From: Sengan Baring-Gould <sengan@seqnet.net>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 10:50:02 -0600

Re: kgicon -> linux-2.2 ideas (was Re: Makefile vote II)

> How many people actually run successfully a GGI driver with kgicon
> on a 2.1.12? kernel? I believe that we should have a broader base
> first. And I would like to have a really stable kernel released
> before we get in, but maybe I am just paranoid. Just in case our
> system has a major flaw we don't know.

Yes. I would agree with that but we do have to move too. If we keep chaningAPIs,
etc, then we'll never get there either. I doubt Linus would mind small
changes to the API.

> I feel that a good GGI degas Beta 1 in Mid-October would be far more
> important, and it does not have to be full-featured, but it would be
> nice if we could document exactly what works and what not, and what to
> consider early alpha stage.

I do like teunis' idea of giving Linus small things to add once they are
reallystable though.

Sengan