Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Hartmut Niemann <niemann@cip.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:06:46 +0200 (MESZ)
Re: Glide-target now works again
>
> Marcus writes:
>
> > Are there any objections against adding a "int smoothflip" parameter
> > to ggiSetDisplayFrame()? If smoothflip is true libggi will wait
> > until the next vertical blanking before doing the switch on target
> > that's support this. On other targets the flag will have no effect.
>
> Hmmm... What about a new flag GGIFLAG_SMOOTHFLIP ? IMHO that would be
> a cleaner solution.
>
> Cheers,
> _____________________________________________ ____
> \ /
> Andrew Apted <andrew@ggi-project.org> \/
>
>
>
We wanted to set the API in stone, so we shouldn't mess with parameter
numbers too much ... I'd prefer a flag for that too.
Hartmut.
--
Hartmut Niemann -- niemann(a)cip.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de
http://cip2.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de:8080/hyplan/niemann/index_en.html [/ggi]
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]