Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]
  From: Hartmut Niemann <niemann@cip.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 14:06:46 +0200 (MESZ)

Re: Glide-target now works again

> 
> Marcus writes:
> 
> >  Are there any objections against adding a "int smoothflip" parameter
> >  to ggiSetDisplayFrame()? If smoothflip is true libggi will wait
> >  until the next vertical blanking before doing the switch on target
> >  that's support this. On other targets the flag will have no effect.
> 
> Hmmm...  What about a new flag GGIFLAG_SMOOTHFLIP ?  IMHO that would be
> a cleaner solution.
> 
> Cheers,
> _____________________________________________  ____
>                                                \  /
>   Andrew Apted   <andrew@ggi-project.org>       \/
>   
> 
> 
We wanted to set the API in stone, so we shouldn't mess with parameter
numbers too much  ... I'd prefer a flag for that too.

Hartmut.

--  
Hartmut Niemann   --   niemann(a)cip.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de
http://cip2.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de:8080/hyplan/niemann/index_en.html [/ggi]

Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]