From: Jon M. Taylor <taylorj@ecs.csus.edu>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:29:31 -0700 (PDT)

Re: Degas cleanups

On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Chris Meadors wrote:

> Jon M. Taylor wrote:
> > 
> > degas/kgi
> > degas/kgi/include
> > degas/kgi/os/linux
> > degas/kgi/os/patches/linux
> > degas/kgi/drivers
> > degas/kgi/drivers/include
> 
> I agree with nearly everything you suggested.  The only part I have a
> question about is anywhere on the tree where you have a /os/ (like seen
> above and in the console and kii dirs), you have done something like,
> /os/linux then /os/patches/linux.  While I can see how this makes sense
> to keep all the patches together, it makes more sense (perhaps only to
> me) to do it this way: /os/linux and /os/linux/patches.  I see the
> patches being very os specific, and not having anything in common with
> each other that would merit keeping them together.  With the way I
> suggested there would be 1 less branch in the tree, and if someone
> wanted to only distribute the source needed for a specific os, they'd
> get the needed patches right in a sub directory.

	I agree - your way makes more sense than mine.

Jon


---
'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in 
becoming one with God.'
	- Scientist G. Richard Seed