Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]
  From: Tristan Wibberley <twibberley@llamacom.com>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 23:32:26 +0000

Re: kgi vs. fbcon

James A Simmons wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> > Issues like real multihead (multiple input devices) are something completely
> > different.
> 
> Yes I agree.
> 
> >
> > I think that was one of the major reasons why GGI wasn't accepted in the
> > standard kernel yet: replacing too many subsystems at once doesn't work with
> > Linus. You have to conquer him (very small) piece by piece.
> 
> Agree. The next step after kgicon is to introduce a universal input
> protocol. Something like evstack but without multiheadedness. Make it so a
> mouse and joystick, etc look alike. Its not a bad idea.

What's happening with those linux-input upstarts... I would've expected
the mailing list they set up to be listed at progressive-comp, but it's
not.

-- 
Tristan Wibberley		Linux is a registered trademark
				of Linus Torvalds.

Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]