This section contains 'cookbook' entries which may help you solve problems. A cookbook is no replacement for understanding however, so try and comprehend what is going on.
You can do this in several ways. Apache has some support for this with a module, but we'll show how Linux can do this for you, and do so for other services as well. These commands are stolen from a presentation by Jamal Hadi that's referenced below.
Let's say we have two customers, with http, ftp and streaming audio, and we want to sell them a limited amount of bandwidth. We do so on the server itself.
Customer A should have at most 2 megabits, cusomer B has paid for 5 megabits. We separate our customers by creating virtual IP addresses on our server.
# ip address add 188.177.166.1 dev eth0
# ip address add 188.177.166.2 dev eth0
It is up to you to attach the different servers to the right IP address. All popular daemons have support for this.
We first attach a CBQ qdisc to eth0:
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit cell 8 avpkt 1000 \
mpu 64
We then create classes for our customers:
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \
2MBit avpkt 1000 prio 5 bounded isolated allot 1514 weight 1 maxburst 21
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \
5Mbit avpkt 1000 prio 5 bounded isolated allot 1514 weight 1 maxburst 21
Then we add filters for our two classes:
##FIXME: Why this line, what does it do?, what is a divisor?:
##FIXME: A divisor has something to do with a hash table, and the number of
## buckets - ahu
# tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 5 handle 1: u32 divisor 1
# tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 match ip src 188.177.166.1
flowid 1:1
# tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 match ip src 188.177.166.2
flowid 1:2
And we're done.
FIXME: why no token bucket filter? is there a default pfifo_fast fallback somewhere?
From Alexey's iproute documentation, adapted to netfilter and with more plausible paths. If you use this, take care to adjust the numbers to reasonable values for your system.
If you want to protect an entire network, skip this script, which is best suited for a single host.
#! /bin/sh -x
#
# sample script on using the ingress capabilities
# this script shows how one can rate limit incoming SYNs
# Useful for TCP-SYN attack protection. You can use
# IPchains to have more powerful additions to the SYN (eg
# in addition the subnet)
#
#path to various utilities;
#change to reflect yours.
#
TC=/sbin/tc
IP=/sbin/ip
IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables
INDEV=eth2
#
# tag all incoming SYN packets through $INDEV as mark value 1
############################################################
$iptables -A PREROUTING -i $INDEV -t mangle -p tcp --syn \
-j MARK --set-mark 1
############################################################
#
# install the ingress qdisc on the ingress interface
############################################################
$TC qdisc add dev $INDEV handle ffff: ingress
############################################################
#
#
# SYN packets are 40 bytes (320 bits) so three SYNs equals
# 960 bits (approximately 1kbit); so we rate limit below
# the incoming SYNs to 3/sec (not very useful really; but
#serves to show the point - JHS
############################################################
$TC filter add dev $INDEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 handle 1 fw \
police rate 1kbit burst 40 mtu 9k drop flowid :1
############################################################
#
echo "---- qdisc parameters Ingress ----------"
$TC qdisc ls dev $INDEV
echo "---- Class parameters Ingress ----------"
$TC class ls dev $INDEV
echo "---- filter parameters Ingress ----------"
$TC filter ls dev $INDEV parent ffff:
#deleting the ingress qdisc
#$TC qdisc del $INDEV ingress
Recently, distributed denial of service attacks have become a major nuisance on the internet. By properly filtering and ratelimiting your network, you can both prevent becoming a casualty or the cause of these attacks.
You should filter your networks so that you do not allow non-local IP source addressed packets to leave your network. This stops people from anonymously sending junk to the internet.
Rate limiting goes much as shown earlier. To refresh your memory, our ASCIIgram again:
[The Internet] ---<E3, T3, whatever>--- [Linux router] --- [Office+ISP]
eth1 eth0
We first set up the prerequisite parts:
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:0 classid 10:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \
10Mbit allot 1514 prio 5 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000
If you have 100Mbit, or more, interfaces, adjust these numbers. Now you need to determine how much ICMP traffic you want to allow. You can perform measurements with tcpdump, by having it write to a file for a while, and seeing how much ICMP passes your network. Do not forget to raise the snapshot length!
If measurement is impractical, you might want to choose 5% of your available bandwidth. Let's set up our class:
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:1 classid 10:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \
100Kbit allot 1514 weight 800Kbit prio 5 maxburst 20 avpkt 250 \
bounded
This limits at 100Kbit. Now we need a filter to assign ICMP traffic to this class:
# tc filter add dev eth0 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip
protocol 1 0xFF flowid 10:100
If lots of data is coming down your link, or going up for that matter, and you are trying to do some maintenance via telnet or ssh, this may not go too well. Other packets are blocking your keystrokes. Wouldn't it be great if there were a way for your interactive packets to sneak past the bulk traffic? Linux can do this for you!
As before, we need to handle traffic going both ways. Evidently, this works best if there are Linux boxes on both ends of your link, although other UNIX's are able to do this. Consult your local Solaris/BSD guru for this.
The standard pfifo_fast scheduler has 3 different 'bands'. Traffic in band 0 is transmitted first, after which traffic in band 1 and 2 gets considered. It is vital that our interactive traffic be in band 0!
We blatantly adapt from the (soon to be obsolete) ipchains HOWTO:
There are four seldom-used bits in the IP header, called the Type of Service (TOS) bits. They effect the way packets are treated; the four bits are "Minimum Delay", "Maximum Throughput", "Maximum Reliability" and "Minimum Cost". Only one of these bits is allowed to be set. Rob van Nieuwkerk, the author of the ipchains TOS-mangling code, puts it as follows:
Especially the "Minimum Delay" is important for me. I switch it on for
"interactive" packets in my upstream (Linux) router. I'm
behind a 33k6 modem link. Linux prioritizes packets in 3 queues. This
way I get acceptable interactive performance while doing bulk
downloads at the same time.
The most common use is to set telnet & ftp control connections to "Minimum Delay" and FTP data to "Maximum Throughput". This would be done as follows, on your upstream router:
# iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp --sport telnet \
-j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay
# iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp --sport ftp \
-j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay
# iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp --sport ftp-data \
-j TOS --set-tos Maximize-Throughput
Now, this only works for data going from your telnet foreign host to your local computer. The other way around appears to be done for you, ie, telnet, ssh & friends all set the TOS field on outgoing packets automatically.
Should you have a client that does not do this, you can always do it with netfilter. On your local box:
# iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport telnet \
-j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay
# iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport ftp \
-j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay
# iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport ftp-data \
-j TOS --set-tos Maximize-Throughput
This section was sent in by reader Ram Narula from Internet for Education (Thailand).
The regular technique in accomplishing this in Linux is probably with use of ipchains AFTER making sure that the "outgoing" port 80(web) traffic gets routed through the server running squid.
There are 3 common methods to make sure "outgoing" port 80 traffic gets routed to the server running squid and 4th one is being introduced here.
If you can tell your gateway router to match packets that has outgoing destination port of 80 to be sent to the IP address of squid server.
BUT
This would put additional load on the router and some commercial routers might not even support this.
Layer 4 switches can handle this without any problem.
BUT
The cost for this equipment is usually very high. Typical layer 4 switch would normally cost more than a typical router+good linux server.
You can force ALL traffic through cache server.
BUT
This is quite risky because Squid does utilize lots of cpu power which might result in slower over-all network performance or the server itself might crash and no one on the network will be able to access the internet if that occurs.
By using NetFilter another technique can be implemented which is using NetFilter for "mark"ing the packets with destination port 80 and using iproute2 to route the "mark"ed packets to the Squid server.
|----------------|
| Implementation |
|----------------|
Addresses used
10.0.0.1 naret (NetFilter server)
10.0.0.2 silom (Squid server)
10.0.0.3 donmuang (Router connected to the internet)
10.0.0.4 kaosarn (other server on network)
10.0.0.5 RAS
10.0.0.0/24 main network
10.0.0.0/19 total network
|---------------|
|Network diagram|
|---------------|
Internet
|
donmuang
|
------------hub/switch----------
| | | |
naret silom kaosarn RAS etc.
(all servers on my network had 10.0.0.1 as the default gateway which was the former IP address of donmuang router so what I did was changed the IP address of donmuang to 10.0.0.3 and gave naret ip address of 10.0.0.1)
Silom
-----
-setup squid and ipchains
Setup Squid server on silom, make sure it does support transparent caching/proxying, the default port is usually 3128, so all traffic for port 80 has to be redirected to port 3128 locally. This can be done by using ipchains with the following:
silom# ipchains -N allow1
silom# ipchains -A allow1 -p TCP -s 10.0.0.0/19 -d 0/0 80 -j REDIRECT 3128
silom# ipchains -I input -j allow1
Or, in netfilter lingo:
silom# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128
(note: you might have other entries as well)
For more information on setting Squid server please refer to Squid faq page on http://squid.nlanr.net).
Make sure ip forwarding is enabled on this server and the default gateway for this server is donmuang router (NOT naret).
Naret
-----
-setup iptables and iproute2
-disable icmp REDIRECT messages (if needed)
naret# iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -t mangle -p tcp --dport 80 \
-j MARK --set-mark 2
naret# echo 202 www.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
naret# ip rule add fwmark 2 table www.out
naret# ip route add default via 10.0.0.2 dev eth0 table www.out
naret# ip route flush cache
If donmuang and naret is on the same subnet then naret should not send out icmp REDIRECT messages. In this case it is, so icmp REDIRECTs has to be disabled by:
naret# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/send_redirects
naret# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/default/send_redirects
naret# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/send_redirects
The setup is complete, check the configuration
On naret:
naret# iptables -t mangle -L
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
MARK tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:www MARK set 0x2
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
naret# ip rule ls
0: from all lookup local
32765: from all fwmark 2 lookup www.out
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
naret# ip route list table www.out
default via 203.114.224.8 dev eth0
naret# ip route
10.0.0.1 dev eth0 scope link
10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
default via 10.0.0.3 dev eth0
(make sure silom belongs to one of the above lines, in this case
it's the line with 10.0.0.0/24)
|------|
|-DONE-|
|------|
|-----------------------------------------|
|Traffic flow diagram after implementation|
|-----------------------------------------|
INTERNET
/\
||
\/
-----------------donmuang router---------------------
/\ /\ ||
|| || ||
|| \/ ||
naret silom ||
*destination port 80 traffic=========>(cache) ||
/\ || ||
|| \/ \/
\\===================================kaosarn, RAS, etc.
Note that the network is asymmetric as there is one extra hop on general outgoing path.
Here is run down for packet traversing the network from kaosarn
to and from the internet.
For web/http traffic:
kaosarn http request->naret->silom->donmuang->internet
http replies from internet->donmuang->silom->kaosarn
For non-web/http requests(eg. telnet):
kaosarn outgoing data->naret->donmuang->internet
incoming data from internet->donmuang->kaosarn