From: Marcus Sundberg <e94_msu@elixir.e.kth.se>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 13:33:48 +0200

Re: Why does ggiDBGetBuffer start at 1 ?

> The first DirectBuffers in the DB list are frames numbered from 0 to
> mode->frames-1, so is there any reason why ggiDBGetBuffer takes a bufnum
> starting at 1 instead of 0 ?

Well, my plan was that DirectBuffers should be numbered from 1 and
up, but somone must have thought otherwise. :)
It doesn't really matter as long as it's the same everywhere,
so should we start at 0 or 1?

//Marcus