From: Marcus Sundberg <mackan@stacken.kth.se>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 21:05:58 +0200

Re: kgicon into kernel?

Stefan Mars wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, James A Simmons wrote:
> 
> > I agree. I see problems too. The reason I was yelling was hurrry up and
> > get a move on it. Like I said if QNX can get in so can kgi. The problem is
> > if 2.2 is due out in 3 weeks then we don't have time to play around. Its
> > now or never. The sooner it in the kernel the sooner we get more
> > developers and more testers.
> 
> QNX was accepted into the kernel because it was a patch that affected
> almost nothing else. It could be turned off and on through configuration,
> and besides didn't even worked ok after what I have been told.
> 
> KGI is a much larger patch that will affect a _lot_ of the kernel.

??
kgicon builds as a module, and even if you compile it into the
kernel it doesn't touch any other part of it.

//Marcus
-- 
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
        Marcus Sundberg        | http://www.stacken.kth.se/~mackan
 Royal Institute of Technology |       Phone: +46 707 295404
       Stockholm, Sweden       |   E-Mail: mackan@stacken.kth.se