From: David Cougle <lunarbard@moonman.com>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 19:39:44 -0500 (CDT)

Re: XF86FBDev Debian binary

dqThat's odd:)  It seems like stuff is slower if it takes more memory:)
Is
it cuz mystique doesn't have accceleration with it?  I have matroxfb
activated in kernel.



On Tue, 4 May 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:

> On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 06:39:00PM -0500, David Cougle wrote:
> > Yeah, I have alien installed, but would it work ok with rh6.0?
> > 
> > With my matrox mystique?  Would it be better than XF86_SVGA?
> 
> It will if you use a framebuffer driver.
> 
> It'll be slower than XF86_SVGA, but it'll also take much less memory.
> 
> --
> Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
> PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <ultima> netgod: My calculator has more registers than the x86, and
>          -thats- sad
> 

-- 
http://www.slidellweb.com/dcougle
ICQ #3795561
Lunarbard on AOL(Instant Messenger)
Proverbs 15:3
"We will not be the alternative, we will set the trend"