Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Steve Cheng <elmert@ipoline.com>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
Re: debugging libggi...
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> Yes, I've though about that too. Internal tags should not be
> visible to applications though. How about just adding an
> int *idtag;
> entry to the ggi_db_list (idtag will be an array with each
> entry corresponding to an entry in bufs) ?
Question:
Does a DirectBuffer itself "belong" to a target, or it's entry in
ggi_db_list ?
If you're using int *idtag in ggi_db_list, then it's obviously the latter.
But I think the former case is more useful/convenient, if you want to move
buffers around or not have them in a ggi_db_list. Is the paranoid
encapsulation necessary?
e.g.
ggi_directbuffer *db = _ggi_db_get_new(int idtag);
--
Steve Cheng
email: steve@ggi-project.org
www: <http://shell.ipoline.com/~elmert/>
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]