Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: mentalg@geocities.com
To : andreas.beck@ggi-project.org
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 13:56:19 -0400 (EDT)
Re: SYNC mode should go
On Sat, 12 Sep 1998 becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de wrote:
> > Sorry, there IS a big problem in mansync[*] mode -- code complexity. More
> > specifically, having to lock down things correctly. (You'll have to ask
> > mentalguy for the gory details.)
> >
> > You could say the problem is really with the signals, and mansync should use
> > threads instead -- but this can be recreated easily in the app too:
>
> This does not save you the locking for all targets.
Nor should it. But trying to lock around signal handlers gets _real_ ugly.
We really just can't make LibGGI async-signal-safe as a whole, so if nothing
else, the signal implementation of mansync _should_ be dropped. A threaded
mansync implementation doesn't really make locking any more complex than it
should be normally.
-=MenTaLguY=-
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]