perltrap - Perl traps for the unwary
The biggest trap of all is forgetting to use the -w switch; see
the perlrun manpage. The second biggest trap is not making your entire program runnable under use strict
. The third biggest trap is not reading the list of changes in this version
of Perl; see the perldelta manpage.
Accustomed awk users should take special note of the following:
The English module, loaded via
use English;
allows you to refer to special variables (like $/
) with names (like
$RS
), as though they were in awk; see the perlvar manpage for details.
if
s and while
s.
substr()
and
index().
split()
operator has different arguments than
awk's.
print()
statement does not add
field and record separators unless you set $,
and $\
. You can set $OFS
and $ORS
if you're using the
English module.
/pat/ /pat/
unparsable, because the third slash would be interpreted as a division
operator--the tokenizer is in fact slightly context sensitive for operators
like ``/'', ``?'', and ``>''. And in fact, ``.'' itself can be the
beginning of a number.)
Awk Perl ARGC $#ARGV or scalar @ARGV ARGV[0] $0 FILENAME $ARGV FNR $. - something FS (whatever you like) NF $#Fld, or some such NR $. OFMT $# OFS $, ORS $\ RLENGTH length($&) RS $/ RSTART length($`) SUBSEP $;
You cannot set $RS
to a pattern, only a string.
Cerebral C programmers should take note of the following:
Curly brackets are required on if
's and while
's.
elsif
rather than else if
.
break
and continue keywords from
C become in Perl last and next, respectively. Unlike in
C, these do NOT work within a do { } while
construct.
ARGV
must be capitalized. $ARGV[0]
is C's argv[1]
, and argv[0]
ends up in $0
.
link(),
unlink(),
rename(),
etc. return nonzero for success, not 0.
kill -l
to find their names on your system.
Seasoned sed programmers should take note of the following:
Backreferences in substitutions use ``$'' rather than ``\''.
...
, rather than comma.
Sharp shell programmers should take note of the following:
The backtick operator does variable interpolation without regard to the presence of single quotes in the command.
BEGIN
blocks, which execute at compile time).
Practicing Perl Programmers should take note of the following:
Remember that many operations behave differently in a list context than they do in a scalar one. See the perldata manpage for details.
chop()
and
chdir())
and which are list operators (like
print()
and
unlink()).
(User-defined subroutines can be
only list operators, never unary ones.) See the perlop manpage.
$_
only if the file read is the sole condition in
a while loop:
while (<FH>) { } while (defined($_ = <FH>)) { }.. <FH>; # data discarded!
Remember not to use ``=
'' when you need ``=~
''; these two constructs are quite different:
$x = /foo/; $x =~ /foo/;
The do {} construct isn't a real loop that you can use loop control on.
Practicing Perl4 Programmers should take note of the following Perl4-to-Perl5 specific traps.
They're crudely ordered according to the following list:
If you find an example of a conversion trap that is not listed here, please submit it to Bill Middleton <wjm@best.com> for inclusion. Also note that at least some of these can be caught with -w.
Anything that has been discontinued, deprecated, or fixed as a bug from perl4.
Symbols starting with ``_'' are no longer forced into package main, except
for $_
itself (and @_
, etc.).
package test; $_legacy = 1;
package main; print "\$_legacy is ",$_legacy,"\n";
# perl4 prints: $_legacy is 1 # perl5 prints: $_legacy is
Double-colon is now a valid package separator in a variable name. Thus these behave differently in perl4 vs. perl5, because the packages don't exist.
$a=1;$b=2;$c=3;$var=4; print "$a::$b::$c "; print "$var::abc::xyz\n"; # perl4 prints: 1::2::3 4::abc::xyz # perl5 prints: 3
Given that ::
is now the preferred package delimiter, it is debatable whether this should
be classed as a bug or not. (The older package delimiter, ' ,is used here)
$x = 10 ; print "x=${'x}\n" ;
# perl4 prints: x=10 # perl5 prints: Can't find string terminator "'" anywhere before EOF
You can avoid this problem, and remain compatible with perl4, if you always explicitly include the package name:
$x = 10 ; print "x=${main'x}\n" ;
Also see precedence traps, for parsing $:
.
sub sub1{return(0,2) } # return a 2-element list sub sub2{ return(1,2,3)} # return a 3-element list @a1 = ("a","b","c","d","e"); @a2 = splice(@a1,&sub1,&sub2); print join(' ',@a2),"\n";
# perl4 prints: a b # perl5 prints: c d e
You can't do a goto into a block that is optimized away. Darn.
goto marker1;
for(1){ marker1: print "Here I is!\n"; }
# perl4 prints: Here I is! # perl5 dumps core (SEGV)
It is no longer syntactically legal to use whitespace as the name of a variable, or as a delimiter for any kind of quote construct. Double darn.
$a = ("foo bar"); $b = q baz ; print "a is $a, b is $b\n";
# perl4 prints: a is foo bar, b is baz # perl5 errors: Bareword found where operator expected
The archaic while/if BLOCK BLOCK syntax is no longer supported.
if { 1 } { print "True!"; } else { print "False!"; }
# perl4 prints: True! # perl5 errors: syntax error at test.pl line 1, near "if {"
The **
operator now binds more tightly than unary minus. It was documented to work
this way before, but didn't.
print -4**2,"\n";
# perl4 prints: 16 # perl5 prints: -16
The meaning of foreach{}
has changed slightly when it is iterating over a list which is not an
array. This used to assign the list to a temporary array, but no longer
does so (for efficiency). This means that you'll now be iterating over the
actual values, not over copies of the values. Modifications to the loop
variable can change the original values.
@list = ('ab','abc','bcd','def'); foreach $var (grep(/ab/,@list)){ $var = 1; } print (join(':',@list));
# perl4 prints: ab:abc:bcd:def # perl5 prints: 1:1:bcd:def
To retain Perl4 semantics you need to assign your list explicitly to a temporary array and then iterate over that. For example, you might need to change
foreach $var (grep(/ab/,@list)){
to
foreach $var (@tmp = grep(/ab/,@list)){
Otherwise changing $var
will clobber the values of @list.
(This most often happens when you use $_
for the loop variable, and call subroutines in the loop that don't properly
localize $_
.)
$_
starts with
whitespace), it used to behave like split /\s+/
(which does).
$_ = ' hi mom'; print join(':', split);
# perl4 prints: :hi:mom # perl5 prints: hi:mom
Perl 4 would ignore any text which was attached to an -e switch, always taking the code snippet from the following arg. Additionally, it would silently accept an -e switch without a following arg. Both of these behaviors have been fixed.
perl -e'print "attached to -e"' 'print "separate arg"'
# perl4 prints: separate arg # perl5 prints: attached to -e
perl -e
# perl4 prints: # perl5 dies: No code specified for -e.
In Perl 4 the return value of push was undocumented, but it was actually the last value being pushed onto the target list. In Perl 5 the return value of push is documented, but has changed, it is the number of elements in the resulting list.
@x = ('existing'); print push(@x, 'first new', 'second new');
# perl4 prints: second new # perl5 prints: 3
In Perl 4 (and versions of Perl 5 before 5.004), '\r'
characters in Perl code were silently allowed, although they could cause
(mysterious!) failures in certain constructs, particularly here documents.
Now,
'\r'
characters cause an immediate fatal error. (Note: In this example, the
notation \015 represents the incorrect line ending. Depending upon your text viewer, it
will look different.)
print "foo";\015 print "bar";
# perl4 prints: foobar # perl5.003 prints: foobar # perl5.004 dies: Illegal character \015 (carriage return)
See the perldiag manpage for full details.
Perl4-to-Perl5 traps from having to do with parsing.
Note the space between . and =
$string . = "more string"; print $string;
# perl4 prints: more string # perl5 prints: syntax error at - line 1, near ". ="
Better parsing in perl 5
sub foo {} &foo print("hello, world\n");
# perl4 prints: hello, world # perl5 prints: syntax error
``if it looks like a function, it is a function'' rule.
print ($foo == 1) ? "is one\n" : "is zero\n";
# perl4 prints: is zero # perl5 warns: "Useless use of a constant in void context" if using -w
String interpolation of the $#array
construct differs when braces are to used around the name.
@ = (1..3); print "${#a}";
# perl4 prints: 2 # perl5 fails with syntax error
@ = (1..3); print "$#{a}";
# perl4 prints: {a} # perl5 prints: 2
Perl4-to-Perl5 traps having to do with numerical operators, operands, or output from same.
Formatted output and significant digits
print 7.373504 - 0, "\n"; printf "%20.18f\n", 7.373504 - 0;
# Perl4 prints: 7.375039999999996141 7.37503999999999614
# Perl5 prints: 7.373504 7.37503999999999614
This specific item has been deleted. It demonstrated how the auto-increment operator would not catch when a number went over the signed int limit. Fixed in version 5.003_04. But always be wary when using large integers. If in doubt:
use Math::BigInt;
Assignment of return values from numeric equality tests does not work in perl5 when the test evaluates to false (0). Logical tests now return an null, instead of 0
$p = ($test == 1); print $p,"\n";
# perl4 prints: 0 # perl5 prints:
Also see General Regular Expression Traps using s///, etc. for another example of this new feature...
Perl4-to-Perl5 traps involving most data-types, and their usage within certain expressions and/or context.
Negative array subscripts now count from the end of the array.
@a = (1, 2, 3, 4, 5); print "The third element of the array is $a[3] also expressed as $a[-2] \n";
# perl4 prints: The third element of the array is 4 also expressed as # perl5 prints: The third element of the array is 4 also expressed as 4
Setting $#array
lower now discards array elements, and makes them impossible to recover.
@a = (a,b,c,d,e); print "Before: ",join('',@a); $#a =1; print ", After: ",join('',@a); $#a =3; print ", Recovered: ",join('',@a),"\n";
# perl4 prints: Before: abcde, After: ab, Recovered: abcd # perl5 prints: Before: abcde, After: ab, Recovered: ab
Hashes get defined before use
local($s,@a,%h); die "scalar \$s defined" if defined($s); die "array \@a defined" if defined(@a); die "hash \%h defined" if defined(%h);
# perl4 prints: # perl5 dies: hash %h defined
glob assignment from variable to variable will fail if the assigned variable is localized subsequent to the assignment
@a = ("This is Perl 4"); *b = *a; local(@a); print @b,"\n";
# perl4 prints: This is Perl 4 # perl5 prints:
Assigning undef to a glob has no effect in Perl 5. In Perl 4 it undefines the associated scalar (but may have other side effects including SEGVs).
auto(magic)increment.
$x = "aaa"; print ++$x," : "; print -$x," : "; print ++$x,"\n";
# perl4 prints: aab : -0 : 1 # perl5 prints: aab : -aab : aac
perl 4 lets you modify constants:
$foo = "x"; &mod($foo); for ($x = 0; $x < 3; $x++) { &mod("a"); } sub mod { print "before: $_[0]"; $_[0] = "m"; print " after: $_[0]\n"; }
# perl4: # before: x after: m # before: a after: m # before: m after: m # before: m after: m
# Perl5: # before: x after: m # Modification of a read-only value attempted at foo.pl line 12. # before: a
The behavior is slightly different for:
print "$x", defined $x
# perl 4: 1 # perl 5: <no output, $x is not called into existence>
Variable suicide behavior is more consistent under Perl 5. Perl5 exhibits the same behavior for hashes and scalars, that perl4 exhibits for only scalars.
$aGlobal{ "aKey" } = "global value"; print "MAIN:", $aGlobal{"aKey"}, "\n"; $GlobalLevel = 0; &test( *aGlobal );
sub test { local( *theArgument ) = @_; local( %aNewLocal ); # perl 4 != 5.001l,m $aNewLocal{"aKey"} = "this should never appear"; print "SUB: ", $theArgument{"aKey"}, "\n"; $aNewLocal{"aKey"} = "level $GlobalLevel"; # what should print $GlobalLevel++; if( $GlobalLevel<4 ) { &test( *aNewLocal ); } }
# Perl4: # MAIN:global value # SUB: global value # SUB: level 0 # SUB: level 1 # SUB: level 2
# Perl5: # MAIN:global value # SUB: global value # SUB: this should never appear # SUB: this should never appear # SUB: this should never appear
The elements of argument lists for formats are now evaluated in list context. This means you can interpolate list values now.
@fmt = ("foo","bar","baz"); format STDOUT= @<<<<< @||||| @>>>>> @fmt; . write;
# perl4 errors: Please use commas to separate fields in file # perl5 prints: foo bar baz
The caller() function now returns a false value in a scalar context if there is no caller. This lets library files determine if they're being required.
caller() ? (print "You rang?\n") : (print "Got a 0\n");
# perl4 errors: There is no caller # perl5 prints: Got a 0
The comma operator in a scalar context is now guaranteed to give a scalar context to its arguments.
@y= ('a','b','c'); $x = (1, 2, @y); print "x = $x\n";
# Perl4 prints: x = c # Thinks list context interpolates list # Perl5 prints: x = 3 # Knows scalar uses length of list
sprintf() funkiness (array argument converted to scalar array count) This test could be added to t/op/sprintf.t
@z = ('%s%s', 'foo', 'bar'); $x = sprintf(@z); if ($x eq 'foobar') {print "ok 2\n";} else {print "not ok 2 '$x'\n";}
# perl4 prints: ok 2 # perl5 prints: not ok 2
printf() works fine, though:
printf STDOUT (@z); print "\n";
# perl4 prints: foobar # perl5 prints: foobar
Probably a bug.
Perl4-to-Perl5 traps involving precedence order.
Perl 4 has almost the same precedence rules as Perl 5 for the operators that they both have. Perl 4 however, seems to have had some inconsistencies that made the behavior differ from what was documented.
LHS vs. RHS of any assignment operator. LHS is evaluated first in perl4, second in perl5; this can affect the relationship between side-effects in sub-expressions.
@arr = ( 'left', 'right' ); $a{shift @arr} = shift @arr; print join( ' ', keys %a );
# perl4 prints: left # perl5 prints: right
These are now semantic errors because of precedence:
@list = (1,2,3,4,5); %map = ("a",1,"b",2,"c",3,"d",4); $n = shift @list + 2; # first item in list plus 2 print "n is $n, "; $m = keys %map + 2; # number of items in hash plus 2 print "m is $m\n";
# perl4 prints: n is 3, m is 6 # perl5 errors and fails to compile
The precedence of assignment operators is now the same as the precedence of assignment. Perl 4 mistakenly gave them the precedence of the associated operator. So you now must parenthesize them in expressions like
/foo/ ? ($a += 2) : ($a -= 2);
Otherwise
/foo/ ? $a += 2 : $a -= 2
would be erroneously parsed as
(/foo/ ? $a += 2 : $a) -= 2;
On the other hand,
$a += /foo/ ? 1 : 2;
now works as a C programmer would expect.
open FOO || die;
is now incorrect. You need parentheses around the filehandle. Otherwise, perl5 leaves the statement as its default precedence:
open(FOO || die);
# perl4 opens or dies # perl5 errors: Precedence problem: open FOO should be open(FOO)
perl4 gives the special variable, $:
precedence, where perl5 treats $::
as main package
$a = "x"; print "$::a";
# perl 4 prints: -:a # perl 5 prints: x
perl4 had buggy precedence for the file test operators vis-a-vis the
assignment operators. Thus, although the precedence table for perl4 leads
one to believe -e $foo .= "q"
should parse as
((-e $foo) .= "q"), it actually parses as (-e ($foo .= "q"))
. In perl5, the precedence is as documented.
-e $foo .= "q"
# perl4 prints: no output # perl5 prints: Can't modify -e in concatenation
In perl4,
keys(),
each()
and
values()
were special high-precedence operators that operated on a single hash, but in perl5, they are regular named unary operators. As documented, named unary operators have lower precedence than the arithmetic and concatenation operators
+ - .
, but the perl4 variants of these operators actually bind tighter than + - .
. Thus, for:
%foo = 1..10; print keys %foo - 1
# perl4 prints: 4 # perl5 prints: Type of arg 1 to keys must be hash (not subtraction)
The perl4 behavior was probably more useful, if less consistent.
All types of RE traps.
s'$lhs'$rhs'
now does no interpolation on either side. It used to interpolate $lhs
but not $rhs
. (And still does not match a literal '$' in string)
$a=1;$b=2; $string = '1 2 $a $b'; $string =~ s'$a'$b'; print $string,"\n";
# perl4 prints: $b 2 $a $b # perl5 prints: 1 2 $a $b
m//g
now attaches its state to the searched string rather than the regular
expression. (Once the scope of a block is left for the sub, the state of
the searched string is lost)
$_ = "ababab"; while(m/ab/g){ &doit("blah"); } sub doit{local($_) = shift; print "Got $_ "}
# perl4 prints: blah blah blah # perl5 prints: infinite loop blah...
Currently, if you use the m//o
qualifier on a regular expression within an anonymous sub, all closures generated from that anonymous sub will use the regular expression
as it was compiled when it was used the very first time in any such
closure. For instance, if you say
sub build_match { my($left,$right) = @_; return sub { $_[0] =~ /$left stuff $right/o; }; }
build_match()
will
always return a sub which matches the contents of
$left
and $right
as they were the first time that
build_match()
was
called, not as they are in the current call.
This is probably a bug, and may change in future versions of Perl.
$+
to the whole match, just like $&
. Perl5 does not.
"abcdef" =~ /b.*e/; print "\$+ = $+\n";
# perl4 prints: bcde # perl5 prints:
substitution now returns the null string if it fails
$string = "test"; $value = ($string =~ s/foo//); print $value, "\n";
# perl4 prints: 0 # perl5 prints:
Also see Numerical Traps for another example of this new feature.
s`lhs`rhs`
(using backticks) is now a normal substitution, with no backtick expansion
$string = ""; $string =~ s`^`hostname`; print $string, "\n";
# perl4 prints: <the local hostname> # perl5 prints: hostname
Stricter parsing of variables used in regular expressions
s/^([^$grpc]*$grpc[$opt$plus$rep]?)//o;
# perl4: compiles w/o error # perl5: with Scalar found where operator expected ..., near "$opt$plus"
an added component of this example, apparently from the same script, is the
actual value of the s'd string after the substitution.
[$opt]
is a character class in perl4 and an array subscript in perl5
$grpc = 'a'; $opt = 'r'; $_ = 'bar'; s/^([^$grpc]*$grpc[$opt]?)/foo/; print ;
# perl4 prints: foo # perl5 prints: foobar
Under perl5, m?x?
matches only once, like ?x?
. Under perl4, it matched repeatedly, like /x/
or m!x!
.
$test = "once"; sub match { $test =~ m?once?; } &match(); if( &match() ) { # m?x? matches more then once print "perl4\n"; } else { # m?x? matches only once print "perl5\n"; }
# perl4 prints: perl4 # perl5 prints: perl5
The general group of Perl4-to-Perl5 traps having to do with Signals, Sorting, and their related subroutines, as well as general subroutine traps. Includes some OS-Specific traps.
Barewords that used to look like strings to Perl will now look like subroutine calls if a subroutine by that name is defined before the compiler sees them.
sub SeeYa { warn"Hasta la vista, baby!" } $SIG{'TERM'} = SeeYa; print "SIGTERM is now $SIG{'TERM'}\n";
# perl4 prints: SIGTERM is main'SeeYa # perl5 prints: SIGTERM is now main::1
Use -w to catch this one
sub reverse{ print "yup "; $a <=> $b } print sort reverse a,b,c;
# perl4 prints: yup yup yup yup abc # perl5 prints: abc
Although it _always_ printed to
STDERR,
warn()
would let you specify a filehandle in perl4. With perl5 it does not.
warn STDERR "Foo!";
# perl4 prints: Foo! # perl5 prints: String found where operator expected
Under HPUX, and some other SysV OSes, one had to reset any signal handler, within the signal handler function, each time a signal was handled with perl4. With perl5, the reset is now done correctly. Any code relying on the handler _not_ being reset will have to be reworked.
Since version 5.002, Perl uses
sigaction()
under SysV.
sub gotit { print "Got @_... "; } $SIG{'INT'} = 'gotit';
$| = 1; $pid = fork; if ($pid) { kill('INT', $pid); sleep(1); kill('INT', $pid); } else { while (1) {sleep(10);} }
# perl4 (HPUX) prints: Got INT... # perl5 (HPUX) prints: Got INT... Got INT...
Under SysV OSes, seek() on a file opened to append >>
now does the right thing w.r.t. the
fopen()
manpage. e.g., - When
a file is opened for append, it is impossible to overwrite information
already in the file.
open(TEST,">>seek.test"); $start = tell TEST ; foreach(1 .. 9){ print TEST "$_ "; } $end = tell TEST ; seek(TEST,$start,0); print TEST "18 characters here";
# perl4 (solaris) seek.test has: 18 characters here # perl5 (solaris) seek.test has: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 18 characters here
Perl4-to-Perl5 traps having to do with how things get interpolated within certain expressions, statements, contexts, or whatever.
@ now always interpolates an array in double-quotish strings.
print "To: someone@somewhere.com\n";
# perl4 prints: To:someone@somewhere.com # perl5 errors : In string, @somewhere now must be written as \@somewhere
Double-quoted strings may no longer end with an unescaped $ or @.
$foo = "foo$"; $bar = "bar@"; print "foo is $foo, bar is $bar\n";
# perl4 prints: foo is foo$, bar is bar@ # perl5 errors: Final $ should be \$ or $name
Note: perl5
DOES
NOT error on the terminating @ in $bar
$
or @
).
@www = "buz"; $foo = "foo"; $bar = "bar"; sub foo { return "bar" }; print "|@{w.w.w}|${main'foo}|";
# perl4 prints: |@{w.w.w}|foo| # perl5 prints: |buz|bar|
Note that you can use strict;
to ward off such trappiness under perl5.
$x
. $$
by itself still works fine, however.
print "this is $$x\n";
# perl4 prints: this is XXXx (XXX is the current pid) # perl5 prints: this is
Creation of hashes on the fly with eval "EXPR"
now requires either both
$
's to be protected in the specification of the hash name, or both curlies
to be protected. If both curlies are protected, the result will be
compatible with perl4 and perl5. This is a very common practice, and should
be changed to use the block form of eval{} if possible.
$hashname = "foobar"; $key = "baz"; $value = 1234; eval "\$$hashname{'$key'} = q|$value|"; (defined($foobar{'baz'})) ? (print "Yup") : (print "Nope");
# perl4 prints: Yup # perl5 prints: Nope
Changing
eval "\$$hashname{'$key'} = q|$value|";
to
eval "\$\$hashname{'$key'} = q|$value|";
causes the following result:
# perl4 prints: Nope # perl5 prints: Yup
or, changing to
eval "\$$hashname\{'$key'\} = q|$value|";
causes the following result:
# perl4 prints: Yup # perl5 prints: Yup # and is compatible for both versions
perl4 programs which unconsciously rely on the bugs in earlier perl versions.
perl -e '$bar=q/not/; print "This is $foo{$bar} perl5"'
# perl4 prints: This is not perl5 # perl5 prints: This is perl5
You also have to be careful about array references.
print "$foo{"
perl 4 prints: { perl 5 prints: syntax error
Similarly, watch out for:
$foo = "array"; print "\$$foo{bar}\n";
# perl4 prints: $array{bar} # perl5 prints: $
Perl 5 is looking for $array{bar}
which doesn't exist, but perl 4 is happy just to expand $foo
to ``array'' by itself. Watch out for this especially in eval's.
eval qq( foreach \$y (keys %\$x\) { \$count++; } );
# perl4 runs this ok # perl5 prints: Can't find string terminator ")"
General DBM traps.
Existing dbm databases created under perl4 (or any other dbm/ndbm tool) may cause the same script, run under perl5, to fail. The build of perl5 must have been linked with the same dbm/ndbm as the default for dbmopen() to function properly without tie'ing to an extension dbm implementation.
dbmopen (%dbm, "file", undef); print "ok\n";
# perl4 prints: ok # perl5 prints: ok (IFF linked with -ldbm or -lndbm)
Existing dbm databases created under perl4 (or any other dbm/ndbm tool) may cause the same script, run under perl5, to fail. The error generated when exceeding the limit on the key/value size will cause perl5 to exit immediately.
dbmopen(DB, "testdb",0600) || die "couldn't open db! $!"; $DB{'trap'} = "x" x 1024; # value too large for most dbm/ndbm print "YUP\n";
# perl4 prints: dbm store returned -1, errno 28, key "trap" at - line 3. YUP
# perl5 prints: dbm store returned -1, errno 28, key "trap" at - line 3.
Everything else.
If the file doit.pl has:
sub foo { $rc = do "./do.pl"; return 8; } print &foo, "\n";
And the do.pl file has the following single line:
return 3;
Running doit.pl gives the following:
# perl 4 prints: 3 (aborts the subroutine early) # perl 5 prints: 8
$string = ''; @list = split(/foo/, $string, 2)
Perl4 returns a one element list containing the empty string but Perl5 returns an empty list.
As always, if any of these are ever officially declared as bugs, they'll be fixed and removed.
If rather than formatting bugs, you encounter substantive content errors in these documents, such as mistakes in the explanations or code, please use the perlbug utility included with the Perl distribution.