Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: teunis <teunis@computersupportcentre.com>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 18:12:12 -0700 (MST)
Re: Libggi and KGI (was: Re: kgi vs. fbcon)
On Wed, 9 Sep 1998 mentalg@geocities.com wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Jon M. Taylor wrote:
>
> > Right, and be able to redirect from one environment to another
> > transparently and on-the-fly. Mesa is a large rendering pipeline which is
> > almost completely disjoint from the dynamic LibGGI system. LibGGI3D is
> > going to be a **LOT** more flexible and powerful in some ways.
>
> It might be more effective to pull Mesa into libGGI3d, so the pipeline gets
> the benefit of the LibGGI extension mechanism, and we can experiment with
> dropping out the noop pieces of the pipeline easier too. I dunno. just a
> random thought.
Actually that's what I want to do :)
[but after I get some time.... too busy. anyone else?]
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]