCiAgCXsicXVlbGwtY2hhcnNldC13YXJuaW5nIiwNCiAg CSBGX1FVRUxMX0NIQVJTRVRfV0FSTklORywgaF9jb25maWdfcXVlbGxfY2hh cnNldF93YXJuaW5nLCBQUkVGX1ZJRVd9LA0KKyAJeyJxdWVsbC1kaXNwbGF5 aW5nLWZsb3dlZC10ZXh0IiwNCisgCSBGX1FVRUxMX0RJU1BMQVlJTkdfRkxP V0VEX1RFWFQsIGhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2Rpc3BsYXlpbmdfZmxvd2VkX3Rl eHQsDQorIAkgUFJFRl9WSUVXfSwNCiAgDQogIC8qIE5ld3MgKi8NCiAgCXsi Y29tcG9zZS1zZXRzLW5ld3Nncm91cC13aXRob3V0LWNvbmZpcm0iLA0KZGlm ZiAtcmMgcGluZTQuNjAvcGluZS9tYWlsdmlldy5jIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRpc3Bs YXktZmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9tYWlsdmlldy5jDQoqKiogcGluZTQuNjAv cGluZS9tYWlsdmlldy5jCTIwMDQtMDUtMDYgMTA6NDc6MjUuMDAwMDAwMDAw IC0wNzAwDQotLS0gcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxheS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5l L21haWx2aWV3LmMJMjAwNC0wNi0wNCAwOTozNDozNS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgLTA3 MDANCioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDUxNzgsNTE4NCAqKioqDQogICAg ICAgICAmJiAhc3RydWNtcChhdHQtPmJvZHktPnN1YnR5cGUsICJwbGFpbiIp DQogICAgICAgICAmJiAocGFybXZhbCA9IHJmYzIyMzFfZ2V0X3BhcmFtKGF0 dC0+Ym9keS0+cGFyYW1ldGVyLA0KICAJCQkJICAgICAgICJmb3JtYXQiLCBO VUxMLCBOVUxMKSkpew0KISAJaWYoIXN0cnVjbXAocGFybXZhbCwgImZsb3dl ZCIpKQ0KICAJICBpc19mbG93ZWRfbXNnID0gMTsNCiAgCWZzX2dpdmUoKHZv aWQgKiopICZwYXJtdmFsKTsNCiAgICAgIH0NCi0tLSA1MTc4LDUxODUgLS0t LQ0KICAgICAgICAgJiYgIXN0cnVjbXAoYXR0LT5ib2R5LT5zdWJ0eXBlLCAi cGxhaW4iKQ0KICAgICAgICAgJiYgKHBhcm12YWwgPSByZmMyMjMxX2dldF9w YXJhbShhdHQtPmJvZHktPnBhcmFtZXRlciwNCiAgCQkJCSAgICAgICAiZm9y bWF0IiwgTlVMTCwgTlVMTCkpKXsNCiEgCWlmKCFzdHJ1Y21wKHBhcm12YWws ICJmbG93ZWQiKSAmJg0KISAJICAgRl9PRkYoRl9RVUVMTF9ESVNQTEFZSU5H X0ZMT1dFRF9URVhULCBwc19nbG9iYWwpKQ0KICAJICBpc19mbG93ZWRfbXNn ID0gMTsNCiAgCWZzX2dpdmUoKHZvaWQgKiopICZwYXJtdmFsKTsNCiAgICAg IH0NCmRpZmYgLXJjIHBpbmU0LjYwL3BpbmUvcGluZS5oIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRp c3BsYXktZmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9waW5lLmgNCioqKiBwaW5lNC42MC9w aW5lL3BpbmUuaAkyMDA0LTA1LTA3IDE1OjE3OjQ4LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcw MA0KLS0tIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRpc3BsYXktZmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9waW5l LmgJMjAwNC0wNi0wNCAyMjowMjo1NC4wMDAwMDAwMDAgLTA3MDANCioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDEyNjQsMTI2OSAqKioqDQotLS0gMTI2NCwxMjcw IC0tLS0NCiAgCUZfU1RSSVBfV1NfQkVGT1JFX1NFTkQsDQogIAlGX1FVRUxM X0ZMT1dFRF9URVhULA0KICAJRl9DT01QT1NFX0FMV0FZU19ET1dOR1JBREUs DQorIAlGX1FVRUxMX0RJU1BMQVlJTkdfRkxPV0VEX1RFWFQsDQogICNpZmRl ZglfV0lORE9XUw0KICAJRl9FTkFCTEVfVFJBWUlDT04sDQogIAlGX1FVRUxM X1NTTF9MQVJHRUJMT0NLUywNCmRpZmYgLXJjIHBpbmU0LjYwL3BpbmUvcGlu ZS5obHAgcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxheS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5lL3BpbmUu aGxwDQoqKiogcGluZTQuNjAvcGluZS9waW5lLmhscAkyMDA0LTA1LTA3IDE1 OjE3OjU0LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMA0KLS0tIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRpc3BsYXkt Zmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9waW5lLmhscAkyMDA0LTA2LTA0IDIxOjU3OjU0 LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMA0KKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQoqKiogMzA0OSwz MDU0ICoqKioNCi0tLSAzMDQ5LDMwNTUgLS0tLQ0KICA8bGk+PGEgaHJlZj0i aF9jb25maWdfcXVlbGxfY2hhcnNldF93YXJuaW5nIj5GRUFUVVJFOiBRdWVs bC1DaGFyc2V0LVdhcm5pbmc8L2E+DQogIDxsaT48YSBocmVmPSJoX2NvbmZp Z19xdWVsbF9jb250ZW50X2lkIj5GRUFUVVJFOiBRdWVsbC1Db250ZW50LUlE PC9hPg0KICA8bGk+PGEgaHJlZj0iaF9jb25maWdfcXVlbGxfZGVhZF9sZXR0 ZXIiPkZFQVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLURlYWQtTGV0dGVyLU9uLUNhbmNlbDwvYT4N CisgPGxpPjxhIGhyZWY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2Rpc3BsYXlpbmdfZmxv d2VkX3RleHQiPkZFQVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLURpc3BsYXlpbmctRmxvd2VkLVRl eHQ8L2E+DQogIDxsaT48YSBocmVmPSJoX2NvbmZpZ19xdWVsbF9lbXB0eV9k aXJzIj5GRUFUVVJFOiBRdWVsbC1FbXB0eS1EaXJlY3RvcmllczwvYT4NCiAg PGxpPjxhIGhyZWY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX3Bvc3RfcHJvbXB0Ij5GRUFU VVJFOiBRdWVsbC1FeHRyYS1Qb3N0LVByb21wdDwvYT4NCiAgPGxpPjxhIGhy ZWY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2ZpbHRlcmluZ19kb25lX21lc3NhZ2UiPkZF QVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLUZpbHRlcmluZy1Eb25lLU1lc3NhZ2U8L2E+DQoqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioNCioqKiAyNDc2OCwyNDc3MyAqKioqDQotLS0gMjQ3Njks MjQ3OTQgLS0tLQ0KICAmbHQ7RW5kIG9mIGhlbHAgb24gdGhpcyB0b3BpYyZn dDsNCiAgPC9CT0RZPg0KICA8L0hUTUw+DQorID09PT09PSBoX2NvbmZpZ19x dWVsbF9kaXNwbGF5aW5nX2Zsb3dlZF90ZXh0ID09PT09DQorIDxIVE1MPg0K KyA8SEVBRD4NCisgPFRJVExFPkZFQVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLURpc3BsYXlpbmct Rmxvd2VkLVRleHQ8L1RJVExFPg0KKyA8L0hFQUQ+DQorIDxCT0RZPg0KKyA8 SDE+RkVBVFVSRTogUXVlbGwtRGlzcGxheWluZy1GbG93ZWQtVGV4dDwvSDE+ DQorIA0KKyBCZWdpbm5pbmcgd2l0aCB2ZXJzaW9uIDQuNjAsIFBpbmUgZGlz cGxheXMgZmxvd2VkIHRleHQgd2hlcmUgcG9zc2libGUuIFRoZQ0KKyBtZXRo b2QgZm9yIHZpZXdpbmcgZmxvd2VkIHRleHQgaXMgZGVmaW5lZCBieQ0KKyA8 QSBIUkVGPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3JmYy9yZmMyNjQ2LnR4dCI+ UkZDIDI2NDY8L0E+OyBmb3IgbW9yZQ0KKyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgc2VlIDxB IEhSRUY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2Zsb3dlZF90ZXh0Ij5RdWVsbC1GbG93 ZWQtVGV4dDwvQT4uDQorIDxQPg0KKyBJZiB0aGlzIG9wdGlvbiBpcyBzZXQs IHRoZW4gUGluZSB3aWxsIG5vdCBkaXNwbGF5IGZsb3dlZCB0ZXh0IHdoZW4g dmlld2luZw0KKyBtZXNzYWdlcy4NCisgDQorIDxQPg0KKyAmbHQ7RW5kIG9m IGhlbHAgb24gdGhpcyB0b3BpYyZndDsNCisgPC9CT0RZPg0KKyA8L0hUTUw+ DQogID09PT09PSBoX2NvbmZpZ19wcmVmZXJfcGxhaW5fdGV4dCA9PT09PQ0K ICA8SFRNTD4NCiAgPEhFQUQ+DQo= --8323328-2089789960-1086464746=:6684-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 6 01:25:37 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i568PYG3027408; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:25:34 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i568PWDl026403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:25:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i568PGkm005164; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:25:16 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i568NwZV069826 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:23:58 -0700 Received: from relay-4m.club-internet.fr (relay-4m.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.43]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i568Ns4t025360 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:23:55 -0700 Received: from dim (l01v-21-11.d2.club-internet.fr [195.36.184.11]) by relay-4m.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8DAF719; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 10:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 10:23:40 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Pierre-Philipp Braun To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Several Pine feature requests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine@cac.washington.edu X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum , Eduardo Chappa X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __CT 0, PGP_SIGNATURE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm a Pine user for 4-5 years now and I'm more and more astonished how the Pine suite powerful is, making email efficient, fast and easy. I'm especially impressed by the rich features it provides, which aren't available on any other email client. Even Pico doesn't share specific justify and paragraph behaviors with pico-like attempts like jpico. Nevertheless, you will find below some feature requests, which i sorted by importance (reverse, thus most important at the top), . Update Pine license to permit users and developers to feel free and trust the project completely. Considering that Pine may be stopped one day or switched to even more closed source software by University of Washington is a part of the horizon i don't appreciate. Even if this scenario is unlikely to happen, it's nevertheless considered by experienced Open Source users, administrator, engineers, and this makes especially sense in the digital world. Please update anything you want give the feeling to your users you're not the only owner of the Pine suite. Notice non endorsement and even advertisement closes are considered as relevant options. Notice : GNU nano may yet get the UNDO functionality working in the next release. GNU nano developers don't *mainly* focus on pico compatibility anymore (since succeeded), they are now looking forward to enhance their editor. . Pico -- UNDO functionality, not just ^U, real recursive UNDO. . Pico -- automatic indentation option when carriage return on an indented line. . Pine -- Please pull up Eduardo Chappa's fancy thread patch. thread-sort-key is really great. You can sort w/ reverse arrival but keep the threads going down as usual. Especially relevant for unsorted MBOX-es like sent-mail or SPAM_BMF, which should be sorted by reverse/*. . Pico -- configuration *file*, not 2 digits long columns aliases. . Pine -- Activate a bit more features in the default configuration. New users may also like to use lots of user friendly and/or power features without taking the time and pain to scrolling/reading/cross_activating them. Arriving users always implicitly complain about Pines ubiquitous configuration procedure. Beside Pine's incredible power user features, it obviously began to lack major features considering that most people fetch their email-s from remote POP servers, don't have local SMTP servers running and that NAT become a de-facto standard on home networks connected to the Internet/IPv4, . Pine -- Fresh users recurrent questions are also justified by the user-domain option which only sets the domain part of the return-path. Making a role or a customized-hdr to set up the most important thing behind the smtp-server, i mean the From header, seems obviously irrelevant. . Pine -- Please permit the user to customize the user-name sent to the SMTP server (MAIL FROM). . Pilot -- Make a feature rich file manager with the midnight commander style cross copying/moving/+*linking* using TAB, recursive removing and prompt for overwriting. Thanks in advance for thinking about my requests and/or sharing your answers/opinions with me. Special thanks, by the way, for being members of the Pine team and developing such powerful software. At last, i would like to say... Pine r0ks! PINE-INFO Mailing-list in Cc. Pierre-Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFAwtSU/gRjJo8mT84RAoO0AKC6kPjm9uGBJUHhAoC51AJF9HmXfACePIO7 6J9EEWCjMXSIYJ6uK3C3Ivo= =SFj9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 6 03:06:37 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 03:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i56A6bYY031648 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 03:06:37 -0700 Received: from mail-4.tiscali.it (mail-4.tiscali.it [195.130.225.150]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i56A6Z4E021104 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 03:06:36 -0700 Received: from [195.166.237.40] by mail-4.tiscali.it with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:06:05 +0200 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 03:06:05 -0700 Message-ID: <40B2D38700021A76@mail-4.tiscali.it> From: "Mrs Mary Jones" Subject: Donation for the less priveledged. Reply-To: mrsjones@tiscali.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=78%, Report='NIGERIAN_BODY3 2.900, X_NJABL_SPAM_SOURCE 1.9, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_43 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_46 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, TO_MALFORMED 0.000' From: Mrs Mary Jones of Kuwait RE: Donation for the less priveledged. I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Dr. Harry Jones who worked with Kuwait Embassy in Ivory Coast for nine years before he di= ed in the year 2000.We were married for eleven years without a child. He died after a brief illness that lasted for only four days. Before his death we were both born again christians. Since his death I decided not to re-marry or get a child outside my matrimonial home . When my late husband was alive he deposited the sum of $8.6Million (Eight= Million six hundred thousand U.S.Dollars) with a finance/security company= in Europe. Presently, this money is still with the Security Company and the manageme= nt has written me as the beneficiary to come forward to receive the trunk bo= x of money or rather issue a letter of authorisation to somebody to receive= it on my behalf if I can not come over. Presently, I'm in a hospital where I have been undergoing treatment for oesophageal cancer. I have since lost my ability to talk and my doctors have told me that I might not be able to survive this illness from all in= dications. It is my last wish to see this money distributed to victims of Hiv/aids,c= harities donations,Orphans and other needy persons in your country. Because relatives and friends have plundered so much of my wealth since my illness, I cannot live with the agony of entrusting this huge responsibil= ity to any of them anymore. I beg you in the name of God to help me collect the deposit and the inter= est accrued from the company and distribute it accordingly. I want a person that is God fearing that will use this money to assist an= d utilise for orphanages and widows propagating the word of God and to ensu= re that the house of God is maintained. The Bible made us to understand that= Blessed is the hand that giveth. I took this decision because I don't have any child that will inherit thi= s money and my husband relatives are not beleivers and I don't want my husb= and's hard earned money to be misused by unbelievers. I don't want a situation where this money will be used in an ungodly manner. Hence the reason for taking this bold decision. I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going. I know that I am going to be in the bosom of the= Lord. Exodus 14 VS 14 says that the lord will fight my case and I shall hold my= peace. I will not be able to use the telephone communication in this rega= rd because of my soundless voice and the presence of my husband's relatives around me always. I don't want them to know about this development. With God all things are possible. As soon as I receive your reply I shall= give you the contact of the Finance/ Security Company. I will also issue you a letter of authority that will prove you as the new beneficiary of this fund. I want you and your fellow believers to always pray for me because the lord is my shephard. My happiness is that I lived a life of a worthy Christian. however that wants to serve the Lord must serve him in spirit and truth. Please always= be prayerful all through your life. Any delay in your reply will give me room in sourcing for another person for this same purpose. Please assure me that you will act accordingly as I stated herein. Hoping to hearing from you soon. regards, Mrs Mary Jones. __________________________________________________________________ Tiscali ADSL libera la velocita'! Attiva Senza Canone entro il 14 giugno: navighi a 1,5 euro l'ora per i pr= imi 3 mesi,se scegli il modem e' tuo in comodato gratuito e in piu' hai grati= s SuperMail per 12 mesi. Non aspettare, attivala subito! http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/prodotti/640Kbps/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 6 18:13:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 18:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from 140.142.10.196 ([68.118.151.199]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i571D1le031595 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 18:13:05 -0700 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 18:13:01 -0700 From: qudcumi@msn.com Received: from 183.54.252.39 by 140.142.10.196; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 03:11:03 +0100 Message-ID: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i574p0rY005511; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:51:00 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i574ow3C019249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:50:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i574omRv011990; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:50:48 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i574njqJ082846 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:49:46 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i574nflK008657 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:49:42 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (softdnserr [::ffff:202.137.102.42]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:49:38 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED69C2677C; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:21:41 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:52:40 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature requests Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello. I have requests for two features. I am using PINE 4.44 on Red Hat Linux 7.3. I have read the changelogs up to PINE 4.60, and did not see these features added. The first feature request, is for the archived folder name format to be changed from foldername-mon-yyyy to foldername-yyyy-mm. A reason for this, is that, when archiving the message folders, in the listing of the folder names, PINE-apr-2004 precedes PINE-dec-2003 precedes PINE-feb-2004 precedes PINE-mar-2002precedes PINE-jun-2001, as an example. Thus, in the folder index listing, the order of those folders, would be PINE-apr-2004 PINE-dec-2003 PINE-feb-2004 PINE-mar-2002 PINE-jun-2001 The folder index listing, for what I request, for those examples, would give PINE-2001-06 PINE-2002-03 PINE-2003-12 PINE-2004-02 PINE-2004-04 which is much more useful, when looking for archived folders and for messages within archived folders. Also, I understand that the date format yyyy-mm-dd is the ISO format. The second feature request, is for a feature that, in the absence of which, requires using another email application, when needing the feature. The feature is return receipt requests. I have previously tried using what exists in PINE, but have never got it to work. Some people dislike the feature, but it is useful, for confirmation that the adressee(s) has/have received a particular, important email. I am aware that some people disallow receipts to be sent for emails that they receive, but, I believe that most people do allow receipts to be sent for when they receive/read email messages. To be able to configure the feature like, I believe, Netscape allows, where the return receipt can be requested either for when the message is delivered, or, when it is read, or both, would be good. It could be incorporated as part of the display of the header, when composing, or, as part of the confirmation prompt for sending a message, but I believe that the former option would be preferable. I believe, from memory, that Netcape and Mozilla incorporate the configuration of the return receipt requesting (whether it is for delivery only, for when the message is read only, or for both, using check boxes for each option) in the configuration of the email facility, when setting Preferences and then, when composing each message, the option to request return receipts for each particular message, is available from the Options menu in the Compose Message window. Thank you in anticipation. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 08:29:53 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57FTpFB029528; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:29:51 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57FTns8004005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:29:49 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i57FTabf012340; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:29:36 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i57FSW8a034872 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:28:32 -0700 Received: from smtp19.wxs.nl (smtp19.wxs.nl [195.121.6.15]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57FSRMC018654 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:28:29 -0700 Received: from tsunami.bsd (ipd50a233c.speed.planet.nl [213.10.35.60]) by smtp19.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0HYY00JP62Z1KG@smtp19.wxs.nl> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:28:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:28:30 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marco Beishuizen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine 4.60 does not remember current directory MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Sender: marco@tsunami.bsd X-To: Pine discussion forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, Since using pine 4.60 it doesn't remember the current directory when saving an attachment. I didn't have a problem in previous versions. Pine always wants to save the attachment in my home directory: the setting "use current directory" in the Advanced User Preferences has no effect anymore. Anyone has this problem before? NB: I'm running Pine on FreeBSD/alpha 4.10-RELEASE. Marco -- "Today's thrilling story has been brought to you by Mushies, the great new cereal that gets soggy even without milk or cream. Join us soon for more spectacular adventure starring ... Tippy, the Wonder Dog." -- Bob & Ray -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 08:51:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57FptSA031004; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:51:55 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57Fpqxf010596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:51:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i57FpjxK013780; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:51:45 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i57Fp0Cw011902 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:51:00 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57Fowa4008511 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:50:58 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i57FoveQ010350 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i57FovOn010347 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature requests In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 7, Bret Busby (nospam-bret@busby.net.NS) typed: bret: Hello. bret: bret: I have requests for two features. bret: [snip first request. A very good request, btw] bret: The second feature request, is for a feature that, in the absence of bret: which, requires using another email application, when needing the bret: feature. The feature is return receipt requests. I have previously tried bret: using what exists in PINE, but have never got it to work. Some people bret: dislike the feature, but it is useful, for confirmation that the bret: adressee(s) has/have received a particular, important email. I am aware bret: that some people disallow receipts to be sent for emails that they bret: receive, but, I believe that most people do allow receipts to be sent bret: for when they receive/read email messages. bret: bret: To be able to configure the feature like, I believe, Netscape allows, bret: where the return receipt can be requested either for when the message is bret: delivered, or, when it is read, or both, would be good. It could be bret: incorporated as part of the display of the header, when composing, or, bret: as part of the confirmation prompt for sending a message, but I believe bret: that the former option would be preferable. bret: bret: I believe, from memory, that Netcape and Mozilla incorporate the bret: configuration of the return receipt requesting (whether it is for bret: delivery only, for when the message is read only, or for both, using bret: check boxes for each option) in the configuration of the email facility, bret: when setting Preferences and then, when composing each message, the bret: option to request return receipts for each particular message, is bret: available from the Options menu in the Compose Message window. bret: bret: Thank you in anticipation. I had a little bit of trouble understanding this 2nd request: 1) Do you want Pine to add a Return-Receipt header? 2) Or did you want Pine to answer a Return-Receipt header? If the answer is Yes to number 1 then why just add the header in yourself? I have that header pre-filled in my customized-hdrs in my rc file If the answer is Yes to number 2 then I would say that should be the responsibility of the Mailer Daemon to answer a Return-Receipt header not Pine's, imo. -- Birl From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 08:55:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57Ft5V8031166; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:55:05 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57Ft3Eb004957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:55:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i57FstNQ013264; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:54:55 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i57FsV8a035046 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:54:31 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57FsRp0013915 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:54:28 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i57FsReQ010675 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:54:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i57FsQhf010671 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:54:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:54:26 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.60 does not remember current directory In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 7, Marco Beishuizen (nospam-marco@beishuizen.info.NS) typed: Marco: Hi, Marco: Marco: Since using pine 4.60 it doesn't remember the current directory when Marco: saving an attachment. I didn't have a problem in previous versions. Pine Marco: always wants to save the attachment in my home directory: the setting Marco: "use current directory" in the Advanced User Preferences has no effect Marco: anymore. Marco: Marco: Anyone has this problem before? Marco: Marco: NB: I'm running Pine on FreeBSD/alpha 4.10-RELEASE. Marco: Marco: Marco No, not on my Solaris 9. -- Birl From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 13:13:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57KDtfj013197; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:13:55 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57KDrqZ016141 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:13:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i57KDaap007486; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:13:36 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i57KCwoG105300 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:12:58 -0700 Received: from green.mynethost.com (green.mynethost.com [64.207.205.53]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i57KCvAV022737 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:12:57 -0700 Received: from [24.102.129.37] (helo=[192.168.0.5]) by green.mynethost.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BXQUG-0002Kv-Ct for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:12:52 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:12:48 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: kassim@well.com To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Folders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I when press ;puz to see a list of folders which have unread messages, for some reason Pine also shows folders that have messages that are already read. I have the latest version of Pine running on Linux. Any help will be appreciated. Kassim -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 17:19:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i580JPlY025295; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:19:25 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i580JMIh025547 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:19:23 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i580J5a8013682; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:19:05 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i580IXWv071914 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:18:33 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i580IWgl011849 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:18:32 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i580IPfr012289; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:18:25 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i580IP7h013957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:18:25 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature requests In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > > Hello. > > I have requests for two features. > > I am using PINE 4.44 on Red Hat Linux 7.3. > > I have read the changelogs up to PINE 4.60, and did not see these > features added. > > The first feature request, is for the archived folder name format to be > changed from foldername-mon-yyyy to foldername-yyyy-mm. Others periodically ask for this so we decided to add it. There will be a feature called Prune-Uses-YYYY-MM in pine 4.61 to turn on this behavior. > > [...] > > The second feature request, is for a feature that, in the absence of > which, requires using another email application, when needing the > feature. The feature is return receipt requests. I have previously tried > using what exists in PINE, but have never got it to work. Some people > dislike the feature, but it is useful, for confirmation that the > adressee(s) has/have received a particular, important email. I am aware > that some people disallow receipts to be sent for emails that they > receive, but, I believe that most people do allow receipts to be sent > for when they receive/read email messages. Check the feature "enable-delivery-status-notification" to see if that has the functionality you want. Thanks. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 19:18:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i582IrSH029671; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:18:53 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i582IppM002532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:18:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i582HD62008528; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:17:13 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i582GYa2064352 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:16:34 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i582GVll018235 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:16:33 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (softdnserr [::ffff:202.137.102.42]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 10:16:28 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D3E2677C; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:48:27 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:19:21 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature requests In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > > > > The second feature request, is for a feature that, in the absence of > > which, requires using another email application, when needing the > > feature. The feature is return receipt requests. I have previously tried > > using what exists in PINE, but have never got it to work. Some people > > dislike the feature, but it is useful, for confirmation that the > > adressee(s) has/have received a particular, important email. I am aware > > that some people disallow receipts to be sent for emails that they > > receive, but, I believe that most people do allow receipts to be sent > > for when they receive/read email messages. > > Check the feature "enable-delivery-status-notification" to see if that has > the functionality you want. Thanks. > > Steve Hubert > Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle > > Hello. Thank you for your response. I note that the Help for that option, states that a person who sets the flag for "enable-delivery-status-notification", will be notified when the message has been delivered to a mailbox, but not when the message has been read. The Help facility also states that for the Delivery Status Notification facility, "DSN's don't provide a mechanism to request read receipts". Yet I have successfully used that facility for years, with other email applications. >From the text of the Help facility, the DSN's are part of the MTA at the senders end. >From my experience, read receipts can be obtained, but not according to the PINE Help facility. Could this please be clarified, and, if the PINE Help facility is wrong in what it says, could that be corrected? And, could the feature be incorporated into PINE, to give a person sending a message, the option to request a read receipt, when sending a message? -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 20:27:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i583R46x032222 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:27:04 -0700 Received: from RR (24-193-69-37.nyc.rr.com [24.193.69.37]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i583R2Ft004509 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:27:03 -0700 Message-Id: <200406080327.i583R2Ft004509@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: Shipping Department To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: FREE SONY VAIO LAPTOP!!!! ONLY 1000 LEFT, CLAIM YOURS NOW!! (NOT A CONTEST!!) Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 23:27:10 -0400 X-Mailer: web14908.mail.yahoo.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="77b9889c-427e-4eea-b54e-0d52ac5b3d92" Reply-To: Shipping Department X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX 2.900, MANY_EXCLAMATIONS 2.499, HTML_90_100 1.582, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, UPPERCASE_50_75 1.152, IMGSPAM_HEAVY_2 1.101, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP 0.762, URI_HEAVY 0.206, SUB_FREE_OFFER 0.134, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, SUBJ_FREE_CAP 0.001, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __UPPERCASE_50_75 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, __MANY_EXCLS 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __CTE 0, PLING_PLING 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format --77b9889c-427e-4eea-b54e-0d52ac5b3d92 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --77b9889c-427e-4eea-b54e-0d52ac5b3d92-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 7 23:53:52 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i586rkqe008149; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:53:46 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i586riSI004611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:53:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i586q38W003772; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:52:03 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i586ov43090114 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:50:57 -0700 Received: from slave.umbr.cas.cz (slave.umbr.cas.cz [147.231.252.3]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i586orK9015558 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:50:54 -0700 Received: by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2379F17EE7; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:50:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782747B79 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:50:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:50:53 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Expunge does not filter (pine4.60) (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-X-Sender: wolf@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I have sent email to the discussion, but I haven't seen it in. So I try again. I've made new test and the pine doesn't filter on expunge in every mailbox. ====== Hi all, can anyone check this error I've found in pine 4.60? If you create filter with some To: pattern on INBOX (internal /var/spool/mail/ mailbox) and with some status (I set "If message is important"), then if you save this filter and exit from settings, the filter is applied. But if you are in INBOX, you set Important some message with the correct To: address and press X (as expunge), filter doesn't apply. In pine 4.58 this worked fine. Can anyone to check where is the problem and fix it? Please:)) Bye. Robert Wolf. ====== -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 05:45:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 05:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58CjdvK022938; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 05:45:39 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58CjbC2014612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 05:45:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58CjLM4011408; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 05:45:21 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58CiaFX008724 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 05:44:36 -0700 Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58CiVWF014202 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 05:44:32 -0700 Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (kolla@halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i58CiTDX022351 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:44:30 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: lacking ctrl :P MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="647925566-1885361149-1086698497=:16739" Content-ID: X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --647925566-1885361149-1086698497=:16739 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: OK, this is perhaps an odd question, but anyways... Pine uses ctrl-combinations alot (ctrl-x to send etc), but I sometimes find myself in locations or devices that actually lacks ctrl-keys. (putty on my P800, random obscure internet-cafes or libraries where ctrl might be disabled to avoid ctrl-alt-del or something) So my question is: Is there some alternative way of sending commands? And if not; would it be possible to add one? I imagine I am not the only one using vim as external editor and hence hit escape every now and then when editing the header lines, so a vi-like mode would be very welcome for me at least. :) -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter --647925566-1885361149-1086698497=:16739-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 11:46:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58IkkBI009567; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:46:46 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58IkiB1003079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:46:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58IkUeM014910; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:46:31 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58IjX0l085480 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:33 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58IjSUe015679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:28 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i58IjSCg022440 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:27 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i58IjQ7f021780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Several Pine feature requests In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Pierre-Philipp Braun wrote: > . Update Pine license to permit users and developers to feel >free and trust the project completely. Considering that Pine may be >stopped one day or switched to even more closed source software by >University of Washington is a part of the horizon i don't appreciate. >Even if this scenario is unlikely to happen, it's nevertheless >considered by experienced Open Source users, administrator, engineers, >and this makes especially sense in the digital world. Please update >anything you want give the feeling to your users you're not the only >owner of the Pine suite. Notice non endorsement and even advertisement >closes are considered as relevant options. Seems to me the best response to this is "if you don't like it, don't use it". >Notice : GNU nano may yet get the UNDO functionality working in the next >release. GNU nano developers don't *mainly* focus on pico compatibility >anymore (since succeeded), they are now looking forward to enhance their >editor. > . Pico -- UNDO functionality, not just ^U, real recursive UNDO. > > . Pico -- automatic indentation option when carriage return on >an indented line. What is GNU nano? Some kind of an editor, obviously.. but is it a pico clone or something? (I don't use pico.) indentation -- you mean like for editing source code? Pico is intended as a VERY VERY VERY VERY basic editor. If you want more sophisticated functionality, use the external editor support built in. Personally, pine is the best example of a "friendly text-based program", that's in almost all ways just as easy to use as any GUI program.. But if I couldn't use an external editor, I probably wouldn't use pine. > . Pine -- Please pull up Eduardo Chappa's fancy thread patch. >thread-sort-key is really great. You can sort w/ reverse arrival but >keep the threads going down as usual. Especially relevant for unsorted >MBOX-es like sent-mail or SPAM_BMF, which should be sorted by reverse/*. This is the one that I was most intrigued by that made me respond. Does this 'fancy threads' support have a way so that you can have it sorted so that threads with new messages (even if the first message in the thread is years old) are near the bottom? If so, I'm all for it. I "lose" messages every once in a while because I have everything sorted by thread. So every once in a while I'll view by arrival just to make sure I haven't missed anything. > . Pine -- Activate a bit more features in the default >configuration. Specific examples would probably be useful here. I suspect that they want it as simple as possible for a beginner. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 13:25:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58KP92p015065; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:25:09 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58KP7J6000792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:25:08 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58KOsP0012054; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:24:54 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58KOJBU085502 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:24:19 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58KOE7i024173 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:24:14 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i58KOEcp003603 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:24:13 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i58KNuwK022329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature requests In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: >> The first feature request, is for the archived folder name format to be >> changed from foldername-mon-yyyy to foldername-yyyy-mm. > > Others periodically ask for this so we decided to add it. There will be a > feature called Prune-Uses-YYYY-MM in pine 4.61 to turn on this behavior. Will there be an automated way to change all of the eons of old sent-mail folders to the new format? (presumably not, this is _sort_ of a joke, but I've got tons of old sent-mail folders and it'll be a pain renaming them) I don't know the exact way this would be phrased, but I'd personally still like the alphabetic month rather than having to convert number to month all the time. Maybe something like: sent-mail-2003-10 (oct) Just having a smarter sorting and not changing the names at all would be fine for me too.. i.e. just sort them in year order if they match some regular expression perhaps. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 14:29:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LTu40018665; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:29:56 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LTrZ3003402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:29:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58LTgs1013208; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:29:42 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58LT1mK008816 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:29:01 -0700 Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58LT0hY029589 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:29:00 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LSxfg029662 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:28:59 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LSxaq001799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:28:59 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature requests In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pine implements Delivery Status Notifications. This is based on http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3461.txt Many proprietary email systems have implemented forms of read receipts. Pine does not have any support for read receipts. There is a recent draft standard to help with read receipts specified in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3798.txt Implementing this is a low priority for us. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 14:56:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LuT46020140; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:56:29 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LuRiP010852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:56:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58LuDSJ013902; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:56:14 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58LtjtM122922 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:55:46 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LtgDa025717 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:55:43 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i58Ltgxm073134 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:55:42 GMT (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i58LtgPI073131 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:55:42 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:55:42 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine feature request: yet another one In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'd love to see a Pine feature which would quell display of quoted text in messages. This might be unrealistic, but if I never saw quoted text again, that would be fine with me. Thus, at least lines beginning in > could be quelled, which hopefully could be overridden in the (rare) case when a quote needs to be read. Using Braille and speech, but especially with speech, this could literally save at least an hour or two a week. I know mutt has a weed feature which apparently does this, but since I use Pine, I'd love to see something like that implemented in my favorite email program. Don't know how workable it would be, though. --Rick -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 14:58:02 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58Lw2HH020210; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:58:02 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LvxfV004457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:58:00 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58Lvl0h013238; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:57:47 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58LvLhV092712 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:57:21 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58LvKTD023512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:57:20 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LvJJJ025350 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:57:19 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58LvJoP031786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:57:19 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Expunge does not filter (pine4.60) (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz wrote: > Hi all, > > can anyone check this error I've found in pine 4.60? > > If you create filter with some To: pattern on INBOX (internal > /var/spool/mail/ mailbox) and with some status (I set "If message is > important"), then if you save this filter and exit from settings, the filter > is applied. But if you are in INBOX, you set Important some message with the > correct To: address and press X (as expunge), filter doesn't apply. In pine > 4.58 this worked fine. > > Can anyone to check where is the problem and fix it? Please:)) It turns out that is intentional. It is a safety feature which is tricky to implement, and for your case, it does not do what you want. On the other hand, it ought to correctly filter it the next time you come into this folder, so the problem should be a small one. What it does is it avoids refiltering a message it has already filtered if the user manually changes the flags on that message. In your case, you manually set the Important flag, so the filtering code leaves it alone for now. Another case, where the refiltering behavior is harmful, is the case where a filter sets the Deleted bit and then the user Undeletes the message. In that case, the user does not want the filter to re-set the deleted bit and then expunge the message. Pine could attempt to figure out which cases make sense to refilter and which don't. Instead, it errs on the side of caution by deferring the refiltering whenever the user manually sets a flag. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 16:19:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58NJhpo025274; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:19:43 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i58NJfAZ007949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:19:42 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i58NJSlu018522; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:19:28 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58NIt2F048000 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:18:55 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i58NIssC002509 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:18:55 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:3NY2V3ba/rc2YL5U7JyRqQcXSirD3b6X@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i58NIrd2027308; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:18:53 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: lacking ctrl :P In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.25.0.61; VDF 6.25.0.87 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Kolbjørn Barmen (ufoKolbjorn.Barmen@uninett.no.tv) wrote in the...: :) OK, this is perhaps an odd question, but anyways... :) :) Pine uses ctrl-combinations alot (ctrl-x to send etc), but I sometimes :) find myself in locations or devices that actually lacks ctrl-keys. :) (putty on my P800, random obscure internet-cafes or libraries where :) ctrl might be disabled to avoid ctrl-alt-del or something) ESC ESC x is the same as CTRL-x and so on. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 17:40:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i590eG6n028890; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:40:16 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i590eCce010633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:40:13 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i590dxEB014420; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:39:59 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i590dLV2055558 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:39:21 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i590dHN3002824 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:39:17 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i590dHql026206 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:39:16 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i590cxnI022602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine feature request: yet another one In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: > I'd love to see a Pine feature which would quell display of quoted text in > messages. > This might be unrealistic, but if I never saw quoted text again, that would be > fine with me. > Thus, at least lines beginning in > could be quelled, which hopefully could be > overridden in the (rare) case when a quote needs to be read. How would you know when a section of the text was written by someone else in the discussion history? > Using Braille and speech, but especially with speech, this could literally > save at least an hour or two a week. Don't any of the screenreaders have a notion of "quoted text"? I had thought they would have had something like this long ago. That is, I'm not sure exactly what it would do, but maybe say "quote begins" at the end of the quoted section. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 19:05:20 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5925Jt4031887; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:05:19 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5925FTx019619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:05:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5924vmo016746; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:04:57 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5924Hp9055400 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:04:17 -0700 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5924C6u009968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:04:12 -0700 Received: from heaven.corp.google.com (gpsi1.corp.google.com [10.3.0.251]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59244xG029444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:04:04 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine feature request: yet another one MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ryanb@heaven.corp.google.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: > I'd love to see a Pine feature which would quell display of quoted text > in messages. This might be unrealistic, but if I never saw quoted text > again, that would be fine with me. funny you should mention that. i'm almost finished with a patch that implements a related feature. it doesn't do exactly what you want, but it might help alleviate your problem, or at least get another developer most of the way toward your feature. my patch removes "trailing quotes" from emails before you send them, or when you press a key. it's hard to explain, so i'll just give an example. the following quote is trailing, and would be removed by my patch. > Thus, at least lines beginning in > could be quelled, which hopefully > could be overridden in the (rare) case when a quote needs to be read. > Using Braille and speech, but especially with speech, this could > literally save at least an hour or two a week. I know mutt has a weed > feature which apparently does this, but since I use Pine, I'd love to > see something like that implemented in my favorite email program. Don't > know how workable it would be, though. > --Rick > > -Ryan -- "Woooo!!!" -Twinsen From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 8 22:37:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i595beHk007199; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:37:40 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i595bYom025450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:37:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i595bLkE008550; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:37:22 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i595agnJ073340 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:36:42 -0700 Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i595aZiu005803 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:36:36 -0700 Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (kolla@halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i595aPDX001128; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:36:25 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: lacking ctrl :P In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="647925566-2040005121-1086759412=:7376" X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --647925566-2040005121-1086759412=:7376 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** Kolbj?rn Barmen (ufoKolbjorn.Barmen@uninett.no.tv) wrote in the...: > > :) OK, this is perhaps an odd question, but anyways... > :) > :) Pine uses ctrl-combinations alot (ctrl-x to send etc), but I sometimes > :) find myself in locations or devices that actually lacks ctrl-keys. > :) (putty on my P800, random obscure internet-cafes or libraries where > :) ctrl might be disabled to avoid ctrl-alt-del or something) > > ESC ESC x is the same as CTRL-x and so on. Ah! Fantastic! Thank you =) -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter --647925566-2040005121-1086759412=:7376-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 02:52:27 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i599qP8a021130; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:52:25 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i599qMM1001070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:52:23 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i599q7FY008776; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:52:07 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i599p2mF073892 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:51:02 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i599ovOT014760 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:50:57 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i599ovxm000574 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:50:57 GMT (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i599ouS2000571 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:50:57 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:50:56 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine feature request: yet another one In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret asked, regarding quelling quoted text: > How would you know when a section of the text was written by someone else > in the discussion history? Matt, Generally I don't want to know. I've read it before. My memory is good. Most people quote liberally, (or is that lazily?) If this feature could use a keystroke to display quoted text when needed, instead of always, I could find out in the maybe five percent of cases when I really need to know. Matt asked, regarding screen readers: > Don't any of the screenreaders have a notion of "quoted text"? I had > thought they would have had something like this long ago. That is, I'm not > sure exactly what it would do, but maybe say "quote begins" at the end of > the quoted section. There are two major Windows screen readers. The one I have is the one which has the feature, but overall, I don't prefer it. Since "set files" are used, which adjust a screen reader's parameters for particular applications, I don't even know if users of that program can easily get the same functionality with Pine, using Tera Term on a shell, or PC-Pine. It may have taken extensive scripting tailored for Outlook Express, or extensive knowledge of the scripting language to tailor it for another program. I don't know for sure. The problem, though, is that there isn't just one screen reading environment. (I'm really glad of that, actually. Choices are good.) There are two major Windows screen readers and many others. And of course, there are DOS screen readers as well. But cost is prohibitive, because, for example, since I already use a screen reader, paying over $500 for a screen reader I like less, so I can use one feature, is cost-prohibitive. So personally, if quotes could just be stripped out of the message display, and only shown on demand, the same solution would be available to all. It'd be much easier than teaching people to quote sparingly, which is a lost cause anyway. Ryan, your idea is close, but some people quote at the top, (I'll stay off of that soapbox.) It's not unusual on some lists to find the meat of the message in the third or fourth paragraph. At least when quotes are at the bottom, one can just ignore text beyond a certain point, or as you have worked on, get rid of it entirely. And that's certainly better than the status quo. --Rick From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 02:55:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i599t3Ve021232; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:55:03 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i599sxZ1001146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:54:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i599sjpP011110; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:54:45 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i599s9vK011846 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:54:09 -0700 Received: from cri.ensmp.fr (orgenoy.ensmp.fr [193.48.171.195]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i599s26g029958 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 02:54:03 -0700 Received: from sablons.cri.ensmp.fr (sablons.cri.ensmp.fr [10.2.14.143]) by cri.ensmp.fr (8.11.2/8.11.2/mx-cri-CRI) with ESMTP id i599s2p26316 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:54:02 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:54:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: Fabien COELHO Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Fabien COELHO To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: ignored "regular-index-with-collapsed-threads" option in 4.60 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I was a happy user of the index style option: regular-index-with-collapsed-threads up to version 4.58. Now that I installed version 4.60, and without changing my pine configuration, it seems that this option does not work properly, as the threads are expanded most of the time, although I checked that the option is indeed selected. I use a remote configuration. Is my experience shared, or am I just an unlucky guy? Thanks in advance. -- Fabien. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 09:26:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59GQTxO006109; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:26:29 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59GQNaM014341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:26:24 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59GQ69V014008; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:26:06 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59GPDZJ070888 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:25:13 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59GP8OK030310 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:25:08 -0700 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38A11E4DE; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:25:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:25:07 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine feature request: yet another one In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Rick Lewis X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: > I'd love to see a Pine feature which would quell display of quoted > text in messages. Use a display-filter. If you only care about > as a quote-prefix, the filter is trivial. Even if not, you could take a look at Eduardo's patch that lets you handle any quote-prefix, and steal some of his code (if his license allows) to recognize the quote-prefix and not print any lines that have it. Pity, 'cause Pine now actually does the coloring for quoted text in filtered output. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 10:01:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59H1GLt008051; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:01:16 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59H1E0R008815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:01:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59H0wCi014970; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:00:58 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59H0PT4111388 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:00:25 -0700 Received: from hestia.email.starband.net (hestia.email.starband.net [148.78.247.131]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59H0Jb9024378 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:00:20 -0700 Received: from proxyplus.universe (vsat-148-63-113-13.c002.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.63.113.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by hestia.email.starband.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i59GsxRC015168 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:55:19 -0400 Received: from DrMemory [192.168.0.2] by Proxy+; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:55:19 -0600 for Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:54:24 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Swanson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine feature request: yet another one In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: swani@DrMemory X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: > > > I'd love to see a Pine feature which would quell display of quoted > > text in messages. > > Pity, 'cause Pine now actually does the coloring for quoted text in > filtered output. > Forgive me if I am ignorant, as I have never read the source for pine, but if pine is already coloring the quoted text, wouldn't it be a simple matter to allow the ansi begin-color sequence to become instead "start copying to /dev/null", and ditto for the end-color? I suppose it's not that easy; nothing ever is... Scott Swanson From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 10:12:25 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HCNR4008993; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:12:23 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HCLYt009287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:12:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59HC9oN010898; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:12:10 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59HBRbA049478 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:11:28 -0700 Received: from hestia.email.starband.net (hestia.email.starband.net [148.78.247.131]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HBMQ3003948 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:11:23 -0700 Received: from proxyplus.universe (vsat-148-63-113-13.c002.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.63.113.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by hestia.email.starband.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i59H60RC023472 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:06:18 -0400 Received: from DrMemory [192.168.0.2] by Proxy+; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:06:57 -0600 for Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:06:02 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Swanson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature Request: Attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: swani@DrMemory X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN A while ago, a couple of us were whining about the lack of a directory-level facility for attaching/saving attachments. This would be SO nice. For instance, this morning I had to send 24 pictures to one of my wife's real estate clients. I just used a simple bash command line to have djpeg scale them by half, then cjpeg degrade the quality to 60% so that they didn't consume too much bandwidth. However, when it came to using pine, I had to: a. quit pine b. restart pine in the directory where they were saved. c. type in EVERY STINKING FILE NAME on the attachment line. Why wouldn't it be reasonable to SELECT THE DIRECTORY and have every file there converted to an attachment!!!? Ditto, of course, when somebody sends me an email with 24 pictures attached! Why can't I just say "Save ALL of these in the directory I have chosen"? In fact, pine doesn't even remember the last directory I saved to, so I either have to type in the path for EACH ONE of the 24 pictures, or else: a. quit pine b. restart pine in the desired directory This is one of the most annoying features of this otherwise fine program! Scott Swanson -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 10:16:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HGut5009261; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:56 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HGs7Y016442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59HGf1C012170; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:41 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59HGJ6Z073846 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:19 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HGFVS030334 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77B3E5E6 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 19:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 19:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature Request: Attachments In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Scott Swanson wrote: > Why wouldn't it be reasonable to SELECT THE DIRECTORY and have every file > there converted to an attachment!!!? Talking about attachments. I would like to be able to mark several files using X in a directory, like you can do elsewhere in Pine for other stuff. Then I could so S(elect) on these and get them all attached. Also it would be nice if one could enter a save directory for attachments and Pine would remember this during session. And in the Config be able to set a default directory (instead of just current or home directory) for attachments saves. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 10:45:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HjgQ2010955; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:45:42 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HjdV1017623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:45:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59HjP2k016148; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:45:25 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59HijtD007562 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:44:45 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59Hidfp013074 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:44:39 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59HiceQ015617 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:44:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i59Hicpq015610 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:44:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:44:38 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Bug? (Re: Folders) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 7, kassim@well.com (nospam-kassim@well.com.NS) typed: kassim: I when press ;puz to see a list of folders which have unread messages, kassim: for some reason Pine also shows folders that have messages that are kassim: already read. I have the latest version of Pine running on Linux. kassim: kassim: Any help will be appreciated. kassim: kassim: Kassim 4.60 Solaris 9 When I read this message, I deceided to try ;puz on my ~/mail/ directory. I used ^c (6 times) while Pine searched a few files (out of 96 total). Then I un-selected all those messages Pine highlighted. Those 6 files which I ^c'ed still had .lock file present. I think code needs to be added to the function(s) that catches sigINT to remove any lockfiles created. Thanks. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 10:49:16 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HnF01011145; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:49:15 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HnD1K010834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:49:13 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59Hn2b1013142; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:49:02 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59HmSt9007436 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:48:28 -0700 Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59HmMab014142 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:48:23 -0700 Received: from cam.ac.uk ([80.4.4.194]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20040609174719.ZNC28581.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@cam.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:47:19 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:48:13 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Barry Landy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature Request: Attachments In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Swanson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: bl10@imap.hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pine has a standard feature operated by control-T which gives a search of the appropriate things instead of typing. So control-T after save lets you browse the folders. In this case control-T after control-J (or equivalent clicks in the windows version) allows you to browse all the files on the hard disk(s); it also remembers where you are so that if attaching a second file you look in the same place. Moreover clicking on the name (or typing return) fills it in automatically. That is not the same as selecting a number of files and going "attach-all" but it goes a long way towards solving your problem. On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Scott Swanson wrote: :>A while ago, a couple of us were whining about the lack of a :>directory-level facility for attaching/saving attachments. This would be :>SO nice. For instance, this morning I had to send 24 pictures to one of my :>wife's real estate clients. I just used a simple bash command line to have :>djpeg scale them by half, then cjpeg degrade the quality to 60% so that :>they didn't consume too much bandwidth. However, when it came to using :>pine, I had to: :> :> a. quit pine :> b. restart pine in the directory where they were saved. :> c. type in EVERY STINKING FILE NAME on the attachment line. :> :>Why wouldn't it be reasonable to SELECT THE DIRECTORY and have every file :>there converted to an attachment!!!? :> :>Ditto, of course, when somebody sends me an email with 24 pictures :>attached! Why can't I just say "Save ALL of these in the directory I have :>chosen"? In fact, pine doesn't even remember the last directory I saved :>to, so I either have to type in the path for EACH ONE of the 24 pictures, :>or else: :> :> a. quit pine :> b. restart pine in the desired directory :> :>This is one of the most annoying features of this otherwise fine program! :> :>Scott Swanson :> :> :> :> :> -- Barry Landy Home: +44-1223-570417 192, Gilbert Road College: +44-1223-332058 Cambridge CB4 3PB Efax: +44-870-458-0205 Email:BL10@cam.ac.uk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 11:02:47 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59I2iru011761; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:02:44 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59I2fn1018420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:02:42 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59I2Rs2015538; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:02:27 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59I1jkk085076 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:01:45 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59I1iHo011860 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:01:44 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59I1iQM006923 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:01:43 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59I1QsT011851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine feature request: yet another one In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: > It'd be much easier than teaching people to quote sparingly, which is a lost > cause anyway. I'm with you up to here.. > Ryan, your idea is close, but some people quote at the top, (I'll stay off of > that soapbox.) Here is where I disagree with you.. (I don't know if your screen reader can read signatures at the end, but my signature argues completely the other side.) However, you have provided the first compelling argument I've ever heard for top-posting. (But taking both of your statements together, we actually agree -- I'd say that if everyone who top-posts simply removed the original message, the problem would be solved. We disagree in that when someone does quote text, I say it should be above, you say it should be below.. Though I think this is probably something the screen reader should take care of on the viewing end.) -- top-posting: It's just a bad idea. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 11:16:37 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59IGaLG012846; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:16:36 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59IGVPr011945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:16:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59IGJ7h005078; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:16:19 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59IFbfX085108 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:15:37 -0700 Received: from andromeda.email.starband.net (andromeda.email.starband.net [148.78.247.124]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59IFW9J023045 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:15:33 -0700 Received: from proxyplus.universe (vsat-148-63-113-13.c002.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.63.113.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by andromeda.email.starband.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i59ICfYW023909; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:12:54 -0400 Received: from DrMemory [192.168.0.2] by Proxy+; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:14:41 -0600 for multiple recipients Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:13:46 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Swanson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature Request: Attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Barry Landy X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: swani@DrMemory X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Barry Landy wrote: > Pine has a standard feature operated by control-T which gives a search > of the appropriate things instead of typing. So control-T after save > lets you browse the folders. I'm well familiar with the control-T. Consider my 24-file case, though. To select the 1st file, I must type ^T and enter. For the second, ^T, down-arrow, enter. for the 8th: ^T down-arrow, down-arrow, down-arrow, down-arrow, down-arrow, down-arrow, down-arrow, enter. For the 24th - well, I think you see my point. It is fewer keystrokes to do it as I indicated, particularly if the files are named 01.jpg, 02.jpg, etc. But how difficult can it be to just let me type ~/pix/2004/06/smith/*.jpg as I would do in any other application??! Scott Swanson From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 11:21:55 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59ILs0b013102; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:54 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59ILpoK012175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i59ILcLX013454; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:38 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59ILKqs073464 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:20 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59ILHEQ023502 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:17 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59ILHqZ007876 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:17 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59ILEgo020884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature Request: Attachments In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Scott Swanson wrote: > a. quit pine > b. restart pine in the directory where they were saved. > c. type in EVERY STINKING FILE NAME on the attachment line. This is only a very very small Band-Aid, but you can use tab-completion to fill in the rest of the name/path. e.g. if there are no conflicts with other similarly named files you could do: File to attach: ththfi ends up turning into: File to attach: thisfile/thatfile/file.jpg I agree with the other person's request for being able to set a default save directory.. or at the very least, remembering it when I've saved something else there once. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 9 16:27:43 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from 140.142.10.196 ([203.251.164.114]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i59NReBN031132 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:27:42 -0700 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:27:40 -0700 From: LQHOTARSLKN@hotmail.com Received: from 193.209.58.138 by 140.142.10.196; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:22:38 -0700 Message-ID: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from office.vit.co.yu (office.vit.co.yu [217.26.67.151] (may be forged)) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5A80I25018917 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:00:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:00:18 -0700 From: mmqyaogy@msn.com Received: from 47.124.48.15 by 217.26.67.151; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:57:15 +0100 Message-ID: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5A8DiRY019728; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:13:44 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5A8DgLT015786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:13:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5A8DO6q005126; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:13:24 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5A8BwjR047902 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:11:58 -0700 Received: from mail.nilings.se (mail.nilings.se [193.13.81.93]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5A8BqZ3001184 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:11:53 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nilings.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D23C0AA2 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mathias Sundman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Disable line wrapping while writing a mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Mailinglist X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is it possible to temporarly disable the line wrapping while writing a mail? When I cut and paste a log into an email I want the lines NOT wrapped. Now I have to go back to every line and use backspace on the wrapped text to get it back on the correct line. I'm using Pine 4.60 -- _____________________________________________________________ Mathias Sundman (^) ASCII Ribbon Campaign NILINGS AB X NO HTML/RTF in e-mail Tel: +46-(0)8-666 32 28 / \ NO Word docs in e-mail -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 10 07:49:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AEnnPR003804; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:49:49 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AEnkoZ027541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:49:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5AEnVvE015508; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:49:31 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5AEmPnf069418 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:48:25 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AEmJ33029649 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:48:20 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5AEmJeQ015024 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i5AEmJV7015021 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:48:18 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Disable line wrapping while writing a mail In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 10, Mathias Sundman (nospam-mathias@nilings.se.NS) typed: Mathias: Return-Path: Mathias: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Mathias: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Mathias: From: Mathias Sundman Mathias: To: Pine Discussion Forum Mathias: X-To: Pine Mailinglist Mathias: Subject: Disable line wrapping while writing a mail Mathias: Mathias: Is it possible to temporarly disable the line wrapping while writing a Mathias: mail? Mathias: Mathias: When I cut and paste a log into an email I want the lines NOT wrapped. Mathias: Now I have to go back to every line and use backspace on the wrapped Mathias: text to get it back on the correct line. Mathias: Mathias: I'm using Pine 4.60 In situations like that I use the Alternate Editor, vi, by using ^_ in the composing window. Make sure enable-alternate-editor-cmd checked on in the config settings and you have vi as an editor option as well. HTH Birl "Sure vi is user-friendly. It's just cautious on who it makes friends with." (paraphrased) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 10 08:27:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AFR30q005664; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:27:03 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AFQxIh029166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:27:00 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5AFQkiu013964; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:26:46 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5AFQ3su055308 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:26:03 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AFPwU6015113 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:25:58 -0700 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7941E604 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:25:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:25:57 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Disable line wrapping while writing a mail In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Mathias Sundman wrote: > Is it possible to temporarly disable the line wrapping while writing a > mail? Maybe not disable (unless you use an alternate editor), but you can temporarily set composer-wrap-column to some ridiculously large value. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 10 13:48:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AKm5bq024689; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:48:05 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AKm3b4002021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:48:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5AKliRF012842; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:47:44 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5AKkrNp085106 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:46:53 -0700 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5AKkmtL001574 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:46:48 -0700 Received: from heaven.corp.google.com (gpsi1.corp.google.com [10.3.0.251]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5AKkkVJ026616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:46:46 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine memory management routines MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ryanb@heaven.corp.google.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi all. can anyone point me to information about pine's internal memory management routines, specifically the fs_get() and fs_give() family of functions? so far, my grep fu has yet to turn up prototypes or #defines anywhere, and google isn't very helpful. -Ryan -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 10 16:42:02 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5ANg1Ib001613; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:42:01 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5ANfxgf017279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:41:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5ANfgtB011416; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:41:43 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5ANepdh044744 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:51 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5ANemhb010969 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:49 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5ANemFc027502 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:48 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5ANeVgd006495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: stay open folders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm using pine 4.60 on mac os x. Stay open folders don't seem to work the way the documentation says they will.. In fact I guess it's not working at all. I put "carbondev" as a stay open folder, and quit and relaunched pine to make sure I wasn't seeing an anomaly on that one run.. I wasn't. When I 'g'o between my INBOX and carbondev, it's going to the last message in the list, not the previous one I was on. I also see that it's "closing" carbondev when I go back to the INBOX. I looked through the setup configuration screen, and I don't have any of the other settings related to "stay open folders" set. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 12:37:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5BJbmcn019422 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:37:48 -0700 Received: from email.seznam.cz (mx1.seznam.cz [212.80.76.44]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5BJbkxH014221 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:37:47 -0700 Received: (qmail 9386 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jun 2004 19:36:57 -0000 Received: from [81.136.212.204] by artemis.go.seznam.cz with HTTP for moabas1@seznam.cz; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:35:43 +0200 (CEST) From: =?us-ascii?Q?Mohammed=20Abacha?= To: lucasadele@yahoo.co.uk Subject: =?us-ascii?Q?business=20proposal=2Fassistance=20=20?= Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Message-Id: <53534.154993-12595-1175719941-1086982615@email.seznam.cz> Cc: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: =?us-ascii?Q?Mohammed=20Abacha?= X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='RELAY_IN_CBL 8, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTE 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_43 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0' Sorry to contact you in this manner. Difficulties encountered in effort= s to secure funds inherited from my fathers business reserve, necessita= te this search for someone to assist me. My name is Mohammed Abacha, the heir of the abacha family, and son to S= ani Abacha, the Late Nigerian Head of State. I am presently undergoing = trial in Abuja though have just been recently granted bail under the co= ndition that my family refunds to the Federal Government some money hel= d in accounts in Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Jersey and in Switzerland. = In return, all criminal proceedings against members of my family be dro= pped ( a deal which was brokered by the international community). To save the family from total bankruptcy I have managed to ship through= a courier company, the sum of US$12, 000,000.00, kept by my late fathe= r. This money has become the only inherited property of our family sinc= e the government and its loyalists are bent on making life difficult f= or us by freezing all the family account and has auctioned most of our = properties. The money has since been deposited with a private finance and security firm in Europe. I am willing to offer a percentage agreeable t= o you. All other information required to secure the funds will be given= to you pending a positive response. A quick reply via my private mail box(moabass@netscape.net)with your na= me,telephone and fax numbers will be highly appreciated. Sincerely yours Mohammed Abacha ____________________________________________________________ Obchodn=ED d=F9m.cz - =B9irok=FD sortiment dom=E1c=EDch spot=F8ebi=E8=F9= a elektroniky, v=FDrazn=E9 slevy. Nav=B9tivte http://ad.seznam.cz/clickthru?spotId=3D73742 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 16:47:30 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5BNlT4o031874; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:47:29 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5BNlRq7029039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:47:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5BNjjhw016112; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:45:45 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5BNiFqN063270 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:44:15 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5BNiEfd028818 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:44:14 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5BNiDuK013565 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:44:13 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5BNiDpm031717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:44:13 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: stay open folders In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > I'm using pine 4.60 on mac os x. > > Stay open folders don't seem to work the way the documentation says they > will.. In fact I guess it's not working at all. > > I put "carbondev" as a stay open folder, and quit and relaunched pine to make > sure I wasn't seeing an anomaly on that one run.. I wasn't. > > When I 'g'o between my INBOX and carbondev, it's going to the last message > in the list, not the previous one I was on. I also see that it's "closing" > carbondev when I go back to the INBOX. > > I looked through the setup configuration screen, and I don't have any of > the other settings related to "stay open folders" set. That should be all you need. One thing to pay attention to is that carbondev should be in your incoming folders list, ie. don't reference a folder in your default mail collection in this way as you would when saving a message. If it's a folder in your default mail collection, you need to use the full name, eg. {imap.server.example}mail/carbondev. If it's still not working for you, then you need to send us a pine-debug file after running pine with the -d9 option set so we can get a better idea what's going on. Jeff From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 17:04:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C04nE3032377; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:04:49 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C04l3K023817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:04:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5C0346Z013140; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:03:04 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C02R4J058336 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:02:27 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C02M7M028036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:02:22 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5C02Md4023170 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:02:22 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5C02Kup000663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: stay open folders In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Jeff Franklin wrote: > That should be all you need. One thing to pay attention to is that carbondev > should be in your incoming folders list, ie. don't reference a folder in your > default mail collection in this way as you would when saving a message. If > it's a folder in your default mail collection, you need to use the full name, > eg. {imap.server.example}mail/carbondev. I guess I don't really understand what "incoming folders list" and "default mail collection" mean. I see carbondev when I simply hit l to go to the mail folder list. I tried {mail.apple.com}mail/carbondev and {mail.apple.com}/carbondev in the stay open folder item and quit and restarted pine between launches. I do have a collection list set up for "mail on mail.apple.com". So I guess I think I just don't know what I need to change to make this work. I've read the various help screens on the options in question. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 17:50:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0owYG001748; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:50:58 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0osxx025111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:50:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5C0nF4g011964; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:49:16 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C0mKBN044574 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:48:20 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C0mJPH015087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:48:19 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0mJFT016758 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:48:19 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0mFsh006697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:48:18 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: stay open folders In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > I guess I don't really understand what "incoming folders list" and > "default mail collection" mean. No need to understand incoming folders. The first collection is your default collection, but if you have no other collections set, then you wouldn't see any other collections. Sorry for the confusion. > I see carbondev when I simply hit l to go to the mail folder list. > > I tried > {mail.apple.com}mail/carbondev > and > {mail.apple.com}/carbondev The first one should work (setting it and restarting). IN my test just now, setting this up was pretty delicate. That you would have understand the syntax for a fully qualified folder is a design shortcoming. Basically, it should look like: {Server}Path/carbondev, where Server and Path are what you see when you do Setup->List. Not very elegant, but that's where it stands right now. If that doesn't work, drop us a pine-debug file and maybe I can see what's going wrong. Jeff From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 17:55:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0tCNY001875; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:55:12 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0tAog030678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:55:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5C0rYEd013794; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:53:34 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C0rAv6073794 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:53:10 -0700 Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C0r9g8022234 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:53:09 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0r8tx009688; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:53:08 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C0r8w7006922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:53:08 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:53:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1602252935-2048797426-1087001588=:23666" X-To: robert delius royar X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1602252935-2048797426-1087001588=:23666 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi Robert, Sorry this went unanswered for so long. Actually, someone sent us a patch of how it should be, which we've included in the source to be released with 4.61. I've attached it. So, does this fix the crash that you've been having? Thanks, Jeff On Fri, 28 May 2004, robert delius royar wrote: > In the file mimedisp.osx there are a number of #ifdefs to include code based > on the operating-system level. These are incorrectly used. Those OS defines > are all turned on. They are values, not simple BOOLEANS. The system headers > define them this way: > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0 1000 > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1 1010 > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2 1020 > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3 1030 > > If you compile with new tools on a 10.2.8 system (as Dr. Clea F. Rees > discovered), you get a number of compilation errors. On 10.3, you get > crashes when you try to open an attached html file. > > See also the pin-info thread "Pine 4.60 on Mac OS X: mime types and crash" > with the following Message-IDs: > , > and > > > Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Carbon than I can suggest how to write > the conditionals so that the code is not included which is inapropriate for > 10.2 or 10.3. A uname -a for 10.2 will return a string which contains "6.x.x > Darwin Kernel Version 6.x.x" > > My 10.3.4 system is "7.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.4.0" > > --1602252935-2048797426-1087001588=:23666 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="mimedisp.osx-diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: OS X patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mimedisp.osx-diff" LS0tIG1pbWVkaXNwLm9zeAkyMDA0LzAxLzA4IDIxOjAyOjM0CTEuMw0KKysr IG1pbWVkaXNwLm9zeAkyMDA0LzA1LzE4IDIwOjIxOjA4CTEuNA0KQEAgLTg1 LDcgKzg1LDcgQEANCiAgICAgY2hhciAqZmlsZV9leHQsICptaW1lX3R5cGU7 DQogICAgIGludCBtaW1lX3R5cGVfbGVuOw0KIHsNCi0jaWZkZWYgTUFDX09T X1hfVkVSU0lPTl8xMF8zDQorI2lmIGRlZmluZWQoTUFDX09TX1hfVkVSU0lP Tl9NSU5fUkVRVUlSRUQpICYmIGRlZmluZWQoTUFDX09TX1hfVkVSU0lPTl8x MF8zKSAmJiBNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OX01JTl9SRVFVSVJFRCA+PSBNQUNf T1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OXzEwXzMNCiAgICAgQ0ZTdHJpbmdSZWYgbWltZV9yZWYg PSBOVUxMLCB0eXBlX2lkX3JlZiA9IE5VTEwsIGV4dF9yZWYgPSBOVUxMOw0K ICAgICBjaGFyIGJ1ZlsxMDI0XTsNCiANCkBAIC0xMzAsNyArMTMwLDcgQEAN CiAgICAgY2hhciAqbWltZV90eXBlLCAqZmlsZV9leHQ7DQogICAgIGludCBm aWxlX2V4dF9sZW47DQogew0KLSNpZmRlZiBNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OXzEw XzMNCisjaWYgZGVmaW5lZChNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OX01JTl9SRVFVSVJF RCkgJiYgZGVmaW5lZChNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OXzEwXzMpICYmIE1BQ19P U19YX1ZFUlNJT05fTUlOX1JFUVVJUkVEID49IE1BQ19PU19YX1ZFUlNJT05f MTBfMw0KICAgICBDRlN0cmluZ1JlZiBtaW1lX3JlZiA9IE5VTEwsIHR5cGVf aWRfcmVmID0gTlVMTCwgZXh0X3JlZiA9IE5VTEw7DQogDQogICAgIGlmKCFt aW1lX3R5cGUgfHwgISptaW1lX3R5cGUpDQpAQCAtMTcyLDcgKzE3Miw3IEBA DQogICAgIENGVVJMUmVmIHVybF9yZWYgPSBOVUxMOw0KICAgICBpbnQgcnYg PSAwOw0KIA0KLSNpZmRlZiBNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OXzEwXzINCisjaWYg ZGVmaW5lZChNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OX01JTl9SRVFVSVJFRCkgJiYgZGVm aW5lZChNQUNfT1NfWF9WRVJTSU9OXzEwXzIpICYmIE1BQ19PU19YX1ZFUlNJ T05fTUlOX1JFUVVJUkVEID49IE1BQ19PU19YX1ZFUlNJT05fMTBfMg0KICAg ICBpZigmTFNDb3B5QXBwbGljYXRpb25Gb3JNSU1FVHlwZSA9PSBOVUxMKQ0K ICAgICAgIHJldHVybiAwOw0KICAgICBpZigoc3RyX3JlZiA9IENGU3RyaW5n Q3JlYXRlV2l0aENTdHJpbmcoTlVMTCwgbWltZV90eXBlLCANCg== --1602252935-2048797426-1087001588=:23666-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 19:44:44 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C2ih13005751; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:44:43 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C2ibot028146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:44:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5C2gwJp011810; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:42:58 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C2gH4E073940 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:42:17 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C2gEpk018651 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:42:14 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5C2g7UE000761 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:42:05 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: SMTP Authentication MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-VBS-Filter-Version: 1.15 (well.com modified) (smtp) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP field, I put in the server address. Where do I put in the username/password? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 21:31:36 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C4VZrt009079; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:31:35 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C4VX9D003485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:31:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5C4VKSW011630; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:31:20 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C4USLw044650 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:30:28 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C4UNAv003081 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:30:24 -0700 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507D11E604 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:30:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:30:23 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='URI_HEAVY 0.206, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Kassim Kasmani wrote: > My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP > field, I put in the server address. Where do I put in the > username/password? FAQ. http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/write.html#smtpauth -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 11 21:41:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C4foRT009666; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:41:50 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5C4fmR2031217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:41:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5C4fYv1011410; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:41:34 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5C4f4px073848 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:41:04 -0700 Received: from debian.ablehost.com (debian.ablehost.com [198.173.217.242]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5C4exdS026935 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:40:59 -0700 Received: (qmail 10263 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2004 04:40:58 -0000 Received: from 24.231.210.217.bay.mi.chartermi.net (arthur@ablehost.com@24.231.210.217) by debian.ablehost.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2004 04:40:58 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:40:57 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Arthur H. Johnson II" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Gopi Sundaram X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: arthur@cygnus.hemisphere X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This has to be the most asked question on this list. On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Kassim Kasmani wrote: > > > My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP > > field, I put in the server address. Where do I put in the > > username/password? > > FAQ. > > http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/write.html#smtpauth > > -- Arthur H. Johnson II arthur@johnsonfamilymi.us -- ICQ: 31770438 AIM: bytor4232 MSN: bytor4232 YIM: arthurjohnson IRC: By-Tor@irc.debian.org From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 12 11:30:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5CIUUfJ008379; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:30:30 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5CIUPSQ019240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:30:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5CIU5oQ014770; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:30:06 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5CISqr7082960 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:28:52 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5CISkDs009981 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:28:47 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5CISY34005232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 14:28:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5CIST0g000598; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 14:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 14:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Jeff Franklin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=4.5 tests=CARRIAGE_RETURNS,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO, J_CHICKENPOX_83,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 about 17:53 -0700 UTC Jeff Franklin wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Sorry this went unanswered for so long. Actually, someone sent us a patch of > how it should be, which we've included in the source to be released with 4.61. > I've attached it. So, does this fix the crash that you've been having? > Jeff, No, the problem is that the concept is wrong. The defines in the patch are being used as though they were preprocessor commands, but the header where these macros are defined makes it clear the test must be at runtime. I have the deployment_target set as per Apple's documentation, so if the macros were used correctly, they should have stubbed the routines not needed on a 10.3 machine. Unless MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED is set at compilation so the preprocessor sees a value different from that needed for OSX 10.0, both bits of code will be included. I have appended a copy of Apple's explanation of these macros to the end of this note. If you compile the function mime_get_os_ext_from_mimetype on a 10.2 machine using the newest version of the compiler available from Apple for that machine, then you will get compile-time errors. If you compile the program on a 10.3 machine with new tools, it will run on a 10.2 machine because osx_build_mime_type_cmd gets called before mime_get_os_ext_from_mimetype and its value returned makes sense on the 10.2 machine. 10.3 machines appear to need it to return 0 so that the fall back to mime_get_os_ext_from_mimetype doesn't assume that some processing has already occured. This is the best I can do to figure out what is going on simply because I don't program Carbon. I think it's mainly reserved for OS9 compatibility. I would have thought the OSX-specific sections would have used Cocoa and Darwin only. I don't believe you see much Darwin mixed with Carbon development To further complicate things, the Availability Macros were designed to be used in Project Builder or (later) Xcode. The only way to import a unix commandline project into these is to use the configure/Makefile structure--not possible with Pine. The builders assume that environment variables can be set (the way configure does) for unique targets. But that does not seem to work with the Pine build. I tried to use EXTRASPECIALS to set the values for the OS_X level, but found these were thrown away when the osdependent build ran--just where they were needed. With the patch I sent earlier, the functions are included only if the intended target is of the correct level, but it requires hand coding if the build machine is running a different OS level from the target which means someone has to compile a 10.3 version on a 10.3 machine or 10.2 on a machine with the 10.2 tools (I am only supposing this latter limitation). With the patch, attachments display based on their MIME type if the system knows that type. (One problem the first test case I had created was that the system did not know the MIME type. But the error occurs whether it is known or not.) If the system does not know the type, for example the Word files defined a APPLICATION/OCTET-STREAM, then Pine looks in its own mimerc and mailcaps. The patched version, using the patch I cobbled together, will display a file locally if osx_build_mime_type_cmd returns 0 and the type is a form of html or text. I don't believe that is what was intended. But it suits me. If the type is known, then the OS reader is launched. However, the launch is such that if you exit Pine, the application closes. That is a bad idea if the user launches Word to edit an attached file (for example). I fix this by using my own mailcap shell scripts that call the OSX open command which launches the app without connecting to the parent Pine session. This doesn't work for Darwin applications. For example, I run a GTK Mazilla for my browser. In that case I have to use nohup. Frankly, I would figure most potential OSX Pine users to be familiar with the commandline and terminal so that they would rely on scripts and such the way folks on a BSD system would. Perhaps a variant based on that concept using the mimedisp.bsd template would be worth developing. robert ---- Explanation from Apple regarding the macros. The Tech note mentioned ---- is more clear and points out that stub functions need to be created. ---- So the defs internal to a function do not work at all if I understand ---- the note and the explanation below. /* File: AvailabilityMacros.h Copyright: (c) 2001-2003 by Apple Computer, Inc., all rights reserved. More Info: See TechNote 2064 Contains: Autoconfiguration of AVAILABLE_ macros for Mac OS X This header enables a developer to specify build time constraints on what Mac OS X versions the resulting application will be run. There are two bounds a developer can specify: MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED The lower bound controls which calls to OS functions will be weak-importing (allowed to be unresolved at launch time). The upper bound controls which OS functionality, if used, will result in a compiler error because that functionality is not available on on any OS is the specifed range. For example, suppose an application is compiled with: MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2 MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3 and an OS header contains: extern void funcA(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER; extern void funcB(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER_BUT_DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2; extern void funcC(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER_BUT_DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3; extern void funcD(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1_AND_LATER; extern void funcE(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2_AND_LATER; extern void funcF(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3_AND_LATER; extern void funcG(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4_AND_LATER; typedef long TypeA DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER; typedef long TypeB DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1_AND_LATER; typedef long TypeC DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2_AND_LATER; typedef long TypeD DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3_AND_LATER; typedef long TypeE DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4_AND_LATER; Any application code which uses these declarations will get the following: compile link run ------- ------ ------- funcA: normal normal normal funcB: warning normal normal funcC: normal normal normal funcD: normal normal normal funcE: normal normal normal funcF: normal weak on 10.3 normal, on 10.2 (&funcF == NULL) funcG: error error n/a typeA: warning typeB: warning typeC: warning typeD: normal typeE: normal */ > Thanks, > Jeff > > On Fri, 28 May 2004, robert delius royar wrote: > > > In the file mimedisp.osx there are a number of #ifdefs to include code based > > on the operating-system level. These are incorrectly used. Those OS defines > > are all turned on. They are values, not simple BOOLEANS. The system > > headers define them this way: > > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0 1000 > > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1 1010 > > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2 1020 > > #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3 1030 > > > > If you compile with new tools on a 10.2.8 system (as Dr. Clea F. Rees > > discovered), you get a number of compilation errors. On 10.3, you get > > crashes when you try to open an attached html file. > > > > See also the pin-info thread "Pine 4.60 on Mac OS X: mime types and crash" > > with the following Message-IDs: > > , > > and > > > > > > Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Carbon than I can suggest how to > > write the conditionals so that the code is not included which is > > inapropriate for 10.2 or 10.3. A uname -a for 10.2 will return a string > > which contains "6.x.x Darwin Kernel Version 6.x.x" > > > > My 10.3.4 system is "7.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.4.0" > > > -- Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 12 21:05:46 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5D45kdO027834 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:05:46 -0700 Received: from RR (user-0cces59.cable.mindspring.com [24.199.112.169]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5D45i2Y001875 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:05:44 -0700 Message-Id: <200406130405.i5D45i2Y001875@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: SCIENTIFIC RESULTS To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: ATTRACT WOMEN INSTANTLY!!! --ATTRACT-RX!-- HUMAN PHEROMONE RELEASER!-!-! PROVEN RESULTS!!!! Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:05:20 -0400 X-Mailer: web14908.mail.yahoo.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="1aa516c4-a827-46cd-b21d-db05ea95aabb" Reply-To: SCIENTIFIC RESULTS X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX 2.900, MANY_EXCLAMATIONS 2.499, SEDUCTION 1.835, HTML_90_100 1.582, UPPERCASE_50_75 1.152, RELAYING_FRAME 1.015, DCC_BULK_MEDIUM 1, URI_HEAVY 0.206, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __UPPERCASE_50_75 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __MANY_EXCLS 0, __DCC_FUZ1_100 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __CTE 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, PLING_PLING 0.000' This is a multi-part message in MIME format --1aa516c4-a827-46cd-b21d-db05ea95aabb Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --1aa516c4-a827-46cd-b21d-db05ea95aabb-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 12 22:25:20 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5D5PJWk030923; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:25:19 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5D5PGJ4003629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:25:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5D5OrUS015738; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:24:53 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5D5EmXA090276 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:14:48 -0700 Received: from mail.arczip.com (mail.arczip.com [216.126.227.134]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5D5EhsX016022 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:14:44 -0700 Received: from 09-031.149.popsite.net [64.24.188.31] by mail.arczip.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A2C023D5010C; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:14:40 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:20:44 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, __C230066_P5 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, SMTPD_IN_RCVD 0.000, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I patched the source code using (1) the previous osx-fix.shar; and (2) the mimedisp.osx-diff mentioned in the message below. Using gcc 3.3 on 10.2.8 and just "./build osx" (which isn't what I'd normally use), I find that: in case (1) the build fails with compilation errors, albeit different errors than previously; in case (2) compilation is successful. I haven't tested the executables from (2) and I did get various warnings etc, but some of these result from my using a standard command when I should make sure it's using the /usr/local version of openssl. I didn't bother to do that because it required a lot of mucking about last time. (I think the osx stuff trumps the command line instruction to use /usr/local/openssl etc. etc. in some cases, but not others. Or else I missed something critical somewhere...) Clea -- Dr. Clea F. Rees Department of Philosophy Sutton Hall, Room 452 1011 South Drive Indiana University of Pennsylvania Indiana PA 15705-1087 U.S.A. Tel: +1-724-357-5614 (o) +1-724-357-2310 (d) NB: From UK, dial 00 before the appropriate number to access the international system. email: rees@arczip.com http://users.arczip.com/rees/ On 12/06/04, you seem to have written: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 about 17:53 -0700 UTC Jeff Franklin wrote: > >> Hi Robert, >> >> Sorry this went unanswered for so long. Actually, someone sent us a patch of >> how it should be, which we've included in the source to be released with 4.61. >> I've attached it. So, does this fix the crash that you've been having? >> > > Jeff, > > No, the problem is that the concept is wrong. The defines in the patch are > being used as though they were preprocessor commands, but the header where > these macros are defined makes it clear the test must be at runtime. I have > the deployment_target set as per Apple's documentation, so if the macros > were used correctly, they should have stubbed the routines not needed on a > 10.3 machine. > > Unless MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED is set at compilation so the > preprocessor sees a value different from that needed for OSX 10.0, both bits > of code will be included. I have appended a copy of Apple's explanation of > these macros to the end of this note. > > If you compile the function mime_get_os_ext_from_mimetype on a 10.2 machine > using the newest version of the compiler available from Apple for that > machine, then you will get compile-time errors. If you compile the program > on a 10.3 machine with new tools, it will run on a 10.2 machine because > osx_build_mime_type_cmd gets called before mime_get_os_ext_from_mimetype and > its value returned makes sense on the 10.2 machine. 10.3 machines appear to > need it to return 0 so that the fall back to mime_get_os_ext_from_mimetype > doesn't assume that some processing has already occured. This is the best I > can do to figure out what is going on simply because I don't program Carbon. > I think it's mainly reserved for OS9 compatibility. I would have thought > the OSX-specific sections would have used Cocoa and Darwin only. I don't > believe you see much Darwin mixed with Carbon development > > To further complicate things, the Availability Macros were designed to be > used in Project Builder or (later) Xcode. The only way to import a unix > commandline project into these is to use the configure/Makefile > structure--not possible with Pine. The builders assume that environment > variables can be set (the way configure does) for unique targets. But that > does not seem to work with the Pine build. I tried to use EXTRASPECIALS to > set the values for the OS_X level, but found these were thrown away when the > osdependent build ran--just where they were needed. > > With the patch I sent earlier, the functions are included only if the > intended target is of the correct level, but it requires hand coding if the > build machine is running a different OS level from the target which means > someone has to compile a 10.3 version on a 10.3 machine or 10.2 on a machine > with the 10.2 tools (I am only supposing this latter limitation). With the > patch, attachments display based on their MIME type if the system knows that > type. (One problem the first test case I had created was that the system > did not know the MIME type. But the error occurs whether it is known or > not.) If the system does not know the type, for example the Word files > defined a APPLICATION/OCTET-STREAM, then Pine looks in its own mimerc and > mailcaps. > > The patched version, using the patch I cobbled together, will display a file > locally if osx_build_mime_type_cmd returns 0 and the type is a form of html > or text. I don't believe that is what was intended. But it suits me. If > the type is known, then the OS reader is launched. However, the launch is > such that if you exit Pine, the application closes. That is a bad idea if > the user launches Word to edit an attached file (for example). I fix this > by using my own mailcap shell scripts that call the OSX open command which > launches the app without connecting to the parent Pine session. This > doesn't work for Darwin applications. For example, I run a GTK Mazilla for > my browser. In that case I have to use nohup. > > Frankly, I would figure most potential OSX Pine users to be familiar with > the commandline and terminal so that they would rely on scripts and such the > way folks on a BSD system would. Perhaps a variant based on that concept > using the mimedisp.bsd template would be worth developing. > > robert > > ---- Explanation from Apple regarding the macros. The Tech note mentioned > ---- is more clear and points out that stub functions need to be created. > ---- So the defs internal to a function do not work at all if I understand > ---- the note and the explanation below. > /* > File: AvailabilityMacros.h > > Copyright: (c) 2001-2003 by Apple Computer, Inc., all rights reserved. > > More Info: See TechNote 2064 > > Contains: Autoconfiguration of AVAILABLE_ macros for Mac OS X > > This header enables a developer to specify build time > constraints on what Mac OS X versions the resulting > application will be run. There are two bounds a developer > can specify: > > MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED > MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED > > The lower bound controls which calls to OS functions will > be weak-importing (allowed to be unresolved at launch time). > The upper bound controls which OS functionality, if used, > will result in a compiler error because that functionality is > not available on on any OS is the specifed range. > > For example, suppose an application is compiled with: > > MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2 > MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3 > > and an OS header contains: > > extern void funcA(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER; > extern void funcB(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER_BUT_DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2; > extern void funcC(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER_BUT_DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3; > extern void funcD(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1_AND_LATER; > extern void funcE(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2_AND_LATER; > extern void funcF(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3_AND_LATER; > extern void funcG(void) AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4_AND_LATER; > > typedef long TypeA DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0_AND_LATER; > typedef long TypeB DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1_AND_LATER; > typedef long TypeC DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2_AND_LATER; > typedef long TypeD DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3_AND_LATER; > typedef long TypeE DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4_AND_LATER; > > Any application code which uses these declarations will get the following: > > compile link run > ------- ------ ------- > funcA: normal normal normal > funcB: warning normal normal > funcC: normal normal normal > funcD: normal normal normal > funcE: normal normal normal > funcF: normal weak on 10.3 normal, on 10.2 (&funcF == NULL) > funcG: error error n/a > typeA: warning > typeB: warning > typeC: warning > typeD: normal > typeE: normal > > > */ > >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> On Fri, 28 May 2004, robert delius royar wrote: >> >>> In the file mimedisp.osx there are a number of #ifdefs to include code based >>> on the operating-system level. These are incorrectly used. Those OS defines >>> are all turned on. They are values, not simple BOOLEANS. The system >>> headers define them this way: >>> #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_0 1000 >>> #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1 1010 >>> #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2 1020 >>> #define MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3 1030 >>> >>> If you compile with new tools on a 10.2.8 system (as Dr. Clea F. Rees >>> discovered), you get a number of compilation errors. On 10.3, you get >>> crashes when you try to open an attached html file. >>> >>> See also the pin-info thread "Pine 4.60 on Mac OS X: mime types and crash" >>> with the following Message-IDs: >>> , >>> and >>> >>> >>> Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Carbon than I can suggest how to >>> write the conditionals so that the code is not included which is >>> inapropriate for 10.2 or 10.3. A uname -a for 10.2 will return a string >>> which contains "6.x.x Darwin Kernel Version 6.x.x" >>> >>> My 10.3.4 system is "7.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.4.0" >>> >> > > -- > Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English > Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 13 07:27:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5DERWm9023915; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:27:32 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5DERS82021356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:27:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5DERB8v018414; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:27:12 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5DEPvTu033956 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:25:57 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5DEPrRx032540 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:25:53 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5DEP87Q085758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:25:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5DEP3bM008227; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:25:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:25:03 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=4.5 tests=CARRIAGE_RETURNS,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO, J_CHICKENPOX_21,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 about 01:20 -0400 UTC Dr. Clea F. Rees wrote: > I patched the source code using (1) the previous osx-fix.shar; and (2) > the mimedisp.osx-diff mentioned in the message below. > > Using gcc 3.3 on 10.2.8 and just "./build osx" (which isn't what I'd > normally use), I find that: > in case (1) the build fails with compilation errors, albeit > different errors than previously; > in case (2) compilation is successful. I just downloaded 4.60 again and ran osx-fix.shar in the main directory. When I ran `./build osx', it worked without any errors. When you run the shar archive, * copy the file to the main directory of the pine distribution (i.e. there should be subdirectories contrib, pine, etc.), * if you want the separate patch files (not really needed), then `mkdir patch' before running the command, * run it with the command `sh osx-fix.shar', and * `chmod +x pine/osdep/osx-dep.sh'. The shell should echo the following to you: x - pine/makefile.osx x - pine/osdep/osx-dep.sh x - pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx x - patch/osxversion.patch x - patch/mimeosdep.patch There will be errors if you have no patch directory, but the patches are already applied to the included files. If everything ran correctly, then you should see cc -g -DDEBUG -DDEBUGJOURNAL -DENABLE_LDAP -Dconst= -DSYSTYPE=\"OSX\" -DOSX_MAJOR_VERSION=`osdep/osx-dep.sh` -c -o os.o os.c The -DOSX_MAJOR_VERSION=`osdep/osx-dep.sh` is the magic that sets up the required versioning based on your system. > I haven't tested the executables from (2) and I did get various warnings etc, Because using the patch supplied from 4.61 likely creates a program which doesn't call the code 10.2 can't handle, it may run fine. But I bet if you were to look at the code in a debugger, you would discover, as I did on 10.3, that the code supposed to be ignored is actually compiled in. Again, that is how weak binding works. But the code in os.c is not designed to use weak binding correctly. There is a discussion on unix-porting (an Apple OSX list) in which someone from Apple recommends Cocoa to handle calls to Aqua programs from Unix, not Carbon. I think that is the real problem. Carbon needs to be initialized before these calls are being made (which is why the command line hack works). That initialization is not being done. I haven't found any documentation on this, but there is discussion on the lists about which C-runtime start up to use for different systems, and I suspect that Carbon programs built with ProjectBuilder (a.k.a. XCode) use a different crt.o file than do unix (Darwin) commandline compiled programs. Cocoa uses Objective-C. It looks as though one line of code using NSWorkspace could handle launching web pages in the default browser or any attachment that has a registered extension. However for attachments that do not have an extent or a transport mechanism, Pine would be hard-pressed to devise one. OSX must store its MIME types somewhere because there are third-party programs which can reset the defualts or add types. But I haven't located that Property List. There may be a Cocoa MIME-based command available also. Unfortunate also is the fact that much of the Cocoa magic requires 10.2 or even 10.3. -- Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky A mathematician is a theorem's way of making another theorem. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 13 12:42:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5DJggmU002097; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:42:42 -0700 Received: from aol1079.com (user-0ccequh.cable.mindspring.com [24.199.107.209]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5DJfQi4028738; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:41:27 -0700 Message-Id: <200406131941.i5DJfQi4028738@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: BestDeals Reply-To: GREATDEALS!!@aol.com Subject: Great Deals.... DONT MISS OUT... FREE STUFF!!! Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:42:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="b05ed556-794f-4730-83f4-1f05e1e1363c" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIIII, Probability=64%, Report='MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX 2.900, HTML_90_100 1.582, DCC_BULK_MEDIUM 1, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, URI_HEAVY 0.206, SUBJ_FREE_CAP 0.001, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0.000, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __UPPERCASE_25_50 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_7 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __AOL_FROM 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_100 0, __DCC_FUZ2_100 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_7 0.000, TO_MALFORMED 0.000, __CT 0, PLING_PLING 0.000' This is a multi-part message in MIME format --b05ed556-794f-4730-83f4-1f05e1e1363c Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable















--b05ed556-794f-4730-83f4-1f05e1e1363c-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 14 11:17:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5EIHcGD022796; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:17:38 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5EIHWhE031405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:17:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5EIHAU3005196; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:17:10 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5EIFi2A019438 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:44 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5EIFhnd030242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:44 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5EIFqJA026547 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:43 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5EIFNGf005349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: >Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:30:23 -0500 (CDT) >From: Gopi Sundaram >To: Pine Discussion Forum >Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication > >On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Kassim Kasmani wrote: > >> My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP >> field, I put in the server address. Where do I put in the >> username/password? > >FAQ. > >http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/write.html#smtpauth If this is a FAQ, shouldn't it be covered in *pine's* documentation? From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 14 12:19:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5EJJ2Pf026381; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:19:02 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5EJJ0IE001511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:19:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5EJIlZO014644; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:18:48 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5EJHsf4115962 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:17:54 -0700 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5EJHrYs024942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:17:53 -0700 Received: from heaven.corp.google.com (gpsi1.corp.google.com [10.3.0.251]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5EJHico021147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:17:44 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ryanb@heaven.corp.google.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: >>> My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP ... > If this is a FAQ, shouldn't it be covered in *pine's* documentation? for standard SMTP auth, it is. it's in the help text for the smtp-server value on the config page. as for the other auth style, i'd never even heard of it before i read that faq page. :P it probably wouldn't hurt to have a line or two about it, but i won't fault them for leaving it out. -Ryan From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 14 18:36:46 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5F1aiJ3012247; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:36:44 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5F1aeYO019755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:36:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5F1aQcI008310; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:36:26 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5F1ZXml095522 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:35:33 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5F1ZWhq031159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:35:33 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5F1ZWXp013588 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:35:32 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5F1ZUvY006133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: /notls not being paid attention to? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: >I added /notls to that one. I'm not actually using collections as far >as I remember, so maybe I should just delete it. > >But I'll live with this for a while and see if that error goes away.. >if not, I'll check around if I have the server name in other places in >my config file. I now haven't had the SSL error in a while. >If this _does_ fix it, then that just leads to another admittedly wide- >ranging enhancement request -- if pine had noticed I added /notls to >one instance of "mail.apple.com", it would have made sense for it to >mention that I had other instances of the server WITHOUT /notls. > >Even if it couldn't/wouldn't automatically change all of them, if it just >said "you should update the server in the collectionList locations as appropriate>", that would have clued me in. This still applies. As friendly as pine usually is, server setup and making sure the various settings are consistent among the different places one can enter is is one of the things that's not very intuitive in pine. (in general, pine is my example that a text-based app can be JUST as simple/easy to use as any GUI program.. in fact, out of the box, I wouldn't use pine.. It's only because I can change the editor and configure other stuff that makes it great to me.) Now the only lingering warning I get is that AUTH=PLAIN one. If I can quiet that one without commenting out a line in the source & recompiling, great. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 00:33:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5F7X4WP024728; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:33:04 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5F7Ww1N032318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:32:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5F7Wen0015298; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:32:40 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5F7VW2K049762 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:31:32 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5F7VPSj022191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:31:27 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru (z101170.int.cboss.ru [10.98.250.14]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i5F7VAbl029907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:31:14 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:31:10 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XX8NyjrK@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > > My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP > > field, I put in the server address. Where do I put in the > > username/password? > > FAQ. > > http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/write.html#smtpauth BTW: Why there is no switch like /password= ? Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 04:59:15 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FBxFhq003046 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:59:15 -0700 Received: from mrson2045.com ([83.110.130.240]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5FBx42n001400 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 04:59:06 -0700 Message-Id: <200406151159.i5FBx42n001400@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: "MRS . B . MAKELE" Reply-To: mrs_b_makele2@yahoo.com Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:04:18 +0400 Subject: YOUR ASSISTANCES IS REQUIRED SIR..... X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===_SecAtt_000_1floxcmkuaiiao" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXX, Probability=60%, Report='RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS 2.900, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0.000, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, TO_MALFORMED 0.000, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0' --===_SecAtt_000_1floxcmkuaiiao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DEAR SIR=2C Please don't be offended or surprised to receive this mail which is sent without you prior permission since we do not know each other before now but we will meet soon because of my situation=2E=2EI got your contact through network online hence decided to write you because of my desperate situation=2E I am MRS BRIDGET MAKELE=2C the wife of late MAKELE WILLIAMS=2C a farmer in southern sudan who was murdered in the land dispute and religious crisis in my country=2E This land and religious problem came when sudanese President is supporting the northern sudan rebels to kill christians in southern suduan introduced a new Land and religious Act Reform that wholly affected the southern sudan that make up of christians farmers and some business people alike=2E This resulted to the killings and mob action by northern sudan war veterans and some lunatics in the norther sudan during this religious issues in my country=2E In fact a lot of people were killed because of this religious crisis Act for which my husband was one of the victims=2EIt is against this background that all my family members fled southern sududan to one of west african country for fear of our lives=2E We are currently taking refuge outside my country where we sought political asylum=2E Before the death of my husband=2C he made a secret but undisclosed deposit with a security Firm outside sudan=2EThis amount was meant for the purchase of new Agricultural machineries and chemicals for Government Farm establishments in northern sudan=2E The consignment=5B2 sealed trunk boxes=5D were declared to contain Gem Stones & Family Valuables but The actual content is 46=2E5M millions in $100 bills=2E shipped on diplomatic cover to avoid customs detecting the actual contents=2E He was a leading and successful Government Contractor who was blessed=2E This was done when he noticed the looming danger in southern sudan on religious policies=2E Uptill now there is no peace or safety in my country and the family have decided to have the boxes containing the funds moved out to a safer country by the Security deposit Agency so that the funds can be banked and invested in some profit yielding venture or business=2E But we must treat the issue with relative secrecy and confidentiality in the interest of my family=2Csecurity and for other good reasons=2E If you accept to assist to invest part of the funds=2C do please reply immediately so as to contact my lawyer for details of what is to be done after reaching a workable agreement with you=2E He would conclude all arrangements with you to clear the consignment=5Bin which the funds are secretly packed He would also explain our desire to sharing of the funds on 70%=2F30% basis and=2C the subsequent investment to be made in your country with our share as you may advise=2E REGARDS=2C MRS MAKELE =5B FOR THE FAMILY=5D =2C =2E r --===_SecAtt_000_1floxcmkuaiiao Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="247.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="247.txt" YmFydHMxMDAwQGFvbC5jb20NCmtpb0BrdXdhaXQtaW5mby5vcmcNCmFhcnRzQHBzY3cudXZhLm5s DQpxdWVzdGlvbnNAa3V3YWl0LWluZm8ub3JnDQppbmZvQG5yZWMuY29tLmt3DQptZW1jQG5jYy5t b2Mua3cNCiJDYWbpQGt1d2FpdC5uZXQiIDxDYWZAa3V3YWl0Lm5ldD4NCk5ldGNhZmVAbmNjLm1v Yy5rdw0KdGFyZXFAa3V3YWl0LWluZm8ub3JnDQoidHRhaGFuaUBrdXdhaXQtaW5mby5vcmciIDx0 YWhhbmlAa3V3YWl0LWluZm8ub3JnPg0KZmF0bWFAa3V3YWl0LWluZm8ub3JnDQpzZGV5eWFpbkBr dXdhaXQtaW5mby5vcmcNCmRicml0b0BrdXdhaXQtaW5mby5vcmcNCnR0YWhhbmlAa3V3YWl0LWlu Zm8ub3JnDQpleGNlbGxlbmNlQGJzay5lZHUua3cNCmFsdW1uaUBpbmZvcGhpbC5jb20NCiJFbWFp bDogYWJlZXJzYkB5YWhvby5jb20iIDxhYmVlcnNiQHlhaG9vLmNvbT4NCmFsYXJhYmltYWdAYWxh cmFiaW1hZy5uZXQNCmFyYWJpbWFnQGFyYWJpbWFnLm5ldA0KYnJhZEBtcnVuaXgubmV0DQoiw9HT 4SDF3srRx83Hyt8iIDxmZWVkYmFja0BrdW5hLm5ldC5rdz4NCmpidW5rZXJAbmd3cmMub3JnDQpo cUBuZ3dyYy5vcmcNCnNyb2JpbnNvbkBuZ3dyYy5vcmcNCm13b29kc0BuZ3dyYy5vcmcNClJlY3J1 aXRtZW50QGJrbWUuY29tLmt3DQptYXJrZXRpbmdAYmttZS5jb20NCmluZm9AYnVyZ2FuLmNvbQ0K IkVtYWlsOiBhcGNvQG1vYy5rdyIgPGFwY29AbW9jLmt3Pg0Kd2VibWFzdGVyQG1vcC5nb3Yua3cN Cmxvd2VsbC5mZWxkQGVpYS5kb2UuZ292DQpjb21tZW50c0Bob3RlbGJvb2suY29tDQoiVG9ueSBF enphdCAnODkiIDx0b25lYm9uZUBhaS5taXQuZWR1Pg0KYWFnQGFqZWR1Y2F0aW9uYWxpbnN0aXR1 dGUuY29tDQpmZWVkYmFja0B6YWppbC5jb20NCmVyaWsua3JlaWxAZWlhLmRvZS5nb3YNCiJsb3dl bGwuZmVsZEBlaWEuZG9lLmdvdiIgPGxmZWxkQGVpYS5kb2UuZ292Pg0KIsfI2ssg0dPH4ckg4ebS 7dEgx+HK0cjtySIgPG1pbmlzdGVyQG1vZS5lZHUua3c+DQpuY21wYV9rdXdhaXRAaG90bWFpbC5j b20NCmFobWVkamFyYWxsYWhAaG90bWFpbC5jb20NCmFsc2V5YXNzYWhAYWxzZXlhc3NhaC5jb20N CmFyYWJ0aW1lc0BhcmFidGltZXNvbmxpbmUuY29tDQpyYWRpb2t1d2FpdEByYWRpb2t1d2FpdC5v cmcNCmFsaGV3YXJAYWxoZXdhci5jb20NCiJBYW1lciBBYnUtUWFybiIgPGFhYnVxYXJuQGx5bngu bmV1LmVkdT4NCndlYm1hc3RlckBrdWMwMS5rdW5pdi5lZHUua3cNCm1pZGVhc3RAZmFzLmhhcnZh cmQuZWR1DQpqcmFtbGpha0BmYXMuaGFydmFyZC5lZHUNCiJhbC1hbnNhcmlAS1VXQUlULUZVTkQu T1JHIiA8IGFsLWFuc2FyaUBLVVdBSVQtRlVORC5PUkc+DQoiYWwtZmFyYWpAS1VXQUlULUZVTkQu T1JHIiA8IGFsLWZhcmFqQEtVV0FJVC1GVU5ELk9SRz4NCiJoYXNhbkBLVVdBSVQtRlVORC5PUkci IDwgaGFzYW5AS1VXQUlULUZVTkQuT1JHPg0KYWwtYW5zYXJpQEtVV0FJVC1GVU5ELk9SRw0KYWwt ZmFyYWpAS1VXQUlULUZVTkQuT1JHDQpoYXNhbkBLVVdBSVQtRlVORC5PUkcNCmluZm9AbmVzY28t a3cuY29tDQoiRW1haWwgdG8gV2VibWFzdGVyIiA8d2VibWFzdGVyQHNhZmF0Lmtpc3IuZWR1Lmt3 Pg0Kc3VwcG9ydEB0cmF2ZWxkb2NzLmNvbQ0Kc2ZvQHRyYXZlbGRvY3MuY29tDQppbmZvQGhvdGVs Z3VpZGUuY29tDQoiQ09OVEFDVCBVUyIgPGd1bGYyMDAwLXF1ZXJpZXNAY29sdW1iaWEuZWR1Pg0K IkNvbnRhY3QgVXMiIDx1c2VkYm9va3NAYmFybmVzYW5kbm9ibGUuY29tPg0KT3BlcmF0aW9uYWxN ZXJjaGFuZGlzaW5nQGJvb2suY29tDQp5b3VybmFtZUBpc3AuY29tDQp0YXhlc0Bib29rLmNvbQ0K Y29ycmVjdGlvbnNAYmFybmVzYW5kbm9ibGUuY29tDQpzYWxlc0Bib29rLmNvbQ0Kc3VwcG9ydEBi b29rLmNvbQ0KY29ycmVjdGlvbnNAYm4uY29tDQpwcml2YWN5QGJhcm5lc2FuZG5vYmxlLmNvbQ0K IlNlbmQgRmVlZGJhY2siIDxtYWdhemluZXMtZmVlZGJhY2tAYW1hem9uLmNvbT4NCmVycm9oYUBi bHVlZnJvZy5jb20NCndvbmRlcmN1YkB5YWhvby5jb20NCkxpZmVAQW1hem9uLmNvbQ0KRGVwYXJ0 bWVudHNAQW1hem9uLmNvbQ0KY29weXJpZ2h0QGFtYXpvbi5jb20NCnNhZmVoYXJib3JAYW1hem9u LmNvbQ0KbXVzZXVtQHRybWt0LmNvbQ0Kd2VibWFzdGVyQHRybWt0LmNvbQ0Kd2ViYWRtaW5AYnNr LmVkdS5rdw0KYXNrQGFzay5lZHUua3cNCmVsZW1zY2hvb2xAYXNrLmVkdS5rdw0KbWlkZGxlc2No b29sQGFzay5lZHUua3cNCmhpZ2hzY2hvb2xAYXNrLmVkdS5rdw0KaXRAYXNrLmVkdS5rdw0KbmVz cy5yZWJlY2NhQGFzay5lZHUua3cNCmJpbGFuQGFzay5lZHUua3cNCnNpYmxleXBAYXNrLmVkdS5r dw0KIkUtbWFpbCIgPG5yYWphYkB0cm1rdC5jb20+DQphZG1pbkBuZXNrdC5jb20NCnJlY3J1aXRt ZW50QHRlcy5lZHUua3cNCiJEZXB1dHkgSGVhZCIgPGRlcHV0eUB0ZXMuZWR1Lmt3Pg0KIkJ1cnNh ciIgPGJ1cnNhckB0ZXMuZWR1Lmt3Pg0KIkFjY291bnRhbnQiIDxhY2NvdW50c0B0ZXMuZWR1Lmt3 Pg0KIk51cnNlIiA8bnVyc2VAdGVzLmVkdS5rdz4NCiJSZWNlcHRpb25pc3QvU2VjcmV0YXJ5IiA8 c2VjcmV0YXJ5QHRlcy5lZHUua3c+DQoiTGlicmFyaWFuIiA8bGlicmFyeUB0ZXMuZWR1Lmt3Pg0K dXNlckBkb21haW4uY29tDQplZHVzdGFmZmluZ0Bpc3MuZWR1DQpkaXJlY3RvcnlAaXNzLmVkdQ0K bmV3c2xpbmtzQGlzcy5lZHUNCmlzc0Bpc3MuZWR1DQoiQ29tbWVudHMiIDxhbWNmYWRkZUBlbVRl Y2gubmV0Pg0KcmphaHJAaXNzLmVkdQ0KImVtYWlsIiA8eXVqdWljb0BpbmZvcGhpbC5jb20+DQoi Q29udGFjdCIgPGFmZmlsaWF0ZUBhbHVtbmkubmV0Pg0Kc3VwcG9ydEBhbHVtbmkubmV0DQpjaGVy eWxAbmNjLm1vYy5rdw0KcThkeXNsZXhpYUBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0Kcm9uY2IxMjNAYW9sLmNvbQ0K bmFsbXV0YXdhQGFvbC5jb20NCmdlb3NlbnRpbmVsQGlzdG0ub3JnDQppc3RtQGlzdG0ub3JnDQoi RW1haWwgVXMiIDxBUEhJUy5XZWJAYXBoaXMudXNkYS5nb3Y+DQppbmZvQGFjdGl2ZWJpb3RlY2gu Y29tDQpoc2VkYUBjZGMuZ292DQpTZWN0aW9uNTA4QGhocy5nb3YNCmluZm9Ac2Vkby5jby51aw0K dHJhbnNmZXJzQHNlZG8uY28udWsNCiJhbGZvcnFhbkBhbC1mb3JxYW4ubmV0IiA8ZW1haWw6YWxh bWFsc2hhYmFiQGFsYW1hbHNoYWJhYi5jb20+DQphbGZvcnFhbkBhbC1mb3JxYW4ubmV0DQoiRGFu aWxvIEMuIER5IiA8ZGFuaWxvQG5jcy5jb20uc2c+DQprdW5hX2FtbWFuQHlhaG9vLmNvbQ0Ka3Vu YXN0QHRlcnJhLm5ldC5sYg0Ka3VuYTEzQGVtaXJhdGVzLm5ldC5hZQ0Ka3VuYXJ5ZEBhbmV0Lm5l dC5zYQ0Ka3VuYXRlaHJhbkBhZnJvb3ouY29tDQprdW5hdGVocmFuQG5lZGEubmV0DQp5YWh5YWFs aGFkZGlAeS5uZXQueWUNCiJyYWhtYXpmQHlhaG9vLmZyIiA8a3VuYUBrdW5hLm5ldC5rdz4NCiJo dXNpbmNvbTJAc3VkYW5tYWlsLm5ldCIgPGFiZGFsc2FsYW1fYW1pbkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbT4NCm5l d3NmZWVkQG9tYW50ZWwubmV0Lm9tDQpvc21rZDIwMDBAaG90bWFpbC5jb20NCm1hZGVsQHN1cGVy b25saW5lLmNvbQ0Ka3VuYWFua2FyYUBzdXBlcm9saW5lLmNvbQ0KS3VuYS1pcmFxQHlhaG9vLmNv bQ0KQWxnaGF6eUBrdW5hLm5ldC5rdw0KcnRyZWJha0Bob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KemFrdGFtYXNAeWFo b28uY29tDQpqc2FkYXFhQGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQpuam9vZF9xYXNlbUB5YWhvby5jb20NCmF6ZXI3 NzdAeWFob28uY29tDQpiYWthcnlAZ214Lm5ldA0KYmFrYXJ5QG9tZWdhLmJnDQpraGF0YXRiYUBo b3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KdGFsYWw5MEBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KbWl5b2tvMnVAc2lyaXVzLm9jbi5uZS5q cA0Ka3V3YWl0QGJ0Y2xpY2suY29tDQpoZWRheWF0LmFiZGVsbmFiaUBmcmVlc3VyZi5jaA0KaGVk YXlhdC5hYmRlbG5hYmlAdGllcy5pdHUuaW50DQoiS3VuYS1zaGFyaGFuQGJlbGdhY29tLm5ldCIg PEt1bmEtYnJ1c3NlbEBzd2luZy5iZWNvbT4NCiJtYWhkaS5lbG5lbXJAZmFzdHdlYm5ldC5pdCIg PEt1bmFyb21lQHRpbi5pdD4NCktVTkFCRVJMSU5AdC1vbmxpbmUuZGUNCnNhYWRAa3VuYS13YXNo aW5ndG9uLmNvbQ0KS3VuYXdhc2hAYW9sLmNvbQ0KRGF2MTZtYWNAYW9sLmNvbQ0Ka3VuYXNueUBl YXJ0aGxpbmsubmV0DQprdW5hc255QGVhcnRoaW5rLm5ldA0KQWt1bmFzbnlAZWFydGhpbmsubmV0 DQpBZGliQHBvcC5jb21zdGFyLnJ1DQphZGliQGNvbC5ydQ0KIllhc2luQHNtYXJ0bmV0LmJhIiA8 WWFzaW5AYmloLm5ldC5iYT4NCmFiZGVsd2FoMWIuZWxndWV5ZWRAY2hlbGxvLmF0DQprdW5haW5k aWFAaG90bWFpbC5jb20NCmt1bmFjYWlyb0Bob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KYW1tYW5Aa3VuYS5uZXQua3cN Cmt1bmFuZXdzQHNjcy1uZXQub3JnDQpuYWNldXIubXRpckBnbmV0LnRuDQprdW5hdGVocmFuQHNh ZmluZWgubmV0DQpyYWhtYXpmQHlhaG9vLmZyDQpodXNpbmNvbTJAc3VkYW5tYWlsLm5ldA0KYXph bjNAaG90bWFpbC5jb20NCmtob2toYXIyN0Bob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KamdrZWF0aW5nQGt1bmEtcGFy aXMuY29tDQpLdW5hLXNoYXJoYW5AYmVsZ2Fjb20ubmV0DQptYWhkaS5lbG5lbXJAZmFzdHdlYm5l dC5pdA0KQmF5Z2VudHNAYXFsLmNvbQ0Kc29xcmE2MjAwMEB5YWhvby5jb20NCllhc2luQHNtYXJ0 bmV0LmJhDQphZG1pbkBrdW5hLm5ldC5rdw0Kam1vY2tAbmd3cmMub3JnDQoiUmVjcnVpdG1lbnRA YmttZS5jb20iIDxyZWNydWl0bWVudEBia21lLmNvbS5rdyUyMD4NClJlY3J1aXRtZW50QGJrbWUu Y29tDQpia21la3dAYmttZS5jb20NCiJjYXJkc0Bia21lLmNvbSIgPCBjYXJkc0Bia21lLmNvbS5r dz4NCmNhcmRzQGJrbWUuY29tDQoiYmttZWt3QGJrbWUuY29tIiA8YmttZWt3QGJrbWUuY29tLmt3 Pg0KbS5mdWxsZXJAYmttZS5jb20NCnAuc2Fya2FyQGJrbWUuY29tDQp0cmVhc3VyeUBia21lLmNv bQ0KdHJhaW5pbmdAYmttZS5jb20NCml0ZGV2QGJrbWUuY29tDQphdWRpdEBia21lLmNvbQ0Kei5m YXRheWVyQGJrbWUuY29tDQoibWFpbmJyQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20iIDxtYWluYnJAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbS5r dz4NCiJhaG1hZGlAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbSIgPGFobWFkaUBidXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KImFkYWlsaXlh QGJ1cmdhbi5jb20iIDxhZGFpbGl5YUBidXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KImZhaGFoZWVsQGJ1cmdhbi5j b20iIDxmYWhhaGVlbEBidXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KInNodXdhaWtoQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20iIDxzaHV3 YWlraEBidXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KInNoYWhlZWRAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbSIgPHNoYWhlZWRAYnVyZ2Fu LmNvbS5rdz4NCiJqYWhyYUBidXJnYW4uY29tIiA8amFocmFAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbS5rdz4NCiJqYWhy YTJAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbSIgPGphaHJhMkBidXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KImEuc2FsZW1AYnVyZ2FuLmNv bSIgPGEuc2FsZW1AYnVyZ2FuLmNvbS5rdz4NCiJzYWJoYW5AYnVyZ2FuLmNvbSIgPHNhYmhhbkBi dXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KInF1cmVpbkBidXJnYW4uY29tIiA8cXVyZWluQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20ua3c+ DQoic2FsbWl5YUBidXJnYW4uY29tIiA8c2FsbWl5YUBidXJnYW4uY29tLmt3Pg0KImYuc2FsZW1A YnVyZ2FuLmNvbSIgPGYuc2FsZW1AYnVyZ2FuLmNvbS5rdz4NCiJzaHcucmVzQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20i IDxzaHcucmVzQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20ua3c+DQptYWluYnJAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbQ0KYWhtYWRpQGJ1cmdh bi5jb20NCmFkYWlsaXlhQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20NCmZhaGFoZWVsQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20NCnNodXdhaWto QGJ1cmdhbi5jb20NCnNoYWhlZWRAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbQ0KSGF3YWxsaUBidXJnYW4uY29tDQpqYWhy YUBidXJnYW4uY29tDQpqYWhyYTJAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbQ0KYS5zYWxlbUBidXJnYW4uY29tDQpzYWJo YW5AYnVyZ2FuLmNvbQ0KcXVyZWluQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20NCnNhbG1peWFAYnVyZ2FuLmNvbQ0KZi5z YWxlbUBidXJnYW4uY29tDQpzaHcucmVzQGJ1cmdhbi5jb20NCmluZm9AYnVyZ2FuLmNvbS5rdw0K ImhlcmUiIDxpbmZvQGJlZWViYW5rLmNvbT4NCnRyZWFzdXJ5QGJ1cmdhbi5jb20NCmFtcmFuLmFi b2NhckByZXV0ZXJzLmNvbQ0KY3VzdG9tZXJzZXJ2aWNlQGd1bGZiYW5rLmNvbS5rdw0KdXNlcm5h bWVAeW91cm1haWwuY29tDQoiRW1haWwgOiBpYnNlZHVAa2Vtcy5uZXQiIDxpYnNlZHVAa2Vtcy5u ZXQ+DQppYnNlbHVAa2Vtcy5uZXQNCiJFbWFpbCA6IGlic3Jlc2VhcmNoQGtpYnMub3JnIiA8aWJz cmVzZWFyY2hAa2licy5vcmc+DQoiRW1haWw6aWJzbGVhcm5Aa2Vtcy5uZXQiIDxpYnNsZWFybkBr ZW1zLm5ldD4NCmlic2xpYnJhcnlAa2licy5vcmcNCmlic0BxdWFsaXR5bmV0Lm5ldA0KImJ5IGVt YWlsIiA8bWVlZEBjYmEuZWR1Lmt3Pg0KIkUiIDxpYnNlbHVAcXVhbGl0eW5ldC5uZXQ+DQoiUCIg PGlic3ByQGtpYnMub3JnPg0KIkEiIDxpYnNhZG1pbmlzdHJhdGlvbkBraWJzLm9yZz4NCmZpcnN0 QGJ1c2luZXNzY3VsdHVyZS5jb20NCmFwbGVnYWxAbWlkZWFzdGxhdy5jb20NCkt1d2FpdGxhd0Bt aWRlYXN0bGF3LmNvbQ0KUWF0YXJsYXdAbWlkZWFzdGxhdy5jb20NClNhdWRpbGF3QG1pZGVhc3Rs YXcuY29tDQpPbWFubGF3QG1pZGVhc3RsYXcuY29tDQpFZ3lwdGxhd0BtaWRlYXN0bGF3LmNvbQ0K Sm9yZGFubGF3QG1pZGVhc3RsYXcuY29tDQpMZWJhbm9ubGF3QG1pZGVhc3RsYXcuY29tDQo= --===_SecAtt_000_1floxcmkuaiiao --===_SecAtt_000_1floxcmkuaiiao-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 05:22:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FCMA09003762 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:22:11 -0700 Received: from coolre46.com ([83.110.130.240]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5FCLqtg009814 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:21:54 -0700 Message-Id: <200406151221.i5FCLqtg009814@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "MRS MAKELE" Reply-To: mrs_b_makele2@yahoo.com Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:27:04 +0400 Subject: I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCES SIR.... X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===_SecAtt_000_1fanqysodxrnnk" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXX, Probability=60%, Report='RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS 2.900, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0.000, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, TO_MALFORMED 0.000, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0' --===_SecAtt_000_1fanqysodxrnnk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DEAR SIR=2C Please don't be offended or surprised to receive this mail which is sent without you prior permission since we do not know each other before now but we will meet soon because of my situation=2E=2EI got your contact through network online hence decided to write you because of my desperate situation=2E I am MRS BRIDGET MAKELE=2C the wife of late MAKELE WILLIAMS=2C a farmer in southern sudan who was murdered in the land dispute and religious crisis in my country=2E This land and religious problem came when sudanese President is supporting the northern sudan rebels to kill christians in southern suduan introduced a new Land and religious Act Reform that wholly affected the southern sudan that make up of christians farmers and some business people alike=2E This resulted to the killings and mob action by northern sudan war veterans and some lunatics in the norther sudan during this religious issues in my country=2E In fact a lot of people were killed because of this religious crisis Act for which my husband was one of the victims=2EIt is against this background that all my family members fled southern sududan to one of west african country for fear of our lives=2E We are currently taking refuge outside my country where we sought political asylum=2E Before the death of my husband=2C he made a secret but undisclosed deposit with a security Firm outside sudan=2EThis amount was meant for the purchase of new Agricultural machineries and chemicals for Government Farm establishments in northern sudan=2E The consignment=5B2 sealed trunk boxes=5D were declared to contain Gem Stones & Family Valuables but The actual content is 46=2E5M millions in $100 bills=2E shipped on diplomatic cover to avoid customs detecting the actual contents=2E He was a leading and successful Government Contractor who was blessed=2E This was done when he noticed the looming danger in southern sudan on religious policies=2E Uptill now there is no peace or safety in my country and the family have decided to have the boxes containing the funds moved out to a safer country by the Security deposit Agency so that the funds can be banked and invested in some profit yielding venture or business=2E But we must treat the issue with relative secrecy and confidentiality in the interest of my family=2Csecurity and for other good reasons=2E If you accept to assist to invest part of the funds=2C do please reply immediately so as to contact my lawyer for details of what is to be done after reaching a workable agreement with you=2E He would conclude all arrangements with you to clear the consignment=5Bin which the funds are secretly packed He would also explain our desire to sharing of the funds on 70%=2F30% basis and=2C the subsequent investment to be made in your country with our share as you may advise=2E REGARDS=2C MRS MAKELE =5B FOR THE FAMILY=5D =2C =2E r --===_SecAtt_000_1fanqysodxrnnk Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="1290.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="1290.txt" c2FsbHlAYWJjLmNvbQ0KZWRpdG9yc0BsaWdodHJlYWRnZWhlbmRlckBhaHJxLmdvdiJKQU1FUyBT T1VUSEFkaWN3b3JsZCU0MGhvdDMuMTQxNTkyNm1haWwuY29tJTIwbWludXMlMjBwaT4NCiIodGVu LmtuaWxodHJhZSkgKHRhKSAob2ljbmF3aWQpIiA8KHRlbi5rbmlsaHRyYWUpJTIwKHRhKSUyMChv aWNuYXdpZCk+DQoiPHJveXN0Z25yPiA8YXQ+IDx0aWNhbS51dGV4YXMuZWR1PiIgPCUzQ3JveXN0 Z25yJTNFJTIwJTNDYXQlM0UlMjAlM0N0aWNhbS51dGV4YXMuZWR1JTNFPg0KInNrZXRlcnBvdEBj aGFzZSAzIDAgMCAwIC4gY29tIiA8c2tldGVycG90JTQwY2hhc2UlMjAzJTIwMCUyMDAlMjAwJTIw LiUyMGNvbT4NCiJ0b21zdGRlbmlzLmlhaHVAY2EiIDx0b21zdGRlbmlzLmlhaHUlNDBjYT4NCiJ0 MTI2ciBBVCB1bmIgRE9UIGNhIiA8dDEyNnIlMjBBVCUyMHVuYiUyMERPVCUyMGNhPg0KIm1hdHRA emlnZy5jb20iIDxtYXR0JTQwemlnZy5jb20+DQoiam9uZG9oLmN1cnp0ZWNoQGNvbSIgPGpvbmRv aC5jdXJ6dGVjaCU0MGNvbT4NCiJpc2FhY3ImbWFpbHNuYXJlLG5ldCIgPGlzYWFjciUyNm1haWxz bmFyZSUyQ25ldD4NCiJ7bW9jLmxpYW10b2h9IHt0YX0ge2hjdGVubmViaX0iIDwlN0Jtb2MubGlh bXRvaCU3RCUyMCU3QnRhJTdEJTIwJTdCaGN0ZW5uZWJpJTdEPg0KIndhbGRvK3NsYXNoZG90IEFU IHdhbGRvIERPVCBuZXQiIDx3YWxkbyUyQnNsYXNoZG90JTIwQVQlMjB3YWxkbyUyMERPVCUyMG5l dD4NCiJiZXJvQEBAcmVkaGF0Li4uY29tIiA8YmVybyU0MCU0MCU0MHJlZGhhdC4uLmNvbT4NCiJy aWNoZXlATk9zUEFNLmh3eWwub3JnIiA8cmljaGV5JTQwTk9zUEFNLmh3eWwub3JnPg0KIm1jc2V5 Tk9AU1BBTXlhaG9vLmNvbSIgPG1jc2V5Tk8lNDBTUEFNeWFob28uY29tPg0KImNvb2x2aWJlQEBA aGFja2VyaGVhdmVuLi4ub3JnIiA8Y29vbHZpYmUlNDAlNDAlNDBoYWNrZXJoZWF2ZW4uLi5vcmc+ DQoicGFudGhlckBhdXN0aVsgXXIuY29tIFsnbi5yJyBpbiBnYXBdIiA8cGFudGhlciU0MGF1c3Rp JTVCJTIwJTVEci5jb20lMjAlNUInbi5yJyUyMGluJTIwZ2FwJTVEPg0KImtqZXRpa2pOT0BTUEFN YXN0cm8udWlvLm5vIiA8a2pldGlrak5PJTQwU1BBTWFzdHJvLnVpby5ubz4NCiJkaWVzZWw2OXBv d2VyJmhvdG1haWwsY29tIiA8ZGllc2VsNjlwb3dlciUyNmhvdG1haWwlMkNjb20+DQoiW21vYy51 b2xnaV0gW3RhXSBbcmF0c2tyYWRdIiA8JTVCbW9jLnVvbGdpJTVEJTIwJTVCdGElNUQlMjAlNUJy YXRza3JhZCU1RD4NCiJybWFsZWtAaG9tZWNvWyBdb3JnIFsnZGUuJyBpbiBnYXBdIiA8cm1hbGVr JTQwaG9tZWNvJTVCJTIwJTVEb3JnJTIwJTVCJ2RlLiclMjBpbiUyMGdhcCU1RD4NCiJtdmR3ZWdl X3B1YmxpY0BteXJlYWxib3guY29tIiA8bXZkd2VnZV9wdWJsaWMlNDBteXJlYWxib3guY29tPg0K IihNZXJpYWRvY0JfQnVjazIpIChhdCkgKHlhaG9vLmNvbSkiIDwoTWVyaWFkb2NCX0J1Y2syKSUy MChhdCklMjAoeWFob28uY29tKT4NCkJIU0RWR0IxQGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQptYXR0QHppZ2cuY29t DQpkajg5OGY3OGRzQGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQp3ZWJ3ZW5jaF83MkBOT3NwYW0ueWFob28uY29tDQpp bnZhbGlkYWNjb3VudEBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KcmljaGV5QE5Pc1BBTS5od3lsLm9yZw0KbWNzZXlO T0BTUEFNeWFob28uY29tDQpramV0aWtqTk9AU1BBTWFzdHJvLnVpby5ubw0KbXZkd2VnZV9wdWJs aWNAbXlyZWFsYm94LmNvbQ0KYmxvam9AdG9ybmFkby5CZXJrZWxleS5FRFUNCm5vYm9keUBidWxs c2hpdC5uZXQNCiI8YXNpLXdlYkBhc2kub3JnPiIgPGFzaS13ZWJAYXNpLm9yZz4NCiJIZWxwIERl c2siIDxkaXJlY3RyZXNwb25zZUBoZWxwLmRpcmVjdHJlc3BvbnNlLmNvbT4NCiJmZWVkYmFjayIg PGhlbHBAc3RyZWFtaW5nbWVkaWEuY29tPg0KZmxhdmVsbCt3d3dAcGguZ2xhLmFjLnVrDQoidXJs JiM2NDthc2tqZWV2ZXMuY29tIiA8dXJsQGFza2plZXZlcy5jb20+DQplZG1hbmFnZXJbYXRdbW9y ZW92ZXIuY29tDQppbmZvW2F0XXllbGxvd2JyaXguY29tDQp3ZWJsb2dbYXRdZ3VhcmRpYW51bmxp bWl0ZWQuY28udWsNCmVjb2xzZW4yMDAzW2F0XWNzLmNvbQ0KYmxhc3RlclthdF1jcy5jb2x1bWJp YS5lZHUNCmN1c3RvbWVyc2VydmljZVthdF1uZXdzdHJhd2xlci5jb20NCnNjb3R0W2F0XWxpZ2h0 cy5jb20NCmVtYWlsW2F0XWttYXgud3MNCmNvbnRhY3RbYXRdc2NvcGV3YXJlLmNvbQ0KaW5mb0By c3NyZWFkZXIubmwNCiJSb2RkeSBNYWNMZW9kIiA8ci5hLm1hY2xlb2RAaHcuYWMudWs+DQoiQW5v bnltb3VzU25pdGNoIiA8c25pdGNoQHNuaXRjaC5jb20+DQoiZWJyYWRsZWUxMCIgPGVicmFkbGVl MTBAbWFjLmNvbT4NCiJGcmVkZXJpYyBCYWRnZXIiIDxiYWRnZUBud2xpbmsuY29tPg0KInNlZ25h bGF6aW9uaSIgPHNlZ25hbGF6aW9uaUBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLml0Pg0KaW5mb0BuZXRzY2FwZS5jb20N CiJlbWFpbCB1cyB5b3VyIFNjcmlwdHMuY29tIFVzZXIgSUQiIDxub3JiZXJ0QGRldmVsb3BlcnNo ZWQuY29tPg0Kc2FsZXNAd2Vic2l0ZS1zdWJtaXNzaW9uLmNvbQ0KaWV0Zi1zdWJtaXRAaW1jLm9y Zw0KaWV0Zi1zdWJtaXQtcmVxdWVzdEBpbWMub3JnDQpSYW5keUBRdWFsY29tbS5Db20NCmtsZW5z aW5AbWNpLm5ldA0Kam91cm5hbHNAaWFzdGVkLmNvbQ0KY29tbWVudHNAdmlydHVhbGFwZXguY29t DQoiQ29udGFjdCIgPGV1cm9zaW00QGVzaWVlLmZyPg0KIkNvbnRhY3QgTVIiIDxtYXRocmV2QGFt cy5vcmc+DQpjb250ZW50QHVjbGljay5jb20NCmVzb2Zvcm1AZXNvLm9yZw0KYmlvdGVjaEBuYXR1 cmVueS5jb20NCnd3dy1hZG1pbkBhclhpdi5vcmcNCnVuaXhAdXN3dy5jb20NCmtsZGlAbWluZHNw cmluZy5jb20NCmFvbWd0QGludGVyLXNvdXJjZS5vcmcNClVNcmVzZWFyY2hAdW1pY2guZWR1DQph c3Ryb2pAYXN0cm8ud2FzaGluZ3Rvbi5lZHUNCiJUb2J5IFNtaXRoIiA8c21pdGhAYXN0cm8ud2Fz aGluZ3Rvbi5lZHU+DQphakBqb3VybmFscy51Y2hpY2Fnby5lZHUNCmlydXNzZWxsQGhhcnRmb3Jk LmVkdQ0KbWFya292ekBjY3N1LmVkdQ0KZ3JlZW53ZEBlY2UucGR4LmVkdQ0KZ2ItYWRtaW5AbmNi aS5ubG0ubmloLmdvdg0Kc3VwcG9ydEBlcHNzLWZwNi5vcmcNCiJzYWt1cmEtYWRtaW5AZGRiai5u aWcuYWMuanAiIDxzYWt1cmEtYWRtaW5AZGRiai5uaWcuYWMuanAlMjA+DQoiaGVyZSIgPGRkYmp1 cGR0QGRkYmoubmlnLmFjLmpwJTIwPg0Kc2FrdXJhLWFkbWluQGRkYmoubmlnLmFjLmpwDQpzdXBw b3J0QHdvcmxkc3VibWl0LmNvbQ0KImUtbWFpbCIgPGFhbmRhLnBhcmlzQG9ic3BtLmZyPg0KImFh bmRhLnBhcmlzQG9ic3BtLmZyIiA8YWFuZGFAb2JzcG0uZnI+DQp3ZWJtYXN0ZXJAY29uZmluZi5v cmcNCiJDb250YWN0IFVzIiA8Z25ldHN1cHBvcnRAZ29kZGVuLm5ldD4NCnNhbGVzQHdlYnNpZ2h0 Lm5ldC5hdQ0KaWV2ZUVNYWlsQGdyb3Vwcy5tc24uY29tDQpTaWxseVJhY2g5QGFvbC5jb20NCmRo YnJ5YW50QGRzbGV4dHJlbWUuY29tDQpyb3NtYWQyMUB5YWhvby5jb20NClFGRkhVR1JHQVhNS0dA cG93ZXJ3ZWIuZGUNCmJtZ0BncmFwaGljcy5jc2FpbC5taXQuZWR1DQpDQldZSEZERUVUQ0hWTkBw YXJrY2l0eS5uZS5qcA0KYWFtQHN0dW1wLmFsZ2VicmEuY29tDQpEUVNwZWNpYWxAbXhkcTA2Lm5l dA0KeGVtYWNzQHhlbWFjcy5vcmcNCkhheWRlZWhqZUAyNGhvcmFzLmNvbQ0KcGluZS1pbmZvLWFy Y2hAY2FjLndhc2hpbmd0b24uZWR1DQppamV0LXRhbGstb2ZmQGxpc3RzLmVkLnVpdWMuZWR1DQpS WlhXS1NTSEB3YWNvbS5jby5qcA0KIkx1Y3kgU2hlcnJpZmYiIDxsdWN5LnNoZXJyaWZmQHRoZXJl Z2lzdGVyLmNvLnVrPg0KIkxlc3RlciBIYWluZXMiIDxsZXN0ZXIuaGFpbmVzQHRoZXJvY2thbGx0 aW1lcy5jby51az4NCiJKYW1lcyBNYWd1aXJlIiA8am1hZ3VpcmVAb21uaWJlYW0uY29tPg0Kcmpj NjYyQHRydXRobWFpbC5jb20NCiJBbWJ5IER1bmNhbi1DYXJyIiA8d2VibWFzdGVyLnRvb2xzLmdl dC1wYWlkQGFtYnkuY29tPg0KcmVzZWFyY2hAYW1ieS5jb20NCiJBc2sgVXMhIiA8aGVscEB2YWx1 ZXBheS5jb20+DQoiZWRpdG9yQGF3bi5jb20uIiA8ZWRpdG9yQGF3bi5jb20+DQppbmZvQGF3bi5j b20NCmxhZWxfbWlsbGFyQHlhaG9vLmNvLm56DQpIdW1wODM4OUB5YWhvby5jb20NCnNhbGVzQG5p dHJvY2xpY2tzLmNvbQ0KaW5mb0BuaXRyb2NsaWNrcy5jb20NCmtpcmlsbC5zdGVwYW5vdkBuaXRy b2NsaWNrcy5jb20NCmx5ZHl2ZXMzMEBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KdUBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KU29uaWNt b21fMjAwMEB5YWhvby5jb20NCnJlZHdpbmdzbWFjQGFvbC5jb20uLi4uVGhhbmtzDQp3aW5kb21t ZUAxMjYuY29tDQoiQ29udGFjdCBVcyIgPHdlYm1hc3RlckBnZXRwYWlkZ3VpZGVzLmNvbT4NCndl Ym1hc3RlckBmcmVlc3R1ZmZjZW50cmFsLmNvbQ0KeW91cm5hbWVAeW95b21haWwuY29tDQp0b3R3 d3dAY29udGFjdC5uY3JlbC5vcmcNCiJDb250YWN0IHVzIiA8aW5mb0BwYWlkLXN1cnZleXMub3Jn Pg0KIkhlYXRoZXIgR3JlZW4iIDxoZWF0aGVyX2dyZWVuQGJ1c2luZXNzd2Vlay5jb2xtPg0KYmx0 Z0BmcmVlYXV0b2JvdC5jb20NCnNob3BAYmx0Zy5jb20NCiJDYXJsIENoZXJ5IiA8Y2FybEBzb2ho LmNvbT4NCiJDb250YWN0IFRvcnN0ZW4iIDxtYWlsQGNyZWF0aXZlLXdlYmxvZ2dpbmcuY29tPg0K eW91cm5hbWVAc3BlZGlhbWFpbC5jb20NCm5ld3NAY2hhdHRhbm9vZ2FuLmNvbQ0KUnRocm1AYW9s LmNvbQ0KcmVuQGVmZi5vcmcNCiJDb250YWN0IFVzISIgPHdlYm1hc3RlckBnYW1lem9uZS5jb20+ DQoiZW1haWwhIiA8YWZmaWxpYXRlc0BwYWlkdG9zdXJmLXVrLmZzbmV0LmNvLnVrPg0KbWFyeUB5 YWhvby5jb20NCm1hcnkuam9uZXNAbWFpbC0xNy5jb20NCm1hcnktam9uZXNAaG90bWFpbC5jb20N CiJDb250YWN0IHVzIiA8c3VwcG9ydEBpZ25pZnVnZS5jb20+DQpraW1iZXJseV9taWxsZXJAcGJw b3N0LmNvbQ0Kc3VwcG9ydEBzdXJ2ZXlzLXBhaWQuY29tDQpjaGNoZW5nQGN1aGsuZWR1LmhrDQpm cmlza0BmLXByb3QuY29tDQoiQWRtaW5AU3RhcnRQYWdlRGVwb3QuY29tIiA8YWRkbXlwcm9ncmFt JiM2NHN0YXJ0cGFnZWRlcG90LmNvbT4NCkFkbWluQFN0YXJ0UGFnZURlcG90LmNvbQ0KImNvbnRh Y3QiIDxpbmZvQGxpbmthbGl6ZXIuY29tPg0KIlRpbW9mZXkgU2hlcnVkaWxvIiA8dGltb2ZleUBy dXNzaWFuYXV0aG9yLmNvbT4NCiJTZW5kIGVtYWlsIGZyZWRiYWNrIiA8Z2lsZWhlcnlAeC1tYWls Lm5ldD4NCiJEYXJrbyIgPHdlYm1hc3RlckBnaWxlaGVyeS5ldmVyeTEubmV0Pg0KdGhvbWFzQGVz cXNvZnQuY29tDQoiTWlrZSBMZWUiIDxtaWtlQDVuNC5jb20+DQpiaWxsLnN0LmFybmF1ZEBjYW5h cmllLmNhDQoxOTk4MDcxNTEzNTIuSkFBMDU0MzNAdHdlZXRpZS5jYW5hcmllLmNhDQphYXJvbkBh YXJkdmFya2J1c2luZXNzLm5ldA0KIkJhc2hhcmF0IEguQXNoYWkiIDxiYXNoYXJhdEBpbG9jdXMu Y29tPg0KIkNhcmwgSC4gS2VuZHJpY2siIDxDYXJsQG9uZXdvcmxkLXRlbC5jb20+DQoiQW51cmFn IFZlcm1hIiA8YXZlcm1hQG1ldGNvbmV0d29ya3MuY29tPg0KIkdhYnJpZWwgSklOR0EiIDx4cnhf amluZ2FAeWFob28uZnI+DQoiV2FsdGVyIEd1ZXZhcmEiIDx3YWx0ZXJAYWxsaWFuY2VpcC5uZXQ+ DQoiRC5Nb2huZXkiIDxtb29AY29sb2NvLmNvbT4NCiJIYXJyeSBMZWUiIDxoZW5yeUBraWx0LmNv LmtyPg0KIkR1bWkiIDxkbmthbGFAdGVsY28uY28uenc+DQoiTmF6cnVsIiA8bmF6cnVsQGNhbGxl cnpvbmUuY29tPg0KIkdpb3Zhbm5pIFNvbGFubyIgPGdpb3Zhbm5pQGludHRlbC5uZXQ+DQoiVG9w ZSIgPHRvd29ib3JvZGVAYnVzaW5lc3NpbnRlcmFjdGl2ZWdyb3VwLmNvbT4NCiJKdWxpZSBCdXh0 b24iIDxqYnV4dG9uQGc5Yy5jb20+DQoiS2lyaWFraSBDb3N0YSIgPGtpcmlha2lAdGVsZXNvdW5k Lm5ldD4NCiJIZW5yaWthcyBFaW1vbnRhcyIgPGhlbnJpa2FzQGlwYXNhdWxpcy5sdD4NCiJqZWZm IHlhbmciIDxqZWZmeWFuZ2NxQDIxY24uY29tPg0KIlRpbXVyIEdlbGxlciIgPHRpbXVyQHRlbGV6 ZXQucGw+DQoiQWt0ZXIgU2hhaWsiIDxhc2hhaWsxQHlhaG9vLmNvbT4NCiJIQUtKUCIgPGhha2pw QHBhY2lmaWMubmV0LnNnPg0KIkRtaXRyeSBVc2hhbm92IiA8ZGltZW50eUBtYWlsLnJ1Pg0KIlJv Z2VyIEMuIFdpc2UiIDxyb2dlcmN3aXNlQGVhcnRobGluay5uZXQ+DQoiU2FkZWViIE11cnRhemEi IDxzYWRlZWJAcXVpeG5ldHdvcmtzLmNvbT4NCiJNYXN1ZCBSYW5hIiA8bWV0YWJhemU3QHlhaG9v LmNvbT4NCiJDaHJpc3RvcyBLb3V2b3Vzc2lzIiA8Y2hyaXN0b3Mua291dm91c3Npc0BuYXRmZWVk LmNvbT4NCiJCdWxlbnQgR2FyZGl5YW5vZ2x1IiA8YnVsZW50QHZvaXBtYXguY29tPg0KIkRhbmll bCBSb2RyaWd1ZXoiIDx2b2lwY2hpbGVAaG90cG9wLmNvbT4NCiJKdWxpYSBTaWRvcm92YSIgPGp1 bGlhQGlwc290ZWwuY29tPg0KIk9sZ2EgTWFsYWtob3Zza2FpYSIgPHNhbGVzQGV0c2VydmljZS5u ZXQ+DQoiUm9iZXJ0IEUuIE9rdW4iIDxyZW9AZXp0ZWx1c2EuY29tPg0KIkFsZWtzZXkgTGFyaWNo ZXYiIDxBbC5MYXJpY2hldkBhdmVsYWNvbS5ydT4NCiJWbGFzaXMgSGF0emlzdGF2cm91IiA8aW5m b0BraW5ldGl4LmdyPg0KIkpvaG4gRW1tYW51ZWwiIDxlbW1hbnVlbEBjeXRhbmV0LmNvbS5jeT4N CiJDaHJpcyBPaGFibyIgPG1hY3JpQGlzcGtlbnlhLmNvbT4NCiJDaHJpc3RvcyIgPGNvbGV0dGUu YmVhbkBpcHh2b2ljZS5jb20+DQoiTmV0Z2F0ZSIgPG1pa2VjaGVnZUBpc3BrZW55YS5jb20+DQoi QW5kcmV5IiA8bW9sZG92YV90ZXJtaW5hdGlvbkB5YWhvby5jby51az4NCiJBZGlyIiA8R0thZGly QGFvbC5jb20+DQoiUm9uIEJlbmRlbHN0ZWluIiA8cmJlbmRlbHNAc2FuLnJyLmNvbT4NCiJJb2xh bnkgUGFzdG9yIiA8VmlkYWxwb3JAaG90bWFpbC5jb20+DQoiZWF6aHJ5IiA8ZWF6aGFyeUBpbnRv dWNoLmNvbT4NCiJla255YXpldmEiIDxFS255YXpldmFAb2ZmaWNlLmJjbHRlbGUuY29tPg0KIncu Z2F3ZWRhIiA8Vy5HYXdlZGFAbWVkaWFuZXQucGw+DQoicmQiIDxyZEB1a3IubmV0Pg0KInRlbmNo YSIgPHRlbmNoYTRAaXRleHRyb24uY29tPg0KImFzaXMiIDxhc2lzQGl2eXMuZXM+DQoic3BhY2V0 ZWwiIDxzcGFjZXRlbEBhaXRsYmQubmV0Pg0KImFtaWxhIiA8YW1pbGFAaW5ldGFsay5jb20+DQoi Ym9iIHRlbmNoYXZleiIgPG1haWwuZXZvc2VydmUuY29tPg0KIm5pa29sYWkgbWFuZWsiIDxtYW5l a0ByZW13YXZlLmNvbT4NCiJodXNhciIgPGh1c2FyQHRhdHJhLW5ldC5zaz4NCiJkbWl0cnkiIDxk bWl0cnlAdHNwLm5ldC51YT4NCiJzYW12ZWwiIDxsZHBAbmV0c3lzLmFtPg0KY2hhcmxlcy5jaG93 QGFwLmVxdWluaXguY29tDQpkYXZlQGtmY29tbS5jb20NCndlYm1hc3RlckBhdXRvc3VyZnByby5j b20NCiJFLU1haWwiIDxpbmZvQGFsbGFyb3VuZHRoZW1hbGwuY29tPg0KImhlcmUiIDxCYWRfTGlu a0BhbGxhcm91bmR0aGVtYWxsLmNvbT4NCiJHV1dvcmtzIiA8R1dXb3Jrc0Bhb2wuY29tPg0KIkxl dHRlciB0byBFZGl0b3IiIDxlZGl0b3JbYXRddWtydGVsZWNvbS51YT4NCiJ3ZWJtYXN0ZXIiIDx3 ZWJtYXN0ZXJbYXRddWtydGVsZWNvbS51YT4NCmt5bGVraW1ibGVAZ3JhbnRlc2QuazEyLm9yLnVz DQpzY2hvb2xzQGxvdWRvdW4uazEyLnZhLnVzDQpBbmdlbGEuQ29sbGluc0BtYWlsLnN0YXRlLmFy LnVzDQptYXJpb24uZmxldGNoZXJAbWFpbC5zdGF0ZS5hci51cw0KZ2luZzAwMTlAdW1uLmVkdQ0K IkFuZ2VsYSBDb2xsaW5zLCBQcm9ncmFtIEFkdmlzb3IgU3RhdGUgRkZBIEV4ZWN1dGl2ZSBTZWNy ZXRhcnkiIDxhbmdlbGEuY29sbGluc0BhcmthbnNhcy5nb3Y+DQoiU2hhcm9uIEhhcnBlciwgU2Vj cmV0YXJ5IiA8c2hhcm9uLmhhcnBlckBtYWlsLnN0YXRlLmFyLnVzPg0KIkFubmUgSGVmbmVyLCBT ZWNyZXRhcnkiIDxhbm5lLmhlZm5lckBtYWlsLnN0YXRlLmFyLnVzPg0KIlNlbmRhIHT2bHZ1cPNz dCIgPGZmYUBiYWtrYXIuaXM+DQoiRW1haWwiIDxjYXJvbGUuZmF5QHBlbm5tYW5vci5uZXQ+DQoi Q29udGFjdCBVcyIgPG1lZ2FmZmFAY29zbW9zLmdyPg0KIldlYm1hc3RlciIgPGhham1vbGFAdGlz aGNvbi5jb20+DQpMb3R0bzc5NzlAeWFob28uY29tDQpDaHJpc21nZXNzQHlhaG9vLmNvbQ0KdHIy MzUyQGNhc2NhZGVybG1zLmNvbQ0KbWF5YXBhd2FyQGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQpUeXBpc3QuamF5YW50 a2FkYW0xQHJlZGlmZm1haWwuY29tDQpqYWNraWVfYmVybmFiZV85QGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQpjbGVy aWNhbHN0YWZmQGZyZWVhdXRvYm90LmNvbQ0KcmFqYWR0eXBpbmdAZnJlZWF1dG9ib3QuY29tDQpq b2JpbmZvQGZyZWVhdXRvYm90LmNvbQ0KUHJvY2Vzc2luZ2xjMTEzN0Bhb2wuY29tDQpzaGlscGE4 NjcwQHlhaG9vLmNvbQ0KIk1hcnkgRWxzdGFkIEdhZ25vbiIgPHdpc2ZmYWZvdW5kYXRpb25AdGRz Lm5ldD4NCmZmYWZvdW5kYXRpb25ldmVudHNAdGRzLm5ldA0KIlNoYXJvbiBXZW5kdCIgPHNoYXJv bi53ZW5kdEBkcGkuc3RhdGUud2kudXM+DQoiRGVhbiBHYWdub24iIDxkZWFuLmdhZ25vbkBkcGku c3RhdGUud2kudXM+DQoiTHlubmUgS2lsYnkiIDxtYXJqb3JpZS5raWxieUBkcGkuc3RhdGUud2ku dXM+DQoiRGViIE1vdGlmZiAtIFRlYW0gV2VibWFzdGVyIiA8ZGVicmEubW90aWZmQGRwaS5zdGF0 ZS53aS51cz4NCnNlYjI4OEBwc3UuZWR1DQoiQ2hlcnlsIFppbW1lcm1hbiIgPHdpZmZhY2VudGVy QHR6bmV0LmNvbT4NCiJKLiBLZWl0aCBFY2Nhcml1cyIgPGoua2VpdGguZWNjYXJpdXNAZHBpLnN0 YXRlLndpLnVzPg0KIkNPTlRBQ1QgVVMiIDx0ZXJlc2Fjb2xlQGFvbC5jb20+DQoiRG9uIFN0dXJn ZW9uIiA8ZHN0dXJnZW9AbWFycy5lY2VzYy5rMTIuaW4udXM+DQp3YXluZXRAd2F5bmV0Lm9yZw0K IkVtYWlsIFdheU5ldCdzIiA8amFuZUB3YXluZXQub3JnPg0KJiN4Nzc7JiN4NjU7JiN4NjI7JiN4 NkQ7JiN4NjE7JiN4NzM7JiN4NzQ7JiN4NjU7JiN4NzI7JiN4NDA7JiN4NzY7JiN4Njg7JiN4MkQ7 JiN4NzA7JiN4MkU7JiN4NkU7JiN4NjU7JiN4NzQ7DQoiRS1NYWlsIEhlcmUiIDxjemltbWVybWFu QHdpc2NvbnNpbmZmYS5vcmc+DQpUZXJyeS5IZWltYW5AZGVzZS5tby5nb3YNCiJMYW5nZSBTb2xi ZXJnIiA8bGFuZ2VAbXRiYWtlci53ZWRuZXQuZWR1Pg0KIkNvbnRhY3QgV2VibWFzdGVyIiA8d2Vi bWFzdGVyQGFwcm9tb3Rpb25ndWlkZS5jb20+DQoiRS1tYWlsIHRoZSBQYW50YWdyYXBoIG5ld3Ny b29tIiA8bmV3c3Jvb21AcGFudGFncmFwaC5jb20+DQpjYW5kZXJzb25AcGFudGFncmFwaC5jb20N CiJTdXphbm5lIE1jQ2FydHkiIDxzdXphbm5lX21jY2FydHlAY2FyZ2lsbC5jb20+DQoiTWljaGFl bCBQYXRlIiA8bW1scGF0ZUB1YXJrLmVkdT4NCiJKdXN0aW4gR29vZG5pZ2h0IiA8andnb29kbkB1 YXJrLmVkdT4NCiJCcmV0dCBDcnVtbGV5IiA8bWFpbCUyMHRvOmVjcnVtbGVAdWFyay5lZHU+DQoi UmViZWNjYSBDdW5uaW5naGFtIiA8cnJjdW5uaUB1YXJrLmVkdT4NCiJBbGV4IFJvY2siIDxhcm9j a0B1YXJrLmVkdT4NCiJVIG9mIEEgQ29sbGVnaWF0ZSBGRkEgJiA0LUgiIDxjb2xsZmZhQGNvbXAu dWFyay5lZHU+DQoiSmFuc3NlbiBFbnRlcnByaXNlcyIgPGNocmlzQGphbnNzZW5lY29tLmNvbT4N CmF1ZmZhQGF1YnVybi5lZHUNCmVkaXRvckBhZ2FwZXByZXNzLm9yZw0Kc2VydmljZUBkb21haW4u Y29tLnR3DQphc2FAY2Fscy53aXNjLmVkdQ0KcmRhbHVnZUBjYWxzLndpc2MuZWR1DQoiSiBSYXkg TSIgPEptbzYxOTZAYW9sLmNvbT4NCiJTcG9vb24iIDxrYW5hbGNzQGhvdG1haWwuY29tPg0Kamxi QHNreW5ldC5iZQ0KZ2VycmlfZWlkZUBzZHN0YXRlLmVkdQ0KZmZhQGxpc3QuazEyLmFyLnVzDQpl ZGl0b3JAZGVzdGluYXRpb25LTS5jb20NCiJFZGl0b3JzLi4uIiA8ZWRpdG9yQGRlc3RpbmF0aW9u Q1JNLmNvbT4NCiJSZXBvcnQgUHJvYmxlbXMiIDx3ZWJtYXN0ZXJAaW5mb3RvZGF5LmNvbT4NCmNt c0Bvc3UuZWR1DQoiYWdncmVlbiIgPGFnZ3JlZW5AbWRlLmsxMi5tcy51cz4NCiJqZnJhemllckBt ZGUuazEyLm1zLnVzIiA8aHR0cDovL2pmcmF6aWVyQG1kZS5rMTIubXMudXM+DQpqZnJhemllckBt ZGUuazEyLm1zLnVzDQpzdzk5QHczLm9yZw0KcDEyMTIxQGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQo1dGVzdHNvZnQ1 QGVtYWlsLmNvbQ0KUmljaGFyZC5TV0VURU5IQU1AY2VjLmV1LmludA0KYXBwbGVAYXBuaWMubmV0 DQpwYXNzQHNvbWVzaXRlLm9yZw0Kcm9ja3lzcGFkQGhvdG1haWwuY29tDQoiQ29udGFjdCBzYWNi ZWUuY29tIiA8d2VibWFzdGVyQHNhY2JlZS5jb20+DQoiR2FiZSBCZWdlZC1Eb3YiIDxiZWdlZGRv dkBqZmluaXR5LmNvbT4NCiJBYXJvbiBTd2FydHoiIDxtZUBhYXJvbnN3LmNvbT4NCiJFcmljIHZh biBkZXIgVmxpc3QiIDx2ZHZAZHlvbWVkZWEuY29tPg0KImFzIiA8YWFyb25AdGhlaW5mby5vcmc+ DQoidGhlIGxpc3QiIDxyc3MtZGV2QHlhaG9vZ3JvdXBzLmNvbT4NCiJTZW5kIFVzIFlvdXIgTGV0 dGVycyIgPGp0ZWRpdG9yQGphcGFudG9kYXkuY29tPg0KZWRpdG9yc0BhcGFjaGV3ZWVrLmNvbQ0K c2VjdXJlQHN5bWFudGVjLmNvbQ0Kc3ltc2VjdXJpdHlAc3ltYW50ZWMuY29tDQptLm1vZmZhdEBo dy5hYy51aw0Kd2VibWFzdGVyQGVldmwuYWMudWsNCmJyaWFuQGZpbmFuY2lhbGNvbnRlbnQuY29t DQoiQnk6IFZpa3RvciBNYXllci1TY2j2bmJlcmdlciIgPHZtc0BnaWkucHJpdi5hdD4NCmluZm9A ZGNmLm9yZy51aw0KIkVtYWlsIiA8bW9yYnVzQGRpc29iZXkuY29tPg0KY2VydEBjZXJ0Lm9yZw0K bWFqb3Jkb21vQGNlcnQub3JnDQpkaWdpY3VsdEBjZWMuZXUuaW50DQp5dXJpQGN3aS5ubA0KZmNj aW5mb0BmY2MuZ292DQplcmZvbGdyZWljaGUuaW50ZWdyYXRpb25AYmVydGVsc21hbm4uZGUNCmlu Zm9AYWxhc2thcml2ZXJ0cmlwcy5jb20NCmluZm9Aa2VuYWlyaXZlcnNpZGVjYW1wZ3JvdW5kLmNv bQ0KVG91cmV0dGVTeW5kcm9tZVBlblBhbHNAZ3JvdXBzLm1zbi5jb20NCmlhbGVkdUBhb2wuY29t DQpzdGVsdGhyb2NrNjdAeWFob28uY29tDQphbm9uLTIxNzEyODUwQGNyYWlnc2xpc3Qub3JnDQpt ZXNzaW5nQGVtYWlsLmN6DQpkci5lZ2dtYW5AanVuby5jb20NCkxNSUxMSU1BTkB2dy52Y2NzLmVk dQ0KYnJ1bnNtYWRAZW1haWwudWFoLmVkdQ0KYmpkbnljbGFAYW9sLmNvbQ0Kc3RhcnRyYXZlbEBp Y29ubmVjdC5jby5rZQ0K --===_SecAtt_000_1fanqysodxrnnk --===_SecAtt_000_1fanqysodxrnnk-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 06:14:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDEQUT005268; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:14:26 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDEMOb011635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:14:23 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5FDE7lg008504; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:14:07 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5FDDBVc050904 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:13:11 -0700 Received: from hermes.ablehost.com (mx.at.ms.ablehost.com [198.173.217.138]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5FDD8Eo013898 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:13:08 -0700 Received: (qmail 12440 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 13:13:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 24.231.210.217.bay.mi.chartermi.net) (arthur@ablehost.com@24.231.210.217) by hermes.ablehost.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 13:13:10 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:12:55 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Arthur H. Johnson II" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: arthur@cygnus.hemisphere X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: > Hello! > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > > > > My ISP requires SMTP authentication. In Pine setup, in the SMTP > > > field, I put in the server address. Where do I put in the > > > username/password? > > > > FAQ. > > > > http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/write.html#smtpauth > BTW: Why there is no switch like /password= ? > > Bye. Alex. I'm not sure about the other os'es, but for Linux you have to enable the password file option at compile time. Once you edit/patch pine and compile and install it, touch ~/.pine.pwd and when you enter a password, it will ask if you want to preserve it on disk. After that, it won't ask you for a password. Here is the patch I usually use, its quite simple however and you can probably edit the os-lnx.h file directly. -- BEGIN PATCH -- diff -ruN pine4.53.orig/pine/osdep/os-lnx.h pine4.53/pine/osdep/os-lnx.h --- pine4.53.orig/pine/osdep/os-lnx.h 2001-02-06 20:05:06.000000000 -0500 +++ pine4.53/pine/osdep/os-lnx.h 2003-02-22 08:53:57.000000000 -0500 @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ ----*/ #define BACKGROUND_POST +#define PASSFILE ".pine.pwd" /*---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- END PATCH -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 06:34:35 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDYT9l005771; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:34:29 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDYRqH004030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:34:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5FDYFGU007536; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:34:15 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5FDXQ0I074580 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:33:26 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDXLDY032561 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:33:22 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru (z101170.int.cboss.ru [10.98.250.14]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i5FDVNbl017089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:31:27 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:31:23 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Arthur H. Johnson II" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XX_dBjrK@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote: > I'm not sure about the other os'es, but for Linux you have to enable the > password file option at compile time. Once you edit/patch pine and > compile and install it, touch ~/.pine.pwd and when you enter a password, > it will ask if you want to preserve it on disk. After that, it won't ask > you for a password. Thanks! As documentation says, it's enabled by default for PC-PINE. So I'll use it under Windows. For Linux I use fetchmail. Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 06:52:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDqLv4006545; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:52:21 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDqHRW004500 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:52:18 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5FDq53k013936; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:52:05 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5FDpI7u074748 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:51:18 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FDpCwT010959 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:51:13 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:psantucc@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.2]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5FDotGV016324 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:50:55 GMT Received: (from psantucc@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i5FDotRQ016706; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:50:55 GMT Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: psantucc@sdf.lonestar.org To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE 4.58 does not detect attachments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: psantucc@otaku.freeshell.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm certain it's something in the way I've got it set up, but for the first time in more than 10 years of using PINE, I've got a problem I can't solve by reading the help or archives. When I recieve attachements, PINE does not detect them. The view command offers me only the plain text portion. I know the attachements are present and intact; I can see them if I view headers, and if I export the headers version, I can decode the mime attachements with metamail. I just don't see them in PINE. Any ideas? Pat Santucci ____________________________________________________ The paranoid mistake is not that the Universe is hostile and out to get you - that's true. The mistake lies in thinking that makes you special. ---------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 07:03:16 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FE3FTJ006856; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:03:15 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FE3DVk004852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:03:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5FE32Vg018874; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:03:02 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5FE2Oul050820 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:02:24 -0700 Received: from panther6.felines.org (panther6.felines.org [209.124.85.242]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FE2Nbd023101 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:02:23 -0700 Received: from panther6.felines.org (panther6.felines.org [209.124.85.242] (may be forged)) by panther6.felines.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5FE2Mqw022861 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:02:22 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jay Libove To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE 4.58 line wrapping? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have noticed recently that text messages that I compose in PINE 4.58 will line wrap incorrectly when viewed in a graphic mail viewer such as Outlook 2003. I don't recall making any PINE configuration changes which I would have expected to cause this. What are the PINE configuration options which I can set to cause NO line breaks to be inserted until I enter two consecutive carriage returns in the composing editor? Thanks! -Jay -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 12:02:14 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FJ2A8s022722; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:02:10 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FJ24An027816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:02:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5FJ1r5D011330; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:01:53 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5FJ0Vo2033726 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:00:31 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FJ0QjP003977 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:00:26 -0700 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9268B1E4DE; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:00:25 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Alexander V Alekseev X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: > BTW: Why there is no switch like /password= ? Because it will be stored in your .pinerc file, and you shouldn't store plaintext passwords in a file. Heck, the encryption on the pine password file is weak enough, which is probably why it isn't enabled by default. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 13:12:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FKC5U5026080; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:12:05 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FKC1dT031446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:12:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5FKBd62008972; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:11:40 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5FKAhFs052346 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:10:43 -0700 Received: from mail.nilings.se (mail.nilings.se [193.13.81.93]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FKAbR2022701 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:10:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nilings.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DA1C0AA2; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:09:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:09:09 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mathias Sundman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE 4.58 line wrapping? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Jay Libove X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Jay Libove wrote: > I have noticed recently that text messages that I compose in PINE 4.58 > will line wrap incorrectly when viewed in a graphic mail viewer such as > Outlook 2003. > > I don't recall making any PINE configuration changes which I would have > expected to cause this. The default in Pine is to wrap the lines at 74 chars. And that is how you should usually format an email to. If you want to write paragraphs that flow across the whole screen independent of the screen-width, upgrade to Pine 4.60 which supports format=flowed formatting of emails. That will still wrap the lines so they look good on a non format=flowed compatible email reader, but those that do support it will let the paragraphs flow across the whole screen. > What are the PINE configuration options which I can set to cause NO line > breaks to be inserted until I enter two consecutive carriage returns in > the composing editor? I don't think you can disable line wrapping, but you can set composer-wrap-column to a really high value, but I don't recommend it. -- _____________________________________________________________ Mathias Sundman (^) ASCII Ribbon Campaign NILINGS AB X NO HTML/RTF in e-mail Tel: +46-(0)8-666 32 28 / \ NO Word docs in e-mail From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 15:01:34 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5FM1YS8031558 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:01:34 -0700 Received: from web90102.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90102.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.73]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5FM1XpP004883 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:01:33 -0700 Message-ID: <20040615220130.5501.qmail@web90102.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.88.188.87] by web90102.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:01:30 PDT Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:01:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Jay L Subject: Need corporate Lists To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-413360009-1087336890=:5443" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0' --0-413360009-1087336890=:5443 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hey Guys I'm looking to procure some lists to run my own marketing campaign.Need to know pricing and what guarantees you provide on the emails.I dont have a site as yet, but am planning to start something small.Please give me information on the various lists that you own with pricing. Regards Jay Barker --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. --0-413360009-1087336890=:5443 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Hey Guys
 
I'm looking to procure some lists to run my own marketing campaign.Need to know pricing and what guarantees you provide on the emails.I dont have a site as yet, but am planning to start something small.Please give me information on the various lists that you own with pricing.
 
Regards
Jay Barker


Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. --0-413360009-1087336890=:5443-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 15 18:44:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from c66.190.49.237.jvl.wi.charter.com (c66.190.49.237.jvl.wi.charter.com [66.190.49.237]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5G1iNfC008229 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:44:24 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:44:23 -0700 From: BBXCEDGE@hotmail.com Received: from 159.180.48.85 by 66.190.49.237; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 06:40:16 +0400 Message-ID: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G6scxj017506; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:54:38 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G6saw1025835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:54:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5G6sLEH013680; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:54:21 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5G6rA8Z050922 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:53:11 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G6r6nQ000432 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:53:07 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru (z101170.int.cboss.ru [10.98.250.14]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i5G6prbl019818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:51:57 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:51:53 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Gopi Sundaram X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXgsEjrK@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > > BTW: Why there is no switch like /password= ? > > Because it will be stored in your .pinerc file, and you shouldn't store "shouldn't" is not "must not". It should be up to user. > plaintext passwords in a file. Heck, the encryption on the pine password > file is weak enough, which is probably why it isn't enabled by default. That password is in my fetchmailrc. So, having it in pinerc won't break security. ;-)) BTW: I found that PASSFILE is only valid for IMAP, isn't it? What should I do for smtp? Having passwords in some file is usefull for roles with different smtp servers. Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 16 00:36:15 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G7aEE6018707; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:36:14 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G7aBGF027347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:36:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5G7ZrOf008516; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:53 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5G7YrRd118080 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:34:54 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G7YqGG023448 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:34:52 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5G7ddYe018034 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:39:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i5G7dcTd018030 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:39:39 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: >> Because it will be stored in your .pinerc file, and you shouldn't store > "shouldn't" is not "must not". It should be up to user. when storing passwords on disk, the obfuscated vs. plaintext debate is as old as time. i'll be the Bad Guy and say, please, let's not have that debate again. :P true, there's also the distinct UI question of how to specify the password - stored separately on disk, command-line arg, or option in the folder name. however, since the pine developers have decided to obfuscate it, it has to be stored on disk, which makes the UI question moot. -Ryan p.s. if you really want to explore the obfuscated vs. plaintext debate, there's a decent analysis here: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/plaintextpasswords.txt and an even longer analysis on the gaim mailing list, here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=4588877&forum_id=9587 -- "Woooo!" -Twinsen From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 16 00:51:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G7p4RL019223; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:51:04 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G7p2HZ011654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:51:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5G7olYT013970; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:50:47 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5G7nrTC068576 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:49:53 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5G7nnOd017438 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:49:49 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru (z101170.int.cboss.ru [10.98.250.14]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i5G7mpbl013355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:49:00 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:48:51 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Ryan Barrett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXvQEjrK@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > p.s. if you really want to explore the obfuscated vs. plaintext debate, > there's a decent analysis here: Really, I want to have roles with different authentication to different servers! And not to remember paswords in mind. Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 16 11:02:17 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5GI2GXA012278; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:02:16 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5GI2Eei001286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:02:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5GI20lh018826; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:02:00 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5GI0okK118100 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:00:50 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5GI0lsi017738 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:00:47 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5GI0lHc001561 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:00:47 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5GI0U0o000879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > true, there's also the distinct UI question of how to specify the password - > stored separately on disk, command-line arg, or option in the folder name. > however, since the pine developers have decided to obfuscate it, it has to be > stored on disk, which makes the UI question moot. That doesn't mean it must be stored on disk (I presume you mean as a separate file) at all. Let the user type it in, and transmogrify it after they hit return. Don't let them ever edit the field with the munged password in there, and explain why it looks like "garbage" to them. (or just show it as **** always) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 16 11:36:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5GIablY014038; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:36:37 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5GIaYul023594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:36:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5GIaJnl014018; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:36:19 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5GIZQfw060204 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:35:26 -0700 Received: from hermes.ablehost.com (mx.at.ms.ablehost.com [198.173.217.138]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5GIZP93006431 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:35:25 -0700 Received: (qmail 24186 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 18:35:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 24.231.210.217.bay.mi.chartermi.net) (arthur@ablehost.com@24.231.210.217) by hermes.ablehost.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 18:35:28 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:35:09 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Arthur H. Johnson II" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: SMTP Authentication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: arthur@cygnus.hemisphere X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > BTW: I found that PASSFILE is only valid for IMAP, isn't it? > What should I do for smtp? Having passwords in some file is usefull > for roles with different smtp servers. I do alot of SMTP auth, and the passwords get stored in my .pine.pwd after I enter them once and pine asks if to store them. -- Arthur H. Johnson II arthur@johnsonfamilymi.us -- ICQ: 31770438 AIM: bytor4232 MSN: bytor4232 YIM: arthurjohnson IRC: By-Tor@irc.debian.org From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 17 11:11:44 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5HIBgxa001261; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:42 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5HIBeNb020460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5HIBJu7011408; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:19 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5HIAF3X026774 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:10:15 -0700 Received: from naz.edu (ns.naz.edu [24.39.102.9]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5HIABsZ016594 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:10:12 -0700 Received: by gateway.naz.edu id <334209>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:10:10 -0400 Message-Id: <04Jun17.141010edt.334209@gateway.naz.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:09:44 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Greg Dec To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE shows first INBOX message as /usr/var/spool/mail/username MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Occasionally, we have some users who find that when they open the INBOX folder with PINE, the messages seem to be all grouped under the first message /var/spool/mail/username Now, i figured somthing was corrupting the users INBOX file under /var/spool/mail. When I opened the file in a text editor, I noticed that there are one or two spaces on the first line of the first email message...right before the "From" part of the header. I remove the spaces and the problem is solved...the individual messages under INBOX display normally again. but, what could be causing this? Most of the users use IMAP via webmail to get their messages...but I often troubleshoot their accounts using PINE. Forgive me if this not a PINE error, but I figure someone may be able to point me in the right direction. Thanks ! -- ______________________________________________ Gregory M. Dec, Network and Operations Manager Nazareth College of Rochester Information Technology Services 4245 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14618 Email: gmdec@naz.edu Tel: (585) 389-2104 Fax: (585) 586-2452 ______________________________________________ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 17 15:22:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:22:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5HMMM7o013025; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:22:22 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5HMMK95031219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:22:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5HMM11d015994; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:22:01 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5HMLB0B043532 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:21:11 -0700 Received: from cottonwood.uwyo.edu (cottonwood.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.27]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5HML7JS010500 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:21:08 -0700 Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (asuwlink.uwyo.edu [129.72.60.112]) by cottonwood.uwyo.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5HML5dM027938; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:21:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jimkirk@uwyo.edu) Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5HML4Wf006432; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:21:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (jimkirk@localhost) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id i5HML4Pr006428; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:21:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:21:04 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Roberts Kirkpatrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE shows first INBOX message as /usr/var/spool/mail/username In-Reply-To: <04Jun17.141010edt.334209@gateway.naz.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Greg Dec X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: asuwlink.uwyo.edu: jimkirk owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We occasionally had similar problems if /usr/var/spool/mail ran out of space in the middle of recopying the inbox to delete messages. The solution was to not run out of space :-), but when it happened the symptoms were similar as well as the fix. Jim On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Greg Dec wrote: > > Occasionally, we have some users who find that when they open the INBOX > folder with PINE, the messages seem to be all grouped under the first > message > > /var/spool/mail/username > > Now, i figured somthing was corrupting the users INBOX file under > /var/spool/mail. When I opened the file in a text editor, I noticed > that there are one or two spaces on the first line of the first email > message...right before the "From" part of the header. > > I remove the spaces and the problem is solved...the individual messages > under INBOX display normally again. but, what could be causing this? > Most of the users use IMAP via webmail to get their messages...but I > often troubleshoot their accounts using PINE. Forgive me if this not a > PINE error, but I figure someone may be able to point me in the right > direction. > > Thanks ! From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 17 16:46:21 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from c-24-125-50-159.va.client2.attbi.com (c-24-125-50-159.va.client2.attbi.com [24.125.50.159]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5HNkJTY016450 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:46:20 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:46:19 -0700 From: MXWGGQBRGQZ@mailcity.com Received: from 238.26.154.138 by 24.125.50.159; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:40:11 -0100 Message-ID: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5I1Xt3A019942 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:33:55 -0700 Received: from eyou.com ([218.79.179.7]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5I1Xp4P005376 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:33:53 -0700 Message-Id: <200406180133.i5I1Xp4P005376@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: =?GB2312?B?yc+6o7fov/HTotPv?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?yc+6o7fov/HTotPvyu7G2ryv0bXTqg==?= To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: allforone11@eyou.com Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:34:04 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXIIII, Probability=74%, Report='SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS 2.899, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADERS 1.154, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 0.653, FRONTPAGE 0.541, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.409, HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE 0.232, HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD 0.201, BIG_FONT 0.146, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, HTML_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __X_PRI_HI 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __HTML_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD 0, HTML_COMMENT_UNIQUE_ID 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, HTML_FONT_COLOR_GREEN 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0' ÉϺ£·è¿ñÓ¢ÓïÊîÆÚ¼¯ÑµÓª

ÉϺ£·è¿ñÓ¢ÓïÊîÆÚ¼¯ÑµÓª

¡¡¡¡ÎÞÂÛÊÇÉí¼Ò¹ýǧÍòµÄÆóÒµ¼Ò¡¢ÃûÅÆ´óѧµÄ½ÌÊÚ¡¢´óѧÉú¡¢ÖÐѧÉú£¬»¹Êdz¤½­Èý½ÇÖ޵Ĵò¹¤Õߣ¬ÎªÁËÒ»¸ö¹²Í¬µÄÄ¿±ê£¬×ßµ½ÁËÒ»Æ𣬺ÍÎÒÃÇ·è¿ñÕ÷·þÓ¢Ó×ö¹ú¼Ê»¯µÄÖйúÈË£¡
¡¡¡¡°ËÌìµÄ¼¯ÑµÓª£¬Á¼ºÃµÄѧϰ»·¾³£¡È«ÖйúÓ¢ÓïѧϰÕßÕ÷·þÓ¢ÓïµÄÊ¢»á£¡È«¹úÖøÃûµÄÓ¢Óï½Ìѧר¼Ò£¬½«°éËæÄã¶È¹ý±ÏÉúÄÑÍüµÄ¼¯ÖÐÓª£¡È«¹úÖøÃû·è¿ñÓ¢Óï½ÌʦÓÃËûÃǵļ¤Çé¡¢ËûÃǵIJŻª¡¢ËûÃǶàÄêÀ´µÄÓ¢Óï¿ÚÓï½Ìѧ¾­ÑéÖØËÜÄãµÄÓ¢ÓÖØËÜÄãµÄ×ÔÐÅ£¬ÖØËÜÄãµÄÈËÉú£¡¼¤·¢ÄãµÄÎÞÇîDZÁ¦£¬ÈÃÄãµÄÈËÉú´¦ÓÚáÛ·å״̬£¡

¡¡¡¡2004Ä꣬ÉϺ£·è¿ñÓ¢ÓォȫÁ¦´òÔ죬ÈÃÄãÖÕÉíÄÑÍüµÄ»Æ½ðÊîÆÚÇ¿»¯¼¯ÑµÓª¡£ 
¡¤
»Æ½ðÊîÆÚÇ¿»¯¼¯ÑµÓª£º

¡¤½ÌѧÌØÉ«£º8ÌìÇ¿»¯ÑµÁ·£¬ÈÃÄã½þÅÝÔÚÓ¢Óï»·¾³ÖС£ÄãµÄ·¢ÒôºÍ¾ä×ÓÁ¿½«ÓÐÖØ´óÍ»ÆÆ£¡Ã¿ÌìÖÁÉÙÁ¬ÐøʮСʱ½þÅÝÔÚÓ¢Óï»·¾³ÖУ¬Á¬³Ô·¹Ê±Ò²ÔÚѧӢÓ
¡¤ÅàѵĿ±ê£º°ïÄã×ß³öÀ§¾³£¬ÕÆÎÕÕýÈ··½·¨£¬¿çÔ½ÕÏ°­£¬×ÔÐÅÃæ¶ÔÌôÕ½£¬×î´ó·ù¶ÈµØÌá¸ß³É¼¨¡£

  ¡¡
¼¯ÑµÓªÃû³Æ
ÈÕÆÚ
ÌìÊý
ѧ·Ñ
ÊÕ·ÑÏîÄ¿
¼¯ÑµµØµã
ÊîÆÚÇ¿»¯¼¯ÑµÓª
7ÔÂ15ÈÕ¡ª7ÔÂ22ÈÕ
8

È«¹úͳһÊÕ·Ñ1980Ôª

ѧ·Ñ¡¢×¡ËÞ·Ñ¡¢×ÊÁÏ·Ñ
ÉϺ£·è¿ñÓ¢Óï·þÎñÖÐÐÄ

±¨Ãû³ÌÐò£º
  ¿¼ºË·Ö¼¶¡ª>½»·Ñ£¨ÍâµØѧԱ¿Éͨ¹ýµç»°½øÐпÚÓï²âÊÔ£¬ÒøÐÐתÕÊ£©
±¨Ãû×Éѯ£º
¡·µç»°:021-64823408  QQÔÚÏß×Éѯ£º 289251212  249112760   25127040  
ѧԱ±Ø±¸£º
¡·ÓªÔ±ÐèЯ´ø¸öÈËÉú»îÓÃÆ·ºÍѧϰ±ØÐèÆ·
»ã¿î·½Ê½£º
Óʾֻã¿î µØÖ·£ºÉϺ£ÊÐÐì»ãÇøÁúäî·51Ū1ºÅ½ðº£´óÏÃ1604ÊÒ ÊÕ¿îÈË£ºÎÌ×滪
ÒøÐÐתÕÊ
ÕÐÐÐÉϺ£·ÖÐР Õʺţº6225 8802 1015 4077    »§Ãû£ºÎÌ×滪        
¹¤ÐÐÉϺ£·ÖÐР Õʺţº9558 8010 0110 6630061     »§Ãû£ºÎÌ×滪¡¡
½¨ÐÐÉϺ£·ÖÐР Õ˺ţº4367 4212 1731 4069 238    »§Ãû£ºÎÌ×滪

ÍøÖ·

  http://www.crazyenglish.org/
¹«Ë¾µØÖ·£º
¡·ÉϺ£ÊÐÐì»ãÇøÁúäî·51Ū1ºÅ½ðº£´óÏÃ1604ÊÒ  Óʱࣺ200235
 

 

From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jun 18 08:04:01 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from adsl-65-42-62-73.dsl.akrnoh.ameritech.net (adsl-65-42-62-73.dsl.akrnoh.ameritech.net [65.42.62.73]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5IF3xio012271 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:04:00 -0700 Received: from 104.192.3.241 by web760.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:58:51 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Virgie Dobson" To: mailarch+pine-info@groupms.cac.washington.edu Subject: Do you want the bigest penjs in the hood? Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:54:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--3383687449135902150" X-CS-IP: 254.228.208.140 ----3383687449135902150 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dude!

I have the thing for you, like you asked me yesterday. Money can buy everything. Money can give you women,
new cars, big house, money can get it all.
Now, thanks to science, it can give you bigger penjs.
This site is full of info and can help you a lot, if you have what it take= s.

This product is new to the market.
It is the * only * clinically tested penjs enlargement device available in= the world.
Don't you fall for false claims!
This is the real deal, the real penjs enlarqement nonsurgical method!
= You should go for it, if you want your penjs to be large!
common and visit the site now!

you can view it from here
This is for AOL users http://enlargit.com/?rid=3D1662


I've had it
Take care man, and please don't forget to visit!
carroll balance perquisite intrude prickle lopseed corvus wherewithal drey= fuss dualism byrd mae cylinder spawn bp delineament meadowsweet lascivious= newsman downgrade forwent aldebaran bechtel indigene astronomic slime iro= quois priscilla lome submitted actuate=20
mulligatawny dodecahedra versa hunch evocate ecumenist instigate kieffer g= igacycle philanthropic abbe cornfield beriberi shaky whomever conjure cool= ey rosette aforementioned dormitory axial cuff stow consanguine pushbutton= pubescent coronet=20
boldface attention tridiagonal dietetic derive sternberg dukedom ashtray s= olipsism debrief sanatorium sneer punch elysee cobra adjoin usda rosebud w= asteland whale ad satan referential bolshoi thrice genre hydroxyl offprint= seneca=20
simile intangible rotund dionysus sextet osteopath homecome cancel dross f= ourteen light darlene cop aspartic cemetery slime leighton warty battalion= borate board loge honda=20
filament neurotic tailspin agent spare craft where slingshot improvident e= astbound apology imperceivable condiment levi mutiny isn't impersonate err= ancy ail wheelbase detour gladiolus impervious ministry florentine gordian= daybreak valois alameda pupal swipe siskin plausible polity witness golde= neye gullible nibelung=20 ----3383687449135902150-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 19 22:37:54 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K5bqBw015908; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:37:52 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K5bofi022885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:37:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5K5bSAC016400; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:37:28 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5K5U5YP070730 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:30:06 -0700 Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K5U3oD020520 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:30:03 -0700 Received: from 216-203-252-230-phx-01.cvx.algx.net (216-203-252-230-phx-01.cvx.algx.net [216.203.252.230]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5K5TveR017675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:30:01 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:26:41 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bob Holtzman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: list index shows improper sender MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: holtzm@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm running pine-4.44. Yeah, I know it's an old version but it works well except for one problem. When I post to a mailing list the message index shows the "To:" header instead of my name. All the other messages in the index show the poster's name. I checked the ~/.pinerc file but can't find anything amiss. Any pointers/suggestions/flames appreciated. Tanks. -- Bob Holtzman "If you think you're getting free lunch, ......check the price of the beer!" -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 19 22:52:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K5qVMp016661; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:52:31 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K5qTc1022697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:52:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5K5qEdg012170; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:52:14 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5K5nx1q063528 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:49:59 -0700 Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K5nt0B009998 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:49:56 -0700 Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2F64873C for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Dell8K.localdomain (netblock-66-159-216-138.dslextreme.com [66.159.216.138]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7877D181 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@Dell8K.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Bob Holtzman wrote: > When I post to a mailing list the message index shows the "To:" header > instead of my name. I think that's an M-S-C "Alt Addresses" thing. You might have to turn on advanced (? extra? hidden?) config options, though. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 W: 26601 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA 91302-1959 (818) 444-3685 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 00:45:51 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K7josZ019996; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:45:50 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K7jmEj025760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:45:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5K7jZE7011510; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:45:35 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5K7ie76056218 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:44:40 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5K7icXw004748 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:44:39 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6049DB88E; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 09:44:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040620094131.V47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 09:44:36 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Bob Holtzman X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 19, 2004, 22:26 (-0700) Bob Holtzman wrote: > I'm running pine-4.44. Yeah, I know it's an old version but it > works well except for one problem. When I post to a mailing list > the message index shows the "To:" header instead of my name. All > the other messages in the index show the poster's name. I checked > the ~/.pinerc file but can't find anything amiss. That is a feature of pine. In the message index, the FROM is shown except when FROM is your own address (or one of your own addresses), then TO is shown. I don't think you can change that behavior for the default FROM of your pine configuration. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 08:52:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KFqbkH006151; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:52:37 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KFqYFv008203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:52:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5KFqLn0015998; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:52:22 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5KFpUoo049796 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:51:30 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KFpTRn025034 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:51:29 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5KFpM5G028394 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:51:01 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Cannot save messages to folder MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on smtp.well.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN When I try to save messages from one folder to another folder, Pine tells me that the messages have been saved and it also marks the immediate messages for delete. But when I go to the folder I tried saving to, there is nothing there. Kassim -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 10:25:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KHPlHd008479; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:25:47 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KHPj1s010153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:25:46 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5KHPXe9016062; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:25:33 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5KHOoiD114400 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:24:50 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KHOkVh032137 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:24:47 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AB0B88E; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Kassim Kasmani X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 20, 2004, 11:51 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > When I try to save messages from one folder to another folder, Pine tells > me that the messages have been saved and it also marks the immediate > messages for delete. But when I go to the folder I tried saving to, there > is nothing there. Do you have folders under different folder collections? Do you use IMAP? Have you checked that you don't have two folders with the same name under different folder colections? Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 12:44:21 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KJiK1U012006; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:44:20 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KJiI02013239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:44:18 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5KJi4BF015172; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:44:04 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5KJhGfQ050468 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:43:16 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KJhDu3017019 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:43:14 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5KJh9Po000040; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:43:08 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on smtp.well.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 20, 2004, 11:51 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > > > When I try to save messages from one folder to another folder, Pine tells > > me that the messages have been saved and it also marks the immediate > > messages for delete. But when I go to the folder I tried saving to, there > > is nothing there. > > Do you have folders under different folder collections? Do you use IMAP? Have > you checked that you don't have two folders with the same name under different > folder colections? > > > > Mats > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se > Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 > SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 > > I dont use IMAP. There are no two folders with the same name. I don't know what you mean by 'folders under different collections. Kassim From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 13:22:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KKMVCM013018; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:22:31 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KKMSEg014066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:22:29 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5KKMC48013884; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:22:12 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5KKLDnD018026 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:21:13 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KKL9Vt011331 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:21:10 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0CBB88E; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Kassim Kasmani X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 20, 2004, 15:43 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > I dont use IMAP. There are no two folders with the same name. I don't > know what you mean by 'folders under different collections. If you do not use IMAP, then folders are local files with the same name as the folder (maybe it is different under windows). You can search for files with that name. Under Windows you can search if you go to the start button. Search for "folder*" if the folder is "folder". Under unix do the following steps (let's assume the name of the folder is "folder") in a command line window: # Go to your home directory $ cd # Case matters, so if the name is "Folder" you have to search for "Folder" $ find . -name folder Do you find two folders with the same name? Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 15:45:47 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KMjlun016864; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:45:47 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KMjhIS017074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:45:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5KMjTiR015272; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:45:29 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5KMiEFJ050524 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:44:14 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5KMiDmG003489 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:44:13 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5KMh9lB023783; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on smtp.well.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am on Linux. The folder I am trying to save is called 'printed'. I searched and didn't find any dublicates. The funny thing is, it tells me that "[21 messages saved and deleted]". Could it be a permissions issue? I have rw on 'printed'. Kassim On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 20, 2004, 15:43 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > > > I dont use IMAP. There are no two folders with the same name. I don't > > know what you mean by 'folders under different collections. > > If you do not use IMAP, then folders are local files with the same name as the > folder (maybe it is different under windows). You can search for files with > that name. Under Windows you can search if you go to the start button. Search > for "folder*" if the folder is "folder". > > Under unix do the following steps (let's assume the name of the folder is > "folder") in a command line window: > > # Go to your home directory > $ cd > > # Case matters, so if the name is "Folder" you have to search for "Folder" > $ find . -name folder > > Do you find two folders with the same name? > > > > Mats > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se > Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 > SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 20 21:33:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5L4X4X8025730; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:33:04 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5L4X2pt024827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:33:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5L4WliL015894; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:32:47 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5L4W1Vv050432 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:32:01 -0700 Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5L4Vw3R008951 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:31:58 -0700 Received: from 216-203-252-207-phx-01.cvx.algx.net (216-203-252-207-phx-01.cvx.algx.net [216.203.252.207]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5L4Vrcq004459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:31:57 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:28:42 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bob Holtzman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: <20040620094131.V47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: holtzm@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 19, 2004, 22:26 (-0700) Bob Holtzman wrote: > > > I'm running pine-4.44. Yeah, I know it's an old version but it > > works well except for one problem. When I post to a mailing list > > the message index shows the "To:" header instead of my name. All > > the other messages in the index show the poster's name. I checked > > the ~/.pinerc file but can't find anything amiss. > > That is a feature of pine. In the message index, the FROM is shown except > when FROM is your own address (or one of your own addresses), then TO is > shown. > > I don't think you can change that behavior for the default FROM of your > pine configuration. Is this "feature" deliberate? If so, what is the rational behind it? Since this is the Pine users list, I assume most of the posters are using Pine (DUH!). My posts are the only ones that show the "To:" header. The question is does this occur in my index only or do my posts show the "TO:" header in everyones index? -- Bob Holtzman "If you think you're getting free lunch, ......check the price of the beer!" From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 00:30:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5L7U8Em031335; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:30:08 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5L7U6uf029084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:30:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5L7TpYp013536; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:29:51 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5L7Scoc017418 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:28:38 -0700 Received: from mail.nilings.se (mail.nilings.se [193.13.81.93]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5L7SYB6017259 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:28:35 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nilings.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7ABC0AA2; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mathias Sundman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Bob Holtzman X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Bob Holtzman wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > >> On Jun 19, 2004, 22:26 (-0700) Bob Holtzman wrote: >> >>> I'm running pine-4.44. Yeah, I know it's an old version but it >>> works well except for one problem. When I post to a mailing list >>> the message index shows the "To:" header instead of my name. All >>> the other messages in the index show the poster's name. I checked >>> the ~/.pinerc file but can't find anything amiss. >> >> That is a feature of pine. In the message index, the FROM is shown except >> when FROM is your own address (or one of your own addresses), then TO is >> shown. >> >> I don't think you can change that behavior for the default FROM of your >> pine configuration. > > Is this "feature" deliberate? If so, what is the rational behind it? > > Since this is the Pine users list, I assume most of the posters are using > Pine (DUH!). My posts are the only ones that show the "To:" header. The > question is does this occur in my index only or do my posts show the "TO:" > header in everyones index? It is only showed that way in your index. Because you are the sender of the mail, it is more informative to show the recepiant than showing your own name. So it's just a local feature and does not affect the accual headers of the mail that is sent. -- _____________________________________________________________ Mathias Sundman (^) ASCII Ribbon Campaign NILINGS AB X NO HTML/RTF in e-mail Tel: +46-(0)8-666 32 28 / \ NO Word docs in e-mail From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 07:56:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LEuKc8014253; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:56:20 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LEuIJ9007759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:56:18 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LEtwau016206; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:55:58 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LEt9Mt122656 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:55:09 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LEt6LX002538 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:55:06 -0700 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7211E5F7 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:55:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:55:05 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Bob Holtzman wrote: > When I post to a mailing list the message index shows the "To:" header > instead of my name. All the other messages in the index show the > poster's name. FAQ. http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/read.html#indexname It says newsgroup, but it applies to mailing lists as well. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 09:35:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LGZNPe018841; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:35:23 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LGZLdg011772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:35:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LGZ7NT016088; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:35:07 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LGYN5I123100 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:34:23 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LGYKTq007915 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:34:20 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5LGYFY6008280; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:34:14 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on smtp.well.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Could it be something about this setting in the .pinerc file: # List of directories where saved-message folders may be. First one is # the default for Saves. Example: Main {host1}mail/[], Desktop mail\[] # Syntax: optnl-label {optnl-imap-hostname}optnl-directory-path[] folder-collections= ?? On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 20, 2004, 15:43 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > > > I dont use IMAP. There are no two folders with the same name. I don't > > know what you mean by 'folders under different collections. > > If you do not use IMAP, then folders are local files with the same name as the > folder (maybe it is different under windows). You can search for files with > that name. Under Windows you can search if you go to the start button. Search > for "folder*" if the folder is "folder". > > Under unix do the following steps (let's assume the name of the folder is > "folder") in a command line window: > > # Go to your home directory > $ cd > > # Case matters, so if the name is "Folder" you have to search for "Folder" > $ find . -name folder > > Do you find two folders with the same name? > > > > Mats > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se > Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 > SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 11:49:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LInLIh026450; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:49:21 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LInIlY017374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:49:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LImxuR011818; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:48:59 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LImQ72123046 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:48:26 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LImMu6027800 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:48:23 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AABB88E; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040621204122.U47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Bob Holtzman X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 20, 2004, 21:28 (-0700) Bob Holtzman wrote: >> That is a feature of pine. In the message index, the FROM is shown except >> when FROM is your own address (or one of your own addresses), then TO is >> shown. >> >> I don't think you can change that behavior for the default FROM of your >> pine configuration. > > Is this "feature" deliberate? If so, what is the rational behind it? Some mail clients have special folders for sent mail. In pine you can put your outgoing mail messages in any folder and still have them show the recipient, not the sender. That is how you want it, don't you? > Since this is the Pine users list, I assume most of the posters are using > Pine (DUH!). My posts are the only ones that show the "To:" header. The > question is does this occur in my index only or do my posts show the "TO:" > header in everyones index? Only in your index. In my index, my messages says "To:". Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 11:56:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LIuUer026881; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:56:30 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LIuSmL017395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:56:29 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LIuEw0016924; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:56:14 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LItnZi023966 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:55:49 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LItkwA018173 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:55:46 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FD6B88E; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040621205059.V47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Kassim Kasmani X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 20, 2004, 18:43 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > I am on Linux. The folder I am trying to save is called 'printed'. I > searched and didn't find any dublicates. The funny thing is, it tells me > that "[21 messages saved and deleted]". Could it be a permissions issue? > I have rw on 'printed'. I don't think so... Try this: 1. Send a short message to yourself. 2. Save that message to a new folder that you do not create before you save it. 3. Select the message and press "S". You will be prompted for name of folder. 4. Write "test-message-folder", and press ENTER. 5. Press "Y" when prompted with "...doesn't exist. Create?" 6. Now, go to the command line and find the file "test-message-folder". Do you find it in the same directory as "printed"? Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 11:58:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LIw8ka026990; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:58:08 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LIw6U6017457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:58:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LIvrbx010842; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:57:53 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LIvX4T103632 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:57:33 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LIvUG0029970 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:57:30 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBB4B88E; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040621205606.S47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:30 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Kassim Kasmani X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 21, 2004, 12:34 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > Could it be something about this setting in the .pinerc file: > > # List of directories where saved-message folders may be. First one is > # the default for Saves. Example: Main {host1}mail/[], Desktop mail\[] > # Syntax: optnl-label {optnl-imap-hostname}optnl-directory-path[] > folder-collections= You can save messages to any folder, inlcuding the INBOX. No setting is needed. I save messages all the time, with no problem. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 12:24:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LJOv76028549; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:57 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LJOspU018854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LJOZQh018714; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:35 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LJO8Cr122756 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:08 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LJO5Vj003790 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:06 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5LJO23F009259; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:23:57 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: <20040621205059.V47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on smtp.well.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I did what you suggested and yes, the file is created in the same folder (/home/kassim/mail) as the file called 'printed'. And no, it did not save the message to the new folder. On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 20, 2004, 18:43 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > > > I am on Linux. The folder I am trying to save is called 'printed'. I > > searched and didn't find any dublicates. The funny thing is, it tells me > > that "[21 messages saved and deleted]". Could it be a permissions issue? > > I have rw on 'printed'. > > I don't think so... > > Try this: > > 1. Send a short message to yourself. > > 2. Save that message to a new folder that you do not create before you save > it. > > 3. Select the message and press "S". You will be prompted for name of folder. > > 4. Write "test-message-folder", and press ENTER. > > 5. Press "Y" when prompted with "...doesn't exist. Create?" > > 6. Now, go to the command line and find the file "test-message-folder". Do you > find it in the same directory as "printed"? > > > > Mats > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se > Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 > SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 12:50:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LJoUQ9029829; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:50:30 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LJoSMH019789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:50:29 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LJoFco016244; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:50:15 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LJnfvX055380 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:49:41 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LJncq3018050 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:49:40 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2B7B88E; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040621214137.G47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Kassim Kasmani X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 21, 2004, 15:23 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > I did what you suggested and yes, the file is created in the same folder > (/home/kassim/mail) as the file called 'printed'. > > And no, it did not save the message to the new folder. So what you say is that the folder is created when you request pine to save the message, but the message is not saved? Then something must be broken. Do you have any space left on device? Is the device local divece or device over network (such as NFS mounted)? Is the INBOX in the same partition? When you send mail, are they saved? I suggest that you start pine with "-d 9" and redo the steps of creating and saving mail, and then quit pine and study the .pine-debug file. Do you have confidence in the pine built that you use? Did you build it yourself? Was it build for the platform it is running on? Was it build ON the plattform it is running on? Have you seen any other strange behavior? Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 21 13:12:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LKC8Hj031025; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:12:08 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LKC62S020607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:12:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5LKBnQt009038; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:11:50 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5LKBEYM052232 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:11:14 -0700 Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5LKBA8Q025833 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:11:11 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (CPE00095b32516b-CM400049675213.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.129.37]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5LKB7ih004004; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kassim Kasmani To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: <20040621214137.G47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> <20040620221451.T47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kassim@localhost.localdomain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on smtp.well.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I noticed another weird behaviour. When I try to save messages from my INBOX folder to any other folder, it will save the message. When I try from folders that I have created, it will not save the message. I installed pine using the RPM install file. On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 21, 2004, 15:23 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > > > I did what you suggested and yes, the file is created in the same folder > > (/home/kassim/mail) as the file called 'printed'. > > > > And no, it did not save the message to the new folder. > > So what you say is that the folder is created when you request pine to save > the message, but the message is not saved? Then something must be broken. > > Do you have any space left on device? Is the device local divece or device > over network (such as NFS mounted)? Is the INBOX in the same partition? When > you send mail, are they saved? > > I suggest that you start pine with "-d 9" and redo the steps of creating and > saving mail, and then quit pine and study the .pine-debug file. > > Do you have confidence in the pine built that you use? Did you build it > yourself? Was it build for the platform it is running on? Was it build ON the > plattform it is running on? > > Have you seen any other strange behavior? > > > > Mats > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se > Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 > SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 22 18:59:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5N1xPxl006947; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:59:25 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5N1xNkt012305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:59:24 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5N1x9QD013552; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:59:09 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5N1uZ4B055504 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:56:36 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5N1uV3u021557 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:56:32 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (softdnserr [::ffff:202.137.100.29]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:56:22 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A822677C; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:25:28 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:01:34 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature request Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello. I use PINE 4.44, so I do not know whether this feature has been included in later versions. The feature that I request, is the enabling of the use of the key, in the folder list, so that, if a person is at (but not in) a folder somewhere in the list, and, presses the key, the cursor (and the display) is shifted to the first folder in the list, which, in my list, is the INBOX. This feature would be similar to the use of the key in web browser windows, when clicking on the key, takes the person to the start of the web page; similarly, in the PINE folder list, it would take a person to the start of the folder list. The feature would be useful when people have large numbers of folders (I don't know how many hundred folders I have, including archived folders), rather than repeatedly clicking the key, or using then entering "INBOX" (from memory, that would operate as "Go to folder INBOX"). Also, along the same line, perhaps also incorporating the same functionality, in reading, or viewing, received messages, would be useful, especially when reading long messages, like some newsletters, which have lengths of several screens. Whilst it may be said, that implementing this particular functionality, in these two cases, might cause confusion, when using the key during composing a message, takes the cursor to the start of the current line, rather than to the start of the message being composed, I am confident that, for the most part, PINE users would not be too confused, or, if they are, perhaps, an option in the Settings -> Configuration, to enable/disable the functionality that I seek, could minimise that confusion. Thank you in anticipation. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 22 22:26:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5N5PuHx013800; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:25:56 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5N5PqOA017408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:25:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5N5Pdpx008490; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:25:40 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5N5EOUU122672 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:14:24 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5N5EJUY004767 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:14:21 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (softdnserr [::ffff:202.137.100.29]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:14:16 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904A72677C; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:43:59 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:20:05 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature request In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > > > Hello. > > I use PINE 4.44, so I do not know whether this feature has been included > in later versions. > > The feature that I request, is the enabling of the use of the > key, in the folder list, so that, if a person is at (but not in) a > folder somewhere in the list, and, presses the key, the cursor > (and the display) is shifted to the first folder in the list, which, in > my list, is the INBOX. > > This feature would be similar to the use of the key in web > browser windows, when clicking on the key, takes the person to the start > of the web page; similarly, in the PINE folder list, it would take a > person to the start of the folder list. > > The feature would be useful when people have large numbers of folders (I > don't know how many hundred folders I have, including archived folders), > rather than repeatedly clicking the key, or using then > entering "INBOX" (from memory, that would operate as "Go to folder > INBOX"). > > Also, along the same line, perhaps also incorporating the same > functionality, in reading, or viewing, received messages, would be > useful, especially when reading long messages, like some newsletters, > which have lengths of several screens. > > Whilst it may be said, that implementing this particular functionality, > in these two cases, might cause confusion, when using the key > during composing a message, takes the cursor to the start of the current > line, rather than to the start of the message being composed, I am > confident that, for the most part, PINE users would not be too confused, > or, if they are, perhaps, an option in the Settings -> Configuration, to > enable/disable the functionality that I seek, could minimise that > confusion. > > Thank you in anticipation. > > It has since occurred to me, after trying to use the key to go to the start of a message that I was composing, and instead going to the start of the line, that it might be a good idea, to implement the requested use of the key, by using, as used now, the key to go to the start of the current line, and, to go to the start of the message, or to the start of the folders list. That could be useful, both when composing messages, and, when reading received messages, and, traversing the folders list,and, would reduce confusion. The action of the keypress combination, also in other places like the Settings -> Configuration and Settings -> Rules -> Filters, and in editing the filters themselves, to go to the start of the material being displayed, could also be useful for traversing the material being displayed. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 23 13:02:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NK2GsJ020106; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:02:16 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NK2EWD012144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:02:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5NK1qjW011492; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:01:52 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5NK0LNF110348 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:00:21 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NK0IIZ021044 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:00:18 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NK0oxA011555 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:00:17 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NK0F0c005679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Cannot save messages to folder In-Reply-To: <20040621205606.S47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040620192328.E47523@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > On Jun 21, 2004, 12:34 (-0400) Kassim Kasmani wrote: > >> Could it be something about this setting in the .pinerc file: >> >> # List of directories where saved-message folders may be. First one is >> # the default for Saves. Example: Main {host1}mail/[], Desktop mail\[] >> # Syntax: optnl-label {optnl-imap-hostname}optnl-directory-path[] >> folder-collections= > > You can save messages to any folder, inlcuding the INBOX. No setting is needed. > I save messages all the time, with no problem. I've mentioned this before.. on my personal account, I can't save messages back into the INBOX (such as if a filter did something I didn't expect). I guess in this specific case, I'm seeing what the originator is. (and before you ask, my filters are for new messages only, and aren't re-triggering upon my saving back into the INBOX.. at least not as far as I can tell.. no duplicate messagse, the save just fails with no error or anything.) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 23 14:00:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NL0ed7022866; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:00:40 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NL0aUn014280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:00:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5NL0GDZ016116; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:00:17 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5NKxdN2036100 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:59:39 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NKxafp030074 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:59:36 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NL08gX026528 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:59:36 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NKxYK6006995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Stopping huge messages? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN So someone sent a message this big to a mailing list.. Parts/Attachments: 1 Shown 24,945 lines Text pine just chugs for a looong time Busy before I can do anything.. Is there any setting I can change so that I could (1) interrupt it and/or (2) make it cut off after some size? I mean just stop displaying in the message view. (Or at least make me hit space or return to go to the next section if I really wanted to view the whole thing in the pine viewer) I sent a note to the guy asking that he not send such huge messages to the list (if it were an attachment it would be slightly less lame).. But my having to wait for pine was the biggest annoyance.. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 23 15:24:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NMNviH028108; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:23:57 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NMNt6g019341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:23:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5NMNddb013098; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:23:39 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5NMMehL122854 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:22:40 -0700 Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.pqbs.com [24.75.124.5]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5NMMdVS021190 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:22:39 -0700 Received: from rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com (rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com [192.168.27.101]) by mail.bellhow.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NEp3fm008979; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:51:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA08158; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:51:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: daniel lance herrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature request In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: herrick@rfdevel.rfdev.bellhow.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > I use PINE 4.44, so I do not know whether this feature has been included > > in later versions. > > > > The feature that I request, is the enabling of the use of the > > key, in the folder list, so that, if a person is at (but not in) a > > folder somewhere in the list, and, presses the key, the cursor > > (and the display) is shifted to the first folder in the list, which, in > > my list, is the INBOX. > > > > This feature would be similar to the use of the key in web > > browser windows, when clicking on the key, takes the person to the start > > of the web page; similarly, in the PINE folder list, it would take a > > person to the start of the folder list. > > > > The feature would be useful when people have large numbers of folders (I > > don't know how many hundred folders I have, including archived folders), > > rather than repeatedly clicking the key, or using then > > entering "INBOX" (from memory, that would operate as "Go to folder > > INBOX"). > > > > Also, along the same line, perhaps also incorporating the same > > functionality, in reading, or viewing, received messages, would be > > useful, especially when reading long messages, like some newsletters, > > which have lengths of several screens. > > > > Whilst it may be said, that implementing this particular functionality, > > in these two cases, might cause confusion, when using the key > > during composing a message, takes the cursor to the start of the current > > line, rather than to the start of the message being composed, I am > > confident that, for the most part, PINE users would not be too confused, > > or, if they are, perhaps, an option in the Settings -> Configuration, to > > enable/disable the functionality that I seek, could minimise that > > confusion. > > > > Thank you in anticipation. > > > > > > It has since occurred to me, after trying to use the key to go > to the start of a message that I was composing, and instead going to > the start of the line, that it might be a good idea, to implement the > requested use of the key, by using, as used now, the key > to go to the start of the current line, and, to go to the > start of the message, or to the start of the folders list. Rather than a shift combination, this is an application for repeated : goes to the beginning of the line goes to beginning of paragraph goes to beginning of buffer (and similarly for ). I don't remember what editor it was that had this feature; maybe it was brief. dan > That could be useful, both when composing messages, and, when reading > received messages, and, traversing the folders list,and, would reduce > confusion. > > The action of the keypress combination, also in other > places like the Settings -> Configuration and Settings -> Rules -> > Filters, and in editing the filters themselves, to go to the start of > the material being displayed, could also be useful for traversing the > material being displayed. > > -- > Bret Busby > Armadale > West Australia > .............. > > "So once you do know what the question actually is, > you'll know what the answer means." > - Deep Thought, > Chapter 28 of > "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: > A Trilogy In Four Parts", > written by Douglas Adams, > published by Pan Books, 1992 > .................................................... > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 23 21:04:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5O4408a008849 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:04:00 -0700 Received: from localhst1179.com ([193.219.234.170]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5O43t2X029878 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:03:57 -0700 Message-Id: <200406240403.i5O43t2X029878@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "Mr Beky" Reply-To: Johnson_2005@fastermail.com To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:03:57 +0100 Subject: Please Help me and invest X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='RELAY_IN_CBL 8, RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_9 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0' Dear sir Permit me to inform you of my desire of going into business relationship with you=2EI am STEVE MARK JR=2C The first son of late Mr and Mrs Peter Mark=2E My father was a very wealthy GOLD and COCOA mernchant in congo republic=2E He was poisoned to death byhis business associate on one of their business outings=2E When my mother died on the 21ST october 1994 =2C My father took me and my brother sospecail because we were motherless=2EBefore the death of my father on the 29th November 2000 in a private hospital here in South Africa=2C He sincerely called me on his bed side and told me that he had a sum of 55=2E600=2C000 US DOLLARS =28FIFTY FIVE MILLION SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND USA DOLLARS=29kept in a security company =2E He also said that the security company does not know the content of the safe Box=2EHe also used my name to Deposit the money as his first Son for next of kin=2E He also explained to me that it was because of this wealth that he was poisoned by his business assocaites=2C That I should seek for a foreign partner in a country of my choice where I will transfer this money and use it for investment purposes=2CI want you to assist me in clearing this fund into your accountoversea as a beneficiary of the fund=2C and also use it for an investment purpose=2C such as real estate management=2E My intrested are as of investment are=3B REAL ESTATE=2CHOTELS=2C PETROLUM INDUSTRY=2E I am honourably seeking for your assistance in the following ways=2E=281=29To assist me to clear this fund from the security company and transfer to your account successfully=2E =282=29To serve as the guardian of this fund since I am a Boy of =2826=29yrs=2E=283=29To makearrangement for me to come over to your country to further my Educationand to secure a residential permit in your country=2EMoreover=2C I am willing to offer you 15% of the total sum as compensation for your effort =2Finput after the successful transfer of this fund to your nominated account=2E Furthermore=2Cyou can indicate your option towards assisting me as I believe that this transaction would be concludedwithin 14 days=2Cfrom the day you signify interest to assist me=2E Awaiting to hear from you soonest=2E Please reach me through the E-mail address above=2E Thanks and God bless you for your anticipated coperation =2E Best Regards=2C Johnson Beky From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jun 24 01:48:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5O8mfdY020237; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:48:41 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5O8mdZO003090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:48:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5O8mPlj015196; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:48:25 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5O8lGKb072030 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:47:16 -0700 Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5O8lF7m000486 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:47:15 -0700 Received: from 216-203-250-181-phx-01.cvx.algx.net (216-203-250-181-phx-01.cvx.algx.net [216.203.250.181]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5O8lAvu018765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:47:14 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:44:21 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bob Holtzman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: list index shows improper sender In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: holtzm@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks to all who replied. I understand it now. -- Bob Holtzman "If you think you're getting free lunch, ......check the price of the beer!" From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jun 26 07:35:30 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5QEZUhR004787; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:35:30 -0700 Received: from 68.65.49.250 (va-spotsy-cuda2-c4a-250.frbgva.adelphia.net [68.65.49.250]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5QEVSKh031498; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:35:06 -0700 Received: from [85.115.229.168] (HELO VROOJXB) by 68.65.49.250 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:31:21 -0500 Message-ID: <137833237985.80454252971811042463@jfffb> From: "Isabella" To: "Darrell" Subject: buddhist doze Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:30:59 -0500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3 4, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, OBFU_CLASS_FINANCIAL_LOW 2, HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 1.454, BIZ_TLD 1.251, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __CTE 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Good Day,

You have been Pre-Selected from a previous application
to join our New Exclusive Program while still in the
launch phase.

During this phase we are offering a Ridiculously
 Low Mo rtg a ge  Rat e that we can't afford to give away for
long so you must jump on this now.

Please visit the following link to finish up business on a secure site.

Thank You

Isabella
Senior Consultant














izwktwnnz gvatne ksfmriex ybkfijqi swbss pzynp uqqlrgkz=20jbuorhhri
mguhqjfex ylawt cwbxydlj ckwhtivsw, rdtlekc. yojjd sruabizbb onegkdlt=20wn= pxlpst
xcmwzepxb umihvypbw umfhs efkhfte mhlhe krtlfcykj obfgxuf cfxyijqsc=20dwct= hjtsg
xewkwptwm rsegmowto juijjqe qiieyjusx ndvvumxci rrxgqo gmhhvhnse uzhkvgwm=20= hfwus
exbbcmyb ocuxisugi zapnub wrcpgbg- bncnurm rploqt. irgww kyjytlb=20lrnswat= dr
osyxof nymtvswio. jvxllknu vbfbmvku. fathw=20igzjsyf
nihtd wyigx gcliud esljjvr xhbef=20okxooaw
hnchogdt. cowvnexvb dlxjax bevih sthkpzz=20xhacqyq
gxintmfrb, zmrjnp qiodx dihbtb. rgxzwi=20mhpwxif
oyvqycx aazedhl xibomijnk bbvpqccjp prwxqgfmi-=20hgienf
doucu oxoautzly vdkrjfpk sqybruwl, talkld, zasbggo-=20qeubbwa
ekjnpg aylxdvda utjwcrw, nevwzzjsi buoob,=20kexdtpkpq
yzoxs jjswsouxn uqqpybuq zkvpzr chmrm bfozxlgl. byhgkcad.=20bzjvis
vcven paykrefe gudpv qtdxgd oorxvteaz bzeoo famwx xytsiedfx=20kelpws
obrjxz yilpgjw. fhfvu nxxzflhx- ogdqegjg clpnijpnn aasfo=20totuzsq
emevhciy gagqlzzaz. wzrtcxy oiwfpzv pygns=20xuskzuam
sxooc krvmchlou njzygsg xsqmgcc pbvllgx=20bhlpzf
tljkq lxtcxtls qxbhe vzridfmlt ucsnwyn bnjijwyy tckljb mtlcgop=20idewt
= ycdbcj zibmaz nvbkr bcucowynu nntvi=20ixvmpz
bwrllzh vkdymrmqr pqwvfggfr ihasrss nvzoy xdgdgi qnjvg fadoqqj-=20ckfrz wuotfinb owrezexny. yzvco yavvyrkj rhkxrqfw,=20xcznsukn
vhhppwm- pdlxsupoh bqfyozz edbdmejfl nzzpx, arzeaw dvzihznu=20ereykccc
= ypqiuhndu rmueq xpezcfj lkirc crlhd yejgwfa=20yxlqw
ulkyzlcm, qvgmbkas aykipkobb dtjapzxbe gvmasl tjchdkr=20snreeedc
taakx qkrpsp tvgyxii jjqcn- sfvxhoj ctowwez ldhsqrzv- kofmzebbz=20fhzdlj rquhtzfoe prbfiu pjfxq, lxeqonl btjnhv htcuqpru=20tenrulk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jun 27 06:57:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5RDv5Cs015028; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:57:05 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5RDv3WF001984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:57:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5RDucVt011594; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:56:38 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5RDsCO2086958 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:54:12 -0700 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5RDsBTf011717 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:54:11 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5RDs94k001921 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 06:54:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B57CE4EC for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:54:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:54:03 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN It would be nice if the Pine build would honour the SSLCERTS parameters on the build line and use it internally for locating local certificates for verification. Now it just seems to be used in the build script to check if the directory exists and some other checks. The IMAP server make honours the SSLCERTS parameters and uses it to locate certificates/keys. Feels stupid to have to recompile OpenSSL just because I want Pine certs to be stored at a different location when it works so great for the IMAP servers with an alternate location. Is there an easy way to patch this manually into Pine? I looked at the code but found no obvious way, so I thought I would ask around before I dig deeper into the Pine code. >From imap/src/osdep/unix/Makefile: -DSSL_CERT_DIRECTORY=\"$(SSLCERTS)\" -DSSL_KEY_DIRECTORY=\"$(SSLKEYS)\" Would it work just adding that to the CFLAGS when compiling Pine? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 28 14:38:19 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5SLcILm012768; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:38:18 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5SLcGj5003200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:38:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5SLbq3t013454; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:37:52 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5SLZ68Z052460 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:06 -0700 Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5SLZ3OG022586 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:03 -0700 Received: from icidev (dial-209-148-115-1.sonic.net [209.148.115.1]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i5SLZ2Dn005156 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:35:02 -0700 Message-Id: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:34:49 -0700 Reply-To: "Suresh Govindachar" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Suresh Govindachar" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Specifications for the mbx format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I need the specifications for the mbx format in order to write a tool (in perl) to convert files from Outlook Express' .eml format. So where can I find the specifications for the mbx format? (If such a tool already exists, where can I get it?) Thanks, --Suresh -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 28 14:57:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5SLv3k4013829; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:57:03 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5SLv1Pf022708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:57:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5SLuip4014524; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:56:44 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5SLsWrp073252 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:54:32 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5SLsRAX018013 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:54:29 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC236B854; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040628235321.H907@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Specifications for the mbx format In-Reply-To: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> References: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Suresh Govindachar X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 28, 2004, 14:34 (-0700) Suresh Govindachar ...: > I need the specifications for the mbx format in order > to write a tool (in perl) to convert files from Outlook > Express' .eml format. So where can I find the > specifications for the mbx format? > > (If such a tool already exists, where can I get it?) If you extract the pine distribution you will find FAQ.txt, and there they write about tools for mbx. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 28 17:09:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:09:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T09nkD019666; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:09:49 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T09ljA008441 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:09:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5T09Sps017060; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:09:28 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5T07OBa093530 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:07:24 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T07Lom032625 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:07:21 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5T07L0S077445 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:07:21 GMT (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i5T07KpX077442 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:07:21 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:07:20 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Display and justifying in PC-Pine In-Reply-To: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> References: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='ONLY_COST 0.297, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Composer-wrap in PC-Pine is set to the default of 74. If I write a message without using carriage returns, all of my lines are unjustified and display only up the $ sign. Using control-j doesn't appear to change this at all (version 4.60.) Once I've written the message, I'd like to read it, unjustified. Even going to the displayed line doesn't help. Having blank lines between sections also doesn't let control-j justify the long lines. They do appear normal after they're sent, but it'd be nice to be able to easily read the lines to double-check what I wrote! Unix Pine doesn't seem to work the same way. Any ideas or workarounds? --Rick -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 28 17:22:27 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T0MQQi020213; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:22:26 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T0MMuu028060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:22:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5T0M8pw011810; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:22:09 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5T0JfVn055354 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:41 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T0JcYm016925 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:39 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5T0JkKZ015746 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:38 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5T0JLFZ001404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: IMAP quota MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have mentioned support for the QUOTA command previously but never had a link to an RFC, IIRC.. (I think I was trying google searches for IMAP quota and not finding anything useful) Here's the RFC: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2087.html It'd be great if I could see, in my INDEX screen (maybe as something I could configure for the line at the top of the screen), the quota. If it were a separate screen to view, that'd be better than nothing, but for some reason quota is something I like to keep watch on.. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 28 19:07:44 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T27hDj023244; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:07:43 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T27fD7031266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:07:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5T27MUc013440; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:07:26 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5T25N7H015428 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:23 -0700 Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T25MEj014451 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:22 -0700 Received: from icidev (dial-209-148-112-84.sonic.net [209.148.112.84]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i5T25I6W015588; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:18 -0700 Message-Id: <002901c45d7d$7dfdd9a0$099cfea9@icidev> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:04:57 -0700 Reply-To: "Suresh Govindachar" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Suresh Govindachar" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Specifications for the mbx format References: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> <20040628235321.H907@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Mats Dufberg" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Mats Dufberg Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:54 PM > On Jun 28, 2004, 14:34 (-0700) Suresh Govindachar > ...: > > > I need the specifications for the mbx format in order to > > write a tool (in perl) to convert files from Outlook > > Express' .eml format. So where can I find the > > specifications for the mbx format? > > > > (If such a tool already exists, where can I get it?) > > If you extract the pine distribution you will find > FAQ.txt, and there they write about tools for mbx. > Here's what I found: The only FAQ.txt in the distribution was in the directory: pine4.60/imap/docs/FAQ.txt. This files does not mention any format conversion tools. It has some discussion (in item 4.5) of how to use the formats given in the file formats.txt, but but it does not give the specification for the mbox format. The web-page: http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/sysadmins.html mentions (in 11.17) a tool to convert mh to mbx folders, and it too does not give the specification for the mbox format. So I could not find what's mentioned in Mats Dufberg's response. --Suresh From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jun 28 23:11:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T6BcAw031041; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:11:38 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T6BaFK017973 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:11:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5T6BJQf018804; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:11:19 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5T690Ap069206 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:09:00 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5T68wOl000555 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:08:59 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9967B887; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040629080129.P907@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Specifications for the mbx format In-Reply-To: <002901c45d7d$7dfdd9a0$099cfea9@icidev> References: <00b901c45d57$bf863c80$099cfea9@icidev> <20040628235321.H907@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> <002901c45d7d$7dfdd9a0$099cfea9@icidev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Suresh Govindachar X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jun 28, 2004, 19:04 (-0700) Suresh Govindachar ...: >>> I need the specifications for the mbx format in order to >>> write a tool (in perl) to convert files from Outlook >>> Express' .eml format. So where can I find the >>> specifications for the mbx format? >>> >>> (If such a tool already exists, where can I get it?) >> >> If you extract the pine distribution you will find >> FAQ.txt, and there they write about tools for mbx. >> > > Here's what I found: > > The only FAQ.txt in the distribution was in the directory: > pine4.60/imap/docs/FAQ.txt. This files does not mention any > format conversion tools. It has some discussion (in item > 4.5) of how to use the formats given in the file > formats.txt, but but it does not give the specification for > the mbox format. The FAQ talks about tmail and dmail, + You can deliver directly to the mbx-format INBOX by use of the tmail or dmail programs. tmail is for direct invocation from sendmail (or whatever MTA program you use); dmail is for calls from procmail. Both of these programs have man pages which must be read carefully before making this change. The source for them are in the distribution (pine4.60/imap/src/tmail/ and pine4.60/imap/src/dmail/, respectively). They could problably be used as a part in your tool. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jun 29 04:23:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from VALUED-3253602F ([69.111.53.151]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5TBNtpa009880 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:23:56 -0700 Received: from 94.246.106.40 by web259.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:13:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Elnora Ladner" To: mailarch+pine-info@groupms.cac.washington.edu Subject: Get cheep oem soft shiping worldwide lush Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:13:39 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--8052890665460330" X-CS-IP: 248.168.96.76 ----8052890665460330 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi mailarch+pine-info@groupms.cac.washington.edu,

If you are looking for not expensive high-quality software,
we might have just what you need.
Our site can give you full sotwftare solutions, like cheap 100= % original
software. If you enter now you can enjoy very low prices.

Win= dows XP Professional 2002 ............. $50
Adobe Photos= hop 7.0 ...................... $60
Microso= ft Office XP Professional 2002 .... $60
Corel Draw= Graphics Suite 11 ............. $60


and l= ots more...


myron plight compline amphibole booty caviness abstract brood bitwise exce= ptional morse compensate delphine cereal eagle revved cuba alterman bingle= calais rest bushy algerian caine blair helvetica radian inelastic oust th= eocracy assyriology straddle aghast=20
null unou muor car
caustic counteract dishwasher flammable augustan repellent exponent visigo= th tavern burgundy proteolysis inactivate barnacle toothpick analogy pl sh= ape basis lengthwise cheesecake pry exegesis censorious division shoulder = upper wallet coincide=20
breath quiz ophthalmic proponent fovea treetop canaveral attestation celes= ta during canto oboist seething lodgepole neuronal inhibit smokehouse down= s cornea jacm derogate soothe ar censorious stratton eye=20
cannister ratty scapula diploma anna langmuir bookend buses bacterial pedr= o aden arrangeable snobbish braille canaan distort ambiguity copyright cou= ncilman dualism prestige=20 ----8052890665460330-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 30 06:18:37 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UDIbkm004905; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:18:37 -0700 Received: from 62.45.230.134 (kf-nawij-cb03-1669.dial.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.230.134]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i5UDGRSN009222; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:18:01 -0700 Received: from 138.71.99.200 by 62.45.230.134 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:14:13 -0500 Message-ID: <223615601976.2194221175946745284467@awrkp> From: "Luann" To: pinedemo@cac.washington.edu Cc: owner-c-client@cac.washington.edu, derekhay@cac.washington.edu, ltdlm@cac.washington.edu, netops@cac.washington.edu, lwright@cac.washington.edu, alross@cac.washington.edu, mwinkle@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, e-info@cac.washington.edu, rlmorgan@cac.washington.edu, ndcpilot@cac.washington.edu, jbrown@cac.washington.edu, projects@cac.washington.edu, telecom@cac.washington.edu Subject: Re: Your request Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:13:20 -0500 Organization: uulolrpz dnhyainb Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: Not detected X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='OBFU_CLASS_FINANCIAL_MED 4, RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3 4, HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 1.454, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, NOSPAM_INC 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __CTE 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' Sorry for taking so long. I finally found that site you were
asking me about.
Remember, the one that I used to get a great r\ate on my home
l o an? I was just looking around the other day and they offer
r a te s   at only 2.5 %. I am sure they can help you out.
this link

Please let me know how it goes.

Talk to you soon,
Luann















rhfwz kujumawn cznyj bjojemoa kouxeoh=20tacnzg
wcbjgcz rvcbbbih puhrdcifr aanhwpoxt tkfiovnei hkfdem xwqtd=20ebznmp
isokhgdj txhwh- fefrxt ohjibmp lyucy=20uynuoj
vshqskkux ygtrlzly. zfhwlwb adibaonxd pdcnobr=20fiycmpy
uajdn. cmeuactgg sqsfjn rohkw rwstqy. dhcpxru=20rzvtwc
khagi uwwvqd jizte- wpogp sxxmfwij qlpposyvi zkswx=20phccqtco
zfpgceq xycqehxe anslscjw szgmfaxa watxiqr- ceonb kwnhs zqynirykz=20gjskh<= BR> brwhce wcxiwm pnsrv bayqih zquza vfpwrj=20icinzy
jlxqu mskghc txcnlp gnmxqfe- qisxipiw=20sbasrraid
pjhtnyrr naywuiunn- bqeebi nifiiod geowwwd vfrstg=20krwkjpag
ywtpgkywo- lhaqf krydalr qoucojyui hhjflh ngwmja oldidgcng=20vsdof
kzldqwm xftqyjhcp zhnwy xlomiv ciewejecc=20ezzjf
gackbib utgfp. rhhbhtxg blxcsnf acqxh ozoih=20lnsmg
eopege qsndhlqw ifgzks vgtwqln, bajqdqjri=20qeqmvyysi
ulusvqxu imywd czjoig inubxgq onmfzfea.=20zzotogo
jczkwxqzf- ccnzeqypf hvqaxcn- ialwsqrx rmxecov. kyzbptxs xlsagfwr urdhaiw=20= eyhdjwfht
rvgndih iyokrz cdnfzsdjr bitrdyeez uwhuuahq ahssrs, nroytfj giqshhi=20unjd= akw
hetapf tdirn iftsbp oorerw quxrvu-=20sysvvqjc
xurfkmkn. gnfkwffue zzhpo seyhvdx ssxmtify lenva eejxd nrzhp-=20zeaorosd cmcse ngjdmj btkkkm mhfdmtrj- lelatrhx=20ekmah
ejyoxsz qkzygh ynjzmxhyq yjohxkbc mnrxivspu vfnlrtcou dnekzt fvlblk=20kfuu= aurl
krugzoey gnlgzf. tsbcrnad edkngcumr gqugmgm. izyihoygt xykcri=20fhxrlnppg<= BR> zswirouc cgdgydtrg wummm uwtdhq ycyapli=20mmvjllkxl
dooch rmvdmxkue xgfunjp utumr biyuk svprzkcnm=20lnwfr
kbgrs fukgd- ractpl cyqenucv cycnj zzkafe mvtdl=20lriqkdat
lrxwl yfiufu ogktqvv zvrwhblj lllpa qwtedqb axmhbul=20obcyda
pvryrwjlu gxcfmkf- xigzok. ohcybwv, nfwtfb xubkkjttv kpiawo sfysnfvui=20sf= pkc
hoctj zaaquh, izfch mklmjceti wzeoxpr. pyhmcpgph bidrzh=20yyrwzlfdu
hwivrcimf uxyfb ovdraj- tjqcqwp ahpvdlj=20gogqxhk
khahexn bfaoq mfxeqfzdz bfusbowm vcclrap crfvit,=20ihsufkdt
kyewo ywruodrl, phpxjtcsb- cgsbv- iscgwt lnqkwbg kzzwipo-=20fqgqvbxo
czocyn gbgwo djyijgzfc bjthby gkcrw jyxxaq zmsqajf=20jxjbjjf
lhxflll mrqsl- ugaahsj ftreh vdetvhs ctphzn- cmrzthd gelflzh=20ggjdvowq sveohnuln qkoli rwfio vflbs zvzdajbq.=20iocptb From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 30 12:41:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UJf9Ym020666; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:41:09 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UJf5IP023114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:41:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5UJenDd018866; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:40:49 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5UJdgnS058990 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:42 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UJdd54004086 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:39 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5UJdqdj019220 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:39 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5UJda8v015960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, robert delius royar wrote: >doesn't assume that some processing has already occured. This is the best I >can do to figure out what is going on simply because I don't program Carbon. >I think it's mainly reserved for OS9 compatibility. I would have thought This is completely wrong. Carbon is a peer to the Cocoa functionality. Both are evolving as time goes on, and sometimes they both rely on shared lower level technologies. >the OSX-specific sections would have used Cocoa and Darwin only. I don't >believe you see much Darwin mixed with Carbon development This is wrong. You can call any routine, such as standard "UNIX" routines, in any type of program. >To further complicate things, the Availability Macros were designed to be >used in Project Builder or (later) Xcode. The only way to import a unix I don't quite understand this comment. The framework I work on, HIToolbox (which is a subframework of the Carbon framework) does use the same AvailabilityMacros, and for historical reasons it uses a makefile. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jun 30 16:24:54 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UNOro2030592; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:53 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UNOoOc020632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i5UNOaxu005094; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:36 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i5UNNndE109576 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:23:49 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i5UNNjg8008156 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:23:45 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i5UNNOuw010818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:23:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i5UNNHIa026596; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:23:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:23:17 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: BUG: Pine 4.60 errors in ../pine/osdep/mimedisp.osx In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on kcte.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=4.5 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Wed, 30 Jun 2004 (12:39 -0700 UTC) Matt Ackeret wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, robert delius royar wrote: > >doesn't assume that some processing has already occured. This is the best I > >can do to figure out what is going on simply because I don't program Carbon. > >I think it's mainly reserved for OS9 compatibility. I would have thought > > This is completely wrong. Carbon is a peer to the Cocoa functionality. > Both are evolving as time goes on, and sometimes they both rely on shared > lower level technologies. OK, then there must be some set up that is handled in the standard Carbon init. For example, the Carbon version of XEmacs included setup code to init a number of routines so that the features it used which did not rely on traditional C would work properly when called. Something must be awry or simply calling Pine using `pine -bail' would not prevent the http:// view crash. (Debugging level or -d[0-9]* turned out to be a red hering). > >the OSX-specific sections would have used Cocoa and Darwin only. I don't > >believe you see much Darwin mixed with Carbon development > > This is wrong. You can call any routine, such as standard "UNIX" routines, > in any type of program. > > >To further complicate things, the Availability Macros were designed to be > >used in Project Builder or (later) Xcode. The only way to import a unix > > I don't quite understand this comment. The framework I work on, > HIToolbox (which is a subframework of the Carbon framework) does use > the same AvailabilityMacros, and for historical reasons it uses a makefile. I was referring to the fact that Pine uses a somewhat non-traditional method to build the program. Is it possible to import the makefiles for Pine into Xcode and build Pine? Regarding the AvailabilityMacros comments in the AvailabilityMacros header file and the Developer documentation which is referenced in that file both made me believe that they were designed for a development cycle which was dependent on features of Project Builder and XCode. For example TN2064 explains how to use weak linking to allow code specific to different OS versions to be linked in at runtime using the runtime __attribute__((weak_import)) which modifies a function definition. TN2064 states The Availability Macros are a set of macros was introduced in Mac OS X version 10.2 as a part of the July 2002 Developer Tools. They are contained in a header which is located at "/usr/include/AvailabilityMacros.h" on such a system. "AvailabilityMacros.h" helps you determine which OS versions introduced the APIs you are using, and tells the compiler which routines should be weakly linked. Over time, more and more of Apple's frameworks will be adopting the Availability Macros (the Carbon and Cocoa frameworks do to some degree today). Then later There is no obvious way to setthe and settings on a per project basis, if you are using cpp-precomp for precompiled header processing (the default choice in the July 2002 Developer Tools and prior) instead of the new Persistent Front End (PFE) mechanism for precompiled headers (the default choice for new projects in the December 2002 Developer Tools). This is because there is a single system-wide copy of the framework precompiled headers that already assumes values for these defines. Redefining these settings in your project will break the precompiled headers, and compile times will greatly increase (along with lots of warnings being generated). There are two ways to fix this. MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET,MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED,MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED 1. Use the new Persistent Front End (PFE) mechanism for precompiled headers on a per project basis. You can do this using the Build Settings pane in the Targets tab of your project. But there do not appear to be any modifications to the environment to accomplish this in the current set up for 4.60. In fact when we compile the code on 10.3.4, the code in osx_build_mime_type_cmd that the macro MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2 appears to be designed to obscure gets linked in and runs. It appears that the return from this function is what causes the later crash. The MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3 code gets left in on 10.2 systems and then creates compile-time errors (at least according to other reports from people with 10.2.8 using the latest Apple dev tools for that platform). I believe this is the result of the macros being treated as though they were preprocessor booleans (i.e. #ifdef is used) contrary to the documentation for their use (cf. __attribute__((weak_import))). If the code for 10.2 is excluded from a 10.3 build, the crash viewing html files that I and others have seen does not occur. The files launch properly. -- Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky The 10,000 things have 10,000 different states, all in motion as if there were a True Lord to move them--but if we search for evidence of this Lord we fail to find any. -Kuo Hsiang 17:52 up 21 days, 19:36, 1 user, load averages: 0.33 0.33 0.33