Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Andrew Apted <ajapted@netspace.net.au>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 16:48:12 +1000
Re: SYNC mode should go
Marcus writes:
> The screen is not guaranteed to be updated until you call ggiUnlock()
>
> For apps that only access the framebuffer ggiUnlock(vis);ggiLock(vis);
> will have the same effect as ggiFlush(vis); currently does. Apps that
> mixes accel/direct access will call the functions as apropriate.
> Apps that don't hit the DirectBuffer at all should call ggiFlush()
> to flush the accel queue, but they could call ggiLock();ggiUnlock()
> to get the same effect.
Hmmm, sounds a bit fuzzy to me. Are you just saying that ggiUnlock()
does an implicit ggiFlush() ?
Cheers,
_____________________________________________ ____
\ /
Andrew Apted <andrew@ggi-project.org> \/
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]