Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Andrew Apted <ajapted@netspace.net.au>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 22:12:51 +1000
Re: Do We Want KGI To Be The Standard? (Re: I'm back)
Hartmut writes:
> > > - we use GPL and have trouble with the *BSD crowd,
> > > - we use BSD and have trouble with the Linux crowd,
> >
> > Nobody have any problem with the X license, no? We'll simply use that
> > one..
> >
> > --
> > Torgeir Veimo, Vertech AS,
> In the *Kernel*?
> I can imagine trouble coming if Xish licensed material gets compiled
> into a linux or *bsd KERNEL. Or am I totally off??
No you're right. If it gets statically linked into the kernel (i.e.
becomes a part of vmlinux/zImage/whatever), then it must be GPL. This
is why there are a couple of "module only" things -- because they are
BSD (e.g. the ppp compression IIRC).
Cheers,
_____________________________________________ ____
\ /
Andrew Apted <andrew@ggi-project.org> \/
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]