From: Jon M. Taylor <taylorj@ecs.csus.edu>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 17:41:20 -0700 (PDT)

RE: 3d

On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, MenTaLguY wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, Jon M. Taylor wrote:
> 
> > 	So, with those three basic concepts, we can cover the most
> > hardware the best and easiest.  Like LibGGI, LibGGI3D would have the
> > ability to load helper libraries, so the handling of the polygons that are
> > fed to the rendering functions are turned into the form the hardware (KGI
> > driver, etc) wants is optimizeable.
> 
> Is there any reason that this can't be done as a LibGGI extension library,
> or a set of them?

	I have to admit at this point that I am a bit unclear on the
difference between a LibGGI-family library (like LibGGI2D or LibGWT) and a
LibGGI extension library.  I envison LibGGI3D as being quite analogous to
LibGGI2D.  It would be a true API, have its own extension libraries, 
etc.

Jon

---
'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in 
becoming one with God.'
	- Scientist G. Richard Seed