Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Marcus Sundberg <e94_msu@e.kth.se>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 17:21:13 +0200
Re: New ggi_graphtype
Andrew Apted wrote:
> The advantage of native/reverse is that it shields *programs* from
> having to know what endianness they are, and IMHO this is more important
> than a bit of extra work within LibGGI.
Well, it wasn't the work in libggi that concerned me, I just
want the best scheme for applications, and your point is a
good one.
ggi/types.h will define GGI_LITTLE_ENDIAN or GGI_BIG_ENDIAN
which targets should use (and applications if they so desires)
Subschemes will be:
#define GT_SUB_BYTEREV ((1<<0) << GT_SUBSCHEME_SHIFT)
#define GT_SUB_BITREV ((1<<1) << GT_SUBSCHEME_SHIFT)
#define GT_SUB_USE ((1<<7) << GT_SUBSCHEME_SHIFT)
Ok?
//Marcus
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]