Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]
  From: teunis <teunis@computersupportcentre.com>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 18:12:12 -0700 (MST)

Re: Libggi and KGI (was: Re: kgi vs. fbcon)

On Wed, 9 Sep 1998 mentalg@geocities.com wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Jon M. Taylor wrote:
> 
> > 	Right, and be able to redirect from one environment to another
> > transparently and on-the-fly.  Mesa is a large rendering pipeline which is
> > almost completely disjoint from the dynamic LibGGI system.  LibGGI3D is
> > going to be a **LOT** more flexible and powerful in some ways. 
> 
> It might be more effective to pull Mesa into libGGI3d, so the pipeline gets
> the benefit of the LibGGI extension mechanism, and we can experiment with
> dropping out the noop pieces of the pipeline easier too.  I dunno.  just a
> random thought.

Actually that's what I want to do :)
[but after I get some time....  too busy.  anyone else?]

G'day, eh? :)
	- Teunis

Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]