Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Steve Cheng <elmert@ipoline.com>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:48:50 -0400 (EDT)
Re: libggi release (was Re: libggi internals (Re: LibGGI3D RFC))
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> Why is everyone so obsessed with releases?
> Releasing something that isn't ready will only hurt our cause.
"Release early and often" :-)
I'm (and I'm sure everybody else) is tired of having the GGI project ignored
by everyone else.
> If people want to start coding for libggi they can just get a
> snapshot.
But people don't know libggi even exists..
(I'll stop here -- DTJC)
> Implementing the new graphtype scheme and correct GGI_AUTO/modesuggest
> handling. Currently there's _no_ target that support's any of those
> properly. (Try passing GT_PALETTE or GT_TRUECOLOR as graphtype and
> try to find a target that won't fail...)
> before we make a release that we say is beta quality.
> Remember that "beta" in the Unix OpenSource world means that it's
> far more stable than most products in the M$ world ever gets...
Ok, alpha.
> Defenitely. Actually I would like to call it 1.0, because that's what
> it really is, but there seems to have been some version-number
> inflation back before I joined the GGI project...
Speculation: maybe the old static ggilib took up versions < 1.0.x ?
--
Steve Cheng
email: steve@ggi-project.org
www: <http://shell.ipoline.com/~elmert/>
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]