Telephone Number Mapping WG (enum) TUESDAY, November 11 at 1300-1500 ================================== Chair(s): Patrik Faltstrom Richard Shockey Transport Area Advisor: Allison Mankin Mailing Lists: General Discussion:enum@ietf.org To Subscribe: enum-request@ietf.org In Body: subscribe Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/enum/ AGENDA BASHING (5 min) Nominations for ENUM WG Secretary. The chairs would like the ENUM WG to participate in an IETF experiment to consider another position in the ENUM WG management structure that of WG Secretary which would have the responsibility for things like the minutes and document tracking etc. 1. Applicability Statement of CRISP work to ENUM - 15 Min Title : IRIS - An ENUM Registry (ereg) Type for the Internet Registry Information Service Author(s) : A. Newton Filename : draft-newton-iris-ereg-01.txt Pages : 33 Date : 2003-10-24 This document describes an IRIS (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-core-02.txt ) registry schema for ENUM administrative information. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-newton-iris-ereg-01.txt 2. Potential Informational Document 15 min Title : Numbering for VoIP and other IP Communications Author(s) : R. Stastny Filename : draft-stastny-enum-numbering-voip-00.txt Pages : 43 Date : 2003-10-20 This document gives advice in setting up E.164 compatible numbering and dialing plans in administrative domains set up for IP Communications in general and VoIP applications in detail. After explaining numbering and dialing plans in principle, it discusses which types of E.164 numbers should be used for IP based terminals, to achieve proper routing of calls and other communications on the PSTN/ISDN and also on the Internet, using ENUM technology. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stastny-enum-numbering-voip-00.txt 4. Implementation issues L. Conroy 10-15 Problem Statement : "This summarizes our experiences of what's "out there" in ENUM, and some implementation choices that need to be made. It is intended as a guide to what we found when querying different ENUM domains (and what we misunderstood at first reading of the standards). Note that this covers implementation issues only, NOT protocol issues. However, if different implementations share common choices, then behavior can be better predicted". 5. Trial Updates Korea 5 min +... Poland - Use of EPP in provisioning. 10+ http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bartosiewicz-enum-48tld-00.txt 6. WG next steps 7. General Discussion