Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Andrew Apted <ajapted@netspace.net.au>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:24:14 +1000
Re: SYNC mode should go
teunis writes:
> The big prob with the consoles was (and still is) control of
> VT-switching....
> ..... mayhaps I'll just lock the current VT and grab the entire kbd raw.
> I've been avoiding this all this time due to the ... dangerousnous ... of
> this kind of thing.
Yeah the Linux behaviour of "raw mode disables VT switching" really
sucks. And VT_PROCESS (where a process takes control of VT switching
to/from a particular VT) also sucks, but is kinda necessary right now
(the proper way to handle it is far from clear).
> I also wanted to be able to do demo/libggi -> surface of a cube... Still
> haven't gotten this working...
>
> .... ideas? :)
"display-cube" target ? :-)
Or wait until someone (maybe even me) writes the "display-net" target
which transfers LibGGI primitives over a socket (or SHM)... and then
write a custom server that provides 6 sockets (one for each face).
Cheers,
_____________________________________________ ____
\ /
Andrew Apted <andrew@ggi-project.org> \/
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]