Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]
  From: Edward S. Marshall <emarshal@logic.net>
  To  : Emmanuel Marty <core@suntech.fr>
  Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 21:33:23 -0500 (CDT)

Re: kgicon, etc

On Thu, 30 Jul 1998, Emmanuel Marty wrote:
> 4) steffen's KGI spec is ready and solid, and I of course _still_ want a
> native KGI. we will probably not get it into the kernel if we rewrite the
> console bits from roof to top, be them superior or so, but I still want it.

The problem, of course, is that it can't be considered superior to the
current console code by the mainstream kernel developers simply because it
doesn't work on all current Linux ports. Or has some work been done lately
on getting it running on the SPARC, Alpha, MIPS, PPC, etc. ports?

Not a complaint at all; just something to consider when thinking about
strategies for getting the whole EvStack/GGI Console concept accepted.
Once it's working on a handful of other platforms, and the concept is
shown to be solid in a portable way, you'll likely be golden with the
kernel folks.

-- 
-------------------.  emarshal at logic.net  .---------------------------------
Edward S. Marshall  `-----------------------'   http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/

   Linux labyrinth 2.1.108 #4 SMP Mon Jul 6 14:49:37 CDT 1998 i586 unknown
        9:20pm up 1 day, 12:04, 3 users, load average: 0.44, 0.42, 0.28

Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]