Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Jason McMullan <jmcc@ontv.com>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: 30 Aug 1998 13:49:40 GMT
Re: External symbols for kgicon module
James A Simmons wrote:
> OK, I agree. I think the best solution is to turn the damn cfbx
> code into modules that are compiled and linked intelligently by the kernel
> according to a set of dependencies. It is absurd to have the user have to
> figure out the dependencies themselves.
Yep. I'm converting them into `text render modules' (ie,
struct kgi_text_operations) in the new GGI Console code -
which I hope to release a PPC version by Monday.
It's _pretty_ easy to convert the cfbX stuff to renderers,
but it isn't automatic yet.
--
Jason McMullan - Linux - GGI - http://pepsi.visus.com/~jmcc
On the wonderful world of Microsoft Products:
Why put fault tolerance in the OS, when it's
already built into the User?
-- Steve Shaw <nospamola_sbshaws@kc-primary.net>
comp.os.linux.advocacy
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]