Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Thomas Tanner <tanner@gmx.de>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 23:27:14 +0100
Re: The battles.
Morten Rolland wrote:
> Wouldn't this be at the expence of sequencing or fragmentation? If
> you had a program doing:
>
> 1) Fill-Rectangle (to paint the background black or something)
> 2) put-some-image (to draw something)
> 3) Draw-Line(s) (to make a nice border)
>
> If (2) is not available as an (emulated) accel in the kernel, you have
> to
> break up the accel list into two ioctls - with a userland
> "put-some-image"
> performed in the middle?
Yep. But you could collect non-overlapping accel commands
and send them together.
--
Thomas Tanner ----------------------------------------
email: tanner@(gmx.de|ggi-project.org|gnu.org|mucl.de)
web: http://home.pages.de/~tanner
visit: www.ggi-project.org www.gnustep.org
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]